Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Transformation Efficiency of RasQ61 Mutants Linked to Structural Features of the Switch Regions in the Presence of Raf  Greg Buhrman, Glenna Wink, Carla.
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Molecular Basis of Box C/D RNA-Protein Interactions
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory domains of the Bcr–Abl kinase reveal a novel control mechanism  Hyun-Joo Nam, Wayne G Haser, Thomas M Roberts,
Allosteric Effects of the Oncogenic RasQ61L Mutant on Raf-RBD
The Gemin6-Gemin7 Heterodimer from the Survival of Motor Neurons Complex Has an Sm Protein-like Structure  Yingli Ma, Josée Dostie, Gideon Dreyfuss, Gregory.
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Structure of Cry2Aa Suggests an Unexpected Receptor Binding Epitope
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Recognition of a TG Mismatch
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Structural Roles of Monovalent Cations in the HDV Ribozyme
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
RIα Subunit of PKA Structure
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Crystal Structure of Carnitine Acetyltransferase and Implications for the Catalytic Mechanism and Fatty Acid Transport  Gerwald Jogl, Liang Tong  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 11, Issue 12, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
Volume 5, Issue 10, Pages (October 1997)
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
K-Ras Populates Conformational States Differently from Its Isoform H-Ras and Oncogenic Mutant K-RasG12D  Jillian A. Parker, Alicia Y. Volmar, Spiro Pavlopoulos,
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 1999)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano, Carla Mattos  Structure  Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 2025-2036 (November 2004) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011

Figure 1 Sequence Alignments of Ral, Ras, and Rap Secondary structural elements are indicated by shading. Switch regions are boxed. The single amino acid difference between simian and human RalA (147) is in gray. Residues are numbered and labeled above their respective sequences. The 14 tree-determinant residues (I18, M35, Y36, E44, K47, A48, K54, L57, I64, I78, N81, A103, T104, M172) are in dark blocks, and the two switch-of-function residues (F34, L112) are in white boxes. Black brackets under the Rap sequence indicate where the backbone of Rap is shifted relative to Ral and Ras. Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)

Figure 2 The Asymmetric Unit in the Crystal Structure of Ral-GppNHP GppNHp is in cyan, Mg2+ is in yellow, and the coordinating water molecules are in red. Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)

Figure 3 Close View of the Mg2+ Ions Bound to GppNHp (A) The model in the absence of an electron density map. Ser28 of the P loop and Gly71 in switch II are shown in magenta. (B) Same model as in (A), superimposed on an anneal omit Fo − Fc electron density map contoured at the 3σ level. The two magnesium ions, the coordinated water molecules, and the nucleotide were deleted from Molecule B in the model. (C) Same model as in (A), superimposed on the final 2Fo – Fc electron density map contoured at the 1σ level. Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)

Figure 4 Switch II in Ral-GppNHp (A) The β turn conformation in switch II of Molecule B in the Ral-GppNHp structure. Switch II in a symmetry-related molecule contributes to a four-stranded β sheet that forms across the interface. (B) A schematic drawing of the two β strands that come together in the crystal contact. Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)

Figure 5 Ral-GDP Structure The asymmetric unit in the crystal structure of Ral-GDP in crystal form 2. Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)

Figure 6 Comparison of Switch I in Three Forms of Ral Switch I of Ral-GppNHp (blue), Ral-GDP (green), and Ral-GppNHp/Sec5 (brick red). The box shows an enlarged view of the area where Sec5 interacts most closely with switch I. The backbone of Sec5 is shown in gold. Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)

Figure 7 Comparison of Switch II in Two Forms of Ral Switch II of Ral-GppNHp (blue) and Ral-GDP (green). Switch II is disordered in the Ral-GPPNHp/Sec5 structure. Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)

Figure 8 The Proposed Binding Site Near the Switch I Effector Region (A) A ribbon diagram of Ral-GppNHp with the secondary structural elements labeled. Ral tree-determinant residues are in blue, and the switch-of-function residue F34 is in cyan. Other selected residues that contribute to the pocket are shown in violet. (B) The electrostatic surface of Ral-GppNHp in the same orientation as that shown in (A). The location of switch I is indicated in green. Residues shown in (A) are identified and labeled with their respective three-letter codes. The Ral tree-determinant residues are indicated by an asterisk, and the switch-of-function residue is indicated by a plus sign. (C) The electrostatic surface of Ras-GppNHp. (D) The electrostatic surface of Rap-GTP. The orientation and labels in (C) and (D) are as described for (B). The numbering of the amino acid residues is relative to each protein as shown in Figure 1. All electrostatic surface calculations shown in this figure and in Figure 9 were generated by using the program GRASP (Nicholls et al., 1991). Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)

Figure 9 The Proposed Binding Site Modulated by Switch II (A–D) (A)–(D) are as described in Figure 8, but with the appropriate orientation. In (B)–(D), relevant secondary structural elements are indicated in green. The many hydrophobic residues that line the pocket are discussed in the text but are not labeled in the figure in order to avoid cluttering. Ser22 and Arg145 are indicated in violet. Structure 2004 12, 2025-2036DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.08.011)