Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Role for PML3 in Centrosome Duplication and Genome Stability
Advertisements

Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages (August 2009)
Regulation and Destabilization of HIF-1α by ARD1-Mediated Acetylation
A Novel Cofactor for p300 that Regulates the p53 Response
Volume 41, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Phosphorylation of Cdc20 by Bub1 Provides a Catalytic Mechanism for APC/C Inhibition by the Spindle Checkpoint  Zhanyun Tang, Hongjun Shu, Dilhan Oncel,
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 134, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ho-Geun Yoon, Doug W. Chan, Albert B. Reynolds, Jun Qin, Jiemin Wong 
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2011)
A Mechanism for Inhibiting the SUMO Pathway
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
UV-Induced RPA1 Acetylation Promotes Nucleotide Excision Repair
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages (January 2013)
Eun-Joo Kim, Jeong-Hoon Kho, Moo-Rim Kang, Soo-Jong Um  Molecular Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2014)
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Volume 46, Issue 3, Pages (May 2012)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
A JNK-Dependent Pathway Is Required for TNFα-Induced Apoptosis
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Negative Control of p53 by Sir2α Promotes Cell Survival under Stress
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
HDAC5, a Key Component in Temporal Regulation of p53-Mediated Transactivation in Response to Genotoxic Stress  Nirmalya Sen, Rajni Kumari, Manika Indrajit.
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages (April 2003)
Jens Herold, Raul Andino  Molecular Cell 
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Phosphorylation on Thr-55 by TAF1 Mediates Degradation of p53
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
The Prolyl Isomerase Pin1 Functions in Mitotic Chromosome Condensation
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Fan Yang, Huafeng Zhang, Yide Mei, Mian Wu  Molecular Cell 
Shrestha Ghosh, Baohua Liu, Yi Wang, Quan Hao, Zhongjun Zhou 
The PHD Finger/Bromodomain of NoRC Interacts with Acetylated Histone H4K16 and Is Sufficient for rDNA Silencing  Yonggang Zhou, Ingrid Grummt  Current.
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Volume 11, Issue 19, Pages (October 2001)
Dong Zhang, Kathrin Zaugg, Tak W. Mak, Stephen J. Elledge  Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
SIRT1 Regulates the Function of the Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome Protein
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (October 2001)
A Smad Transcriptional Corepressor
Jörg Hartkamp, Brian Carpenter, Stefan G.E. Roberts  Molecular Cell 
Cdk1 Negatively Regulates Midzone Localization of the Mitotic Kinesin Mklp2 and the Chromosomal Passenger Complex  Stefan Hümmer, Thomas U. Mayer  Current.
Acetylation Regulates Transcription Factor Activity at Multiple Levels
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 437-444 (February 2003) The Human Sir2 Ortholog, SIRT2, Is an NAD+-Dependent Tubulin Deacetylase  Brian J North, Brett L Marshall, Margie T Borra, John M Denu, Eric Verdin  Molecular Cell  Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 437-444 (February 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00038-8

Figure 1 SIRT2 Is Predominantly Cytoplasmic and Colocalizes with the Microtubule Network (A) Confocal microscopy analysis of SIRT2 and tubulin in human fibroblast. Cells were stained for SIRT2 (green) and tubulin (red) to visualize the microtubule network. (B) Nuclear and cytoplasmic extracts from 293T cells were analyzed by Western blotting with specific antisera for SIRT2, lamin A, and p65. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 437-444DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00038-8)

Figure 2 In Vivo Tubulin Deacetylation by GFP-SIRT2 (A) HeLa cells transfected with GFP-SIRT2 were treated with 400 nM TSA for 12 hr and subsequently stained for acetylated tubulin. DNA was stained with DAPI. Each frame was visualized for GFP (green), acetylated tubulin (red), and DNA (blue). White arrows identify cells transfected with GFP-SIRT2. (B) HeLa cells transfected with GFP and treated as in (A) were stained for acetylated tubulin (red). (C) HeLa cells transfected with GFP-SIRT2 and treated as in (A) were stained for total tubulin (red) to examine the microtubule network. (D) HeLa cells transfected with the N168A point mutant of GFP-SIRT2 and treated as in (A) were stained for acetylated tubulin (red). Molecular Cell 2003 11, 437-444DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00038-8)

