KAHBPS 2015-04-25, Gyeongju, Korea Long-term outcome after resection of huge hepatocellular carcinoma ≥10 cm: Single-institution experience with 471 patients:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pathologic Response to Preoperative Chemotherapy in Colorectal Liver Metastases: Fibrosis, not Necrosis, Predicts Outcome Ann Surg Oncol (2012) 19:2797–2804.
Advertisements

Staging Strategy and Treatment for Patients With HCC
Clinical Significance of Preoperative 18F-FDG PET Non- Avidity in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Do Hoon Koo 1, Ho-Young Lee 2, Kyu Eun Lee 3,4, So Won Oh.
Radiotherapeutic Option in Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for Liver Tumour Dr Dai Wing Chiu Queen Mary Hospital.
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round Queen Mary Hospital 19/10/2013.
Management of colorectal cancer with liver metastasis Dr. Vivian Lee Department of Surgery, UCH.
Interventional Oncology Michael Kotton MD October 27, 2012.
Impact of the Type and Modalities of Preoperative Chemotherapy on the Outcome of Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases R. Adam, E. Barroso, C. Laurent,
Long-Term Survival Following Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Sheung Tat FAN Department of Surgery, The University of HongKong Chair Professor.
Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round 16th Jan 2010 Dr James Fung Department of Surgery United Christian Hospital.
Is the BRAF V600E mutation useful as a predictor of preoperative risk in papillary thyroid cancer? The American Journal of Surgery.
Journal Meeting 時間 : AM 07:30 日期 : 06/29/2007 地點 : 胸腔外科辦公室 報告人 : R2 許博順.
Total Lesion Glycolysis by 18 F-FDG PET/CT a Reliable Predictor of Prognosis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Ilkyu Han Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Seoul National.
Radiofrequency Ablation of Lung Cancer
Ayman Abdo MD, AmBIM, FRCPC
Management of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
57445 HCC were registered HCC with complete data underwent surgical resection 9577 underwent local ablation therapies 9283 underwent TACE 1150.
HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA Monton. HCC in Thailand Most common cancer in Thai male Incidence 5 x 100,000 / year Male : female = 3-8:1 Age > 40 yr.
Differences between radiology and histopathology: Are we judging correctly? Simona Onali 1, Emmanuel Tsochatzis 1, James O’Beirne 1, Aileen Marshall 1,
SYNCHRONOUS COLORECTAL AND LIVER RESECTION J Peter A Lodge MD FRCS HPB and Transplant Unit St James’s University Hospital Leeds LS9 7TF 2006 Association.
Multicenter Study of Down-staging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) to within Milan Criteria before Liver Transplantation Neil Mehta, MD; Jennifer Guy,
on behalf of the ACOSOG Z4032 Investigators
Hepatocellular carcinoma related to Hbv and Hcv
Ki-67 index cutoff value of 1% is a valuable prognostic biomarker for pulmonary carcinoids based on this large cohort. Our data also provide strong evidence.
경희대학교병원 간암 다학제증례집담회 Multidisciplinary case conference Liver Cancer Conference 소화기 센터 회의실
CLINICAL OUTCOME OF 251 PATIENTS WITH EXTRAHEPATIC METASTASIS AT INITIAL DIAGNOSIS OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA: DOES TRANSARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION IMPROVE.
Treatment Strategy for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Salvage Transplantation, Repeated Resection, or Radiofrequency Ablation? Albert C. Y. Chan,
경희대학교병원 간암 다학제증례집담회 Multidisciplinary case conference Liver Cancer Conference 소화기 센터 회의실
Management of Hepatocellular carcinoma
경희대학교병원 간암 다학제증례집담회 Multidisciplinary case conference Liver Cancer Conference 소화기 센터 회의실
GASTROENTEROLOGY 2010;138:493–502 심 재 준 월요 저널.
Golgi Protein-73 Shows Promise as a Sensitive Serum Marker for HCC Slideset on: Marrero J, Romano P, Nikolaeva O, et al. GP73, a resident golgi glycoprotein,
K Nouso, K Miyahara, D Uchida, K Kuwaki, N Izumi, M Omata, T Ichida, M Kudo, Y Ku, N Kokudo, M Sakamoto, O Nakashima, T Takayama, O Matsui, Y Matsuyama,
TACE for HCC in a regional centre: 5 year audit and assessment of baseline predictors of outcome Iain DS Morrison, #R Kasthuri, EH Forrest, S Barclay,
Two-Stage Hepatectomy for Unresectable Metastases :
경희대학교병원 간암 다학제증례집담회 Multidisciplinary case conference Liver Cancer Conference 소화기 센터 회의실
PANCREATODUODENECTOMY + MULTIVISCERAL RESECTION YES/NO
Brain imaging prior to lung cancer resection
Immunoscore Prognostic in Colon Cancer
The Value of Measurement of Circulating Tumor Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Nashwa Sheble, Gehan Hamdy, Moones A Obada, Gamal Y Abouria, Fatma Khalaf.
TACE of Metastatic HCC to the Pleura
Fig. 4. First-line treatment according to 2014 KLCSG-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for patients with HCC, Child-Pugh class A, no portal hypertension, and.
Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Fig. 3. Comparative RFS in response to combination of RFA and TACE vs
A New Model to Estimate Survival for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Prognosis of younger patients in non-small cell lung cancer
EMT inducing transcription factor SIP1: a predictive biomarker of colorectal cancer survival and recurrence? A Patel, R Sreekumar, R Bhome, KA Moutasim,
Locally-Advanced HCC:
Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital Huang Kuo-Hung
The 44th Congress of the Korean Association of HBP Surgery
Improved survival outcomes after resection of ductal adenocarcinoma in the body and tail of the pancreas: A single center 10 years’ experience Seong.
Is hepatic side tumor in T2 gallbladder cancer need extensive resection compared with peritoneal side tumor? : A multicenter study Woohyung Lee1, Jae Yool.
HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA (HCC) at
A Novel Prognostic Nomogram Accurately Predicts Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence after Liver Transplantation: Analysis of 865 Consecutive Liver Transplant.
Individualized prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma occurrence in a large cohort of patients with cirrhosis  Astrid Marot, Jean Henrion, Jean-François.
高雄長庚 大腸直腸外科 吳昆霖 盧建璋, 陳鴻華, 李克釗, 胡萬祥, 張家駱, 蔡鎧隆, 林岳民, 鄭功全
Volume 145, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
International Neurourology Journal 2015;19:
Eung Chang Lee, Sung-Sik Han, Hyeong Min Park,
Epidemiology & First option of treatment
Does Liver Regeneration Increase the Postoperative HCC Recurrence after Curative Resection ? Jin-Ho Lee, MD. Department of Surgery, Yonsei University.
Microvascular Invasion as a Predictor of Response to Treatment with Sorafenib and Transarterial Chemoembolization for Recurrent Intermediate-Stage Hepatocellular.
Bile duct invasion itself can be the prognosis factor in early HCC
Josep M. Llovet, Robert Montal, Augusto Villanueva 
The SUV on 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging as an independent predictor for overall survival and disease free survival after hepatectomy of Hepatocellular carcinoma(
Prognostic effect of complete pathologic response following TACE on HCC patients undergoing liver resection or transplantation Prognostic effect of complete.
Multidisciplinary team approach to hepatocellular carcinoma management in a liver transplant center from Romania Cerban R.1, Iacob S.1, Croitoru A.1, Popescu.
Surgical resection of metachronous liver metastases
Presentation transcript:

