Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages (July 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 17, Issue 17, Pages (September 2007)
Advertisements

Environmental 24-hr Cycles Are Essential for Health
Volume 12, Issue 18, Pages (September 2002)
Thomas Kantermann, Myriam Juda, Martha Merrow, Till Roenneberg 
Organization of the Drosophila Circadian Control Circuit
Circadian Rhythms: To Sync or Not To Sync
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages (August 2013)
Circadian Rhythms: To Sync or Not To Sync
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Disrupted Circadian Rhythms in a Mouse Model of Schizophrenia
Social Jetlag and Obesity
The Circadian Clock and Human Health
The Drosophila Circadian Network Is a Seasonal Timer
Rhythmic Oxygen Levels Reset Circadian Clocks through HIF1α
Sensory Conflict Disrupts Activity of the Drosophila Circadian Network
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Dynamics and Ultradian Structure of Human Sleep in Real Life
Volume 13, Issue 17, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages e3 (August 2017)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (January 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (March 2014)
Gopal K. Pattanayak, Connie Phong, Michael J. Rust  Current Biology 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (February 2009)
Rémi Bos, Christian Gainer, Marla B. Feller  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
A circadian egg timer gates ovulation
Meal Timing Regulates the Human Circadian System
Circadian Disruption Leads to Insulin Resistance and Obesity
Elise Facer-Childs, Roland Brandstaetter  Current Biology 
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages (May 2001)
Light Regulates the Cell Cycle in Zebrafish
Circadian Timing of REM Sleep Is Coupled to an Oscillator within the Dorsomedial Suprachiasmatic Nucleus  Michael L. Lee, Beryl E. Swanson, Horacio O.
Dopaminergic Modulation of Arousal in Drosophila
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 77, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 20, Issue 24, Pages (December 2010)
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (August 2017)
Drosophila CRYPTOCHROME Is a Circadian Transcriptional Repressor
Seasonal Encoding by the Circadian Pacemaker of the SCN
In Vivo Monitoring of Circadian Timing in Freely Moving Mice
Circadian Pathway: The Other Shoe Drops
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages (June 2015)
Gilad A. Jacobson, Peter Rupprecht, Rainer W. Friedrich 
Volume 26, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Glial Cells Physiologically Modulate Clock Neurons and Circadian Behavior in a Calcium-Dependent Manner  Fanny S. Ng, Michelle M. Tangredi, F. Rob Jackson 
Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically
Volume 28, Issue 8, Pages e3 (April 2018)
Ying Tan, Zdravko Dragovic, Till Roenneberg, Martha Merrow 
Flies by Night Current Biology
Circadian Orchestration of the Hepatic Proteome
Environmental 24-hr Cycles Are Essential for Health
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Three period Homologs in Mammals: Differential Light Responses in the Suprachiasmatic Circadian Clock and Oscillating Transcripts Outside of Brain  Mark.
Light Regulates the Cell Cycle in Zebrafish
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages e4 (February 2019)
Volume 27, Issue 17, Pages e2 (September 2017)
The Zfhx3-Mediated Axis Regulates Sleep and Interval Timing in Mice
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Circadian Biology: The Early Bird Catches the Morning Shift
Thomas Kantermann, Myriam Juda, Martha Merrow, Till Roenneberg 
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages 1932-1937 (July 2015) Chronically Alternating Light Cycles Increase Breast Cancer Risk in Mice  Kirsten C.G. Van Dycke, Wendy Rodenburg, Conny T.M. van Oostrom, Linda W.M. van Kerkhof, Jeroen L.A. Pennings, Till Roenneberg, Harry van Steeg, Gijsbertus T.J. van der Horst  Current Biology  Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages 1932-1937 (July 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.012 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Peak Temperature Phases under Normal and CRD Conditions (A–C) Peak temperature phases of p53R270H/+WAPCre animals maintained under stable LD 12:12 conditions (closed circles) or weekly alternating light cycles (open circles) (n = 5 animals per group) before start of the light inversions (A), at the first LD inversion (B), and after 18 LD inversions (C). Per graph, subsequent days are plotted from top to bottom. Time of day on the x axis is expressed as external time (ExT), with ExT 0 corresponding with mid-dark. The upper axis indicates the ExT before the LD inversion. Values represent the mean ± SEM. Diamonds indicate the average temperature peak times of animals maintained under normal LD conditions. Data are presented as double plots to help with visualizing phase shifts (day 0 + 1, day 1 + 2, day 2 + 3, etc., on consecutive lines). Gray areas indicate darkness. Current Biology 2015 25, 1932-1937DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Long-Term Health Effects Resulting from CRD Exposure (A) Relative body weight gain of p53R270H/+WAPCre animals exposed to a regular LD cycle (closed circles, n = 20) or weekly alternating LD cycles (open circles, n = 21) in the longitudinal study. Note the significantly stronger weight gain of animals exposed to chronically alternating light cycles compared with animals maintained under a regular LD cycle in the longitudinal study (RM-ANOVA, group: F(1, 39) = 4.950, p = 0.0319; time: F(27, 1053) = 42.48, p < 0.0001; interaction: F(27, 1053) = 3.738, p < 0.0001). Values represent the mean ± SEM. (B) Percentage of mice with palpable tumor in normal LD cycles (n = 20; closed circles) or chronic CRD conditions (n = 21; open circles). Black color indicates mammary gland tumor, whereas red color indicates other tumor types. See Table S1 for pathology data. Current Biology 2015 25, 1932-1937DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Circadian Variation in Clock and Clock-Controlled Gene Activity and Corticosterone Serum Levels Closed circles indicate LD, open circles indicate chronic LD inversions. Circadian expression of clock genes Bmal1, Per1, Per2, and Dbp and cell-cycle control gene c-Myc in liver and serum corticosterone levels (n = 3 or 4 mice per time point). Chronic LD inversions did not significantly affect circadian expression of clock genes. Only minor differences were found at an individual time point for Bmal1 (Sidak’s posttest ∗p < 0.05). The expression of c-Myc appears to show a phase advance in CRD-exposed animals, but no statistical differences were found. Corticosterone levels, however, were affected by the alternating light cycles. In contrast to the circadian rhythmicity in LD animals, corticosterone exhibits a significant 12-hr rhythm after 18 LD inversions with a major peak at ExT 14 and a minor peak around ExT 2 (p < 0.05). Values at “lights on” were double plotted to help with visualizing circadian patterns. Values represent the mean ± SEM. Time of day on the x axis is expressed as ExT, with ExT 0 corresponding with mid-dark. Current Biology 2015 25, 1932-1937DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Amount of Predicted Sleep per Day—Total Sleep—in the Light and Dark Phase, Relative to Baseline Data represent means of animals per day, whereas linear regression analysis was performed on individual data points. Over time, total sleep and sleep in light significantly increased compared to baseline in both the LD (closed circles) and LD inversion (open circles) group (linear regression analysis: LD, total: p = 0.0492, light: p = 0.0002; LD inversions, total: p < 0.0001, light: p < 0.0001). The amount of sleep in dark only increased after exposure to chronically alternating LD cycles (linear regression analysis: LD: p = 0.5474, LD inversions: p = 0.0005). This gain of sleep was significantly larger for animals exposed to weekly LD inversions compared to LD controls (comparison of slopes: total: F(1, 583) = 15.197, p = 0.0001; light: F(1, 583), p = 0.0391; dark: F(1, 583) = 8.744, p = 0.0032). Current Biology 2015 25, 1932-1937DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2015.06.012) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions