Molecular Development of Sensory Maps

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Axon guidance.
Advertisements

Odor Receptors Govern the Formation of a Precise Topographic Map Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics Columbia University New York, NY
LGN, superior colliculus, and optic tectum development and innervation Chris Strang Ph.D. Vision Sciences WORB
Genetic Analysis of Ephrin-A2 and Ephrin-A5 Show Their Requirement in Multiple Aspects of Retinocollicular Mapping Interdisciplinary Program in Brain Science.
Grades for Exam I BCS 249 Range: Average: 71 Before curve:
Genetic Specification of Axonal Arbors
Volume 33, Issue 3, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Development of Continuous and Discrete Neural Maps
Volume 47, Issue 1, Pages (July 2005)
Katherine Joubin, Claudio D Stern  Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages (September 2002)
Target-Independent EphrinA/EphA-Mediated Axon-Axon Repulsion as a Novel Element in Retinocollicular Mapping  Philipp Suetterlin, Uwe Drescher  Neuron 
Topographic Mapping in Dorsoventral Axis of the Xenopus Retinotectal System Depends on Signaling through Ephrin-B Ligands  Fanny Mann, Samiran Ray, William.
Alternative Splicing of the Robo3 Axon Guidance Receptor Governs the Midline Switch from Attraction to Repulsion  Zhe Chen, Bryan B. Gore, Hua Long, Le.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Gene Switching and the Stability of Odorant Receptor Gene Choice
Olfactory neurons are interdependent in maintaining axonal projections
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Genetic Ablation and Restoration of the Olfactory Topographic Map
A Map of Pheromone Receptor Activation in the Mammalian Brain
Uri Hasson, Michal Harel, Ifat Levy, Rafael Malach  Neuron 
Pathfinding and Error Correction by Retinal Axons
Ephrin-As Guide the Formation of Functional Maps in the Visual Cortex
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1996)
Retinal Axon Response to Ephrin-As Shows a Graded, Concentration-Dependent Transition from Growth Promotion to Inhibition  Michael J Hansen, Gerard E.
Victor Hatini, Stephen DiNardo  Molecular Cell 
Retinal Input Instructs Alignment of Visual Topographic Maps
Jonathan J. Nassi, David C. Lyon, Edward M. Callaway  Neuron 
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Genetic Analysis of the Mechanisms Controlling Target Selection: Complementary and Combinatorial Functions of Netrins, Semaphorins, and IgCAMs  Margaret.
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2000)
Visualizing an Olfactory Sensory Map
Volume 86, Issue 5, Pages (September 1996)
Cytonemes Cell Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Dendrites of Distinct Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons Show Different Capacities for Homotypic Repulsion  Wesley B. Grueber, Bing Ye, Adrian W. Moore,
Axonal Ephrin-As and Odorant Receptors
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (July 2003)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
New Roundabouts Send Axons into the Fas Lane
Lowry A. Kirkby, Georgeann S. Sack, Alana Firl, Marla B. Feller  Neuron 
B.K. Müller, D.G. Jay, F. Bonhoeffer  Current Biology 
Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Volume 87, Issue 6, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Julie E. Cooke, Hilary A. Kemp, Cecilia B. Moens  Current Biology 
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Ivan Rodriguez, Paul Feinstein, Peter Mombaerts  Cell 
Olfactory Sensory Axons Expressing a Dominant–Negative Semaphorin Receptor Enter the CNS Early and Overshoot Their Target  Michael J Renzi, Tamara Lee.
The Development of Neuronal Morphology in Insects
Numb Antagonizes Notch Signaling to Specify Sibling Neuron Cell Fates
Claudia Lodovichi, Leonardo Belluscio, Lawrence C Katz  Neuron 
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (December 2000)
The Anterior-Posterior Axis Emerges Respecting the Morphology of the Mouse Embryo that Changes and Aligns with the Uterus before Gastrulation  Daniel.
Katsuhiko Ono, Yukihiko Yasui, Urs Rutishauser, Robert H Miller  Neuron 
Graded Levels of FGF Protein Span the Midbrain and Can Instruct Graded Induction and Repression of Neural Mapping Labels  Yao Chen, Moosa Mohammadi, John.
Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996)
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (August 2002)
Genetic Mechanisms Specifying Cortical Connectivity
Different Levels of the Homeodomain Protein Cut Regulate Distinct Dendrite Branching Patterns of Drosophila Multidendritic Neurons  Wesley B Grueber,
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Molecular Development of Sensory Maps Dennis D.M O’Leary, Paul A Yates, Todd McLaughlin  Cell  Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages 255-269 (January 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6

Figure 1 Distributions of Eph Receptors and Ephrin Ligands in the Developing Chick Retinotectal System Related to Retinotopic Projections (A) The mapping of the temporal–nasal (T–N) axis of the retina along the anterior–posterior (A–P) axis of the optic tectum relates to the expression of EphA receptors and ephrin-A ligands. Both ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5 have increasing graded expressions along the A–P tectal axis, although their distributions differ: ephrin-A2 is expressed in an increasing gradient across the entire A–P axis, whereas ephrin-A5 expression appears to be limited to the posterior half of the tectum and shows a substantial increase in expression near its posterior pole. Three EphA receptors for these ligands are expressed by RGCs: EphA3 is expressed in a high temporal to low nasal gradient, whereas EphA4 and EphA5 are expressed uniformly. Both ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5 preferentially repel temporal RGC axons, consistent with their expression patterns and role in mapping along the A–P tectal axis. (B) The mapping of the dorsal–ventral (D–V) axis of the retina along the ventral–dorsal (V–D) axis of the tectum relates to the expression of EphB receptors and ephrin-B ligands. Ephrin-B1 has an increasing graded expression along the V–D tectal axis. Three EphB receptors for these ligands appear to be expressed by RGCs: EphB2 and EphB3 are expressed in a high ventral to low dorsal gradient, whereas EphB1 is expressed uniformly. Functional data directly implicating ephrin-B1 and EphB receptors in retinotopic mapping is lacking. However, based on their expression patterns, if involved in mapping they would likely mediate an attraction-like effect preferential for ventral RGC axons. Synonyms for retinal axes: nasal–temporal, anterior–posterior; dorsal–ventral, superior–inferior. Synonyms for tectal axes: anterior–posterior, rostral–caudal; dorsal–ventral, medial–lateral. (Modified from Figure 2 in Friedman and O'Leary 1996b.) Cell 1999 96, 255-269DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6)

Figure 2 In Vitro and In Vivo Methods for Determining the Effects of Ephrin-A Ligands on Topographic Map Formation and RGC Axon Guidance (A and B) In vitro assays: RGC axon guidance was tested in vitro using the membrane stripe assay. The stripe assay consists of alternating lanes of membranes, prepared from two different sources, that are laid down on a matrix. Retinal explants are placed across the lanes and allowed to grow out onto the membranes. The growth characteristics of the two membrane substrates are compared directly by examining the extension of retinal axons on the lanes of one membrane type versus the other. (A) Membranes prepared from anterior (A) and posterior (P) thirds of normal tectum. (A′) To test the effects of ephrin-A ligands on retinal axon growth, membranes were prepared from mock-transfected and ephrin-A-transfected cells. (A′′) Membranes were also prepared from normal anterior tectum as well as anterior tectum in which ephrin-A2 was ectopically expressed. (B) Temporal retinal axons avoid the membranes prepared from normal posterior tecta, cells transfected with ephrin-A2 or ephrin-A5, and the ephrin-A2 infected tecta and choose to extend instead on membranes from normal anterior tecta, mock-transfected cells, and uninfected tecta, respectively. In each case, nasal retinal axons grow equally well on either type of membrane. (C–E) In vivo assay: The effects of ephrin-A ligands on topographic map formation were tested by ectopically expressing ephrin-A2 in the tectum using a retrovirus. (C) A retrovirus containing ephrin-A2 cDNA was injected into the mesencephalon of chick embryos at E1.5, several days before RGC axons reach the tectum. (D) At a stage when remodeling of the retinotectal topographic map is near completion, around E14, RGC axons were anterogradely labeled with injections of DiI into either peripheral temporal or peripheral nasal retina. Peripheral nasal RGC axons are shown exiting the retina through the optic nerve, entering the tectum at its anterior edge, and extending across the tectum to its posterior pole. (E) Retroviral infection results in ectopic expression of ephrin-A2 in patches throughout the tectum. Nasal axons are unaffected by these patches and extend to the posterior pole as in uninfected tectum. However, temporal axons avoid patches of ectopic ephrin-A2 expression. Cell 1999 96, 255-269DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6)

Figure 3 Effects of Ephrin-A Ligands on RGC Axon Guidance and Map Formation (A and B) In vitro functional characterization of ephrin-A2 and ephrin-A5 using the membrane stripe assay. Nasal (N) and temporal (T) retinal explants were grown on carpets consisting of alternating lanes of membranes derived from mock-transfected COS cells and COS cells transfected with (A) ephrin-A2 or (B) ephrin-A5 cDNA. The lanes containing ephrin-A2- or ephrin-A5-transfected cell membranes are labeled with rhodamine isothiocyanate (RITC) fluorescent beads, visualized in the lower part of each panel. Temporal retinal axons grow predominantly on membranes from mock-transfected cells, while nasal retinal axons grow equally well on membranes from ephrin-A- and mock-transfected cells. These growth preferences exhibit an abrupt transition at midretina on ephrin-A2 membranes, in contrast to the more gradual transition on ephrin-A5 membranes. (Adapted by permission of EMBO from Figure 6A and Figure 6C in Monschau et al. 1997.) (C–E) Temporal retinal axons avoid retrovirally expressed patches of ephrin-A2 in chick tectum. RGC axons were anterogradely labeled with DiI at E14 and appear red (demarcated by arrowhead in [D]), while domains of ectopic ephrin-A2 expression in tectum were detected with an EphA3 affinity probe and appear green (demarcated by arrow in [D]). (C) Nasal retinal axons extend unaffected through ectopic patches of ephrin-A2. (D and E) In contrast, temporal RGC axons either terminate abruptly just anterior to a patch of ephrin-A2 (D) or form arbors in anterior tectum that appear to avoid patches of ectopic ephrin-A2 expression (E). (Adapted from Nakamoto et al. 1996). Cell 1999 96, 255-269DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6)

Figure 6 Development of Topographic Order in the Chick Retinotectal Projection In a mature chick, the temporal–nasal (T–N) axis of the retina is rerepresented along the anterior–posterior (A–P) axis of the optic tectum through the orderly termination of RGC axons. The development of order occurs through a multistep process. Initially, the growth cones of RGC axons grow posteriorly past their topographically correct termination zone (TZ) in the tectum. Subsequent to this initial axon overshoot, branches form along the length of the axon, with a clear bias for topographically correct locations along the A–P axis. Axons form connections to the TZ predominantly through the arborization of these branches. Remodeling of the projection generates precise topography by eliminating ectopic branches outside the TZ as well as segments of the primary axon posterior to the TZ. Cell 1999 96, 255-269DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6)

Figure 4 RGC Projections in Wild-Type and Ephrin-A5−/− Mice Related to the Expression Patterns of Ephrin-A5 and Ephrin-A2 (A) Anterograde DiI labeling of RGC axons from temporal retina in wild-type and ephrin-A5−/− mice. Dorsal views of whole mounts of the superior colliculus (SC) are shown; midline is to the right, dashed lines indicate the caudal SC border, and arrowheads indicate the rostral SC border. Left panel: In wild-type mice, the labeled temporal RGC axons end and arborize in a densely labeled termination zone (TZ) in rostral SC. The RGC projection to optic tract nuclei is also evident (OT). Right panel: In ephrin-A5−/− mice, labeled temporal RGC axons also end and arborize in a densely labeled TZ at the topographically appropriate site in rostral SC, but in addition, labeled axons project to and arborize at topographically inappropriate sites in caudal-most SC (e1) and rostral SC (e2). (B) Schematic representations summarizing temporal RGC axon mapping in wild-type and ephrin-A5−/− mice as it relates to the distributions of ephrin-A5 and ephrin-A2. Left panel: In wild-type mice, a focal DiI injection in temporal retina labels axons (red lines) that form a dense termination zone (red oval) in the topographically correct rostral SC. Ephrin-A5 (blue shading) is expressed in a low rostral to high caudal gradient across the SC and continuing into the inferior colliculus, which has the highest level of expression. Ephrin-A2 (orange shading) is expressed highest in midcaudal parts of the SC and shows a graded decline to low levels in more rostral and far-caudal SC. Together, ephrin-A5 and ephrin-A2 may form a smooth gradient of repellent activity across the SC and work in concert to help establish the normal topographic map. Right panel: In ephrin-A5−/− mice, ephrin-A2 (orange shading) is expressed in the same pattern as in wild type. A focal DiI injection in temporal retina labels axons that form a dense termination zone in topographically correct rostral SC, but in addition, aberrant terminations form at topographically incorrect locations in the SC. The pattern of ectopic arbors relates to the maintained expression pattern of ephrin-A2: ectopic arbors are typically present in far-caudal and rostral SC, where ephrin-A2 expression is low, but are rare in mid-SC, where ephrin-A2 expression is highest. This distribution suggests that in the absence of ephrin-A5, ectopic arbors are present where the levels of repellent activity due to ephrin-A2 are too low to prevent their formation and stabilization. Abbreviations: C, caudal; I, inferior; L, lateral; M, medial; N, nasal; R, rostral; S, superior; T, temporal. (Modified from Frisén et al. 1998.) Cell 1999 96, 255-269DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6)

Figure 5 Development of Topographic Order in the Retinotectal Projection by Growth Cone Guidance versus Axon Branching Poses Different Requirements for Gradients of Axon Guidance Molecules A single repellent gradient, such as that formed by ephrin-A ligands in the tectum, coupled with a countergradient of EphA receptors in the retina, can potentially guide growth cones to their topographically correct termination zone (TZ) in the tectum. Growth cones stop at positions in the tectum where they reach a threshold level of repellent activation following a mass action law of receptor–ligand interactions. Growth cones arising from temporal retina (T), which have higher levels of EphA receptors, will reach threshold levels of activation at anterior (A) positions in the tectum, with lower levels of ephrin-A ligand. Growth cones from nasal retina (N), which have lower levels of EphA receptors, will reach threshold levels of activation at more posterior (P) positions in the tectum. However, a single repellent gradient cannot control topographically specific branching along RGC axons, since one would expect both temporal and nasal RGC axons to exhibit increased branching at more anterior positions in the tectum, which have lower levels of ephrin-A ligands. Addition of a parallel attractant gradient could act in concert with the ephrin-A repellent to generate topographic branching along RGC axons. Branching would only occur at positions along the axon at which the level of attractant (or branch promoting activity) exceeds a branching threshold, by definition at the TZ and posterior to it, while higher levels of ephrin-A repellent would prevent branching along the axon posterior to the TZ. Cell 1999 96, 255-269DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6)

Figure 7 Summary of Odorant Receptor Expression Zones and Axonal Convergence (A) Schematic representation of the rodent nasal cavity and forebrain. The stippled area across the turbinates represents the olfactory epithelium. Anterior is to the left, dorsal is to the top. (Reprinted from Figure 7A in Vassar et al. 1993.) (B) A color-coded representation of the four zones of expression of odorant receptors superimposed on a lateral view of the turbinates. The green, yellow, and blue spots represent data showing the location of olfactory neurons (ONs) expressing the I7 odorant receptor (green), the F3 (yellow), and the J7 (blue) receptor subfamilies. The green, yellow, and blue spots delineate expression zones I, II, and III, respectively. The red spots represent a hypothetical expression pattern of an OR, such as M12 or M70, and approximately delineate zone IV. (Adapted from Figure 6A in Vassar et al. 1993.) (C) A photomicrograph of a coronal section through mouse olfactory bulbs after in situ hybridization with a radioactive probe specific for P2. Positive labeling appears white. The arrow points to a medial glomerulus labeled for P2 mRNA and represents the convergence of axons from ONs expressing P2. Note that the location of the medial P2 glomerulus is in the same location in the right and left olfactory bulbs. (Reprinted from Figure 5E in Mombaerts et al. 1996.) (D) A whole-mount view of the olfactory neuroepithelium and the medial aspect of the olfactory bulb of a P2-IRES-tau-lacZ mouse after X-gal staining. Olfactory neurons expressing the P2-IRES-tau-lacZ allele appear blue (arrowhead) and can be seen in zone III of the olfactory neuroepithelium. The medial glomerulus in the olfactory bulb to which axons from the blue ONs converge is indicated (arrow). (Reprinted from Figure 4A in Mombaerts et al. 1996.) Cell 1999 96, 255-269DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6)

Figure 8 Summary of Receptor Substitution Experiments and Schematic Representation of a Zone of Expression to Zone of Convergence Correlation (A) Schematic representation of the M12→P2 and M71→P2 receptor substitution experiments. Olfactory neurons (ONs) expressing a wild-type P2, M12, or M71 allele are represented by colored spots in zone III (P2) and zone IV (M12 and M71) of the olfactory epithelium, and the glomeruli to which they converge are represented by labeled, colored spots in the olfactory bulb (OB). ONs expressing an M12→P2 or M71→P2 allele are not represented, but are found in zone III. The locations of the M12→P2 and M71→P2 glomeruli are indicated by labeled, colored spots in the olfactory bulb. Note that the location of the M12→P2 and the M71→P2 glomeruli are found at approximately the same A–P location as the M12 and M71 glomeruli, respectively, but are biased ventrally toward the location of the P2 glomerulus. The P2, M12, and M71 genes are found at three distinct chromosomal loci. (Reprinted from Figure 6A in Wang et al. 1998.) (B) Schematic representation of the P3→P2 and M50→P2 receptor substitution experiments. Olfactory neurons expressing a wild-type P2, P3, or M50 allele are represented by colored spots in zone III (P2 and P3) and zone I (M50) of the olfactory epithelium, and the glomeruli to which they converge are represented by labeled, colored spots in the olfactory bulb. ONs expressing a P3→P2 or M50→P2 allele are not represented, but are found in zone III. The locations of the P3→P2 and M50→P2 glomeruli are indicated by labeled, colored spots in the olfactory bulb. Note that the location of the M50→P2 glomerulus is found at approximately the same A–P location as the M50 glomerulus but is biased dorsally toward the location of the P2 glomerulus. The P3→P2 glomerulus is adjacent to the P3 glomerulus. The P2, P3, and M50 genes are linked at one chromosomal locus. (Reprinted from Figure 6B in Wang et al. 1998.) (C) Schematic representation of the results summarized in (A) and (B) combined with expression data for I7 and A16. The schematic represents the same view as depicted in (A) and (B). Open circles in the OB represent glomeruli to which axons from ONs expressing a wild-type olfactory receptor (OR) allele converge. Filled circles represent glomeruli to which axons from ONs expressing an OR→P2 allele converge. The asterisk represents the location of the wild-type P2 glomerulus and is marked because all receptor substitutions indicated were made into the P2 coding region. The positions of the A16 and I7 glomeruli are estimations deduced from Ressler et al. 1994 and Vassar et al. 1994, respectively. The lines drawn across the olfactory bulb divide the OB into four zones along the dorsal–ventral (D–V) axis so that all OR alleles expressed in the same zone of the olfactory epithelium have a corresponding glomerulus in the same zone of the OB. Since expression from all OR→P2 alleles indicated is in zone III, we have included all four OR→P2 glomeruli in the same zone of the OB as the wild–type P2 glomerulus. The alignment of the labeled glomeruli allows for the possibility that zone of expression in the olfactory epithelium of an OR correlates with the D–V position of its glomeruli in the OB. Cell 1999 96, 255-269DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80565-6)