Protein Turnover: A CHIP Programmed for Proteolysis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
From the Cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation By: Erica Zakhem.
Advertisements

Chap. 3 Problem 1 See Fig. 3.1a & 3.2 for basic information about structure classifications. More on the definitions of primary, secondary, tertiary, and.
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 13, Issue 13, Pages R514-R516 (July 2003)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages R238-R241 (March 2008)
Interactions between Autophagy Receptors and Ubiquitin-like Proteins Form the Molecular Basis for Selective Autophagy  Vladimir Rogov, Volker Dötsch,
The Cbl Family and Other Ubiquitin Ligases
Biology of common β receptor–signaling cytokines
Ubiquitination Accomplished: E1 and E2 Enzymes Were Not Necessary
Translational Homeostasis via eIF4E and 4E-BP1
Heat shock protein 90 as a molecular target for cancer therapeutics
Principle of protein folding in the cellular environment
Association study of androgen signaling pathway genes in polycystic ovary syndrome  Aline Ketefian, M.D., Michelle R. Jones, Ph.D., Ronald M. Krauss, M.D.,
DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine
Schematic diagram of ubiquitin and SUMO modification pathways
GroEL–Substrate Interactions
Shogo Ito, Young Hun Song, Takato Imaizumi  Molecular Plant 
hsp90: Twist and Fold Cell
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages (February 2012)
ATPase and GTPase Tangos Drive Intracellular Protein Transport
Hsp90: Breaking the Symmetry
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Cystic Fibrosis as a Disease of Misprocessing of the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Glycoprotein  John R. Riordan  The American Journal.
Targeted Protein Degradation: from Chemical Biology to Drug Discovery
Crawling and Wiggling on DNA
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Xiang Chen, Kylie J. Walters  Molecular Cell 
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Cellular Handling of Protein Aggregates by Disaggregation Machines
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages R338-R345 (May 2011)
Volume 134, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Alexander Buchberger, Bernd Bukau, Thomas Sommer  Molecular Cell 
Johannes van den Boom, Hemmo Meyer  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of protein phosphatase-1
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
PCNA, the Maestro of the Replication Fork
Protein Translocons Cell
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Functional Diversity and Regulation of Different Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase (IRAK) Family Members  Sophie Janssens, Rudi Beyaert  Molecular.
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Ubiquitinated Proteins Activate the Proteasome by Binding to Usp14/Ubp6, which Causes 20S Gate Opening  Andreas Peth, Henrike C. Besche, Alfred L. Goldberg 
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Allosteric Regulation of Hsp70 Chaperones by a Proline Switch
Diverse Pore Loops of the AAA+ ClpX Machine Mediate Unassisted and Adaptor- Dependent Recognition of ssrA-Tagged Substrates  Andreas Martin, Tania A. Baker,
Volume 92, Issue 3, Pages (February 1998)
Gymnastics of Molecular Chaperones
GroEL–Substrate Interactions
The Expanding Cosmos of Nuclear Receptor Coactivators
The substrate-binding ATPase cycle of Hsp90 (Chadli et al
Cryptochromes: Tail-ored for Distinct Functions
The swinging lever-arm hypothesis of muscle contraction
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages R238-R241 (March 2008)
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Cooperation of a ubiquitin domain protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase during chaperone/proteasome coupling  Jens Demand, Simon Alberti, Cam Patterson,
Sculpting the Proteome with AAA+ Proteases and Disassembly Machines
The Ran GTPase: Theme and Variations
Volume 113, Issue 3, Pages (August 2017)
Back to the Future with Ubiquitin
Functional Diversity and Regulation of Different Interleukin-1 Receptor-Associated Kinase (IRAK) Family Members  Sophie Janssens, Rudi Beyaert  Molecular.
Protein regulation: Tag wrestling with relatives of ubiquitin
Mike O'Donnell, David Jeruzalmi, John Kuriyan  Current Biology 
The Conformational Dynamics of the Mitochondrial Hsp70 Chaperone
Design Principles of Protein Biosynthesis-Coupled Quality Control
Yang Cang-Jin , Zhang Chi , Lu Yang-Ning , Jin Jia-Qi , Wang Xue-Lu  
DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine
Actin Nucleation: Putting the Brakes on Arp2/3
The Cbl Family and Other Ubiquitin Ligases
Update on glucocorticoid action and resistance
Presentation transcript:

Protein Turnover: A CHIP Programmed for Proteolysis T. Wiederkehr, B. Bukau, A. Buchberger  Current Biology  Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages R26-R28 (January 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00644-3

Fig. 1 Domain organization of Bag-1 and CHIP. Protein motifs mediating the interaction of different Bag-1 isoforms and CHIP with molecular chaperones (Hsp70, Hsp90) and the 26S proteasome (26S) are indicated by coloured boxes. UBL domain, blue; BAG domain, red; TPR domain, yellow; U-box, green. Current Biology 2002 12, R26-R28DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00644-3)

Fig. 2 Modulation of the Hsp70 chaperone cycle by Bag-1 and CHIP. Hsp70 (dark blue, ATPase domain; light blue, substrate-binding domain) interacts with non-native substrates in a low-affinity ATP conformation (substrate binding domain open) or a high-affinity ADP conformation (substrate binding domain closed). Substrates are locked in the ADP conformation, and thereby shielded from aggregation, by rapid, Hsp40-stimulated ATP hydrolysis. Subsequent nucleotide exchange recycles Hsp70 to the ATP state and leads to substrate release, enabling substrates to fold to their native conformation [2]. At low concentrations, free Bag-1 accelerates nucleotide exchange via its BAG domain in a manner productive for substrate folding [10] (right cycle). In contrast, nucleotide exchange and substrate release stimulated by Bag-1 bound to the 26 S proteasome via its UBL domain is proposed to mediate efficient substrate degradation [5,17] (left cycle). For simplicity, substrate ubiquitination is not shown. The mechanism of negative regulation by CHIP is not known in detail. CHIP binds to the carboxy-terminal region of Hsp70 via its TPR domain and inhibits Hsp40-stimulated ATP hydrolysis [11], thereby probably interfering with tight substrate binding. Bag-1 and CHIP domains are colour-coded according to Fig. 1. (Electron microscopic picture of the 26 S proteasome kindly provided by W. Baumeister.) Current Biology 2002 12, R26-R28DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00644-3)

Fig. 3 Re-modelling of chaperone–glucocorticoid receptor (GR) complexes by CHIP. Ordered, nucleotide-dependent interactions of Hsp70, Hsp90 and the co-chaperones Hop and p23 with folding competent GR molecules are necessary for hormone (H)-induced folding of GR (top; reviewed in [20]). Alternatively, CHIP binding via its TPR domains to Hsp70 and/or Hsp90 induces dissociation of p23 and Hop from the chaperone–GR complex. Specific ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2s) are recruited to the U-box of CHIP and catalyze the attachment of ubiquitin (Ub) chains to GR (bottom). Current Biology 2002 12, R26-R28DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00644-3)