A Highly Strained Nuclear Conformation of the Exportin Cse1p Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Ulrich Zachariae, Helmut Grubmüller  Structure 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Advertisements

Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Constraints Imposed by the Membrane Selectively Guide the Alternating Access Dynamics of the Glutamate Transporter GltPh  Timothy R. Lezon, Ivet Bahar 
Using Enhanced Sampling and Structural Restraints to Refine Atomic Structures into Low-Resolution Electron Microscopy Maps  Harish Vashisth, Georgios.
Natalie K. Garcia, Miklos Guttman, Jamie L. Ebner, Kelly K. Lee 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Maik Goette, Martin C. Stumpe, Ralf Ficner, Helmut Grubmüller 
Conformational Change in an MFS Protein: MD Simulations of LacY
Molecular Basis of Fibrin Clot Elasticity
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Volume 22, Issue 13, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2009)
Molecular Dynamics Simulations on SDF-1α: Binding with CXCR4 Receptor
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Decoy Strategies: The Structure of TL1A:DcR3 Complex
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (April 2005)
Jean-Pierre Kocher, Martine Prévost, Shoshana J Wodak, Byungkook Lee 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
HyeongJun Kim, Jen Hsin, Yanxin Liu, Paul R. Selvin, Klaus Schulten 
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Liqun Zhang, Susmita Borthakur, Matthias Buck  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Importin-β: Structural and Dynamic Determinants of a Molecular Spring
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Nicholas J Skelton, Cliff Quan, Dorothea Reilly, Henry Lowman 
The Signaling Pathway of Rhodopsin
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
The Exomer Cargo Adaptor Features a Flexible Hinge Domain
Hongwei Wu, Mark W. Maciejewski, Sachiko Takebe, Stephen M. King 
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
A Gating Mechanism of the Serotonin 5-HT3 Receptor
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Ramzi Alsallaq, Huan-Xiang Zhou  Structure 
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e2 (January 2018)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Structural Determinants and Mechanism of Mammalian CRM1 Allostery
Zara A. Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Gating of HCN Channels by Cyclic Nucleotides: Residue Contacts that Underlie Ligand Binding, Selectivity, and Efficacy  Lei Zhou, Steven A. Siegelbaum 
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Timothy A. Isgro, Klaus Schulten  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
The Atomistic Mechanism of Conformational Transition in Adenylate Kinase: A TEE-REX Molecular Dynamics Study  Marcus B. Kubitzki, Bert L. de Groot  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
In Search of the Hair-Cell Gating Spring
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Fine Details of IGF-1R Activation, Inhibition, and Asymmetry Determined by Associated Hydrogen /Deuterium-Exchange and Peptide Mass Mapping  Damian Houde,
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Interplay between Protein Thermal Flexibility and Kinetic Stability
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Presentation transcript:

A Highly Strained Nuclear Conformation of the Exportin Cse1p Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Ulrich Zachariae, Helmut Grubmüller  Structure  Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 1469-1478 (September 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic Diagram of the Primary Processes Involved in the CAS/Importin-β/α Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Cycle Importin-β (β), aided by the adaptor protein importin-α (α), transports NLS-containing cargo proteins into the nucleus. RanGTP binding disassembles the import complex in the nucleus. The export receptor CAS (Cse1p in yeast) is specialized to carry importin-α back to the cytoplasm in a complex with RanGTP; GTP hydrolysis to GDP then dissociates the export complex in the cytoplasm. All receptor-based nucleocytoplasmic transport processes are based on a steep RanGTP/GDP gradient across the nuclear envelope. Structure 2006 14, 1469-1478DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Transition of the Nuclear Structure of Cse1p into the Cytoplasmic Conformation (A–C) Comparison of the (A) nuclear initial structure of Cse1p with its (B) structure obtained from a 10 