Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (July 2006)
Volume 115, Issue 2, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of an Inactive Akt2 Kinase Domain
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (March 2000)
Core Structure of gp41 from the HIV Envelope Glycoprotein
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Structural Basis of Caspase-7 Inhibition by XIAP
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2001)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Jia-Wei Wu, Amy E. Cocina, Jijie Chai, Bruce A. Hay, Yigong Shi 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Structural Basis for Cooperativity in Recruitment of MAML Coactivators to Notch Transcription Complexes  Yunsun Nam, Piotr Sliz, Luyan Song, Jon C. Aster,
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 569-579 (May 2003) Origins of Peptide Selectivity and Phosphoinositide Binding Revealed by Structures of Disabled-1 PTB Domain Complexes  Peggy C. Stolt, Hyesung Jeon, Hyun Kyu Song, Joachim Herz, Michael J. Eck, Stephen C. Blacklow  Structure  Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 569-579 (May 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6

Figure 1 Dab1 Domain Organization, Formation of PTB-ApoER2 Peptide Complexes, and Measurement of Affinity (A) Schematic diagram of Dab1. The five regulatory tyrosines downstream of the PTB domain are indicated, and sites of alternative splicing are marked with an asterisk. (B) GST pull-down of the Dab1 PTB domain by the ApoER2 and VLDLR cytoplasmic domains (ApoER2-C and VLDLR-C). Bound protein was subjected to SDS-PAGE and visualized by staining with Coomassie blue. (C) Measurement of the dissociation constant of the complex between the Dab1 PTB domain and a 14-residue peptide from the ApoER2 tail by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). A stock solution of the peptide (170 μM) was added in 7.5 μl increments into a 20 μM solution of the Dab1 PTB domain. To calculate the dissociation constant, we fitted data to a one-site binding model with the program Origin 5.0. Structure 2003 11, 569-579DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6)

Figure 2 Electron Density, Overview of Structure, and Sequence Alignment (A) Representative electron density (contoured at 1 σ after refinement) from the residues surrounding the NPVY motif of the peptide in the Dab1 PTB domain-peptide complex. Peptide residues, yellow; protein residues, green. (B) Ribbon representation of the Dab1 PTB domain in stereo colored according to secondary structure, with bound peptide rendered in ball and stick form. (C) Structure-based alignment of the Dab1 PTB domain with other PTB domains and a representative PH domain. Secondary structure elements are colored as in (B). Residues in the Dab1 PTB domain that interact with the ApoER2 peptide are colored cyan (hydrogen bonds), green (hydrophobic interactions), or yellow (both). Residues of the Dab1 PTB domain and the PLCδ PH domain that contact PI-4,5P2 are enclosed in blue boxes, as are the aligned residues of the Dab2 and ARH sequences. Numbers above the alignment refer to residue positions in Dab1. Residue positions for the other proteins are shown to the right of the aligned sequences. Structure 2003 11, 569-579DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6)

Figure 3 Dab1 PTB Domain-Peptide Contacts (A) ApoER2 peptide sequence with schematic indicating contacts between the peptide and the Dab1 PTB domain. Hydrogen bonds, dotted cyan lines; hydrophobic contacts, green. (B) Stereo representation of contacts. For the peptide, side chains are yellow, and residue labels are black. For the PTB domain, side chains are cyan, and residue labels are purple. A transparent surface of the PTB domain is shown in white, and the PTB domain backbone is illustrated with ribbons. Hydrogen bonds, dashed blue lines. Structure 2003 11, 569-579DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6)

Figure 4 Comparison of the Dab1 PTB Domain-ApoER2 Complex with Other PTB Complexes (A) Top panel, superposition of the APP peptide onto the Dab1 PTB domain-ApoER2 peptide complex. The molecular surface representation of the Dab1 PTB domain is colored by electrostatic potential (−15 kt/e [red] to +15 kt/e [blue]). The ApoER2 (gray) and APP (green) peptides are rendered in stick form, and the lysine side chain of the ApoER2 peptide has been removed for clarity. Bottom panel, close-up view of the boxed region highlighting the residues interacting with the Tyr 0 residue of the ApoER2 peptide. The protein backbone is shown as a ribbon, while selected peptide (yellow) and protein (cyan) side chains are in stick form. Hydrogen bonds, dashed blue lines. (B) The IRS-1 PTB domain-pTyr peptide complex. Top panel, the molecular surface representation of the IRS-1 PTB domain [26] is colored by electrostatic potential (as in [A]) to illustrate the basic pocket responsible for phosphotyrosine binding. The bound insulin receptor peptide is rendered in stick form. Bottom panel, close-up view of the boxed region to highlight the residues interacting with the pTyr of the insulin receptor peptide. Colored as in (A), except that the protein side chains are green. Structure 2003 11, 569-579DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6)

Figure 5 Electron Density of PI-4,5P2 Bound to the Dab1 PTB Domain Bound PI-4,5P2 was modeled in two orientations related by a 180° axis of rotation. PI-4,5P2 in the preferred orientation, based on occupancy refinement (see Experimental Procedures), CPK colors; the orientation with the lower occupancy, orange. Orange mesh, Fo − Fc map after refinement of a model with PI-4,5P2 in the less occupied orientation, contoured at 2.5 σ. Note the large regions of residual electron density overlapping the positions of the 1-phosphate and the 2-hydroxyl in the preferred orientation. Green mesh, Fo − Fc map after refinement of a model with PI-4,5P2 in the preferred orientation, contoured at 2.5 σ. Note the residual region of electron density overlapping the position of the 1-phosphate in the other orientation. Blue mesh, 2Fo − Fc map, contoured at 1 σ, of a composite model including refined coordinates of both PI-4,5P2 orientations weighted by occupancy. Protein side chains interacting with bound PI-4,5P2 are indicated. Structure 2003 11, 569-579DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6)

Figure 6 The PI-4,5P2 Binding Site Is Shared by Dab1, Dab2, and PLCδ, but Not by X11 and Shc (A) The Dab1 PTB domain, oriented with the peptide binding groove at the base and the N-terminal residues of the bound peptide projecting toward the viewer. The PI-4,5P2 binding site is on the top face, opposite the peptide binding groove. Dab1-based homology models of the Dab2 (B) and the ARH (C) PTB domains show that the location of the positively charged PI-4,5P2 binding site is conserved (arrows). (D) The PH domain from PLCδ bound to PI-4,5P2 [33]. The basic residues that form the PI-4,5P2 binding site in PLCδ structurally align with the amino acids that create the PI-4,5P2 binding site in Dab1. The X11 (E) and Shc (F) PTB domains lack the basic residues that make up the PI-4,5P2 binding site. All molecular surface representations were generated by the program GRASP [46] and shaded by electrostatic potential (−15 kt/e [red] to +15 kt/e [blue]). Structure 2003 11, 569-579DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6)

Figure 7 A Model for the Arrangement of the Dab1-ApoER2 Complex at the Membrane Surface Structure of the ternary complex of the Dab1 PTB domain (ribbon trace, colored as in Figure 2A), ApoER2 peptide (blue sticks), and PI(4,5)P2 (cyan- and CPK-colored sticks), arranged to illustrate that membrane recruitment of the PTB domain by PI(4,5)P2 is fully compatible with binding to the ApoER2 cytoplasmic tail. The positions of the remainder of the ApoER2 receptor cytoplasmic tail (blue dots) and the phospholipid membrane are highly schematized in the model. Structure 2003 11, 569-579DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(03)00068-6)