doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> March 2004 Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Conditional Approval for 802.15.1REVa] Date Submitted: [The date the document is contributed, in the format “21 May, 1999”] Source: [Tom Siep] Company [TMS Consulting] Address [Suite 100, ms 365, 1802 Pleasant Valley Dr, Garland, TX, USA, 75040] Voice:[+1 972 496 0766], FAX: [+1 469 366 1480], E-Mail:[tom.siep@ieee.org] Re: [Original] Abstract: [Request to 802 SEC for Conditional Approval] Purpose: [Invoke Procedure 10 for 802.15.1REVa] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. Tom Siep, TMS Consulting Tom Siep, TMS Consulting

Procedure 10 for 802.15REVa Letter Ballot Began March 2004 Procedure 10 for 802.15REVa Letter Ballot Began January 12, 2004 at 1800 EST Letter Ballot Ended February 13, 2004 at 2300 EST Vote talley (Yes/No/Abstain) 115/2/33 – 98% # Tech comments 4 # Unresolved Tech comments 1 – pending possible email resolution (see next slide) Estimated Start Recirculation 1 Apr 04 (10 Day) Estimated Start Sponsor Ballot 15 Apr 04 Tom Siep, TMS Consulting

doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year> doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> March 2004 Email to David Cypher Hello David, The comment resolution team has accepted and will apply all of your remedies with the exception of the last one: Start a new letter ballot that is nothing more than the following statement: "Do you approve the Bluetooth Specification 1.2 "as is" to be forwarded to IEEE 802 for approval as an IEEE Standard?“ The comment resolution team respectfully requests you to withdraw this particular comment. We believe the suggested remedy to be infeasible. Please advise if you accept this resolution and therefore can turn your "no" vote to a "yes", conditional upon acceptable application of your remaining remedies. {DAVID DECLINED TO RECIND HIS REMAINING OUTSTANDING COMMENT} Tom Siep, TMS Consulting Tom Siep, TMS Consulting

Motion within the Working Group March 2004 Motion within the Working Group The Working Group approves forwarding Draft 4 of 802.15.1REVa to the EC for Conditional Approval under the Procedure 10 rules of the LMSC Moved: Tom Siep Seconded: John Barr 39 for, 0 no, 6 abstain Tom Siep, TMS Consulting

March 2004 Motion Move to forward Draft 4 of 802.15.1REVa to the Sponsor Ballot under the Procedure 10 rules of the LMSC Moved: Heile Seconded: Upton Tom Siep, TMS Consulting