AEB IWG 02-XX Industry Position

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Emergency Braking System / Lane Departure Warning System OICA POSITION 1 Informal document No. GRRF-S08-10 Special GRRF brainstorming session.
Advertisements

1 TP/EMD European State of the Art for AEBS systems Stuttgart, May 2008 Dr. Jürgen Trost AEBS/LDWS
Warning Timing for AEBS AEBS/LDWS Proposal of Warning Timing 1) Warning has two functions; to induce the driver to take an avoiding maneuver.
Future Assessment of VRU Safety Features
Overview of Team Ford: Active Park Assist Software Engineering - CSE435 Michigan State University Fall 2014 Team members: Project Manager: Joe Reeder Facilitator:
Evaluation of ACSF during periodic technical inspection Informal group ACSF # / 17 in Tokyo Informal Document ACSF
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
The Promotion of Active Safety Measures in Japan - collision damage mitigation brake - September 2007 Road Transport Bureau Road Transport Bureau MLIT.
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Transportation Active Safety Institute TASI: Our Focus on the Human Machine Interface 25 January 2007 Purdue School of Engineering & Technology, IUPUI.
Office of Highway Safety Collision Warning Systems Kristin Poland, Ph.D.
The future of road safety Michael Meyer Robert Bosch GmbH.
1 Consideration of Issues Japan Presentation Informal document No. GRRF-S08-13 Special GRRF brainstorming session 9 December 2008 Agenda item 5.
Outline of Definition of Automated Driving Technology Document No. ITS/AD (5th ITS/AD, 24 June 2015, agenda item 3-2) Submitted by Japan.
Damage Mitigation Braking System
Human Factors Concerns for Design & Performance of Warnings J.L.Harbluk & P.C. Burns Ergonomics & Crash Avoidance, Transport Canada Human Factors Forum.
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
IHRA-ITS UN-ECE WP.29 ITS Informal Group Geneva, March, 2011 Design Principles for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems: Keeping Drivers In-the-Loop Transmitted.
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
3.1 Instruments, Controls, & Devices. _______________ Tells you the speed you are traveling in both _______________ and _______________. Some have digital!
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Research on HMI Homework item 1 (ACSF-01-13)
CLEPA Position Special GRRF Session on Automatic Emergency Braking and Lane Departure Warning Systems Brainstorming Meeting 9 Dec UN Palais des.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
Discussion paper – Major Issues
TPMS OICA POSITION Informal document No. GRRF-64-29
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by UNECE Document No. ITS/AD-07-07
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
Dr. Patrick Seiniger, Federal Highway Research Institute (BASt)
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
ACSF-C2 2-actions system
The Safety Technologies to Consider While Buying a New Car.
AEBS/LDW Proposed changes with regard to the implementation of technical specifications for Lane Departure Warning Systems (LDWS) GRRF st.
Proposal for UN Regulation on AEBS for M1/N1
IVG Driver Training Critical Event Reporting.
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Industry Homework from AEB 02
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Attachment 1: Procedures for Evaluating Automatic Braking (for Vehicles) under Japan’s New Car Assessment Program (JNCAP) ○ Test vehicles (mainly ordinary/compact/light.
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Informal document GRSG
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
AEB IWG 06 – Industry Input
Include cone to account for initial swerving?
Safety Distance to the front
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Overview of Test Procedures, etc
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Global Automotive Millimeter- wave Radar IC Market Report : Trends, Forecast and Competitive Analysis 1.
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
AEB 07 – Euro NCAP Summary Overview
AEB IWG 02 ISO Standard: FVCMS
AEB 07 – Industry Input.
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
VRU-Proxi Reversing Motion Regulation
Terms of Reference (AEBS Rev.1)
Maximum allowable Override Force
Interpretation of CSF warnings #2
AEBS-08 – Industry Input.
False reaction test Car to Car
AEB Pedestrian and Cyclist - minimum velocities Sensor opening angles
General Safety Regulation 5: AEBS – Proportion of M1 vehicles likely to pass the vehicle to pedestrian test of proposed draft regulation June 2019.
Introduction: Modifications to UN R131 AEBS for Heavy Vehicles
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
AEBS-09 – Industry Input.
Presentation transcript:

AEB IWG 02-XX Industry Position A new regulation should be built separate to UNECE R131. Establish ‘if fitted’ requirements. Test method and targets should be inspired from ENCAP/ISO test protocol. Test scenarios for: False reaction test, failure detection test and deactivation test can be taken from UNECE R131. General, performance and HMI requirements should also be taken from UNECE R131. AEB should be activated at least above 10km/h (prevent activation during low speed manoeuvre/parking), and deactivated above 50km/h (prevent activation in inter-urban environments) The system should be default ON, but the driver has the ability to switch the system off. AEB should not activate when the last point to brake is after the last point to steer. Forward Collision Warning and Brake Assist Systems are more effective than AEB at higher speeds.