Figure 3 SIRT2 Deacetylates Tubulin In Vitro (A) Schematic diagram of in vitro tubulin deacetylation assay. (B) One-half of the immunoprecipitated protein corresponding to SIRT2-FLAG was incubated with cellular lysate with or without 1 mM NAD in vitro. Specified reactions were incubated with 5 mM nicotinamide or 400 nM TSA. The reaction products were separated by SDS-PAGE and visualized by Western blotting with specific antisera for acetylated tubulin, tubulin, and FLAG. The second half of the immunoprecipitated material was subjected to HDAC activity assay with an acetylated [3H] acetylated histone H4 peptide. (C) The same assays as in (B) were conducted using the seven class III HDACs, SIRT1-7-FLAG. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 437-444DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00038-8)

Figure 4 Tubulin Is a Preferred Substrate for SIRT2 in Comparison to Hst2p (A) The enzymatic activity of recombinant 6-His-SIRT2 on a [3H] acetylated histone H4 peptide was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of NAD (0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and 10 mM). Released acetate was extracted and measured by scintillation counting. (B) Initial velocities measured at varying concentrations of an acetylated tubulin peptide for SIRT2 (open circles) and for Hst2p (closed circles) with concentrations and conditions described in Experimental Procedures. The curve with SIRT2 represents the average rates from three different experiments. The Hst2p curve is a representative data set from one of three separate experiments. The indicated NAD concentrations are saturating with respect to each enzyme. (C) Initial velocities for each enzyme measured at varying concentrations of acetylated H3 peptide for SIRT2 (open circles) and for Hst2p (closed circles) with concentrations and conditions described in Experimental Procedures. The indicated NAD concentrations are saturating with respect to each enzyme. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 437-444DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00038-8)

Figure 5 Deacetylation of Tubulin by SIRT2 and HDAC6 (A) Knockdown of SIRT2 and HDAC6 with siRNA. 293T cells were mock transfected or transfected with siRNA duplexes for GL3 luciferase (control), SIRT2 (260-278), and HDAC6 (211-229) three times over 5 days and collected 48 hr post final transfection. Cellular lysates were probed by Western blotting with specific antisera for acetylated α-tubulin, tubulin, SIRT2, and HDAC6. (B) SIRT2 and HDAC6 coimmunoprecipitate. 293T cells were either mock transfected or transfected with SIRT2-HA, HDAC6-FLAG, and HDAC4-FLAG in different combinations. Cellular lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-FLAG and probed by Western blotting with antisera specific for FLAG and HA. The same immunoprecipitated samples were blotted for α-tubulin. One sample was obtained from cells treated with 25 μM colchicine for 12 hr as indicated. Ten percent of protein input was analyzed by Western blotting with antisera for FLAG or HA. (C) Confocal microscopy analysis of SIRT2 localization with HDAC6 in human fibroblast. Cells were stained for SIRT2 (green) and HDAC6 (red). (D) 293T cells were transfected with FLAG, SIRT2-FLAG, or HDAC6-FLAG. Cellular lysates were harvested and immunoprecipitated with antiserum for FLAG. The immunoprecipitated protein corresponding to FLAG, SIRT2-FLAG, or HDAC6-FLAG was incubated with purified tubulin substrates ±1 mM NAD in vitro. The reaction products were analyzed by Western blotting with specific antisera for acetylated α-tubulin, tubulin, and FLAG. (E) Same as in (D) except that tubulin from whole-cell lysates were used, either as dimers or as Taxol-stabilized microtubules. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 437-444DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00038-8)