Brookfield Renewable Energy Group. Focusing on Renewable Power Generation and Transmission Conceptual discussion how to integrate renewable resources under.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal For Improvement to the Current ICAP Market Markets Committee October 12, 2004 Ken Bekman Con Edison Energy.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
Standard Market Design (SMD) in New England Federal Energy Regulation Commission Conference on Standard Market Design January 22, 2002 David LaPlante Vice.
Update on Demand Resource Participation in New Englands Forward Capacity Market Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
© 2013 Day Pitney LLP Overview and Update on the Ever-Evolving New England Wholesale Capacity Market presentation to Boston Bar Association May 23, 2013.
APRIL 9-10, 2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Christopher Parent MARKET DEVELOPMENT | Creating a tiered Reserve.
FEBRUARY 14, 2013 RELIABILITY COMMITTEE MEETING Steve Weaver SYSTEM OPERATIONS In-Day Reserves & Supplemental Procurement.
Better Align Capacity Markets with Policy/Planning Objectives James Daly, VP Energy Supply Restructuring Roundtable Sept 21, 2012.
1 Capacity mechanisms - IFIEC position June 12 th 2012.
03/11/2013 MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Overview of Market Rule revisions.
SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 | MARKETS COMMITTEE Aleks Mitreski MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Hourly Offer and Intraday.
Al McBride MANAGER, AREA TRANSMISSION PLANNING Existing Import Interfaces: Transmission Transfer Capabilities and The Calculation of Tie Benefits DECEMBER.
NOVEMBER 18, 2013 | WESTBOROUGH, MA Administrative Pricing Rules for Forward Capacity Auction #8.
OCTOBER 8, 2014 Bob Laurita INTERNAL MARKET MONITORING New Import Capacity Resource FCM Market Power Mitigation Order to Show Cause Compliance Filing.
AUGUST 7-9, 2013 | LENOX, MA Andrew Gillespie MARKET DEVELOPMENT (413) Review of Market Rule 1: Section.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
Demand Response in Connecticut Presented by: Bob Laurita ISO New England December 2, 2004.
Resource Adequacy in PJM
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY © New York Independent System Operator, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FERC’s Order on Possible BSM for ROS.
Texas Deregulation – A Success Story The ERCOT Market Framework Has Been A Success Implementation  Bilateral Contracts - Participants contract up to 100%
Susan Covino Senior Consultant, Emerging Markets March 31, 2015
Utility Regulation March 10, 2011 Raj Addepalli Deputy Director, Electric, Office of Electric,Gas and Water New York State Department of Public Service.
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen 1 © 2011 D. Kirschen and the University of Washington.
RenewElec October 21, 2010 Robert Nordhaus, David Yaffe Van Ness Feldman 1050 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW Washington, DC (202) FERC’s.
Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) Overview Andrew Ott PJM Senior Vice President, Markets.
Economic Demand Response Sheldon Fulton Executive Director, IPCAA November 4, 2008.
ISO New England Regional Update Wholesale Electricity Markets & State Energy Policy Seminar Connecticut Business & Industry Association December 14, 2010.
Electric Generation Reliability Remarks Before the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission 2011 Summer Reliability Assessment Meeting June.
LMP Electricity Markets: Market Operations, Market Power, and Value for Consumers EMRI Symposium American Public Power Association February 5, 2007 Presented.
Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People Performance Targets for the Customer Interconnection Process January, 2008.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Liberalization of Electricity Market in Taiwan Su, Jin-sheng Energy Commission Ministry of Economic Affairs August 8, 2001.
Wholesale Electricity Market – Western Australia APEx Conference 2008 – Sydney Allan Dawson 13 October 2008.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
The Operation of the Electricity Markets Brent Layton Talk at EMA Central Electricity Forum 6 th April 2006.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
1 IMM Pricing Concerns with PFR and FFR Proposed pricing structure provides incentive for FFR to offer at less than cost. Dual clearing price pricing structure.
Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) A Success Story… In Progress Ingmar Sterzing United States Association of Energy Economics (USAEE) Pittsburgh.
Energizing you, powering our communities. Dynegy Energy Services September 18, 2015.
An Overview of: Generation Connections: Transmission Connection Cost Responsibility Review July
G 200 L 200 ISO NEW ENGLAND T H E P E O P L E B E H I N D N E W E N G L A N D ’ S P O W E R. Southwest Connecticut RFP Markets Committee November 14, 2003.
Wholesale Electricity Markets: Opportunities and Challenges Howard HaasUSAEE October 27, 2015.
ERCOT Public 1 Project Panel 1 Dan Woodfin Director, System Operations August 15, 2014.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
NYISO Capacity Markets: Function, Performance, and Future Presented to: Joint Technical Conference on New York Markets & Infrastructure Docket No. AD
Accommodate or Achieve
Connecting the Dots in New England: NEPOOL’s IMAPP Initiative
Stages of Research and Development
Integrating Public Policy Resources Into Markets (in 3 RTOs): NEPOOL’s IMAPP Initiative Integrating Markets And Public Policy Joel Gordon Chairman, New.
PRS Rejection of NPRR Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Massachusetts Electric Restructuring Roundtable
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Perspectives on Integrating Markets and Public Policy in New England
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
Benefits of New England’s Proposed Capacity Market
Marginal Cost Pricing: Why Is It Important? Have We Achieved It?
Energy Efficiency in New England: Resource Opportunities
Locational ICAP in New England
Market Design in New England
Alternative ICAP Proposal
What Does the Recent LICAP Settlement Mean for New England?
The First FCA: Observations & Thoughts
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Presentation transcript:

Brookfield Renewable Energy Group. Focusing on Renewable Power Generation and Transmission Conceptual discussion how to integrate renewable resources under a robust market design Aleks Mitreski NEPOOL Markets Committee March 12 th 2014

2 In the April 2011 order, the Commission expressed concerns with the impact of resources with out-of-market revenues when allowed to offer below a competitive price because: It suppresses the clearing price below competitive levels OOM resources can affect prices even when no new capacity is needed, by displacing what would otherwise be the marginal, price-setting existing resource Whether the FCM design in New England will provide sufficient income to incent market entry when necessary without the assistance of supplemental revenue streams from outside ISO-NE markets In New England significant effort has been undertaken to develop Offer Review Trigger Prices (ORTP) to address these concerns and minimize impact from entires with out of market revenues Allowing resources to offer below their long-run average cost distorts price formation such that clearing prices no longer reflect the true market conditions For example, the ISO-NE/Brattle proposed demand curve has been optimized to meet certain reliability standards and send the correct price signal as a function of reserve margin conditions and Cost Of New Entry for merchant resource Alterations to the supply curve through exemptions can have major impact to clearing prices which in turn will affect near and long term incentives for merchant entry and maintaining system reliability FCM Sloped Demand Curve Design Robust Forward Capacity Markets are designed to provide the correct price signals and incentives

3 New England states have set renewable standards to meet public policy goals The Commission acknowledges the rights of states to pursue policy interests within their jurisdiction but is concerned that OOM capacity suppresses prices regardless of intent and that the Commission has exclusive jurisdiction on assessing whether wholesale rates are just and reasonable The Commission has expressed concerns with the implementation of exemptions where we cannot establish an exemption in a vacuum or without facts supporting a specific exemption Integrating renewable resources under a robust market design is challenging The sloped demand curve is intended to send the correct price signal based on the economics of a new merchant entry and maintaining reliability standards (e.g.,1 in 10) Developing an approach where renewable standards can be achieved with no incremental cost to consumers, while minimizing price formation impact is a win-win outcome for public policy goals and efficient market design FCM Sloped Demand Curve Design Achieving renewable policy standards without incremental cost to consumers and minimal impact to price formation

4 Premise: Enable renewable resources with out-of-market revenue to participate in the Forward Capacity Market and receive a Capacity Supply Obligation (CSO) with minimal impact to the economics of a new entry and without increased cost to consumers Under this concept, if renewable exemption rules are adopted by the Commission, then resources that choose Renewable Technology Resources (RTR) treatment can receive CSO up to the approved annual cap even if the clearing price is below their offer The RTR resources would be required to offer above their respective ORTP If RTR clears within the auction, the RTR becomes existing and no further steps are needed If RTR does not clear in the auction then these resources still receive a CSO To avoid a missing money problem there will be a price proration applied to all resources to accommodate the incremental amount of capacity associated with RTR All resources with a CSO receive a prorated clearing price Cost to consumers does not increase FCM Sloped Demand Curve Design Conceptual overview how to integrate renewable exemptions in a robust market design

5 Assume: 100MW of RTR elects to utilize the renewable exemption These 100MW must offer above their ORTP (e.g., $10/kW-month) During the auction, the ISO-NE clears 35,000MW to meet ICR which results in a clearing price of $7/kW-month Total cost to load is $245,000/kW-month ($7/kW-month x 35,000MW) Since none of the RTR cleared the auction (since their offer was $10/kW- month) these 100MW are nevertheless added to the pool of cleared resources which results having total Capacity Supply Obligation of 35,100MW The capacity clearing price is then prorated as $245,000/35,100MW = $6.98/kW-month. Total cost to load remains $245,000/kW-month All 35,100MW receive the prorated capacity clearing price of $6.98/kW-month *Numbers used in the example are for illustration purpose only FCM Sloped Demand Curve Design Example how renewable resources could be integrated under a robust capacity market design*

6 This proposal is still in a conceptual stage Thoughts and comments are welcomed Aleks Mitreski (413) FCM Sloped Demand Curve Design Further discussion can be undertaken to ensure the concept can be appripriatly implemented