Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jiang Wu, Bihua Bie, Hui Yang, Jijun J. Xu, David L
Advertisements

Volume 70, Issue 4, Pages (May 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (May 2017)
Covalent Modification of DNA Regulates Memory Formation
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 79, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 73, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2003)
Yan-You Huang, Eric R Kandel  Neuron 
Volume 77, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2001)
NMDA Induces Long-Term Synaptic Depression and Dephosphorylation of the GluR1 Subunit of AMPA Receptors in Hippocampus  Hey-Kyoung Lee, Kimihiko Kameyama,
Masahiro Yasuda, Mark R. Mayford  Neuron 
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 60, Issue 2, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Chromatin Acetylation, Memory, and LTP Are Impaired in CBP+/− Mice
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (February 2018)
PSA–NCAM Is Required for Activity-Induced Synaptic Plasticity
Volume 39, Issue 2, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages (December 2008)
Contactin Supports Synaptic Plasticity Associated with Hippocampal Long-Term Depression but Not Potentiation  Keith K. Murai, Dinah Misner, Barbara Ranscht 
Volume 144, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Hippocampus and Entorhinal Cortex Recruit Cholinergic and NMDA Receptors Separately to Generate Hippocampal Theta Oscillations  Zhenglin Gu, Georgia M.
Volume 26, Issue 17, Pages (September 2016)
The Temporal Dynamics of Arc Expression Regulate Cognitive Flexibility
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages (February 2018)
A Distinct Role for Norepinephrine in Memory Retrieval
Enhanced Learning and Memory in Mice Lacking Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger 2
Volume 26, Issue 19, Pages (October 2016)
The Environment versus Genetics in Controlling the Contribution of MAP Kinases to Synaptic Plasticity  Shaomin Li, Xuejun Tian, Dean M. Hartley, Larry.
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (April 2002)
Dynamics of Retrieval Strategies for Remote Memories
Volume 50, Issue 5, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (December 2001)
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (January 2017)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Expression of Constitutively Active CREB Protein Facilitates the Late Phase of Long- Term Potentiation by Enhancing Synaptic Capture  Angel Barco, Juan.
An Animal Model of a Behavioral Intervention for Depression
Volume 131, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 89, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
PKA-GluA1 Coupling via AKAP5 Controls AMPA Receptor Phosphorylation and Cell- Surface Targeting during Bidirectional Homeostatic Plasticity  Graham H.
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 129, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages (October 2008)
Yanghong Meng, Yu Zhang, Zhengping Jia  Neuron 
Genetic Dissection of Presynaptic and Postsynaptic BDNF-TrkB Signaling in Synaptic Efficacy of CA3-CA1 Synapses  Pei-Yi Lin, Ege T. Kavalali, Lisa M.
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 88, Issue 5, Pages (March 1997)
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Erika D. Nelson, Ege T. Kavalali, Lisa M. Monteggia  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 1999)
Volume 116, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Social Isolation Induces Rac1-Dependent Forgetting of Social Memory
The Temporal Dynamics of Arc Expression Regulate Cognitive Flexibility
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Postsynaptic Complexin Controls AMPA Receptor Exocytosis during LTP
Presentation transcript:

Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 153-163 (January 2004) Removal of Giα1 Constraints on Adenylyl Cyclase in the Hippocampus Enhances LTP and Impairs Memory Formation  Victor V Pineda, Jaime I Athos, Hongbing Wang, Jeremy Celver, Danielle Ippolito, Guylain Boulay, Lutz Birnbaumer, Daniel R Storm  Neuron  Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 153-163 (January 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4 Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Intrahippocampal Injection of Pertussis Toxin Lowers Giα1 and Disrupts Memory for Associative-Fear Conditioning (A) Mice that received either the A protomer or B oligomer of pertussis toxin into area CA1 showed memory for passive avoidance 24 hr after training (n = 6 each, p < 0.01). The bilateral administration of whole pertussis toxin to area CA1 (n = 6, p = 1.0) but not CA3 (n = 4, p < 0.05) blocked passive avoidance memory. A single administration of saline, whole pertussis toxin (50 ng/side), the A protomer (50 ng/side), or B oligomer (50 ng/side) into bilateral targets of the hippocampus preceded training for passive avoidance as described in Experimental Procedures. Data is expressed as mean ± SEM, and p values shown are testing versus training day behavior. (B) The bilateral administration of whole pertussis toxin to area CA1 blocked contextual-conditioned memory measured 24 hr after training (mean ± SEM, n = 7, ** p <0.01). (C) The bilateral administration of whole pertussis toxin to area CA1 caused a significant decrease in Giα1 protein measured by Western analysis. The levels of G-coupling proteins were measured 1 week after pertussis toxin treatment. Extracts taken from a pool of three animals were loaded to each lane. (D) Western analysis indicated that Giα1 protein is expressed predominantly in the brain. br, brain; ht, heart; lg, lung; lv, liver; sp, spleen; kd, kidney; ts, testes. Neuron 2004 41, 153-163DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Disruption of the Giα1 Gene Increases Adenylyl Cyclase Activity in the Hippocampus (A) Targeting vector for disruption