Histogram-Based Density Discovery in Establishing Road Connectivity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CarTorrent ® : Cars get to have fun too Kevin C. Lee and Ian S. Yap TA: Uichin Lee Prof Mario Gerla.
Advertisements

Delay bounded Routing in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks Antonios Skordylis Niki Trigoni MobiHoc 2008 Slides by Alex Papadimitriou.
CSLI 5350G - Pervasive and Mobile Computing Week 3 - Paper Presentation “RPB-MD: Providing robust message dissemination for vehicular ad hoc networks”
A Mobile Infrastructure Based VANET Routing Protocol in the Urban Environment School of Electronics Engineering and Computer Science, PKU, Beijing, China.
An Analysis of the Optimum Node Density for Ad hoc Mobile Networks Elizabeth M. Royer, P. Michael Melliar-Smith and Louise E. Moser Presented by Aki Happonen.
Real Time Flow Handoff in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks using Mobility Prediction William Su Mario Gerla Comp Science Dept, UCLA.
An Efficient and Scalable Approach to CNN Queries in a Road Network Hyung-Ju Cho and Chin-Wan Chung Dept. of EECS, KAIST VLDB 2005.
1 Energy-Efficient localization for networks of underwater drifters Diba Mirza Curt Schurgers Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering.
Neighborhood Changing Rate: A Unifying Parameter to Characterize and Evaluate Data Dissemination Scenarios Institut Eurécom † Department of Mobile Communications.
Department of Computer Engineering Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey
Empirical Analysis of Transmission Power Control Algorithms for Wireless Sensor Networks CENTS Retreat – May 26, 2005 Jaein Jeong (1), David Culler (1),
CS401 presentation1 Effective Replica Allocation in Ad Hoc Networks for Improving Data Accessibility Takahiro Hara Presented by Mingsheng Peng (Proc. IEEE.
Network Coding vs. Erasure Coding: Reliable Multicast in MANETs Atsushi Fujimura*, Soon Y. Oh, and Mario Gerla *NEC Corporation University of California,
Design of Cooperative Vehicle Safety Systems Based on Tight Coupling of Communication, Computing and Physical Vehicle Dynamics Yaser P. Fallah, ChingLing.
ENHANCING AND EVALUATION OF AD-HOC ROUTING PROTOCOLS IN VANET.
CCH: Cognitive Channel Hopping in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Brian Sung Chul Choi, Hyungjune Im, Kevin C. Lee, and Mario Gerla UCLA Computer Science Department.
Geographic Routing in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETS) Kevin C. Lee Computer Science Department University of California, Los Angeles Chair – Professor.
VIRTUAL ROUTER Kien A. Hua Data Systems Lab School of EECS University of Central Florida.
Department of Computer Science City University of Hong Kong Department of Computer Science City University of Hong Kong 1 A Statistics-Based Sensor Selection.
Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and David H.C. Du Dept. of.
DISCERN: Cooperative Whitespace Scanning in Practical Environments Tarun Bansal, Bo Chen and Prasun Sinha Ohio State Univeristy.
ENERGY-EFFICIENT FORWARDING STRATEGIES FOR GEOGRAPHIC ROUTING in LOSSY WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS Presented by Prasad D. Karnik.
VAPR: Void Aware Pressure Routing for Underwater Sensor Networks
A study of Intelligent Adaptive beaconing approaches on VANET Proposal Presentation Chayanin Thaina Advisor : Dr.Kultida Rojviboonchai.
Connectivity-Aware Routing (CAR) in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Valery Naumov & Thomas R. Gross ETH Zurich, Switzerland IEEE INFOCOM 2007.
Hop State Prediction Method using Distance Differential of RSSI on VANET 指導教授:許子衡 教授 學 生:董藝興 學生 1.
GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for Wireless Networks EECS 600 Advanced Network Research, Spring 2005 Shudong Jin February 14, 2005.
