Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Simeprevir in Genotype 1 (Viral Relapsers) PROMISE Trial Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Forns X, et al. Gastroenterology.
Advertisements

Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin in GT 1-6 (Flat versus Weight-Based Ribavirin Dosing) WINR Study Phase 3 Treatment.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 REALIZE (Study 216) Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir in Treatment Naïve GT-1 ADVANCE (Study 108) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Jacobson IM, et. al. N Engl J Med.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2a versus Interferon alfa-2a Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Zeuzem S, et al. N Engl J.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study PEG alfa-2a + RBV versus PEG alfa-2a versus INF + RBV APRICOT STUDY Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV and HIV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + RBV vs. Peginterferon alfa-2a + RBV IDEAL STUDY Phase 3, Treatment Naïve Treatment Naïve,
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin versus Interferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Manns.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa -2a+/- Ribavirin versus Interferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study WINR Study Flat versus Weight-Based Ribavirin Dosing Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Jacobson IM, et. al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Interferon alfa-2b +/- Ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV McHutchison JG, et al.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir in Treatment Experienced RESPOND-2 Phase 3 Treatment Experienced Bacon BR, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Telaprevir BID versus q8 in Treatment Naïve GT-1 OPTIMIZE (Study C211) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve Buti M, et al. Gastroenterology.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Peginterferon alfa-2b + Ribavirin in Blacks & Non-Hispanic Whites Phase 3 Treatment Naïve, Chronic HCV Muir AJ,
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Boceprevir with PEG + RBV in Genotype 1 SPRINT-1 Phase 2 Treatment Naïve Kwo PY, et al. Lancet. 2010;376:
Date of download: 7/10/2016 From: Four-Week Direct-Acting Antiviral Regimens in Noncirrhotic Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection: An Open-Label,
Date of download: 9/19/2016 From: Pathogenesis, Natural History, Treatment, and Prevention of Hepatitis C Ann Intern Med. 2000;132(4): doi: /
Phase 3 Treatment Experienced
BACKGROUND MATERIALS & METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
Which patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C can benefit from prolonged treatment with the ‘accordion’ regimen?  Patrick Marcellin, E. Jenny Heathcote,
Hisashi Moriguchi, Makoto Kobayashi, Raymond T. Chung, Chifumi Sato 
Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy: Changing the Rules of Duration
Boceprevir in Treatment Naive SPRINT-2
Volume 131, Issue 2, Pages (August 2006)
Covering the Cover Gastroenterology
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (November 2015)
New Hepatitis C Therapies: The Toolbox, Strategies, and Challenges
Hepatitis C and renal disease: an update 1
Virological tools to diagnose and monitor hepatitis C virus infection
Volume 139, Issue 1, Pages e18 (July 2010)
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2012)
Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis
Daclatasvir + Peg/RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 4 COMMAND-4 Study
Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2
Hepatitis B infection in heart transplant recipients
GI clinical research 2002–2003: the year in review
Volume 155, Issue 5, Pages e2 (November 2018)
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2009)
Treatment of hepatitis C
Volume 152, Issue 1, Pages e4 (January 2017)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages e2 (October 2010)
Acute hepatitis C: Current status and remaining challenges
Volume 130, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
The Combination of Simeprevir and Sofosbuvir Is More Effective Than That of Peginterferon, Ribavirin, and Sofosbuvir for Patients With Hepatitis C–Related.
William K. Fackler, Tina M. Ours, Michael F. Vaezi, Joel E. Richter 
New HCV therapies on the horizon
Volume 142, Issue 6, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 138, Issue 7, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2010)
Rafael Esteban, Maria Buti  Gastroenterology 
Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy: Changing the Rules of Duration
Volume 140, Issue 7, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 137, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages (October 2002)
Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages e5 (September 2012)
Hepatitis C treatment in patients with kidney disease
This Month in Gastroenterology
Volume 132, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 122, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Telaprevir in Treatment Experienced GT-1 PROVE3
Meta-analysis Shows Extended Therapy Improves Response of Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 1 Infection  Harald Farnik, Christian M. Lange,
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2010)
Universal Sustained Viral Response to the Combination of Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir and Dasabuvir with/without Ribavirin in Patients on Hemodialysis.
Volume 147, Issue 6, Pages (December 2014)
Hisashi Moriguchi, Makoto Kobayashi, Raymond T. Chung, Chifumi Sato 
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Telaprevir + Peginterferon + Ribavirin for GT1 PROVE1 Study
The Results of Phase III Clinical Trials With Telaprevir and Boceprevir Presented at the Liver Meeting 2010: A New Standard of Care for Hepatitis C Virus.
