Straw Man Allison & Summer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Straw Man Fallacy By: Will And Courtney.
Advertisements

Ad Hominem Fallacy By: Lucas Cook and Sydney Hyatt.
Ad Hominem- Poisoning the Well Sydney Collier and Shelby Wood.
Ad Hominem Poisoning The Well Nathan Anderson Kaylie Young Emily Walker.
The Crucible Act IV Quiz Review.
The Crucible Study Guide. Restate every question
Kaleb LeFevre & Megan Garrison Either-Or Fallacy.
Fallacy: Slippery Slope Mrs. Hughes – 2 nd Period Group: Alex, Michael, & Tyler.
DA STRAW MAN The straw man fallacy occurs when person B takes
Poisoning the Well Fallacy By : Katie Emmitt, Corey Faller, Chelsee Wooten.
Kenzie Garrett Amber Jewell
Katilyn Wyatt and DeAnna Mabe. Definition Using a biased, suspicious, or incredible source to defend a conclusion. X is true because Y says so. Therefore,
Crucible Reverse Jeopardy Characters Literary Terms Plot Events SettingQuoteSignificance
Appeal to Fear/ Scare Tactics
The Crucible Act III.
Logical Fallacy Brett Willis Kaylee Britt. Appeal to Ridicule Definition: a fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument”.
Ad Populum Appeal to Popularity Bandwagon
Act IV Study Guide Questions
Poisoning the Well Fallacy
Post Hoc Perri Collier Myles King. Post Hoc Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc also manifests itself as a.
Appeal to Ridicule Emma Doyle, Kelly Moss and Jake Beakes.
Argument from authority
Straw Man Logical Fallacy
\ By: Haley Myers, Chelsea Northrup and Kaylyn Goodwin
Post Hoc/Faulty Causality/Non- Sequitur By: Cindy Williams & Sarah Madrigal.
Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning
Appeal to Ridicule Appeal to Ridicule is a logical fallacy that presents the opponent’s argument in a way that appears ridiculous, often to the extent.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
Begging The Question Kelsey Turner and Chelsey White.
APPEAL TO RIDICULE By: Whitney Miles.
The CRUCIBLE Fallacy Project: Slippery Slope.
Post Hoc First period. Definition A fallacy in which one event is said to be the cause of a later event simply because it occurred earlier. A fallacy.
Appeal to Ridicule Mattie Bruton Hannah Weedman. Definition of Fallacy AKA: Appeal to Mockery, The Horse Laugh. Appeal to Ridicule is a fallacy in which.
Da Straw Man! Dalton Stephens Nick Cairo. What is Straw Man? The Straw Man fallacy is committed when a person simply ignores a person's actual position.
Post Hoc Billy Estes. Post Hoc Explained Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc occurs when a faulty assumption.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
FALSE DILEMMA/EITHER-OR Logical Fallacy Power-point. By: Shelby Caudel.
The Crucible Key Themes. Writing about theme When writing about theme avoid: Simply rewriting the question Repeating yourself E.g. do not write “injustice.
15 "If you love me, you will obey what I command. 16 And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Counselor to be with you forever – John 14:15-21;23,24.
Ad Populum/ Appeal to Popularity/ Bandwagon Krystal Sims & Makayla Glass.
Slippery Slope in The Crucible
Appeal to Ridicule By: Dakota Hunt. Definition Ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an argument, or it presents the opponent's argument.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
Jeopardy The Crucible Rhetorical Devices Logical, Ethical or Emotional? Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
The Straw Man Whitney Phillips 7 th Period. Definition: Straw Man Fallacy- when a character misrepresents another character’s position and then proceeds.
Appeal to Ridicule ASHLEY STEPHENS. Appeal to Ridicule is…  A fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument.”
Circular reasoning (also known as paradoxical thinking or circular logic), is a logical fallacy in which "the reasoner begins with what he or she is trying.
1. How much time has passed since Act I? 8 Days.
The Crucible logical fallacy project
By: Kennedy Logsdon. Definition of Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Ignorance is the assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of ridicule.
Arguments from Authority/False Authority Kelsay Manion & Sean Belding Example: In some cases, the expertise may be just for show -"I'm not a doctor, but.
Paper Topics Writing a letter From one character to another
Straw Man Fallacy in The Crucible
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
“I'll find her! Let me fly! Mama! No!”. “A person is either with this court or he must be counted against it, there be no road between."
Circular Reasoning. What is Circular Reasoning? A fallacious form of argument in which someone assumes that parts (or all) of what a person claims to.
BEGGING THE QUESTION/ CIRCULAR REASONING BY: Jessica Greenwood And McKenzie Pedigo.
The Crucible Act III. Martha Corey is on trial It is clear they don’t believe Martha is not a witch – they think everyone accused is guilty Giles disrupts.
GOOD VS EVIL STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN ‘THE CRUCIBLE’
Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.
Straw Man Fallacy By: Taylor Hudson and Rachel Fields.
Justice and Truth in The Crucible
DA STRAW MAN The straw man fallacy occurs when person B takes
Appeal to Ignorance Paige Davis.
Never make these Debate Mistakes II.
Debate Mistakes II: Strawman
False Dilemma/ Either-Or/False Dichotomy
Ad Hominem directed against a person’s characteristics or reputation rather than against his arguments appealing to one's prejudices, emotions, or special.
Presentation transcript:

Straw Man Allison & Summer

Definition of Fallacy Straw Man occurs when an opponent takes an original argument of his/her adversary and then offers a close limitation, or “straw man,” version of his argument. (Straw man-easy target)

Picture Analogy

Picture Analogy

Universal Example #1 Person A: We should liberalize laws on beer. Straw man arguments often arise in public debates such as a (hypothetical) prohibition debate. Person A: We should liberalize laws on beer. Person B: No, any society with unrestricted access to intoxicants loses its work ethic and goes only got immediate gratification.

Universal Example Explanation #1 This proposal was to relax laws on beer. Person B has exaggerated this to a position harder to defend, i.e. “unrestricted access to intoxicants.”

Universal Example #2 One straw man argument is seen between a parent and a child. Child: “Can we get a dog?” Parent: “No.” Child: “It would protect us.” Parent: “Still, no.” Child: “Why do you want to leave us and our house unprotected?”

Universal Example Explanation #2 The child in that situation may be making a straw man argument if the parent’s reasoning behind not getting a dog has nothing to do with protection but with other factors. Moreover, not getting a dog is not necessarily proof that the parent doesn’t want to protect the family and home as there are other means of protection.

The Crucible Example #1 Page 211- 4th Column Procter. I have no love for Mr. Parris. It is no secret. But God I surely love. Cheever. He plow on Sunday, sir. Danforth. Plow on Sunday! Cheever. I think it be evidence, John. I am an official of the court, I cannot keep it. Procter. I-I have once or twice plowed on Sunday. I have 3 children, sir, and until last year my land give little.

The Crucible Example #1 Procter and Cheever are arguing over Procter’s credibility and innocence in court. Cheever brings up plowing on Sundays to make the issue larger involving religion. By bringing up religion, it makes the issue a bigger deal than it is.

The Crucible Example #2 Elizabeth. John, with so many in the jail, more than Cheever’s help is needed now, I think. Would you favor me with this. Go to Abigail. Proctor. (his soul hardening as he senses…) What have I say to Abigail? Elizabeth. John- grant me this. You have a faulty understanding. There is a promise made in every bed- Procter. What promise? Elizabeth. Spoke or silent a promise is surely made. And she may date it now. I am sure she does- and thinks to kill me, then take my place.

The Crucible Example #2 John and Elizabeth are arguing over what Abigail means to John. He says that it was just emotional. When Elizabeth narrows the argument to a promise made in the bed, it makes it harder for John to defend.

Citations "Straw Man." Drury University, Springfield, Missouri. Web. 13 Apr. 2011. Lisle, Dr. Jason. "Logical Fallacies: Straw-Man Fallacy - Answers in Genesis." Answers in Genesis - Creation, Evolution, Christian Apologetics. Answers in Genesis, 28 Sept. 2009. Web. 13 Apr. 2011. "Exposure and Vulnerability." Web log post. All Things Wildly Considered. Blogspot, 10 Feb. 2011. Web. 13 Apr. 2011.

Citations Cont’d "Straw Man." Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. Web. 14 Apr. 2011. Christensen, Tricia. "What Is a Straw Man Argument?" WiseGEEK: Clear Answers for Common Questions. Conjecture Corporation, 6 Apr. 2011. Web. 14 Apr. 2011.