Ozone in the Tri Cities August 2018.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Program in Clark County Presentation to Air Quality Forum May 10, 2005.
Advertisements

REDUCTION OF HIGHLY REACTIVE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS & VARIABLE EMISSIONS IN HOUSTON/GALVESTON: MONITORING, MODELING, MEASURING, RULEMAKING David Allen.
Update: National Ambient Air Quality Standards Association of California Airports September 15, 2010 Phil DeVita.
Kansas City Air Quality, Emissions, and Strategies Douglas Watson Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation January 10, 2006.
Transportation and Air Quality in the Treasure Valley.
Ozone in Colorado: Issues and Reduction Strategies Presentation to the Colorado Environmental Health Association October 2,
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
DEP’s Air Regulatory Update
Solutions: Preventing and Reducing Air Pollution
ADEQ Uses of ICF Modeling Analysis Tony Davis, Branch Manager – Air Planning Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Criteria Pollutant Modeling Analysis.
How Ozone is Regulated under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Air Quality Challenges In South Central Texas Issues and Demand to Infrastructure in the Eagle Ford Region Eagle Ford Consortium Peter Bella, Natural Resources.
1 CE Air Pollution Control Regulations and Philosophies Jeff Kuo, Ph.D., P.E.
Air Quality Beyond Ozone and PM2.5 Sheila Holman North Carolina Division of Air Quality 6 th Annual Unifour Air Quality Conference June 15, 2012.
Commanding Clean Air The Clean Air Act of 1970 as a Model for U.S. Environmental Policy Clean Air Act.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
Presentation to Air & Waste Management Association Louisiana Section by Mike D. McDaniel, Ph.D. Executive Director October 29, 2014 MMCD 29OCT14 INNOVATIVE.
Update on EPA Oil and Gas Activities Greg Green, Outreach and Information Division, OAQPS.
Ozone Regulation under the Clean Air Act Darcy J. Anderson AZ Dept. of Environmental Quality.
Implications of the 2008 Ozone Standard Changes Deanna L. Duram, P.E., C.M. August 7, 2008 trinityconsultants.com.
Air Quality Management China City Mobilization Workshop Joseph Paisie USEPA Beijing, China.
Keeping Tomorrow’s Air Clean: Conforming Transportation Plans with Air Quality Attainment Efforts San Joaquin Valley Transportation Planning Agencies Kern.
Ozone and Nitrogen Concerns in NM WRAP Ozone and NOx in the West November 11, 2009.
Energy Law, Fall 2010 Natashia Holmes
Presentation for Air Quality Coalitions The 2015 Proposed Ozone Standard.
Early Action Compacts Presented by Karen Borel EPA Region 4 March 25, 2003.
Sound solutions delivered uncommonly well Understanding the Permitting Impacts of the Proposed Ozone NAAQS Pine Mountain, GA ♦ August 20, 2015 Courtney.
1 PM2.5 Redesignation Request for the Metropolitan Washington,D.C. Region Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington COG.
National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Current Status of Air Quality Laura Boothe North Carolina Division of Air Quality MCIC Workshops March 2012.
Clean Air Act  The Federal Clean Air Act, passed in 1970 and last amended in 1990, forms the basis for the national air pollution control effort.
Final Clean Air Fine Particle Implementation Rule Briefing for NTAA EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards April 17, 2007.
Initial task : examine the impacts air pollution governance in Houston in the transportation sector What is the structure of air pollution governance.
Template Summary of FY12-13 Work Plan Technical Activities Sue Kemball-Cook and Greg Yarwood NETAC Policy Committee Meeting April 22, 2014.
1 Special Information Session on USEPA’s Carbon Rules & Clean Air Act Section 111 North Carolina Division of Air Quality Special Information Session on.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
November 15, Clean Air Act Framework National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) set public health goals Planning process considers science,
Florida Department of Environmental Protection National Ambient Air Quality Standards being Strengthened --Implications for Northeast Florida-- Larry George.
Garry Kaufman Air Pollution Control Division.  Background on Oil and Gas Air Regulation in Colorado  Basis for Additional Air Quality Requirements for.
Proposed Research Plan Fiscal Year Today’s Proposed Action Approve Fiscal Year Research Plan Allocate $6 million in four research.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
Imperial County 2013 State Implementation Plan for the Hour PM2.5 Moderate Non-attainment Area December 2, 20141, 2014.
Jerry Beasley, Ph.D., P.E. Mississippi Dept. of Environmental Quality MMA Environmental & Safety Conference and Expo October 16, 2015.
New Ozone NAAQS Impacts: What Happens Next with a Lower O3 Standard? Nonattainment Designation and Industry’s Opportunity to Participate New Ozone NAAQS.
Update on the 2015 Ozone Standard Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Environmental Trade Fair May 3, 2016.
1 Long Range Transport of Air Pollution Air pollution can travel hundreds of miles and cause multiple health and environmental problems on regional or.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Environmental Quality Board May 16, 2007