of the Giα1 gene showing insertion of the neomycin cassette into exon 3. Restriction enzyme map shows fragment size. (B) Representative Southern blots showing wild-type (+/+), heterozygous (+/−), and homozygous (−/−) genotypes. (C) Western analysis for G protein α subunits in hippocampal membranes shows no Giα1 protein expression in knockout animals and low protein expression in heterozygote littermates. (D) Adenylyl cyclase activity is increased in the hippocampus of Giα1+/− and Giα1−/− mice. Pooled hippocampal tissue isolated from littermates were prepared and assayed for membrane adenylyl cyclase activity as described in Experimental Procedures. Error is expressed as ±SD, with n = 5 for each, **p < 0.01. Neuron 2004 41, 153-163DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Disruption of the Giα1 Gene Impairs Hippocampus-Dependent Conditioned Fear Memory (A) Memory for passive avoidance training measured after 24 hr and 8 days is reduced in Giα1+/− and Giα1−/− mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (B) Memory for contextual training measured 24 hr after training is reduced in Giα1−/+ and Giα1−/− mice. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 9 +/+, 13 +/−, 7 −/−), **p < 0.01 compared to wild-type controls. Mice were trained for passive avoidance and contextual fear memory as described in Experimental Procedures. Neuron 2004 41, 153-163DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Impaired Object Recognition but Normal Spatial Memory in Giα1-Deficient Animals (A) When presented with two novel objects (A and B) during training, all genotypes (p > 0.99) showed equal preference. When one of the objects was replaced with a different object (C), Giα1+/+ (n = 14 p < 0.01) control animals showed a clear preference for the novel object. However, Giα1+/− (n = 5, p = 0.527) and Giα1−/− (n = 10, p = 0.966) mice exhibited no memory for object recognition. p values relative to training behavior. (B) Target acquisition in the hidden platform version of the Morris water maze was similar in Giα1−/−, Giα1+/−, and Giα1+/+ mice (n = 8, 9, and 7, respectively). (C) Probe test reveals normal spatial memory in Giα1−/− and Giα1+/− animals compared to wild-type littermates (p ≥ 0.996 between genotypes, target quadrant versus other quadrants p ≤ 0.05 for all genotypes). Neuron 2004 41, 153-163DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Disruption of the Gene for Giα1 Does Not Affect Memory for Auditory Cued Conditioning or Extinction of Cued Memory (A) Wild-type as well as Giα1–/+ and Giα1−/− mice showed memory for auditory cued conditioning measured 24 hr after training. (B) Cued memory extinction was normal in Giα1−/− mice. After training for cued conditioning, mice were exposed to the conditioning tone once a day for 6 days without a paired shock and freezing behavior was recorded. Mice were trained for auditory cued learning as described in Experimental Procedures. Neuron 2004 41, 153-163DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Giα1 Antisense Treatment In Vivo Disrupts Contextual Memory (A) Confocal microscopy shows uptake of Cy3-conjugated Giα1 antisense oligonucleotides (red) in area CA1 of the hippocampus (green-syto 13). Labeled oligonucleotide was injected into area CA1 as described in Experimental Procedures. (B) Giα1 antisense treatment of cultured hippocampal neurons increased intracellular cAMP relative to neurons treated with the scrambled oligonucleotide (dODN) control (*p < 0.05). Intracellular cAMP was measured 24 hr after treatment of neurons with oligonucleotides as described in Experimental Procedures. (C) Bilateral administration of Giα1 antisense oligonucleotide into area CA1 decreased Giα1 protein in the dorsal hippocampus. Antisense oligonucleotide (asODN) or scrambled oligonucleotide control (dODN) was bilaterally administered to area CA1. After 4 days, Giα1 protein levels were quantified by Western analysis as described in Experimental Procedures. The graph shows a decrease of about 50% in dorsal hippocampus Giα1 levels after asODN treatment (n = 7) compared to dODN-injected controls (n = 8) (*p < 0.05). (D) Bilateral administration of Giα1 antisense oligonucleotide into Area CA1 decreased context-conditioned memory measured 24 hr after training. Antisense oligonucleotide (asODN, n = 8) or scrambled oligonucleotide control (dODN, n = 7) (*p < 0.05) were bilaterally administered to area CA1 4 days before training. Mean ± SEM for all treatment parameters. Neuron 2004 41, 153-163DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Giα1+/− and Giα1−/− Mice Exhibit Normal Basal Synaptic Transmission but Elevated LTP in Area CA1 of the Hippocampus (A) CA1 paired-pulse facilitation is normal in Giα1−/+ and Giα1−/− slices compared to wild-type littermate controls. (B) Ratio of fEPSP slope to fiber volley amplitude is indistinguishable between Giα1−/+, Giα1−/−, and wild-type littermate control slices. (C) A single 100 hz tetanic stimulus at t = 0 induced E-LTP in hippocampal slices from wild-type mice but elicited L-LTP in hippocampal slices from Giα1−/+ and Giα1−/− mice. LTP at the Schaffer collateral CA1 synapse was measured as described in Experimental Procedures. Neuron 2004 41, 153-163DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Enhanced LTP in Giα1−/− Slices Was Blocked by PKA and Cycloheximide (A) A single 100 hz train failed to elicit L-LTP in area CA1 of Giα1−/− slices in the presence of 250 nM KT5720 (n = 4) and 60 μM cycloheximide (n = 4). (B) Administration of 2 μM forskolin with a single 100 hz tetanic stimulus generated enhanced LTP in hippocampal slices from wild-type mice. Two μM forskolin stimulates adenylyl cyclase activity in the hippocampus approximately 2-fold but is not in itself sufficient to generate LTP. Neuron 2004 41, 153-163DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00813-4) Copyright © 2004 Cell Press Terms and Conditions