Status after 3 months of L1 Cal/Val

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System NASA Langley Research Center / Atmospheric Sciences Methodology to compare GERB- CERES filtered radiances.
Advertisements

University of Wisconsin - Madison Space Science and Engineering Center (SSEC) High Spectral Resolution IR Observing & Instruments Hank Revercomb (Part.
Inter-calibration of Operational IR Sounders using CLARREO Bob Holz, Dave Tobin, Fred Nagle, Bob Knuteson, Fred Best, Hank Revercomb Space Science and.
RMIB involvement in the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB) and Climate Monitoring SAF projects Nicolas Clerbaux Remote sensing from Space Division.
ITSC-XII – 27/2-5/3/2002 – Melbourne1 IASI Level 0 and 1 processing algorithms description B. Tournier D. Blumstein F. Cayla.
Japan Meteorological Agency, June 2016 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS Non-Meteorological Application for Himawari-8 Presented.
Denis Tremblay 1, Yong Han 2, Yong Chen 3, Likun Wang 3, Xin Jin 2, Xiaozhen Xiong 2, Lihang Zhou 2 1 Science Data Processing Inc., 2 NOAA/NESDIS/STAR,
Bias analysis and correction for MetOp/AVHRR IR channel using AVHRR-IASI inter-comparison Tiejun Chang and Xiangqian Wu GSICS Joint Research and data Working.
JMA GPRC report Arata OKUYAMA Meteorological Satellite Center,
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
PLEIADES Lunar Observations Sophie Lachérade, Bertrand Fougnie
GSICS Web Meeting, 17 November 2011
Paper under review for JGR-Atmospheres …
Pre-launch Characteristics and Calibration
NOAA Report on Ocean Parameters - SST Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session, agenda item 9 Author: Sasha Ignatov.
PATMOS-x Reflectance Calibration and Reflectance Time-Series
VIS/NIR reference instrument requirements
In-orbit Microwave Reference Records
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Traceability and Uncertainty of GSICS Infrared Reference Sensors
Radiometric and spectral inter-comparison of IASI
CNES Agency Report for GSICS
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
Masaya Takahashi Meteorological Satellite Center,
GOES-16 ABI Lunar Data Preparation to GIRO
On the use of Ray-Matching to transfer calibration
FY2-IASI and FY3C-IASI towards Demo
Fangfang Yu and Fred Wu 22 March 2011
Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales - Toulouse - France
Requirements for microwave inter-calibration
San Diego Conference 2 August 2001
Update on Advancing Development of the ROLO Lunar Calibration System
Radiometric inter-comparison of IASI : Miscellaneous results
15 November 2018 Best Practice for Hyperspectral IR Sounder SDR Ground Processing - Lessons learned from CrIS Likun Wang & Hank Revercomb University.
Manik Bali Jonathan Mittaz
The Successor of the TOU
Inter-Sensor Comparison for Soumi NPP CrIS
On-orbit Performance : DAY-1 Results
VIS/NIR sub-group discussion
Intercomparison of IASI and CrIS spectra
Sensitivity ANALYSIS Sébastien Wagner (EUMETSAT) In collaboration with
Hanlie XU, Xiuqing HU, Chunqiang Wu, Tianhang Yang, Na Xu
GSICS MW products and a path forward.?
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Infrared Inter-Calibration Product Announcements
Lunar Observation Data for GIRO Landsat–8 Operational Land Imager
AIRS/GEO Infrared Intercalibration
GSICS ATBD (ISRO) GSICS Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for Inter-Calibration of Indian GEO satellites Pradeep Thapliyal Space Applications.
Dorothee Coppens.
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report
IR hyperspectral comparisons
Early calibration results of FY-4A/GIIRS during in-orbit testing
NOAA/NESDIS/Center for Satellite Applications and Research
Radiometric inter-comparison of IASI
SRF Retrieval Using VIIRS/AIRS/IASI radiances
Use of GSICS to Improve Operational Radiometric Calibration
Hot summary of the Fourth GSICS Users Workshop
Inter-band calibration using the Moon
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report Tim Hewison
GSICS Products’ Improvements and Developments
Proposed best practices for Simultaneous Nadir Overpass (A Discussion)
Tim Hewison1 and all GSICS Developers EUMETSAT
FY-3D/HIRAS On-orbit performance and validation
G16 vs. G17 IR Inter-comparison: Some Experiences and Lessons from validation toward GEO-GEO Inter-calibration Fangfang Yu, Xiangqian Wu, Hyelim Yoo and.
Variogram Stability Analysis
Infrared Sub-Group Report Tim Hewison
GSICS IR Reference Uncertainty & Traceability Report
Lunar Calibration Workshop Activities
Traceability and Uncertainty of GSICS Infrared Reference Sensors
How good is IASI-A as an in-orbit reference in GSICS in LWIR and IR
Presentation transcript:

Status after 3 months of L1 Cal/Val IASI on MetOp-B Status after 3 months of L1 Cal/Val By the IASI cal/val team E. Péquignot1, L. Buffet1, J. Chinaud1, S. Gaugain1, E. Jacquette1, D. Jouglet1, V. Lonjou1, C. Larigauderie1, C. Villaret1, J. Donnadille2, B. Tournier2, C. Baque3 1Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) 2Noveltis (Toulouse) 3AKKA (Toulouse) GSICS Annual Meeting, 4-8 March 2013, Williamsburg, Virginia, USA Presentation made by E. Péquignot at the 3rd IASI conference, 4-8 Feb 2013, Hyères, France

Introduction Instrumental artifacts removal Sounder performances Intercalibration Conclusions

Key dates MetOp-B launch: 17th Sept 2012 IASI first interferograms (start of L1 CalVal): 23th Oct 2012 IASI first L0 spectra (computed on-board): 24th Oct 2012 IASI first L1 spectra (calibrated on ground): 25th Oct 2012 Last configuration update before IASI-B L1C trial dissemination: On-board: 10th Jan 2013 Ground: 14th Jan 2013 IASI-B L1C trial dissemination (CalVal partners) in Near Real Time: 22th Jan 2013 IASI-B L1C trial dissemination (member states) in Near Real Time: 5th Feb 2013

First IASI-B spectrum (24th October 2012)

IASI: 2 operational modes Normal Operation Mode Scanning the swath 30 Earth views / 8 sec External Calibration Mode Fixed viewing direction: Earth, Hot Blackbody, 2 Cold Spaces, Back of the scan mirror) 27 views / 8 sec On-board programming (here quasi-nadir looking)

Space & Ground segments: algorithms and configuration tuning The IASI L1 CalVal Plan describes the process, methods and data To obtain the ultimate performances of L1 IASI products (calibration), To demonstrate these performances (validation) during flight operations General goal of the Level 1 Cal/Val activities is to ensure that The IASI Level 1 products are compliant with their specifications radiometric (absolute & noise), spectral and geometric performances All instrumental potential artifacts have been removed at user level product (L1C) In-flight Cal/Val activities broken in 2 main successive phases The second phase has started after the L1C “trial dissemination” The level accuracy of the validation and diversity of the conditions in which the validations are performed increase with time

Introduction Instrumental artifacts removal Sounder performances Intercalibration Conclusions

Interpixel radiometric calibration at L1C (Obs-Obs) P2-P1 P3-P1 P4-P1 Radiometric interpixel at L1C is better than 0.1K -> at L1C all pixels are radiometrically independent -> on-board calibration & on-ground post-calibration work perfectly Still effects in the interbands. The limits will be optimized in phase B.

Interpixel spectral calibration at L1C (Obs - Obs) IASI-B in ExtCal “EW” Soundings oversampling of 1.5km, only nadir viewing Selection of collocated and homogeneous scenes Spectral interpixel at L1C is better than 0.25/0.5 ppm -> at L1C all pixels are spectrally independent -> L1B(spectral shift correction) & L1C(SRF removal) processing work perfectly

Introduction Instrumental artifacts removal Sounder performances Intercalibration Conclusions

Radiometric noise IASI-B in-flight measured L0 NedT@280 on BB targets is Close to Vacuum Test values (TAS 2006 and MetOp-B 2010) Close to IASI-A in-flight

Radiometric noise: comparison with CrIS Usually this picture is presented …. But the NedL also depends on spectral sampling & spectral resolution which are not the same for IASI and CrIS.

Radiometric noise: comparison with CrIS at user level A much fair comparison is to do it at the same spectral sampling and resolution To do so we have computed CrIS-like spectra from noisy BB L1C IASI spectra (920 random draws) The CrIS-like module works in the interferogram space using CrIS characteristics (OPDmax and apodisation functions) At the same spectral sampling and resolution Raw comparison IASI CrISlike / IASI (=overestimation factor of IASI noise in the raw comparison) B1 B2 B3 2.5 3 5

Absolute spectral calibration at L1C (Obs - Calc) Evaluation not straightforward 1ppm@645 cm-1 =3/1000 of the spectral sampling 1ppm@2200 cm-1 =1/100 of the spectral sampling Selection of collocated and homogeneous scenes dν/ν Results still very dependant on scene selection, radiative transfer (spectroscopy, line-mixing, pressure shift), atmospheric profile used, algorithm (correlation, difference, peak finding), spectral line shape, instrument noise,… Consolidation of the results in phase B.

Geolocation Sounder / IIS ~ 1 km No orbital variations IIS / AVHRR ~ 0.1-0.2 km wrt the offset guess in the current ground configuration No orbital variations

Radiance classification in L1C products (CCS) Sfax (Tunisia) AVHHR-4 image and the associated classification (6 radiometric classes) Black Blue Green (hottest scenes), Orange Red Yellow (coldest scenes)

L0&L1 data quality and availability PTSI-6: uploaded on the 10th of January 2013 @11:25 Availability of L1C data: 99.4% (B3), 99.7% (B1&B2)

Introduction Instrumental artifacts removal Sounder performances Inter calibration Conclusions

IASI-B / IASI-A radiometric inter calibration at L1C (Obs-Obs) Biases over a relevant dataset (homogeneous and stable scenes, night Broad band pseudo-channels Full resolution Biases < ~0.1K  Very well cross calibrated wrt spec (absolute 0.5K for each) Standard deviations mainly due to geophysics See Wednesday’s presentation for more details and inter comparisons (AIRS,CrIS)

IASI-B / IASI-A spectral inter calibration at L1C (Obs-Obs) IASI-B / IASI-A ExtCal “MA_MB” : reprocessing of 26th November data with BSO-8 Selection of collocated and homogeneous scenes : ~ 50 scenes Inter pixel at L1C display a constant bias of 2.5 ppm. A part of this bias (1.5 ppm) may be attributed to IASI-B laser misalignment. It will be improved in L1 CalVal phase B.

Introduction Instrumental artifacts removal Sounder performances Intercalibration Conclusions

Conclusions After 3 months of IASI-B L1 CalVal Instrument & interferogram acquisition are very stable and work perfectly Space & ground segments are now working well with consolidated parameters. The in-depth tuning has started. Performances are very encouraging and already of order of IASI-A Thanks to both CNES and EUMETSAT teams

The Earth seen by IASI-B (26th October at 9:30 local)