Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Influence of Domain Interactions on Conformational Mobility of the Progesterone Receptor Detected by Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry Devrishi.
Advertisements

Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
Natalie K. Garcia, Miklos Guttman, Jamie L. Ebner, Kelly K. Lee 
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages e4 (October 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Choel Kim, Cecilia Y. Cheng, S. Adrian Saldanha, Susan S. Taylor  Cell 
Structure-Guided Design of Fluorescent S-Adenosylmethionine Analogs for a High- Throughput Screen to Target SAM-I Riboswitch RNAs  Scott F. Hickey, Ming C.
Volume 19, Issue 10, Pages (October 2011)
Hybrid Structure of the RagA/C-Ragulator mTORC1 Activation Complex
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Seisuke Yamashita, Kozo Tomita  Structure 
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Discovery Through the Computational Microscope
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
The Monomeric dUTPase from Epstein-Barr Virus Mimics Trimeric dUTPases
Volume 109, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Partial Agonists Activate PPARγ Using a Helix 12 Independent Mechanism
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
AMPK and SNF1: Snuffing Out Stress
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Partial Agonists Activate PPARγ Using a Helix 12 Independent Mechanism
Hafumi Nishi, Kosuke Hashimoto, Anna R. Panchenko  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2000)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 1942-1953 (November 2013) Activation of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Revealed by Hydrogen/Deuterium Exchange Mass Spectrometry  Rachelle R. Landgraf, Devrishi Goswami, Francis Rajamohan, Melissa S. Harris, Matthew F. Calabrese, Lise R. Hoth, Rachelle Magyar, Bruce D. Pascal, Michael J. Chalmers, Scott A. Busby, Ravi G. Kurumbail, Patrick R. Griffin  Structure  Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages 1942-1953 (November 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2013.08.023 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2013 21, 1942-1953DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Dynamics of apo AMPK α1β1γ1 (A) The percentage of corrected deuterium uptake for all peptides of apo AMPK is mapped onto PDB 2Y94. A separate model of GBD is built based on yeast AMPK structure and shown alongside 2Y94. Three different time points (10, 300, and 3,600 s) are shown here. The percentage of deuterium uptake values, an average of six time points (0 s to 3,600 s), is depicted by color code explained at the bottom of the figure. Regions colored as white represent peptides that are not consistently resolved in the study. (B) Deuterium uptake curve of Cα helix from kinase domain. These plots present the level of deuterium incorporation (%D) for a given peptide across all time points for three replicates in two sample conditions. The individual replicate measurements at each time point are used to calculate and plot the mean %D. The error bars represent the SD of these measurements. (C and D) Differential deuterium uptake of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated peptide spanning the activation loop of the α subunit (C) and the Ser108 loop of the β subunit (D). These plots present the level of deuterium incorporation (%D) for a given peptide across all time points for three replicates in two sample conditions. The individual replicate measurements at each time point are used to calculate and plot the mean %D. The error bars represent the SD of these measurements. (E) Peptides belonging to two different CBS motifs of the γ subunit show different levels of deuterium incorporation. These plots present the level of deuterium incorporation (%D) for a given peptide across all time points for three replicates in two sample conditions. The individual replicate measurements at each time point are used to calculate and plot the mean %D. The error bars represent the SD of these measurements. See also Figures S1 and S2. Structure 2013 21, 1942-1953DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Effect of AMP and ZMP on AMPK α1β1γ1 (A) Differential HDX data mapped onto the AMPK atomic structure (PDB 2Y94) (B) Schematic representation of AMPK regions undergoing conformational changes upon AMP/ZMP binding. Percentages of deuterium differences are color-coded according to the color key. The boxed area in the activation loop region represents the phosphorylated form as compared to the non-boxed area below that represents the nonphosphorylated form. See also Tables S1 and S2. Structure 2013 21, 1942-1953DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Conformational Changes of AMPK α1β1γ1 upon Binding of A769662, Beta-Cyclodextrin, and Staurosporine (A) Differential HDX data mapped onto the AMPK atomic structure (PDB 2Y94). (B) Schematic representation of AMPK regions undergoing conformational changes upon binding of A769662, β-cyclodextrin, and staurosporine. Percentages of deuterium differences are color-coded according to the color key. The boxed area in the activation loop region represents the phosphorylated form as compared to the nonboxed area below that represents the nonphosphorylated form. See also Figure S3 and Tables S1 and S2. Structure 2013 21, 1942-1953DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Effect of AMP and A769662 Binding on Truncated AMPK (A) Differential HDX data mapped onto the AMPK atomic structure (PDB 2Y94). (B) Schematic representation of AMPK regions undergoing conformational changes upon AMP/A769662 binding. Percentages of deuterium differences are color-coded according to the color key. The boxed area in the activation loop region represents the phosphorylated form as compared to the nonboxed area below that represents the nonphosphorylated form. See also Figure S3 and Table S2. Structure 2013 21, 1942-1953DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Effect of AMP and A769662 Binding on AMPK α2β2γ1 Isoform (A) Differential HDX data mapped onto the AMPK atomic structure (PDB 2Y94). (B) Schematic representation of AMPK regions undergoing conformational changes upon AMP/A769662 binding. The percentage of deuterium differences are color-coded according to the color key. The boxed area in the activation loop region represents the phosphorylated form as compared to the nonboxed area below that represents the nonphosphorylated form. See also Figure S3 and Tables S1 and S2. Structure 2013 21, 1942-1953DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Schematic of AMPK Conformational Dynamics Induced by Different Activators Protein stabilization caused by ligand binding (as measured by the differential HDX profile) is shown in blue, whereas destabilization is shown in yellow. Changes in stabilization are a result of altered conformation of the protein. Known or putative ligand binding sites on AMPK subunits are shown by orange squares (AMP), dark circles (ZMP), green triangles (A769662), and solid stars (beta-cyclodextrin). These are just schematic representations of the general observations from the HDX experiments with different ligands but not an absolute mapping of the extent of deuterium exchange. AMP binding results in enhanced protection or stabilization of the γ subunit and the activation loop in the kinase module of the α subunit. Binding of ZMP, an AMP analog and a cellular metabolite of AICAR, primarily alters the HDX profile in the γ subunit and to a smaller extent, the α subunit. The synthetic activator A769662 displays strong stabilization of the β subunit and portions of the α subunit involved in substrate binding and catalysis. In addition, A769662 causes destabilization of the γ subunit, the reasons for which are not completely understood. The effect of the glycogen mimetic, beta-cyclodextrin, is mostly restricted to the β subunit. The combination of A769662 and beta-cyclodextrin elicits a profile that is a combination of the individual profiles obtained by each of the ligands. These results also suggest that A769662 and beta-cyclodextrin bind at nonoverlapping sites on the glycogen binding module of the β subunit. The HDX data strongly suggest two fundamentally different modes of AMPK activation by A769662 and the nucleotides. Structure 2013 21, 1942-1953DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2013.08.023) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions