High Rock Lake TMDL Development

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2005 Stream Phosphorus TMDLs to be proposed in July 5th NJR The NJDEPs Division of Watershed Management is seeking stakeholder input on proposed phosphorus.
Advertisements

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Prioritization Workgroup Summary. Workgroup Topics Nutrient results What is a watershed? What is a TMDL? Prioritization methods Basin framework and management.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
ENTITY and DATE HERE Tampa Bay Nitrogen Management Consortium TMDL and Reasonable Assurance Overview.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
1 State Water Quality Assessments Under the Clean Water Act Charles Spooner Assessment and Watershed Protection Division Monitoring Branch National Water.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Federal Clean Water Act Monitoring and assessments completed statewide Standards not met? Section 303 (d) requires placing the water body on the “Impaired.
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
John Huisman – NC DWQ NC Water Quality Commission – January 11, 2012 NC Environmental Management Commission – January 12,
Integrated Watershed Management
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS
High Rock Lake, Yadkin River Basin Scoping Monitoring Study
Presented by: Bill Kreutzberger Jaime Robinson November 14, 2017
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Updates 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan
Water Quality Credit Trading
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Environmental Management Commission Information Item January 8, 2015
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
Fitting the pieces together
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Total Maximum Daily Loads
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
Environmental Management Commission January 2014
Upper Clark Fork Watershed Restoration and TMDLs
Implementation of Water Quality Standards and the WQ Based Approach
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Watershed Restoration, Chesapeake Bay
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Presentation transcript:

High Rock Lake TMDL Development Michelle Woolfolk, NC DWQ May 24, 2005 Stakeholder Meeting

Topics to cover Regulatory basis Process for strategy development Timeline Monitoring and modeling Questions and discussion

Acronyms, acronyms Environmental Management Commission (EMC) North Carolina List of Impaired Waters (303(d) List) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Division of Environmental Management (DEM) Total nitrogen (TN) Total phosphorus (TP) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) US Geological Survey (USGS) Alcoa Power (APGI)

Regulatory basis High Rock Lake appears on the 2004 North Carolina 303(d) list 5568.8 acres impaired due to chlorophyll a 11,305 acres impaired due to turbidity Clean Water Act requires TMDLs for waters impaired by a pollutant

40CFR130.7(c) States (and EPA) shall establish TMDLs for the water quality limited segments (identified in the 303(d) list) TMDLs shall be established at levels necessary to attain and maintain the applicable narrative and numerical water quality standards, with seasonal variations and a margin of safety … Determinations of TMDLs shall take into account critical conditions for stream flow, loading, and water quality parameters

40CFR103.7(c) cont. All TMDLs for water quality limited segments (303(d) list) will be submitted to EPA for review and approval.

What does TMDL stand for? Total Maximum Daily Load TMDLs are written plans for attaining and maintaining water quality standards, in all seasons, for a specific waterbody and pollutant.

Elements of a TMDL 1. Problem identification 2. Target analysis 3. Source assessment 4. Linkage of source and target 5. Determine maximum allowable load 6. Allocation of load/wasteload 7. Public participation

Federal regulatory authority EPA Region IV oversight Modeling Target setting Allocations (Reasonable assurance) NPDES permitting Compliance schedules Approval/Disapproval of final TMDL

Strategy development process Step 1 Build the tools (models) Systematic planning Monitoring Modeling Step 2 Develop the strategy Target setting Allocations Point and nonpoint strategies Environmental Management Commission

Systematic planning Based on EPA guidance for environmental projects Development of a monitoring and modeling study plan Outlines project responsibility Describes project goals Describes modeling approaches Outlines monitoring plan Step 1. Build the tools

Describe the impairment What is the water quality standard? Addressing duration and frequency At what location was the reason for listing determined? DWQ ambient monitoring location(s) Coalition/Basin Association monitoring Step 1. Build the tools

Supporting Information Data availability Ambient monitoring (DWQ or coalition) NPDES instream monitoring USGS flow stations Special studies (DWQ, discharger, coalition, USGS, university, other?) Rarely have all of the data listed above. Step 1. Build the tools

Monitoring Monitoring plan and data needs in monitoring and modeling study document Monitoring plan for scoping study available on internet as stand-alone memorandum. Step 1. Build the tools

Modeling: Linking causes and sources Model selection Data availability Watershed and reservoir characteristics EPA guidance (e.g., Nutrient TMDL Protocol) Experience (personally and as a unit) Schedule Model calibration Critical conditions Step 1. Build the tools

OK, now we have a calibrated nutrient response model, what next? Figure out how to use it!!!!

Addressing the standard What are the critical conditions? How are they determined? Frequency of violations, magnitude of violations Temporal averaging Spatial averaging Step 2. Develop strategy

Target setting Assimilative capacity determination Reduction needed? (TMDL needed) Loading cap? Remaining capacity? How much can I pour without going over? Step 2. Develop strategy

Target setting, cont. Water quality standards Chlorophyll a Turbidity Dissolved oxygen pH Control of TN and/or TP may be needed Step 2. Develop strategy

Allocations Typically allocated the allowable load between point sources (wasteload) and nonpoint sources (load) Who gets the biggest piece of the pie? Equity versus efficiency Step 2. Develop strategy

How are targets achieved? Point source allocations Each discharger assigned a mass loading allocation Provisions for another compliance group May require rulemaking Nonpoint source management May include buffers, stormwater controls on existing and/or new development, agriculture Step 2. Develop strategy

State regulatory authority The NC Environmental Management Commission NPDES permitting Nonpoint source management Rulemaking Step 2. Develop strategy

Strawman schedule

Questions? Michelle Woolfolk or George Hunt NCDWQ – Modeling & TMDL Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 (919) 733-5083 ext. 505 Michelle.Woolfolk@ncmail.net George.Hunt@ncmail.net