Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) ACMP Conference Juneau, AK 2007.
Advertisements

SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Section 4(f) Section 6(f). Section 4(f) Process Overview 2 Project Initiation Package Field Review 4(f) Property Present Use Coordination NEPA Document.
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Jennifer Horn, Preservation Pennsylvania. Who is Preservation Pennsylvania? Pennsylvania’s only private, non-profit, statewide organization dedicated.
Tribal Issues & Project Delivery Case Studies & Lessons Learned Federal Highway Administration Washington Division FHWA Environmental Meeting, June 29,
Geothermal Projects and Indian Tribes: Dealing with Cultural Resources Issues Michael P. O’Connell Stoel Rives LLP O R.
Section 106, Section 4(f) and You!: The Role of Consulting Parties in Transportation Projects Kevin Mock, Historic Preservation Specialist Pennsylvania.
NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT of 1966 as amended Garry J. Cantley Regional Archeologist Bureau of Indian Affairs.
Update on Historic Bridges MaryAnn Naber Federal Highway Administration June 17, 2008.
Section 4(f) Updates questions to:
NHPA, Section 106, and NEPA Highlights and Misconceptions.
Module 15 Environmental Considerations Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
A BEGINNERS GUIDE TO SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 REVIEW PROCESS TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE: REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION.
Connecticut Department of Transportation Bureau of Policy & Planning.
L O N G B E A C H, C A. David B. Kessler, AICP Regional Environmental Protection Specialist Federal Aviation Administration – Western-Pacific Region
Sacred Sites. Documentation Documentation: Forest Supervisor or Ranger District Offices may document Sacred site (s) information in a variety of ways.
Future Transportation Projects within the Loxahatchee River Basin Florida Department of Transportation District IV 3400 W. Commercial Blvd W. Commercial.
Driving Indiana’s Economic Growth. Management and Preservation of Indiana's Historic Bridges: A Programmatic Approach Thanks to Mead & Hunt & FHWA-IN.
THE FOUR STEP SECTION 106 PROCESS: AN INTRODUCTION TENNESSEE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE REVIEW AND COMPLIANCE SECTION All reproduction rights reserved.
COSCDA Workshop Renovation, Reconstruction and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods Section 106 and Programmatic Agreements Overview.
Cultural Resource Management An Introduction to Federal Heritage Preservation and the Law.
Florida Cultural Resources and How They Relate to Your Public Works Project Presented by: Brent Handley, MA, RPA Archaeology Division Director.
SAFETEA-LU Changes  Exemption of the Interstate System from Section 4(f) [Section 6007]  de minimis impacts to historic sites [Section 6009(a)]  de.
Mitigation in the Section 106 Process Dave Berwick Army Program Manager Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
1 ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING CULTURAL RESOURCES LAWS AND REGULATIONS CH 5 CH 5 HO # 13, 13a, 13b
Positive Train Control Infrastructure: Section 106 Review Process under the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation’s May 2014 Program Comment For More.
INTRODUCTION TO SECTION 4(f) Presented by Ian Chidister Environmental Program Manager FHWA – Wisconsin Division December 4, 2013.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Decision Authority l All permit decisions, scope of analysis, 404(b)(1), mitigation, alternatives, jurisdiction -- Corps.
Section 106: Historic Preservation Review and Compliance as it relates to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 “How Can State Agencies Assist.
3D Technology and the Section 106 Process Matt Diederich Archaeologist Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Oregon Heritage Programs Division.
By Rachel Coleman.  “ The head of any federal agency having direct or indirect jurisdiction over a proposed federal or federally assisted undertaking.
Locally Administered Federal-Aid Project Initiation Workshop Prospectus Part 3 and NEPA Requirements Presenter: Howard Postovit; ODOT Region 5 Region Environmental.
1 CDBG and Environmental Review For Local Officials.
Section 4(f)/6(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
1 Historic Preservation Webinar "Reporting Through PAGE and to PMC"
NRC Environmental Reviews for Uranium Recovery Applicants and Licensees James Park (301)
EM500-1 Environmental Foundations and Principals April 14, 2011.
Categorical Exclusion Training Class
Historic Preservation Memoranda of Agreement. What is an MOA? As part of the Section 106 review process, it is an agreement among an agency official,
By: Dean Suagee Director First Nations Environmental Law Program Vermont Law School PROTECTING SACRED LANDS AND TRADITIONAL CULTURAL PLACES WITH CULTURAL.
NEPA and Section 106: An Introduction WISDOT MEETING NOVEMBER 3-4, 2015.
South Dakota State Historic Preservation Office and the Nebraska National Forests and Grasslands July 24, 2013 National Grasslands Visitor Center.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class.
Integration of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) NEPA and NHPA A Handbook for Integrating NEPA and.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Anth January 2012.
National Treasures: Brownfields and the National Historic Preservation Act Brownfields 2006 Boston, MA.
AASHTO 2016 NTPEP Annual Meeting May 9, 2016
Deepwater Horizon (MC 252) Oil Spill: Section 106 Compliance
101 New London Road Newark, Delaware
Program Overview: Tribal Preservation Program and HPF Grants to Tribes
Section 4(f).
Monte Mills Alexander Blewett III School of Law University of Montana
Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Water Resources Division
Environmental Prequalification Requirements
General comments: These projects are locally owned and the LPA should be involved and informed throughout the project. The project agreement is between.
May 8, 2018 Marion Werkheiser, Cultural Heritage Partners
Cultural Resources Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
Section 4(f) Categorical Exclusion Training Class – Presented by the Office of Environmental Services.
National Historic Preservation Act
The Role of the SHPO John Pouley, Assistant State Archaeologist
National Historic Preservation Act
National Historic Preservation Act
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Presentation transcript:

Protecting What We Love Building What We Need – The “H” Factor

Renee Gledhill-Earley Environmental Review Coordinator NC State Historic Preservation Office Department of Natural & Cultural Resources

What is the “H” Factor – HISTORY, of course National Register of Historic Places (NRHP): A list of properties that have been determined by the State Historic Preservation Officer and the National Park Service to be significant to the history of the United States at a local, state, or national level.

