Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Advertisements

Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Sebastian Meyer, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
ALS Mutations Disrupt Phase Separation Mediated by α-Helical Structure in the TDP-43 Low-Complexity C-Terminal Domain  Alexander E. Conicella, Gül H.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Structure and RNA Interactions of the N-Terminal RRM Domains of PTB
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Yizhou Liu, Richard A. Kahn, James H. Prestegard  Structure 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Yuan Yang, Chang Shu, Pingwei Li, Tatyana I. Igumenova 
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
A Functional Proline Switch in Cytochrome P450cam
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 10, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages e5 (December 2017)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
A Plug Release Mechanism for Membrane Permeation by MLKL
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (December 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 893-902 (May 2015) The SH3 Domain Acts as a Scaffold for the N-Terminal Intrinsically Disordered Regions of c-Src  Mariano Maffei, Miguel Arbesú, Anabel-Lise Le Roux, Irene Amata, Serge Roche, Miquel Pons  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 893-902 (May 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Domain Structure and Amino Acid Sequence of USrc-SH3 of Human c-Src (A) Domain structure of c-Src and regulatory interactions. Classical interactions of the SH2 domain with phosphotyrosine, the SH3 domain with a proline-rich connector linking SH2 and SH1, and SH4 with lipids are indicated in black. New interactions reported here are shown in red. (B) Residues 1–85 (SH4 and Unique domains) are shown in black. Residues 86–150 (SH3 domain) are shown in gray. The secondary structure according to Wang et al. (2001) is represented on top of the sequence. c-Src SH3 residues that are in direct contact with the core sequences of poly-proline ligand (Feng et al., 1995) are highlighted in brown. SH4 domain, red; Unique lipid-binding region (ULBR), light blue; RT loop, green; nSrc loop, dark blue; distal loop, gold. The SH4 domain is divided into two subdomains (see text for details). (C) Crystal structure of the SH3 domain of human c-Src (PDB ID code 4HXJ). The color code is the same as in (B). Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SH3 Inter-domain Interactions (A–D) Combined absolute value 1H-15N NMR chemical shift changes between linked and isolated domains. (A and C) USrc-SH3 versus USrc at 278 K. (B and D) USrc-SH3 versus SH3 at 298 K. (C) and (D) were measured in the presence of 1 equivalent of PPP while no SH3 ligand was added in (A) and (B). Asterisks (*) mark residues whose chemical shift differences are off-boundaries of the plots: K5∗ Δδ value is 0.18 ppm (A and C) and V86∗ Δδ value is 0.14 ppm (B) and 0.13 ppm (D). V114∗ Δδ value is 0.12 ppm. All spectra were measured at pH 7.0 and at a protein concentration of 0.2 mM. Combined NH chemical shift differences (Δδ) were computed as in Equation 1 (see Experimental Procedures). Gray circles indicate proline residues. The dashed line represents one SD. (E and F) SH3 residues perturbed by the presence of USrc in the absence (E) and in the presence of PPP (F) are highlighted on the SH3 structure (PDB entry 4HXJ). Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 SH3-SH4 Domains Interaction (A) Combined absolute value 1H-15N NMR chemical shift changes between the SH3 domain alone and in the presence of a 10-fold excess of SH4 peptide. (B) SH3 residues perturbed by the presence of a 10-fold excess of SH4 peptide are highlighted on the SH3 structure (PDB entry 4HXJ). (C) 1H-15N NMR CSPs between SH3-PPP complex and SH3-PPP in the presence of a 10-fold excess of SH4 peptide. Combined NH chemical shift differences (Δδ) were computed as in Equation 1 (see Experimental Procedures). Gray circles indicate proline residues. The dashed line represents one SD. Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ULBR Mutations Partially Affect Inter-domain Interactions Combined absolute value 1H-15N NMR chemical shift changes between linked and isolated domains measured at pH 7.0. Asterisks (*) mark residues whose chemical shift differences are off-boundaries of the plots. (A) USrc-SH3-AAA versus USrc-AAA at 278 K. K5∗ Δδ value is 0.11 ppm. (B) USrc-SH3-AAA versus SH3 at 298 K. V86∗ Δδ value is 0.14 ppm. Proline residues are shown as gray circles. Dashed lines correspond to one SD. Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 PRE Experiments in Spin-Labeled USrc-SH3 Constructs Intensity ratios of NH cross peaks from MTSL-labeled A59C-USrc-SH3 WT (A) and A59C-USrc-SH3-AAA mutant (B) between paramagnetic (oxidized) and diamagnetic (reduced) forms. The most affected regions in the SH3 domain are highlighted. M, MTSL; gray circles indicate proline residues. Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Effect of AAA Mutation on Long-Range Interactions within the Unique Domain Intensity ratios of NH cross peaks from MTSL-labeled A59C-USrc WT (A), A59C-USrc-AAA mutant (B) between paramagnetic (oxidized) and diamagnetic (reduced) forms. The gray line corresponds to the theoretical PREs computed from the random-coil definition (see Experimental Procedures). M, MTSL; gray circles indicate prolines. Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Effect of the PPP on the SH3-Lipid Interaction (A) Combined 1H-15N chemical shift changes of USrc-SH3 induced by the presence of 8% w/v DHPC/DMPG bicelles. (B) Combined 1H-15N chemical shift changes between USrc-SH3 WT construct in the presence of PPP and in the presence of PPP + DHPC/DMPG bicelles. (C) Combined 1H-15N CSPs between USrc-SH3 WT construct in the presence of DHPC/DMPG bicelles and in the presence of DHPC/DMPG bicelles + PPP (only USrc residues are shown). (D) Combined 1H-15N chemical shift changes between USrc-SH3 WT construct in the presence of DHPC/DMPG bicelles and in the presence of DHPC/DMPG bicelles + PPP (only SH3 residues are shown). Notice the expanded Δδ scale associated with PPP binding. Arrows mark SH3 residues known to be directly interacting with PPP (long for the core, short for additional regions). Gray circles indicate proline residues. The dashed line represents one SD. See also Figure S2. Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Cartoon Models Showing SH4-Unique-SH3 Interactions The gray sphere represents the SH3 domain. The black line corresponds to the Unique domain, which is connected to the back of the SH3 domain. Residues or regions experimentally detected to be involved in interactions are indicated. The yellow oval represents the lipid bicelle (not to scale). (A) USrc-SH3 WT. Residues E60 and N68 are located at the beginning and at the end of the ULBR, respectively. (B) USrc-SH3 AAA. Most of the inter-domain contacts outside the ULBR are retained. This mutation also affects the conformational space sampled by USrc. (C) USrc-SH3-PPP complex. SH3-Unique contacts are abolished while the N-SH4-SH3 interaction is maintained. (D) USrc-SH3 in the presence of lipids. SH4, ULBR (USrc), and the RT and nSrc loops of SH3 are involved in lipid binding. USrc-SH3 contacts are conserved. (E) USrc-SH3-PPP complex in the presence of lipids. Direct SH3-lipids interaction is abolished. ULBR and SH4 interact with lipids. The SH4-SH3 interaction is retained. Structure 2015 23, 893-902DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.03.009) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions