MODIS NDVI growing season metrics for Alaska:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Drought monitoring with coarse resolution remote sensing at the African continent level O. Rojas (FAO) and F. Rembold (JRC) One of the main water sources.
Advertisements

Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
Examining Vegetation Recovery Time After a Small Scale Disaster using MODIS Data and the OSDC Zac Flamig (University of Oklahoma) Gilbert Warren Cole (University.
Lecture 2: Modeling of Land Surface Phenology with satellite imagery Kirsten M. de Beurs, Ph.D. Assistant Professor of Geography Center for Environmental.
Satellite data products to support climate modelling: Phenology & Snow Cover Kristin Böttcher, Sari Metsämäki, Olli-Pekka Mattila, Mikko Kervinen, Mika.
Climate Change and Vegetation Phenology
Land Surface Evaporation 1. Key research issues 2. What we learnt from OASIS 3. Land surface evaporation using remote sensing 4. Data requirements Helen.
Scaling Biomass Measurements for Examining MODIS Derived Vegetation Products Matthew C. Reeves and Maosheng Zhao Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group.
MODIS Snow Cover Metrics for Alaska: Algorithm and Evaluation Jiang Zhu 1 and Chuck Lindsay 2 1 Geographic Information Network of Alaska, University of.
Development of Remote Sensing-based Predictive Models for the Management of Taste and Odor Events in Kansas Reservoirs Dr. Mark Jakubauskas Kansas Biological.
Detecting the Onset of Spring in the Midwest and Northeast United States: An Integrated Approach Jonathan M. Hanes Ph.D. Student Department of Geography.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey NASA/USDA Workshop on Evapotranspiration April 6, 2011 – Silver Spring, Maryland ET for famine early.
University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Geographic Information Science Geography 625 Intermediate Geographic Information Science Instructor: Changshan Wu Department.
Green Vegetation Fraction (GVF) derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) sensor onboard the SNPP satellite Zhangyan Jiang 1,2,
Giant Kelp Canopy Cover and Biomass from High Resolution SPOT Imagery for the Santa Barbara Channel Kyle C Cavanaugh, David A Siegel, Brian P Kinlan, Dan.
Overview of Biomass Mapping The Woods Hole Research Center Alessandro Baccini, Wayne Walker and Ned Horning November 8 – 12, Samarinda, Indonesia.
DROUGHT MONITORING THROUGH THE USE OF MODIS SATELLITE Amy Anderson, Curt Johnson, Dave Prevedel, & Russ Reading.
Satellite Data Access – Giovanni, LAADS, and NEO Training Workshop in Partnership with BAAQMD Santa Clara, CA September 10 – 12, 2013 Applied Remote SEnsing.
Introduction Land surface temperature (LST) measurement is important for understanding climate change, modeling the hydrological and biogeochemical cycles,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
MODIS Subsetting and Visualization Tool: Bringing time-series satellite-based land data to the field scientist National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA RPC – March, Evaluation for the Integration of a Virtual Evapotranspiration Sensor Based.
Application of GI-based Procedures for Soil Moisture Mapping and Crop Vegetation Status Monitoring in Romania Dr. Adriana MARICA, Dr. Gheorghe STANCALIE,
Assessing Climate Changes in Arctic Sweden and Repercussions on Sami Reindeer Husbandry and Culture: Using a MODIS Image Time Series and Key Informant.
Spatially Complete Global Surface Albedos Derived from MODIS Data
Assessment of Regional Vegetation Productivity: Using NDVI Temporal Profile Metrics Background NOAA satellite AVHRR data archive NDVI temporal profile.
A METHODOLOGY TO SELECT PHENOLOGICALLY SUITABLE LANDSAT SCENES FOR FOREST CHANGE DETECTION IGARSS 2011, Jul, 27, 2011 Do-Hyung Kim, Raghuram Narashiman,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Using Advanced Satellite Products to Better Understand I&M Data within the Context of the Larger.
Development and evaluation of Passive Microwave SWE retrieval equations for mountainous area Naoki Mizukami.
ORNL DAAC MODIS Subsetting and Visualization tools Tools and services to access subsets of MODIS data Suresh K. Santhana Vannan National Aeronautics and.
The climate and climate variability of the wind power resource in the Great Lakes region of the United States Sharon Zhong 1 *, Xiuping Li 1, Xindi Bian.
Recent increases in the growing season length at high northern latitudes Nicole Smith-Downey* James T. Randerson Harvard University UC Irvine Sassan S.
DEVELOPING HIGH RESOLUTION AOD IMAGING COMPATIBLE WITH WEATHER FORECAST MODEL OUTPUTS FOR PM2.5 ESTIMATION Daniel Vidal, Lina Cordero, Dr. Barry Gross.
EG2234: Earth Observation Interactions - Land Dr Mark Cresswell.
Remote sensing for surface water hydrology RS applications for assessment of hydrometeorological states and fluxes –Soil moisture, snow cover, snow water.
Spatial distribution of snow water equivalent across the central and southern Sierra Nevada Roger Bales, Robert Rice, Xiande Meng Sierra Nevada Research.
Remotely sensed land cover heterogeneity
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Normalized Difference Vegetation Index for Restoration Monitoring Bruce K. Wylie 1, Steve Boyte.
NASA Snow and Ice Products NASA Remote Sensing Training Geo Latin America and Caribbean Water Cycle capacity Building Workshop Colombia, November 28-December.
Assessing the Phenological Suitability of Global Landsat Data Sets for Forest Change Analysis The Global Land Cover Facility What does.
Vegetation Index Visualization of individual composite period. The tool provides a color coded grid display of the subset region. The tool provides time.
Observing Laramie Basin Grassland Phenology Using MODIS Josh Reynolds with PROPOSED RESEARCH PROJECT Acknowledgments Steven Prager, Dept. of Geography.
Introduction GOES-R ABI will be the first GOES imaging instrument providing observations in both the visible and the near infrared spectral bands. Therefore.
Beyond Spectral and Spatial data: Exploring other domains of information: 3 GEOG3010 Remote Sensing and Image Processing Lewis RSU.
A Remote Sensing Approach for Estimating Regional Scale Surface Moisture Luke J. Marzen Associate Professor of Geography Auburn University Co-Director.
Validation of Satellite-derived Clear-sky Atmospheric Temperature Inversions in the Arctic Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Axel Schweiger 3, Jennifer.
Data Processing Flow Chart Start NDVI, EVI2 are calculated and Rank SDS are incorporated Integrity Data Check: Is the data correct? Data: Download a) AVHRR.
MODIS Snow and Sea Ice Cover using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data Dorothy.
MODIS Atmosphere Products: The Importance of Record Quality and Length in Quantifying Trends and Correlations S. Platnick 1, N. Amarasinghe 1,2, P. Hubanks.
Wildland Fire Emissions Study – Phase 2 For WRAP FEJF Meeting Research in progress by the CAMFER fire group: Peng Gong, Ruiliang Pu, Presented by Nick.
SeaWiFS Highlights July 2002 SeaWiFS Celebrates 5th Anniversary with the Fourth Global Reprocessing The SeaWiFS Project has just completed the reprocessing.
Developing the Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI): Monitoring Vegetation Stress from a Local to National Scale Brian Wardlow National Drought Mitigation.
Assessment on Phytoplankton Quantity in Coastal Area by Using Remote Sensing Data RI Songgun Marine Environment Monitoring and Forecasting Division State.
U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of Interior Automated Cropland Mapping Algorithms (ACMA) for Global Food Security Assessment Across Years Pardhasaradhi.
The Vegetation Drought Response Index (VegDRI) An Update on Progress and Future Activities Brian Wardlow 1, Jesslyn Brown 2, Tsegaye Tadesse 1, and Yingxin.
Stennis Space Center Phenological Parameters Estimation Tool Presented by Jerry Gasser Lockheed Martin Mission Services John C. Stennis Space Center USDA.
Figure 10. Improvement in landscape resolution that the new 250-meter MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) measurement of gross primary.
Changes in the Melt Season and the Declining Arctic Sea Ice
Comparison of GPP from Terra-MODIS and AmeriFlux Network Towers
Sea Surface Temperature as a Trigger of Butterfish Migration: A Study of Fall Phenology Amelia Snow1, John Manderson2, Josh Kohut1, Laura Palamara1, Oscar.
NASA JPL Drought Project Kickoff Meeting
STUDY ON THE PHENOLOGY OF ASPEN
VegDRI History, Current Status, and Related Activities
An Introduction to VegDRI
Factsheet # 6 Spatiotemporal Analysis of Mountain Goat Habitat
An Introduction to VegDRI
Using Remote Sensing to Monitor Plant Phenology Response to Rain Events in the Santa Catalina Mountains Katheryn Landau Arizona Remote Sensing Center Mentors:
NASA alert as Russian and US satellites crash in space
Rice monitoring in Taiwan
World Bank Land and Poverty Conference March 2018
Presentation transcript:

MODIS NDVI growing season metrics for Alaska: Product development and monitoring applications J. Zhu1, A.E. Miller2, P. Martyn2, D. Broderson1, and T. Heinrichs1 1University of Alaska Fairbanks - Geographic Information Network of Alaska (GINA); 2National Park Service, Inventory & Monitoring Program Introduction Algorithm Introduction Algorithm Applications a. Average Start of Season (2000-2011) The National Park Service (NPS) and the University of Alaska Fairbanks, Geographic Information Network of Alaska (GINA) have developed an algorithm to derive NDVI growing season metrics for Alaska. The algorithm is a refinement of that used by Swets et al. (1999) and Reed et al. (2006), and takes as input the MODIS 250m 7-day composite NDVI product (eMODIS). The NDVI data (2000-present) are archived at the USGS-EROS Data Center and subsequently acquired, processed and distributed by GINA. At GINA, the data are then stacked, filtered, and smoothed into yearly composites. A combined delayed moving average and threshold method is applied to derive 12 NDVI metrics for each year, including onset of greenness and end of greenness (start and end of season). Here, we present 11 years of NDVI metrics analyzed for temporal and zonal variation. Preliminary results show that the satellite-derived NDVI metrics are consistent with observed variation in phenology. The data are being used to assess variation in growing season length and NDVI for years 2000-2011. NDVI metrics were averaged over the period of record (2000-2011) for all pixels that had 11 years of valid data. Pixels that lacked one or more years of data were flagged as no data (-1) or as not valid (0). Water bodies and ice were masked. Reclassified images (Fig. 7, left) show the range of values calculated for average SOS, EOS, growing season length, and maximum NDVI statewide. Temperature influences growing season length in Alaska, as indicated by the positive relationship between average NDVI metrics (SOS, EOS, growing season length) and growing season temperature, approximated by average maximum July temperature (Fig. 8, right). Climate-NDVI relationships were evaluated as follows: values were extracted for 2500 randomly assigned points statewide from two raster data sets: (1) average NDVI metrics (2000-2011; SOS, EOS, growing season length, maximum NDVI, time-integrated NDVI) and (2) average maximum July temperature from the PRISM data set updated for Alaska (1971-2000; http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu). Regionally, we are examining the relationship between NDVI metrics, calculated annually, and local climate records. Zonal statistics calculated for AOIs defined by elevation, land cover classes, and ecoregion in southwest Alaska are allowing us to explore phenology-climate interactions in specific vegetation types (Figs. 9-10). At these finer spatial scales, we observe high interannual variability in NDVI metrics (e.g., SOS, EOS) and climate variables, such as spring temperature (Fig. 9). However, within the same land cover class (e.g., alder) and year, variation in elevation or proximity to the coast can result in differences in SOS of 30 days or more (data not shown). When data from all years are plotted against selected climate variables (Fig. 10), the variation among sample classes (AOIs) becomes more apparent. Here, we present results for SOS using two shrub classes in two elevation bands in Katmai National Park & Preserve (Fig. 10): (1) Warmer late-spring (e.g., April) temperatures tend to correlate with earlier SOS dates, and (2) late-season snow (March snow depth; April snowfall) tend to correlate with later SOS. Future work will examine the link between snow season and growing season metrics, as we expect that the timing of green-up (SOS) will be strongly influenced by snow-off dates (Reed et al. 2009). NDVI metrics and smoothed data files 1. Stack the NDVI and quality data, respectively 2. Interpolate the stacked data 3. Smooth the interpolated data 4. Calculate the metrics NDVI and quality data The algorithm calculates 12 metrics: Onset of greenness /Start of Season (SOS) 2. Value of onset of greenness 3. End of greenness /End of Season (EOS) 4. Value of end of greenness 5. Duration of greenness – no. days 6. Time of maximum NDVI – day of year 7. Value of maximum NDVI 8. Range of NDVI 9. Rate of green up 10. Rate of senescence 11. Time-integrated NDVI 12. Metrics ‘flag’ Major steps in the algorithm are shown in Fig 1. Study area extent for metrics is shown in Fig. 2. Step 1 – Stack: 7-day composite NDVI and quality data, covering a one year time range (e.g., Jan-29-2008 to Nov-17-2008), are stacked into two 42-band files, respectively. The NDVI metrics are calculated for each pixel of the stacked file (Steps 2-4). Step 2 – Interpolate: Bad data (e.g. < 100; Fig. 3), clouds, and negative reflectance data in the raw time series are linearly interpolated (Fig. 4). Step 3 – Smooth: Anomalously low NDVI values are eliminated (Fig.4), and the data are smoothed using a weighted least-squares regression approach. Step 4 – Calculate metrics: Start and end of season (SOS/EOS) dates are determined using a combined delayed moving average and threshold method (Reed et al. 2006, 2009; Swets et al. 1999). The algorithm uses a fixed-length window as a default, but can also determine dynamically the moving window length according to the potential growing season length. The possible SOS days are determined by the intersection of the smoothed time series (Fig. 5, solid line) and the forward-moving average of the time series (Fig. 5, dotted line), as indicated by the star symbol in Fig. 5. A threshold value of 20% of maximum NDVI is used to identify possible threshold days (Fig. 5, triangle symbol). The maximum slope day is also identified (Fig. 5, square symbol). The candidate SOS day is selected among the possible SOS days as the day that is closest to the threshold day. If the candidate day is before the threshold day, then SOS = threshold day (e.g., as in Fig. 5). Otherwise, the candidate day = SOS. Similarly, end of season (EOS) is determined using the smoothed time series and a backward-moving average, as indicated in Fig. 6. Once the SOS and EOS dates are obtained, the remaining metrics are calculated. Output files include NDVI metrics and smoothed data, respectively. Fig. 8 Relationship between mean maximum July temperature and MODIS-derived NDVI growing season metrics across Alaska. MODIS metrics represent an average of 12 years of data (2000-2011), as shown in Fig. 7. Mean maximum July temperatures are derived from PRISM data (1971-2000) and serve as a proxy for growing season temperatures across the state. Values shown above were calculated for 2500 random points assigned statewide. b. Average End of Season (2000-2011) Fig. 1 NDVI metrics algorithm schema NDVI data set The 7-day composite eMODIS Alaska data set is used as input for the algorithm. The data set is produced by the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) calibrated radiance data acquired by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Earth Observing System. Historical surface reflectance and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) products over Alaska are composited in 7-day intervals on the NAD83/Alaska Albers (EPSG3338) mapping grid and stored in Geostationary Earth Orbit Tagged Image File Format (GeoTIFF). The eMODIS Alaska data have a spatial resolution of 250 x250 square meters and are produced with an improved cloud masking algorithm (Jenkerson et al. 2010). The data can be downloaded from the USGS-EROS eMODIS website (http://dds.cr.usgs.gov/emodis/Alaska/historical/TERRA). Fig. 2 Study area extent for NDVI metrics showing the MODIS NDVI product (250m) with NPS park unit boundaries in yellow. Katmai National Park & Preserve is bound in red (see ‘Applications’). c. Average growing season length (2000-2011) Fig. 9 Annual SOS and EOS values shown with spring temperature in two shrub cover types, Katmai National Park & Preserve. Climate data are from the NWS-COOP station at King Salmon, AK. Fig. 3 Raw NDVI time series d. Average maximum NDVI (2000-2011) Field observations Day 119 (April 29, 2011) – SOS Day 149 (May 29, 2011) Day 232 (Aug 20, 2011) – Maximum NDVI Fig.4 Interpolated and smoothed NDVI time series Progression of green-up, from start of season (Day 119) to maximum NDVI (Day 232), at Contact Creek, Katmai National Park & Preserve. Daily images are from a time-lapse camera installed at a remote automated weather station. Visible green-up lags SOS by as much as 30 days in some locations. Literature cited Fig. 10 Annual SOS values as a function of spring temperature, snowfall, and snow depth in low & mid-elevation shrub cover types, Katmai NPP. Data are zonal statistics plotted for land cover class x elevation for each year of record. Fig. 5 Determination of Start of Season (SOS) Jenkerson, C.B., Maiersperger, T., and G. Schmidt. 2010. eMODIS: A user-friendly data source. USGS Open-File Report 2010-1055, 10 pp. Reed B., M. Budde, P. Spencer, and A. Miller. 2009. Integration of MODIS-derived metrics to assess interannual variability in snowpack, lake ice, and NDVI in southwest Alaska. Remote Sensing of Environment 113:1443-1452. Reed B., M. Budde, P. Spencer, and A. Miller. 2006. Satellite-Derived Measures of Landscape Processes: Draft Monitoring Protocol for the Southwest Alaska I&M Network, ver. 1.0. National Park Service, Inventory & Monitoring Program, Southwest Alaska Network, Anchorage, Alaska. 30 pp. Daniel L. Swets, D.L., Bradley C. Reed, B.C., James D. Rowland, J.D., and S.E. Marko. 1999. A weighted least-squares approach to temporal NDVI smoothing. Proceedings of the 1999 ASPRS Annual Conference, Portland, Oregon, pp. 526-536. Fig. 7 Average growing season metrics for the 2000-2011 period. Legend shows day of year for SOS, EOS (a-b); no. days for growing season length (c); and NDVI values (d). Summary & Acknowledgments NDVI growing season metrics (MODIS) have been developed for Alaska following modifications to Swets et al. (1999) and Reed et al. (2006) MODIS-NDVI metrics are currently available for 2000-2011 through the WCS feed at GINA: (http://ndvi.gina.alaska.edu/metrics?) SOS/EOS values are consistent with phenological patterns on the ground, but visible green-up lags MODIS-derived SOS by up to 30 days in some areas NDVI metrics are inherently variable; however, temperature appears to influence growing season length, primarily through its effect on SOS Acknowledgments: Support for this project was provided by the National Park Service, Inventory & Monitoring Program, Alaska Region I&M Networks Fig. 6 Determination of End of Season (EOS)