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and with the (C) crystal structure of the cytoplasmic state in form 2 (side views). (D–F) (D), (E), and (F) are top views of (A), (B), and (C), respectively. HEAT repeat numbers and inserts 8 and 19 are indicated. Spontaneous ring formation is observed in MD simulations (from [A] to [B] or from [D] to [E]), during which HEAT repeats 1 and 2 are shifted by ∼1.8 nm relative to HEAT repeats 14–16. Structure 2006 14, 1469-1478DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analysis of the Trajectory Reflecting the Complete Structural Change (A) Cα root-mean-square deviation (rmsd, black line) of HEAT repeats 1–16 of Cse1p with respect to form 2 of the crystal structure of the cytoplasmic state (1Z3H in the PDB) during closure, compared to projection of the trajectory upon the first eigenvector (red). Cse1p approaches and eventually reaches a conformation very similar to that of the cytoplasmic state from the nuclear initial conformation after removal of RanGTP and Kap60p. The dashed line indicates a typical rmsd value to the starting structure, seen in equilibration runs of proteins of comparable size (the cytoplasmic form of Cse1p reaches an rmsd of ∼0.3 nm after 0.5 ns of equilibration). (B) Coulombic energy between HEAT repeats 1–3 and residues 630–900 on the extended interface region (green line), and comparison with the drop in rmsd (black line). (C) Time-resolved contribution of Cse1p residues to ring formation. The color range is from red (∼0.3 nm deviation in 200 ps time windows) to blue (∼0 nm). The overall rmsd to the crystal structure is overlayed in white. Areas of high variability include the N-terminal ∼120 residues and helices 15A–17A. Frames showing a high structural change correlate well with significant drops in the rmsd curve. (D) Comparison of the rmsd with respect to the cytoplasmic structure in the simulations that exhibited spontaneous ring formation. Structure 2006 14, 1469-1478DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Electrostatic Potential Representation of the Surface of Cse1p in the Nuclear State Colors range from red (−5 kT, negative surface potential) to blue (+3 kT, positive surface potential). Structure 2006 14, 1469-1478DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Variations of the Angles between Adjacent HEAT Repeats during the Course of the Simulation The largest variations are seen for the angle between HEAT repeats 3 and 4. A comparison of the evolution of this angle is plotted for all four simulations. Simulation 3 covered 20 ns; therefore, the time was scaled by a factor of two for this simulation (1, solid line; 2, dashed line; 3, dotted line; 4, dash-dotted line). Structure 2006 14, 1469-1478DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Cα Rmsd Plot of the First 17 HEAT Repeats with Respect to the Initial Nuclear Structure HEAT repeats 1–3 exhibit the largest deviation and can be clearly separated from the rest of the protein. HEAT repeat 17 is also shifted to a higher extent than most of the other HEAT repeats. Notably, internal repeats 7–13 are almost invariant. Colors correspond to the coding used in Figure 2. Structure 2006 14, 1469-1478DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Schematic Diagram of Major Steps in Ring Formation The electrostatic properties and the flexibility of the N-terminal three HEAT repeats as well as HEAT repeats 14–17 are the basis for ring closure. Subsequent domino-like relaxation of the HEAT repeats between both interfaces leads to the occurrence of an apparent hinge near HEAT repeat 8. Structure 2006 14, 1469-1478DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Simulations of Mutated Cse1p (A) Behavior of reverse-charge mutants. The rmsd to the cytoplasmic structure is plotted for the mutants K21E/R25E/R28E (EEE, green line) and K21E/R25E/R28E/D71K/E72K (two simulations, EEEKK, cyan and red lines) and is compared to the behavior of the wild-type (black line). (B) Simulations of neutral mutants. The rmsd to the cytoplasmic conformation is shown for the polar neutral mutant K21Q/R25Q/R28Q/D71N/E72Q (red line) and the alanine mutant K21A/R25A/R28A/D71A/E72A (green line) and is compared with the wild-type (black line). (C and D) (C) and (D) display the Coulombic energy between the N terminus and the C-terminal interface region for the reverse-charge and the neutral mutants, respectively. Structure 2006 14, 1469-1478DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2006.08.001) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions