Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Meeting Two More Theory
Advertisements

A section has been added regarding Stream Restoration Design Criteria: A. Designs for stream restoration try to mimic natural conditions present in stable.
Stream Geomorphology Leslie A. Morrissey UVM July 25, 2012.
Development of the Controlled Assessment task for 2015 By: Helen Robertson FSC London 21 October 2013.
DESIGNING STONE TOE PROTECTION. IS STP THE RIGHT SOLUTION? IS THE CHANNEL BED STABLE? IS THE BANKFULL WIDTH IN BEND LESS THAT 130% OF BANKFULL WIDTH.
Watershed Geomorphology. Motivation Effect of water on landscape: – Whereas hydrologists are mostly concerned with the movement of water, a common task.
Rock Riffle Design Course
River Studies. Outline of Events During your river field work you will be visiting two different sites in the lower course of the river. At each site.
Channel Pattern Outline Description of channel pattern Alternate bars Channel pattern continua and evolution Controls of channel pattern.
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
Pine Valley Country Club Stream Restoration: Phase 2 Proposal Presented March 17, 2003 Greg Jennings, NC State Univ Barbara Doll, NC Sea Grant Dave Bidelspach,
Mitigation Categories 3 and 4 February 15,  Reminders:  Mitigation Category 3  WWH – GHQW  CWH – Inland Trout Streams  Class III PHWH  Mitigation.
Hydrologic Studies Unit Land and Water Management.
Predicting natural channel types in the Columbia River basin Hiroo Imaki 1, Tim Beechie 1, John Buffington 2 1. NOAA, Northwest Fisheries Science Center,
Lewis Creek Reach M19 Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3.
LANE’S BALANCE Construction Phase - Sediment Delivery  Q + S ~ Q s + d s Post-Construction - Sediment Delivery  Q ++ S -- ~ Q s - d s + Incision.
Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202)
ENSC 202 – 2004 Phase 1 Steps 6-10 Watershed Assessment (ENSC 202) Phase 1 – Steps 6-10 Extracted from Vermont ANR Stream Geomorphic Assessment Protocols.
“We Bring Engineering to Life” 3-D Stream Restoration Design, Monitoring and Beyond David Bidelspach, PE - Stantec Consulting Greg Jennings, PE – NCSU.
Greg Jennings, PhD, PE Professor, Biological & Agricultural Engineering North Carolina State University BAE 579: Stream Restoration Lesson.
Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.
Regional/National Sediment Yields: Application of Fundamental Fluvial Geomorphic Techniques for TMDLs National Sedimentation Laboratory Andrew Simon USDA-ARS.
Habitat Restoration Division Coastal Program Partner For Wildlife Program Schoolyard Habitats Chesapeake Bay Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Stream Stability and Sediment Transport Environmental Hydrology Lecture 21.
The flow or movement of water
Step 1: Assess Riparian Resource Function Using PFC §1d. Complete PFC assessment l 17 questions about attributes and processes l Reminder – PFC based on:
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Channel Modification Washington Dept. Forestry, 2004, Channel Modification Techniques Katie Halvorson.
Assessing Riparian Function YOUR remarkable RIPARIAN.
Andrew Lipsky State Biologist USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Rhode island Watershed Stewardship Class: Introduction.
Bank-Stability and Toe-Erosion Model Andrew Simon, Robert Thomas, Andrea Curini and Natasha Bankhead USDA-ARS National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford,
 Four measures related to channel condition  Sinuosity (pool formation)  Pool/Riffle Development  Channel Modification  Channel Stability.
Field Instruction in Surface-Water Hydrology – Not a Summer Course Steve Custer Earth Sciences Montana State University Bozeman, MT
Detroit District, Hydraulics & Hydrology Office US Army Corps of Engineers River Bank Erosion Siskiwit River, Cornucopia, WI.
PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.
This training was prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) team of Otto Gonzalez-USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (Team Leader), Jon Fripp.
Christie Beeman, Andrew Collison, and Mike Liquori Philip Williams & Associates Options for Flow-Control Compliance.
Stream Classification. What factors affect stream morphology? Width Depth Slope Velocity Discharge Flow resistance Sediment size Sediment load Leopold.
Qualitative Habitat Evaluation Index Bradley Hansen John Nieber Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering For BBE 4535/5535 Fall 2011.
Fluvial Geomorphology Environmental Hydrology Lecture 20.
Natural Riparian Resources Water Landscape & SoilVegetation.
Natural Riparian Resources Vegetation Landscape/Soil Water.
Sinclair Wash Stream Restoration Feasibility Study
Assessing Bank Erosion Potential in the San Antonio River
Hydrology.
Teaching Geomorphology in the Field
When should you fix a stream????
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Fluvial Geomorphology
Our Hazardous Environment GEOG 1110 Dr. Thieme
Brian murphy and Emily valenzuela
4 channel types defined at reach scale, based on 3 features
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys
Stream Classification
Streams Hydrodynamics
Milltown Phase II Draft Restoration Plan
Module 1: Welcome and Overview
Module 5: Morphology, Facets, Ratios, and Stream Classification
Module # 17 Overview of Geomorphic Channel Design Practice
Module # 8 Channel Evolution Implications & Drivers of Instability
Kastanis- Existing Conditions
Module # 16 Restoring Functions to Streams Through Design
Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training
When should you fix a stream????
Module # 10 Review of Field Day 2 Data Collection
Module # 7 Field Day 1 – Basic Geomorphic Data Collection
Laguna Creek Watershed Management Plan Hydrology and Geomorphology
Longitudinal Profile Survey for Successful Culvert Replacement
In-Stream Structures & Grade Control
Shaver Creek Permitting
Presentation transcript:

Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training Module # 13 Understanding the Key Instability Drivers to Inform Design/Decision Matrix Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training

Key Design Parameters

Key Drivers Floodplain Access Bank Height Ratio Entrenchment Bankfull Properties Area Discharge Width Depth Channel Evolution Stage Dominant BEHI Buffer Width

Bank Height Ratio (BHR) BHR= LBH/Dbkf Lowest Bank Height (LBH) Bankfull Depth (Dbkf)

Geomorphic Floodplain Entrenched Channel Bankfull Depth Geomorphic Floodplain Bankfull Width

Bankfull Geometry

Channel Evolution Models Simon’s Modification of Schumm’s Model

Shear Stresses in Streams  Discharge Return Interval Shear Stress Natural Stream Channelized Stream 2-Year Storm 100-Year Storm D100 D2 Channelized Stream 100-Year Storm D100 2-Year Storm D2 Natural Stream

BEHI Study Bank Height Bankfull Height Root Depth Bank Angle Surface Protection Bank Material Adjustment Stratification Adjustment Bank Length Reach Length

Heading for Text Over a Photo Riparian Buffer

Additional Key Drivers Pattern/Geometry Radius of Curvature Meander Width Ratio Pool to Pool Spacing Width to Depth Ratio Channel Length Channel Slope Stream Type Presence of Headcuts/Bed Stability Geomorphic Region/Geology Sediment Supply/Bed Materials Constraints

Pattern/Geometry Wbkf = Bankfull Width Lm = Meander Wavelength Wblt = Belt Width Am = Amplitude Lm = Meander Wavelength Rc = Radius of Curvature

Channel Slope

BKF Width / Mean BKF Depth Stream Type Classification A B C E DA D F G Entrenchment ratio* <1.4 1.4 -2.2 >2.2 >4.0 n/a FP width / BKF Width BKF Width / Mean BKF Depth W / D ratio* <12 >12 <40 >40 Typical sinuosity 1 -1.2 >1.2 >1.5 Not predictive Well-defined point bars Veg. islands Heavy veg. Both banks erode in wide dirt canyon Confined, u-shaped valley Often bedrock / log controlled Visual Cues Gully in soft materials Sed. islands Typical slope .04-.099 .02-.039 <.02 <.005 <.04 Typical stability Usually Stable Likely Unstable Classifications from Rosgen, 1996

Headcuts/Bed Stability Caused by Excess Shear Stress Often Triggered by Downstream Straightening of Channel Will Propagate Upstream Increases Channel Entrenchment

Sediment Supply/Bed Materials

Constraints

Key Design Parameters

Functional Status

The Assessment Process 8. Submit final analysis for review 7. Perform analysis of appropriate practices/techniques 6. Receive adjusted recommendations based on design intent 5. Update Key Drivers for design based on step 4 4. Make initial decisions that will affect the project design 3. Receive initial assessment based on site conditions 2. Fill out data collection Excel workbook 1. Assess project site conditions

Purpose of Decision Matrix Documentation of intuitive knowledge used in stream restoration design Establish logic used to determine appropriate practices & techniques Note that there are multiple “right answers”

Channel Evolution Models Simon’s Modification of Schumm’s Model

Decision Matrix – Channel Evolution

Bank Height Ratio (BHR) BHR= LBH/Dbkf Lowest Bank Height (LBH) Bankfull Depth (Dbkf)

Decision Matrix – Bank Height Ratio

Decision Matrix - Slope

Decision Matrix – Bankfull Width

Design Assessment Tab

Technique Ranking

Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training Module # 13 Understanding the Key Instability Drivers to Inform Design/Decision Matrix Iowa’s River Restoration Toolbox Level 1 / Base Training