The National Register is: Buildings Structures Sites (archaeological) Districts Objects

But, is it this?

OR This?

OR This?

OR This?

OR This?

OR This?

OR This?

OR This?

Yup! They are all historic and just waiting to for your next project So Let’s do the Numbers

North Carolina has nearly 3,000 properties listed in the NRHP There are about 500 NRHP Historic Districts containing multiple resources The NPS estimates that there are approximately 66,000 historic resources listed in the NRHP either individually or as parts of historic districts in north carolina more than I,800 Properties have been determined eligible for listing in the NRHP (mostly through Section 106) SHPO/OSA reviews approximately 4,000 projects/year (

some more numbers (that you are sure to know) Section 106 of the National Historic preservation Act Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act NC General Statute 121-12(a)

Section 106 of the NHPA of 1966, as amended [16 USC 470, 36 CFR 800] Requires Federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties included in, or eligible for inclusion in the NRHP prior to the approval of the expenditure of Federal $ or the issuance of any Federal license, permit, or approval.

Section 4(f)- Department of Transportation Act FHWA & other USDOT agencies CANNOT approve the use of land from Publicly owned parks/recreation areas Wildlife & waterfowl refuges Public and private historic sites UNLESS There is no feasible and prudent avoidance alternative to the use AND The action includes all possible planning to minimize harm, resulting from the use OR The Use is determined to have a de minimis impact

NC General Statute 121-12(a) State agency with direct or indirect authority to fund, permit, license, or approve an undertaking that may affect a property listed in the National Register of Historic Places must offer the North Carolina Historical Commission the opportunity to review and comment on the undertaking

How does this affect ME? It Depends Working for ncdot or fhwa ? Or A local community using fhwa/ncdot funding? Faa/fta/fra? Your client needs a federal permit, license, approval or funding?

If you are working for ncdot or fhwa? Use the Programmatic agreement between fhwa, ncdot and shpo to streamline projects up to an eis pa expands ncdot’s Archaeology and Historic Architecture Groups authority to make decisions on behalf of hpo/osa pa covers all levels of projects except EIS Some activities do not require review but do require documentation of exemption from review (this becomes important for federal permits) Typical projects: bridge replacements, rail safety, traffic signal systems, widenings and improvements Annual report provided to hpo/osa for review and comment – approx. 400-600 projects covered per year

A local community using fhwa/ncdot funding? is not covered by the Programmatic agreement between fhwa, ncdot and shpo Determine who is to be the contact with the hpo – the local community or the consultant to prevent duplication If the consultant, indicate that your are acting on behalf of your client Use project checklist found at: http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/er_email_submittal.html Submit via email to: environmental.review@ncdcr.gov Do your background work BUT Make no assumptions about the presence or absence of historic resources

https://archaeology.ncdcr.gov/ Helpful sites http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/ http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/er_email_submittal.html http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/Section106_Standards.html https://archaeology.ncdcr.gov/ https://files.nc.gov/dncr-arch/OSA_Guidelines_Sept2017.pdf

HPOWEB is a Great tool BUT It only covers above-ground resources Its content is what we currently know from survey work BUT Survey results may be 30 years old and lots of resources may have become historic or are gone Archaeological resources are still only available in person

Faa/fta/fra? not covered by the Programmatic agreement between fhwa, ncdot and shpo BUT they do trigger section 4(f) compliance start through local sponsor/client Start EARLY to get a HPO project tracking number – email submission Don’t assume the need for archaeological or architectural surveys/ask first If an archaeological survey is needed, make an appointment with OSA to properly scope the project Follow report guidelines from HPO and OSA http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/Section106_Standards.html https://files.nc.gov/dncr-arch/OSA_Guidelines_Sept2017.pdf

Your client needs a federal permit, license, approval or funding? Start through your client or on their behalf Start EARLY to get a HPO project tracking number – email submission Don’t assume the need for archaeological or architectural surveys/ask first If a survey is needed, make an appointment with OSA to properly scope the project Follow report guidelines from HPO and OSA http://www.hpo.ncdcr.gov/er/Section106_Standards.html https://files.nc.gov/dncr-arch/OSA_Guidelines_Sept2017.pdf

cemeteries In general, Cemeteries are NOT considered historic, unless they are the only site associated with an important person, have artistic value, or are part of a historic property Rather, they are sites that are protected and can be moved following a process set out by state law. (Your last resting place is not always your last.) Cemeteries are often identified as part of an archaeological survey and are recorded on a special cemetery site form with an assigned tracking number Unmarked and Native American cemeteries deserve special notice because they can create delays if encountered during construction – Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act - Public Law 101-601 Unmarked Human Burial & Human Skeletal Remains Protection Act – G.S. 70, Art. 3 If you do encounter unmarked Human remains – Immediately call the sheriff and state archaeologist and ensure that the remains stay covered until directed otherwise.

Hope this has been helpful So you can better Protect What We Love and Hope this has been helpful So you can better Protect What We Love and Build What We Need