Germany’s Approach to Prescription Drug Pricing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pharmaceutical Policy and Pricing: How are Countries Getting Greater Value? Commonwealth Fund/ Alliance for Health Reform Briefing on Capitol Hill Dr.
Advertisements

Management of Drug Formulary Dimitry Gotlinsky Western University Managed Care Clerkship ProPharma Pharmaceutical Consultants, Inc. 06/16/06.
Value & Coverage Issue Brief Slides A Closer Look at Health Plan Coverage Policies and Approaches.
Pricing and Reimbursement Policies 27. Pricing Policies Patented Medicines Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) monitors and sets the price of.
Keith Tolley, Director, Tolley Health Economics Ltd IDF Europe Symposium 30 th September Tolley Health Economics Ltd Strategic Consulting in Health.
Portugal Economic Evaluation Applied to Decision Making Isaura Vieira INFARMED, I.P. – National Authority for Medicines and Health Products I Pan-American.
Medicare Supplement vs Medicare Advantage For authorized agent use only. Not for public use.
MEDICARE: PAST, PRESENT AND F UTURE James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Department of Sociology & Anthropology.
Part I: Basic Economics Tools
International Experience in Pharmaceutical Services for Promoting Access to Medicines: Canada, Cuba, England, Mexico International Seminar on the Challenges.
MZC1© 2005 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Unit I: Foundations of Community Health Chapter 7 Economics of Health Care.
1.03 Healthcare Finances Understand healthcare agencies, finances, and trends Healthcare Finances Government Finances Private Finances 2.
The German Health Care System and the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) Norbert Schmacke FJC/ University of Bremen.
3rd Baltic Conference on Medicines Economic Evaluation, Reimbursement and Rational Use of Pharmaceuticals Pricing and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals.
Current Approaches in European Health Care Policy What models can balance the needs of payors and industry?
CHCWG DRAFT March 2, 2006 Hearing from the American People: Preliminary Overview of Sources and Reports March 2006 Caution: Preliminary Data Do not cite.
European Commission Dialogue-Innovation-Future An experience of the Pharmaceutical Forum Dr Stefaan Van der Spiegel, MD Competitiveness in the Pharmaceuticals.
Washington State Health Care Authority/PEBB1 Public Employees Benefits Board Meeting June 27, 2000.
Universal- Multi Payer PowerPoint Universal Means for Everyone! It’s the promise of this grant. Michicare? Better for people: better for business.
Presentation by Lia van Ginneken – EMP Secretary & João Salazar – EMP Chairman 21st February 2009.
The competition between innovative and generic pharmaceutical companies intensified in the last decades. The models created by innovative pharmaceutical.
HTA cooperation in the EU EPF workshop Jérôme Boehm 18 May 2010.
Competitiveness of the European-based Pharmaceutical Industry Prospective of a New Member State Imre Hollo Deputy Secretary of State, MOH Hungary.
1 Comparative Effectiveness Research: Key Issues and Controversies Consumer-Purchaser Disclosure Project Discussion Forum May 5, 2009 Steven D. Pearson,
Title text here Consumer Perspective on Containing Drug Costs Leigh Purvis, Director, Health Services Research.
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND Figure 1. Medicare’s Success in Achieving Major Goals “How successful has Medicare been in accomplishing each of the following specific.
1.03 Healthcare Finances. Health Insurance Plans Premium-The periodic amount paid to an insurance company for healthcare or prescription drugs Deductible-Amount.
The Third Annual Medical Device Regulatory, Reimbursement and Compliance Congress 1 How to Implement a Private Payer Reimbursement Strategy Barbara Grenell.
1.03 Healthcare Finances Understand healthcare agencies, finances, and trends Healthcare Finances Government Finances Private Finances 2.
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK.
Introduction How Much Money does the United States Spend on Health Care? What Types of Government-Supported Health Insurance Are Available? What Types.
Medicaid Influence in the Drug Market Dana Costea PhD student, Department of Economics, Lehigh University Franklin Carter Assistant Professor, Marketing.
School of Public Health Health Economics and Health Care Management University of Bielefeld Bielefeld (Germany), September 29th, 2015 Prof. Dr. Wolfgang.
Title text here Consumer Perspective on Value-Based Pricing Leigh Purvis, AARP Public Policy Institute.
Continuous Improvement & Real World Evidence: A Public Payer’s Perspective Suzanne McGurn, Assistant Deputy Minister and Executive Officer Ontario Public.
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Economics of Pharmaceutical Regulation in the Mediterranean: the case of Spain and Italy Joan Costa Font LSE.
The Czech Health System – its Presence and Future
Health Reform: What It Means to Our Community
Managed Care Models: The Benefit vs. Cost Balance
Comparative Effectiveness Research: Key Issues and Controversies
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Started Business 1971 Nations Largest Privately Held Agency Catering to Retiree’s Needs.
Cooperation for Better Regulation
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Reinsurance and rating area rule update
Prescription for Pharmaceutical Reform: Healing an Ailing System
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
The German Health Care System and the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA)
Comparing HTA recommendations
Evaluating Your Health Insurance Needs and Options
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Wal-Mart’s Perspective on Health Reform
2019 ZESTLIFE GAP COVER.
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Evaluation and impact of HTA on private health insurance Dr Ehab Abul-Magd *President of the Afro-Asian congress for Medical Insurance & Managed Care.
Understanding Medicare
Prescription drug prices: Recent trends and opportunities for change
Policy Options and Distribution of 10-Year Impact
A View from Washington, DC
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
Pharmacy – Fully Insured versus Self Funding
A PILOT STUDY EXAMINING CRITERIA USED TO SELECT DRUGS FOR HOSPITAL, PROVINCIAL AND NATIONAL FORMULARIES Robertson J, Newby DA, Pillay T, Walkom EJ The.
Figure 1. Three of Five Health Care Opinion Leaders Feel that Mixed Private-Public Group Insurance Is an Effective Approach to Achieving Universal Health.
1.03 Healthcare Finances.
WA1 Snapshots of World Health:
Drug Formulary Development & Management
Germany’s Approach to Prescription Drug Pricing
Process mapping of registration to reimbursement for new pharmaceuticals in UK Description: A systematic methodology was developed in order to create the.
Presentation transcript:

Germany’s Approach to Prescription Drug Pricing Leigh Purvis, Director, Health Services Research AARP Public Policy Institute

What does the German health care system look like? Unlike many EU counterparts, has private multi-payer system. Health insurance is mandatory and is provided through either nonprofit, semi-private plans (“sickness funds”) or substitutive fully private plans. The Federal Joint Committee—a non-governmental body of payer, private, and patient representatives—has authority over coverage decisions for all German payers.  To the extent possible, coverage decisions are based on evidence from health technology assessments and comparative-effectiveness reviews.

How does Germany cover prescription drugs? Germany has historically prioritized patient choice and availability. Similar to the US, drug manufacturers were once free to set any price knowing that the health insurance funds would immediately have to reimburse them. Concerned by price and spending trends, policymakers developed a plan to help reduce both while also supporting continued innovation and patient access. The 2010 Pharmaceutical Market Restructuring Act, or AMNOG, established a process to assess the added benefit of new drugs through the use of comparative effectiveness research.

How does the AMNOG process work? Once a drug has been determined safe and effective, the drug maker can introduce its product at the price of its choosing and is fully reimbursed for 12 months. During those 12 months, the Federal Joint Committee commissions a clinical comparative effectiveness review by the non-governmental Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG). IQWiG evaluates all evidence of a new drug’s clinical effectiveness and benefits compared with standard treatment and/or existing drugs. Drug makers must submit all of the relevant data in a standardized dossier format and face sanctions for withheld information. Three to six months after IQWiG submits its findings, the Federal Joint Committee must issue a decision.

Notable exceptions to the AMNOG process Orphan drug manufacturers must submit a dossier but the new drug is automatically considered to have added value. Note: if total sales exceed €50 million per year, then a complete dossier must be submitted within 12 months. Vaccine reimbursement is simply tied to vaccine prices in comparable European countries. Excludes generics and hospital-only drugs.

How are new drugs rated? Evaluates whether the new drug adds a patient-relevant benefit such as an improvement of health status, shortening of disease duration, extension of life expectancy, reduction of side effects, or improvement in quality of life. Possible benefit ratings: Major added benefit – sustained and substantial improvement; Considerable added benefit – significant improvement; Minor added benefit – moderate improvement; Added benefit present but not quantifiable; No added benefit proven; Lower benefit than current therapies. The quality of the studies and data is also rated: Proof of benefit Indication of benefit Hint of benefit

What happens after a new drug rating is final? If a new drug’s rating is 1-2-3, the drug maker can begin negotiating with the organization representing all public insurance providers in Germany. Level of added benefit serves as the basis for negotiation. Ensures that all health insurance funds will pay the same price for the drug. If a new drug’s rating is 4-5-6, then payers will reimburse only at prices currently paid for the older existing drugs or therapies. In rare cases where an agreement on price cannot be reached within 6 months of the Federal Joint Committee decision, the matter is submitted to an arbitration panel.

What does arbitration look like? Board includes impartial Chairman and two other impartial panel members, in addition to two members appointed by insurers and the drug company. Members are appointed for 4 years. Decision made by simple majority vote and Chairman vote is decisive in the case of a tie. Reimbursement price decision is binding, although either party can challenge it and apply to have a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis conducted by IQWiG. Can revisit an agreement or arbitration decision on the basis of new scientific findings after one year.

What other options are on the table for drug companies? Drug companies can choose not to have their drug assessed and have their price set through the German reference pricing system. Prices are based on the prices of other drugs in that therapeutic class (including generics). Drug companies can also choose not to offer their drug in Germany.

How has the AMNOG process worked so far? Research indicates that the prices of drugs with no added benefit are not higher than the prices of existing products, and drugs with added benefit are coming to market with a price premium. Arbitration decisions often lead to substantially lower prices than what manufacturers originally demand. Savings in the billions on new drugs with added benefit; additional savings from new drugs with no added benefit. Has not stifled access: more than 300 new drugs were assessed between January 2011 and May 2018. < 30 new drugs pulled from the market after evaluation and/or price decision.

Some takeaways to consider German system provides an evidence-based way to reward innovative drugs that provide genuine clinical benefits. Provides immediate access to new drugs. Determines final prices only after a determination of clinical benefits, and through negotiations involving drug companies and stakeholders. Arbitration is used as a last resort and the entire process offers multiple opportunities for drug makers to weigh in. Products that are ultimately removed from the market seem to reflect more on innovation shortfall than process.

Leigh Purvis Director, Health Services Research lpurvis@aarp Leigh Purvis Director, Health Services Research lpurvis@aarp.org AARP Public Policy Institute www.aarp.org/ppi Twitter:@leighdrugwonk www.Facebook.com/AARPpolicy Blog: www.aarp.org/policyblog