APL: Autonomous Passive Localization for Wireless Sensors Deployed in Road Networks IEEE INFOCOM 2008, Phoenix, AZ, USA Jaehoon Jeong, Shuo Guo, Tian He.
SenProbe: Path Capacity Estimation in Wireless Sensor Networks Tony Sun, Ling-Jyh Chen, Guang Yang M. Y. Sanadidi, Mario Gerla.
1 TBD: Trajectory-Based Data Forwarding for Light-Traffic Vehicular Networks IEEE ICDCS’09, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Jaehoon Jeong, Shuo Gu, Yu Gu, Tian.
Performance Evaluation of Mobile Hotspots in Densely Deployed WLAN Environments Presented by Li Wen Fang Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.
UCLA ENGINEERING Computer Science RobustGeo: a Disruption-Tolerant Geo-routing Protocol Ruolin Fan, Yu-Ting Yu *, Mario Gerla UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Network Connectivity of VANETs in Urban Areas Wantanee Viriyasitavat, Ozan K. Tonguz, Fan Bai IEEE communications society conference on sensor, mesh and.
Energy-Efficient Randomized Switching for Maximizing Lifetime in Tree- Based Wireless Sensor Networks Sk Kajal Arefin Imon, Adnan Khan, Mario Di Francesco,
U of Minnesota DIWANS'061 Energy-Aware Scheduling with Quality of Surveillance Guarantee in Wireless Sensor Networks Jaehoon Jeong, Sarah Sharafkandi and.
2010 IEEE Fifth International Conference on networking, Architecture and Storage (NAS), pp , 2010 作者: Filip Cuckov and Min Song 指導教授:許子衡 教授 報告學生:馬敏修.
Copyright © 2002 OPNET Technologies, Inc. 1 Random Waypoint Mobility Model Empirical Analysis of the Mobility Factor for the Random Waypoint Model 1542.
Performance Comparison of Ad Hoc Network Routing Protocols Presented by Venkata Suresh Tamminiedi Computer Science Department Georgia State University.
VADD: Vehicle-Assisted Data Delivery in Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Zhao, J.; Cao, G. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY, 鄭宇辰
Connectivity-Aware Routing (CAR) in Vehicular Ad Hoc Network Valery Naumov, and Thomas R. Gross Proceedings of IEEE 26 th International Conference on Computer.
Matter, Measurement, and Problem Solving. Measurement and Significant Figures Tro: Chemistry: A Molecular Approach, 2/e.
Mingze Zhang, Mun Choon Chan and A. L. Ananda School of Computing
Location of mobile devices in the Ad Hoc Network
Author:Zarei.M.;Faez.K. ;Nya.J.M.
2010 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (GLOBECOM 2010)
Unsupervised Learning: Clustering
Unsupervised Learning: Clustering
Universal Opportunistic Routing Scheme using Network Coding
Jérôme Härri, Fethi Filali, Christian Bonnet
Dynamic Fine-Grained Localization in Ad-Hoc Networks of Sensors
A paper on Join Synopses for Approximate Query Answering
Controlling the Cost of Reliability in Peer-to-Peer Overlays
By Ioannis Chatzigiannakis, Elena Kaltsa, Sotiris Nikoletseas
任課教授:陳朝鈞 教授 學生:王志嘉、馬敏修
Vehicular Communication Technology
Highway Vehicular Delay Tolerant Networks: Information Propagation Speed Properties Emmanuel Baccelli, Philippe Jacquet, Bernard Mans, and Georgios Rodolakis.
Efficient Evaluation of k-NN Queries Using Spatial Mashups
Why Social Graphs Are Different Communities Finding Triangles
Totally Disjoint Multipath Routing in Multihop Wireless Networks Sonia Waharte and Raoef Boutaba Presented by: Anthony Calce.
How Science works: Taking measurements.
Performance Comparison of Tarry and Awerbuch Algorithms
Kevin Lee & Adam Piechowicz 10/10/2009
Effective Replica Allocation
Data Mining (and machine learning)
Seam Carving Project 1a due at midnight tonight.
How Science works: Taking measurements.
Minimizing the Aggregate Movements for Interval Coverage
Motion-Aware Routing in Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks
Dhruv Gupta EEC 273 class project Prof. Chen-Nee Chuah
Speaker : Lee Heon-Jong
Presentation transcript:

Histogram-Based Density Discovery in Establishing Road Connectivity Kevin Lee, Jiajie Zhu, Jih Chung Fan, Mario Gerla University of California, Los Angeles VNC, 10/28/09

Why Do We Need Density? Using density information to avoid traps in VANET What is the relationship between density and connectivity? D ? What is a good density algorithm that allows us to establish accurate connectivity of the road? S Nodes bunched up at the intersection => Can’t assume uniform density Credit: M. Fiore and J. H¨arri, ACM MobiHoc 2008

Histogram-Based Density Discovery Algorithm Break up the roads into segments Nodes within a segment keep track of density in that segment in P2P fashion Nodes keep a histogram of density Ni for other segments by broadcast Road is connected if Get the density from node whose distance is closest to the segment center just because nodes at the segment center know better the density of the road segment 1 2 1 2 1 2 Segment center 1 2 ? 1 2 1 2 1 2

Advantages of Histogram-Based Approach Scalable E.g. 1500-meter road, 250-meter segment length The number of segments is 6 (1500/250) P2P can only store 6 cars, not enough More accurate Each segment size is smaller than the road length Connectivity correlates better with segment density than road density Need a slide on [Seg/Radio Range] NOT CONNECTED

Why Optimal Segment Size? No fluctuation of density due to influx of cars A histogram of segment densities correlates well with road connectivity Note that Optimal Segment Size is NOT necessarily the radio range Imagine in the extreme case where a car’s radio range covers multiple segments. Every time a car moves in and out, that segment’s density has to be updated. This kind of frequent update does not make road connectivity any more accurate.

Density Accuracy Intuition: Given a car’s Spd and convergence time Conv, it should stay within the segment (thus not change the density of a segment) SegSizeopt >= Conv * Spd The convergence time is the time that a car knows the density of ALL segments

Convergence Time Convergence time does NOT vary with segment size Convergence time varies with either traffic or road length RL 900m RL 1000m

Minimum Segment Size Extrapolate the relationship between road length and convergence, density and convergence Use [SegSizeopt >= Conv * Spd] to obtain relationship between SegSizeopt, road length, and density

Connectivity Accuracy Places upperbound on the optimal segment size Definition: the number of runs that are identified correctly/total number of runs 1,000 runs 300 runs are connected, 270 are identified correctly 700 runs are not, 650 are identified correctly 92% accurate ((270+650)/1000) 30 false negatives 50 false positives As the road length approaches to the road length, it becomes peer to peer. Connectivity accuracy actually decreases For some segment size x False negatives: not connected when in fact it is False positive: connected when in fact it is not Note that connectivity accuracy is the majority opinion of the nodes on the road segment

Segment Size vs. Connectivity Accuracy Connectivity accuracy drops when segment size increases Periodic rise and drop due to last segment not evenly divisible by segment size RL 900m RL 1000m Radio range can cover despite there is no car in the last segment. May indicate that the road is disconnected when in fact it is not (false negatives). The false negatives increase until the last segment size is greater than the radio range. Maximum segment size is before the first drop in connectivity accuracy because connectivity generally drops SegSizemax = 325m SegSizemax = 375m

Optimal Segment Size For each road length and density, find SegSizemin and SegSizemax Average is SegSizeopt Use average for sensitivity. Can also use SegSizemax.

Evaluation Connectivity accuracy between P2P and histogram- based approach Road Percentage Connectivity (RPC) vs. Connectivity Accuracy (CA) If road is connected, CA = RPC If road is not, CA = 1 – RPC Broadcast overhead between P2P and histogram- based approach 1,000 traces from VanetMobiSim RPC, road percentage connectivity, tells how many percentages of the cars say the road is connected. If the road is actually connected, it is RPC. If it not, it is 1- RPC. The mobility traces were generated by VanetMobiSim [27], an open source and freely available realistic vehicular traffic generator for network simulators.

Connectivity Accuracy between P2P and Histogram P2P underperforms when density is low This is due to sparse density that models cluster behavior

Broadcast Overhead between P2P and Histogram Broadcast/node/sec P2P has scalability issue as it needs to keep track of unique cars

Conclusion Systematic way to obtain optimal SegSize Evaluation shows histogram-based scheme’s scalability