Assessment of International Transport and Improved Ozone Air Quality
State of the Chemical Industry & Legislative Priorities
Environmental Protection Agency
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
PM 2.5 Attainment Re-designation Approvals
Byeong-Uk Kim and Jim Boylan Planning and Support Program
High ozone levels in the Tri Cities
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
High ozone levels in the Tri Cities
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Planning to Achieve the 8-Hour Ozone Standard
Major New Source Review (NSR) Part 2
CEQA Guidelines & Thresholds Update
PM2.5 NSR and Designations
Ozone in the Tri Cities July 2018.
High ozone levels in the Tri Cities
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Air Toxics Program Laura McKelvey.
DOGM Collaborative Meeting
Diagnostic and Operational Evaluation of 2002 and 2005 Estimated 8-hr Ozone to Support Model Attainment Demonstrations Kirk Baker Donna Kenski Lake Michigan.
Presentation transcript:

Ozone in the Tri Cities August 2018

Smog – Ground Level Ozone

Ozone in the Tri Cities - a brief history: 2013 – AirPact (model) showed potential for high ozone in Kennewick 2014 – Temporary Monitor on Kellogg; mobile monitoring 2015 – Permanent Monitor installed at BCAA offices; additional mobile monitoring 2015 – National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Ozone reduced to 70 ppb from 75 ppb 2016 – Precursor Study 2017 – Precursor Study Completed; Kennewick ozone values continue to be of concern 2018 – Community outreach

Areas of the country projected to have ozone issues: The Tri Cities is not on this map!

Local geography is part of the situation:

Area of interest: Franklin County Dept. of Ecology Benton County Nuclear Program Industrial Unit Eastern Regional Office Benton County Walla Walla County Benton Clean Air Agency

Where does Ozone come from?

Sources of NOx

Sources of Volatile Organic Compounds

August 13, 2015 (77 ppb)

Average of three years’ fourth highest 8-hour daily average

Ozone Design Value Federal standards require the O3 “Design Value” to be less than 70ppb. DV calculated as the average of the annual fourth highest maximum daily 8-hour average(MDA8). Kennewick O3 4th high MDA8, ppb # of days > 70 ppb 2015 75 5 2016 68 2 2017 74 9 Latest DV 72 If ozone levels exceed Federal standards, the entire community has to bear the health consequences and financial burden of reducing ozone. This also makes it more difficult for industries to expand.

When does O3 build up? Almost guaranteed in right conditions Light north winds on hot days Suggest constant & not sporadic precursor sources Northerly flow dams up against Horse Heaven Hills, allowing O3 to “cook”

Whodunnit? Tri Cities Ozone Precursor Study (TCOPS) StoryMap http://www.ecology.wa.gov/Research- Data/Scientific-reports/Air-quality-studies Ecology spent about $150K to contract with WSU and RJ Lee Group Inc to conduct 3 weeks of intensive field measurements in summer 2016, to understand O3 precursor sources in the Tri Cities.

How do you know vehicles contribute? Emissions inventory TCOPS: NOx spikes coincide with rush hour Weekday/ weekend effect ~ 17% reduction in NOx and VOC emissions Almost entirely driven by mobile sources Weekend O3 ~ 3.5ppb less under similar conditions

Main TCOPS findings No single “smoking gun”. Airshed not VOC or NOx limited. Moderate NOx and VOC cuts for now Very crude estimate: 30% reduction  -5ppb O3. Modeling study needed to nail down specifics.

Timeline Oct. 1, 2015 EPA finalizes 2015 Ozone NAAQS Oct. 1, 2016 October submission requested that Kennewick be declared “unclassifiable” as there are insufficient data to do otherwise Oct. 1, 2017 EPA finalizes designations based on 2014-2016 DVs Kennewick considered unclassifiable (this is good news) May 2017 and forward If monitor readings continue to exceed the standard, there is potential that the area represented by the Kennewick monitor could be declared in non-attainment. (Benton, Franklin, Walla Walla) 2018 Community Outreach to begin to consider ramifications of non attainment and how we might develop solutions Local Entities explore strategies: Benton Franklin Council of Governments, Benton Clean Air, Department of Ecology, Benton Franklin Transit, Benton Franklin Health Department Oct. 1, 2020 Ozone standard evaluated for revision Oct. 1, 2022 (possible) Non-attainment designation

Affected Communities Regulated Sources Stationary sources of air pollution currently in a permit program: gas stations autobodies food processing chemical plants fertilizer plants Effects of Non-Attainment New Source Review Transportation Infrastructure Transportation projects and planning Transportation Conformity Economic Development Impact on manufacturing/production establishment and expansion Citizens Health impacts of ozone Sensitive populations most affected (elderly, young, cardiovascular conditions, allergies) General Quality of Life Transportation Mobile sources –passenger vehicles, trucking, rail shipping, barge/river shipping Transit Trip management resources Many potential impacts; many potential solutions; community effort – thank you for being here this morning.

Benton Clean Air Agency 526 South Steptoe Street Kennewick, WA 99336 509-783-1304 www.bentoncleanair.org Robin Bresley Priddy, PE

Non Attainment New Source Review Would apply to new or reconstructed sources of NOx and VOC Lowest Achievable Emissions Rate (LAER) The term "lowest achievable emission rate" means for any source, that rate of emissions which reflects: the most stringent emission limitation which is contained in the implementation plan of any State for such class or category of source, unless the owner or operator of the proposed source demonstrates that such limitations are not achievable, or the most stringent emission limitation which is achieved in practice by such class or category of source, whichever is more stringent.  Best Available Control Technology (BACT) is the current standard – it is much more flexible Result of structured analysis on a case by case basis Energy consumption, total source emission, regional environmental impact, and economic costs are taken into account.