KAHBPS 2015-04-25, Gyeongju, Korea Long-term outcome after resection of huge hepatocellular carcinoma ≥10 cm: Single-institution experience with 471 patients: Proposal of a prognostic prediction system Shin Hwang, Young-Joo Lee, Ki-Hun Kim, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Sung-Gyu Lee Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Huge HCC > 10 cm China > 20% of all HCC, Japan & Korea >10% of all HCC

Proportions of survival Overall and disease-free survival perioperative mortality: n=2 n=100 57% Proportions of survival Study period: 1997-2002 31% Overall Disease-free Postoperation months Lee, Hwang et al. World J Surg 2007

Background Zhang et al. World J Surg 2013 There is some noticeable survival difference according to tumor size, but it was not possible to identify any definite cutoff in tumor size. n=615 OS DFS OS DFS Cutoff in tumor size 2 cm 5 cm 3 cm 8 cm 4 cm 10 cm

Current issues If resectable, there is no limit in size for resection of HCC. Single HCC is regarded as T1 or T2 unless macroscopic vascular invasion is involved. The overall surgical outcome of huge HCCs is acceptable, but still worse than that of smaller HCCs.

Purpose To assess the long-term outcomes of resection for HCC ≥10 cm To establish a prognostic model for early recurrence, which will be useful for postoperative surveillance To validate the reliability of the prognostic model using an external cohort

Incidence of HCC > 10 cm 4148 HCC patients underwent resection during Jan. 2000 and Apr. 2012 - Exclusion of mixed pathology - 471 cases of HCC > 10 cm (11.4%) - Follow-up to Mar. 2014 (≥24 mos)

Flow of patients Surgical resection 471 patients Preoperative treatment (n=52) n=419 Surgical resection 1-month TACI (n=167) Perioperative mortality (n=8) Follow-up Tumor recurrence (n=346) No recurrence (n=117)

Preoperative treatment TACE RACE TACE + RTx/RFA RTx/RFA CTx n = 37 n = 8 n = 3 n = 4

Clinical features ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Age (yrs) 47.8±10.8 (range: 20 – 79) Sex (n) Male 375 Female 96 Primary liver disease (n) HBV 372 ALD 54 HCV 12 Others 33 Serum AFP (n=471) ≥100 ng/mL 304 (64.5%) Median 810 ng/mL (0.4-2700000) Serum PIVKA-II (n=231) ≥200 mAU/mL 304 (82.3%) Median 2400 mAU/mL (12-101073) ICG R15 (%) 13.5±8.2 Tumor diameter(median, cm) 13.0 (range, 10 – 26) Single tumor (n) 438 (93%) HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; ALD, alcoholic liver disease; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; PIVKA-II, Proteins Induced by Vitamin K Antagonist or Absence; ICG R15, indocyanine green retention test at 15 minutes.

Expression of AFP and PIVKA-II Linear scale Logarithmic scale PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) PIVKA-II (mAU/mL) AFP (ng/mL) AFP (ng/mL)

Ellipsoid tumor volume 10 cm-sized sphere = 500 mL 13 cm = 1000 mL 10 cm x 9 cm x 8 cm = 360 mL Mean diameter 13.6±3.1 cm 200 – 499 mL 500 – 999 mL ≥ 1000 mL n = 182 (38.6%) n = 175 (37.2%) n = 114 (24.2%)

Extents of resection -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Type of liver resection Systematic resection (n=429) (91.1%) Right hepatectomy ± S1 resection 251 Left hepatectomy ± S1 resection 69 Right anterior sectionectomy 23 Right posterior sectionectomy 31 Left lateral sectionectomy 14 Left medial sectionectomy 5 Central bisectionectomy 22 Right trisectionectomy 10 Left trisectionectomy 4 Non-systematic resection (n=42) (8.9%) Partial hepatectomy 42 Combined bile duct resection 8 (1.7%) Combined resection of adjacent organs (n) 28 (6.0%) Tumor thrombectomy Portal vein 47 (10.0%) Hepatic vein 4 (0.9%) Curative resection R0 resection 421 (89.4%) R1 resection 50 (10.6%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Extents of tumor ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Number of tumors (n) One 438 (93.0%) Two 19 (4.0%) ≥3 14 (3.0%) Simple nodular growth (n) 191 (40.6%) Microvascular invasion (n) 265 (56.3%) Macrovascular invasion (n) 49 (10.4%) Satellite nodules (n) 80 (17.0%) Bile duct invasion (n) 9 (1.9%) Capsule invasion (n) 86 (18.3%) Tumor necrosis (n) 380 (80.7%) Tumor differentiation (n) Most common Well: 168, Moderate: 194, Poor: 96 Worst Well: 88, Moderate: 261, Poor: 109 Regional lymph node metastasis (n) 12 (2.6%)

Long-term survival analysis Early recurrence prediction model External validation

Proportions of recurrence Cumulative HCC recurrence 76.0% 77.8% 72.5% Proportions of recurrence 62.2% n=471 Postoperation months

Proportions of survival Overall patient survival Perioperative mortality: n=8 (1.7%) 96.4% at 3 mos Proportions of survival 69.2% 46.9% 35.5% 18.8% Postoperation months

First recurrence timing and treatment -------------------------------------------------------------------First rec. site Treatment No. of patients ------------------------------------------------------------------- Liver (n=253) TACE 213 TACI 13 RFA 9 Resection 4 EBRT 1 PEIT 1 None 11 Lung (n=49) Chemotherapy 29 Resection 12 EBRT 3 None 5 Bone (n=7) EBRT 7 Adrenal (n=4) Adrenalectomy 3 EBRT 1 Thyroid (n=1) Thyroid lobectomy 1 Multiple recurrence (n=32) Specific treatment 22 None 10 -------------------------------------------------------------------TACE, transarterial chemoembolization; TACI, transarterial chemoinfusion; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; EBRT, external beam radiotherapy; PEIT, percutaneous ethanol injection therapy. Disease-free survival 4 mos 6 mos p=0.003 Surgical resection (n=20)

Overall survival respect to the first recurrence sites Disease-free survival Overall patient survival 20 mos 10 mos 21 mos p=0.009 p=0.003 + Post-recurrence survival 6 mos 12 mos 16 mos p=0.000

Univariate analyses for tumor recurrence and patient survival ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Variables HCC recurrence Patient survival ------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- Median disease-free p-value Median overall p-value survival period (mos) survival period (mos) Serum AFP 0.041 0.000 < 100 ng/mL 12 53 ≥ 100 ng/mL 5 21 Serum PIVKA-II 0.542 0.443 < 200 mAU/mL 6 29 ≥ 200 mAU/mL 6 40 FDG-PET 0.000 0.000 Not hypermetabolic 36 > 5 years Hypermetabolic 5 25 Satellite nodule 0.000 0.001 Absent 8 37 Present 4 21 Microvascular invasion 0.000 0.000 Absent 16 58 Present 4 17 Macrovascular invasion 0.041 0.191 Absent 7 33 Present 4 20 Tumor volume 0.331 0.812 < 500 mL 8 27 50–999 mL 5 33 ≥ 1000 mL 7 29 Type of resection 0.079 0.014 R0 4 34 R1 7 11 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; PIVKA-II, proteins induced by vitamin K antagonist or absence-II; FDG-PET, 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography.

Multivariate analyses for tumor recurrence and patient survival ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Variables HCC recurrence Patient survival ------------------------------------- -------------------------------------- Hazard 95% p-value Hazard 95% p-value ratio CI ratio CI Serum AFP ≥ 100 ng/mL 1.47 1.06–2.05 0.021 1.81 1.20–2.71 0.004 vs. < 100 ng/mL   FDG-PET Hypermetabolic 1.79 1.02–3.15 0.033 2.18 1.01–4.77 0.041 vs. not hypermetabolic Satellite nodule Present 1.61 1.16–2.24 0.005 1.51 1.04–2.20 0.030 vs. absent Microvascular invasion Present 1.73 1.24–2.41 0.001 1.91 1.28–2.83 0.001 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; PIVKA-II, proteins induced by vitamin K antagonist or absence-II; FDG-PET, 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography.

Long-term survival analysis Early recurrence prediction model External validation

Training cohort 4148 HCC patients underwent resection during Jan. 2000 and Apr. 2012 - 257 cases of HCC > 10 cm - Follow-up to Mar. 2014 (≥24 mos) - Meeting 4 factors: AFP, PET, pathology (satellite nodule, MVI)

Multiple regression for 3-month recurrence -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Variables Beta SE of Beta B SE of B p-value AFP 0.149 0.062 0.153 0.064 0.017 (< vs. ≥ 100 ng/mL)   FDG-PET 0.138 0.063 0.163 0.076 0.042 (Not hypermetabolic vs. hypermetabolic) Satellite nodule 0.151 0.061 0.173 0.069 0.014 (Absent vs. present) Microvascular invasion 0.148 0.064 0.148 0.064 0.021 Beta, standardized coefficient; B, unstandardized coefficient; SE, standard error; AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; FDG-PET, 2-18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography. Training cohort of 257 patients

4-risk factor prediction model - Training cohort of 257 patients - No. of risk factors : AFP, PET, satellite nodule, microvascular invasion Recurrence rate at 3 mos 63.2% 45.0% Percentage of recurrence 30.0% 12.1% 0% 0 1 2 3 4 No. of risk factors

Internal validation of 4-risk factor model for 12-month recurrence Tumor recurrence Patient survival 18.7% 30.3% 58.7% 79.0% 92.1% p=0.000 - Training cohort of 257 patients - No. of risk factors: AFP, PET, satellite nodule, microvascular invasion

Long-term survival analysis Early recurrence prediction model External validation

External validation cohort Study period: May 2012 – Feb. 2014 - 92 cases of HCC > 10 cm - Follow-up to Jan. 2015 (≥12 mos) - Patient profiles Age: 48.2 ± 11.3 (range, 23–73) Sex: male 71 (77.2%) HBV: 75 (81.5%) Single tumor: 84 (91.3%) Median tumor size: 12.8 cm R0 resection

External validation of 4-risk factor model for 12-month recurrence Tumor recurrence Patient survival 33.4% 31.6% 58.3% 78.3% 92.9% p=0.000 - Validation cohort of 92 patients - No. of risk factors: AFP, PET, satellite nodule, microvascular invasion The same discriminating power was obtained.

This study is under R2 minor revision in World Journal of Surgery. Conclusions Hepatic resection combined with active treatment of recurrence enhanced long-term survival in patients with HCC ≥10 cm. Our 4-factor risk prediction model appears to contribute to quantitative postoperative risk estimation for early HCC recurrence. Further validation is necessary with large patient populations in multicenter studies. This study is under R2 minor revision in World Journal of Surgery.