Induction Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2b in Combination With Ribavirin in Patients With Genotypes 1 and 4 Chronic Hepatitis C: A Prospective, Randomized,
Presentation transcript:

Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages 1061-1069 (October 2002) Adherence to combination therapy enhances sustained response in genotype-1– infected patients with chronic hepatitis C  John G. McHutchison, Michael Manns, Keyur Patel, Thierry Poynard, Karen L. Lindsay, Christian Trepo, Jules Dienstag, William M. Lee, Carmen Mak, Jean–Jacques Garaud, Janice K. Albrecht  Gastroenterology  Volume 123, Issue 4, Pages 1061-1069 (October 2002) DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.35950 Copyright © 2002 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the 4 studies performed with regimens of interferon α-2b or peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin,3,4,7 and peginterferon α-2b or interferon α-2b alone.10 Asterisks indicate the groups of patients where adherence was evaluated from pharmacy records, pill counts, and patient diaries. For patients receiving interferon α-2b plus ribavirin, we evaluated adherence in all patients receiving 48 weeks of therapy, those with HCV-1 infection receiving 48 weeks of treatment, and those with HCV-2 or -3 infection receiving either 24 or 48 weeks of treatment. From the Manns et al. study,7 we also evaluated adherence in those receiving the most effective regimen, 48 weeks of peginterferon α-2b 1.5 μg/kg/week plus ribavirin for 48 weeks—first, in all patients in the subgroups with HCV-1 or HCV-2 or -3, and also in the subgroup receiving the weight-based dosing regimen of ribavirin ≥10.6 μg/kg, as shown. From the Lindsay et al. study,10 we evaluated the peginterferon α-2b 1.5 μg/kg and interferon α-2b monotherapy groups, once again in all patients, and also according to genotype. In each subgroup, the number of patients that could be evaluated is noted. Gastroenterology 2002 123, 1061-1069DOI: (10.1053/gast.2002.35950) Copyright © 2002 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 (A) The observed sustained virologic response rates at different levels of adherence for all patients who received interferon α-2b plus ribavirin (solid line) and for all patients who received interferon alone (dashed line). These corresponding observed response rates (as a percentage) are listed below the plot under the appropriate adherence levels. The ITT response rate for patients who received interferon and ribavirin is 44% (440 of 1010) and that for patients who received interferon alone is 16% (82 of 503). The adherence-response regression curves for the 2 treatment groups are superimposed. The estimated full-adherence sustained response rate for combination therapy is 50% (denoted by “X”). (B) The relationship between observed adherence and sustained virologic response rates for the subset of HCV-1 patients. The ITT response rate for HCV-1 patients who received interferon and ribavirin is 31% (208 of 668), and that for patients who received interferon alone is 9% (30 of 330). The estimated full-adherence effect for combination therapy for HCV-1 patients is 34% (denoted by “X”). Gastroenterology 2002 123, 1061-1069DOI: (10.1053/gast.2002.35950) Copyright © 2002 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 (A) The observed sustained response rates at different levels of adherence for all patients who received peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin (solid line) and all patients who received peginterferon alone (dashed line). The adherence-response regression curves are superimposed. The ITT response rate is 54% (274 of 511) for peginterferon plus ribavirin and 23% (71 of 304) for peginterferon alone. The estimated full-adherence response rate for combination therapy is 62% (denoted by “X”). (B) The relationship between observed adherence and sustained virologic response rates for the subset of patients infected with HCV-1. The ITT response rate is 42% (145 of 348) for combination therapy and 14% (31 of 223) for monotherapy. The estimated full-adherence sustained response rate for combination therapy in patients with HCV-1 is 50% (denoted by “X”). Gastroenterology 2002 123, 1061-1069DOI: (10.1053/gast.2002.35950) Copyright © 2002 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 (A) The observed sustained response rates at different levels of adherence for patients who received peginterferon and ribavirin at a dose of at least 10.6 mg/kg and corresponding patients of the same weight group who received peginterferon alone. The adherence-response regression curves are superimposed. The ITT response rate is 61% (114 of 188) for the weight-based subgroup that received peginterferon plus ribavirin and 25% (30 of 118) for the subgroup that received peginterferon alone. The estimated full-adherence response rate for weight-based combination therapy is 71% (denoted by “X”). (B) The relationship between observed adherence and sustained virologic response rates for the subset of patients also infected with HCV-1. The ITT response rate is 48% (58 of 122) for weight-based combination therapy and 14% (12 of 83) for the monotherapy. The estimated full-adherence sustained response rate for weight-based combination therapy in patients with HCV-1 is 61% (denoted by “X”). Gastroenterology 2002 123, 1061-1069DOI: (10.1053/gast.2002.35950) Copyright © 2002 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Contingency tables indicating the effect of drug adherence during the first 12 weeks of therapy compared to that during the remainder of treatment and the impact on sustained viral response rates. (A) Observed data for the group treated with interferon α-2b plus ribavirin; (B) depicts data for patients treated with peginterferon α-2b plus ribavirin. Most patients were adherent for the duration of treatment; a minority of patients who were not adherent in the first 12 weeks were adherent thereafter. Adherence to therapy for the first 12 weeks improves response rates compared to nonadherence throughout treatment. Gastroenterology 2002 123, 1061-1069DOI: (10.1053/gast.2002.35950) Copyright © 2002 American Gastroenterological Association Terms and Conditions