Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
Advertisements

R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Tsan Xiao, Par Towb, Steven A. Wasserman, Stephen R. Sprang  Cell 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
The 1.85 Å Structure of Vaccinia Protein VP39: A Bifunctional Enzyme That Participates in the Modification of Both mRNA Ends  Alec E Hodel, Paul D Gershon,
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (May 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Structure of the DNA-Bound T-Box Domain of Human TBX3, a Transcription Factor Responsible for Ulnar-Mammary Syndrome  Miquel Coll, Jonathan G Seidman,
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
The structure of an RNA dodecamer shows how tandem U–U base pairs increase the range of stable RNA structures and the diversity of recognition sites 
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages (December 2001)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Structure of a water soluble fragment of the ‘Rieske’ iron–sulfur protein of the bovine heart mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex determined by MAD phasing.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of the InlB Leucine-Rich Repeats, a Domain that Triggers Host Cell Invasion by the Bacterial Pathogen L. monocytogenes  Michael Marino, Laurence.
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
The Crystal Structure of a Laminin G–like Module Reveals the Molecular Basis of α- Dystroglycan Binding to Laminins, Perlecan, and Agrin  Erhard Hohenester,
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 525-536 (August 1998) Crystal Structure of the Hexamerization Domain of N-ethylmaleimide–Sensitive Fusion Protein  Christian U. Lenzen, Diana Steinmann, Sidney W. Whiteheart, William I. Weis  Cell  Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages 525-536 (August 1998) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81593-7

Figure 1 Structure of the NSF D2 Protomer (A) Topology of D2. Helices are shown as cylinders; strands are shown as as arrows. Residue numbers at the beginning and end of the principal elements of secondary structure are indicated, as well as the locations of the P loop and the DExx box (DDIE in D2). Helices and strands are numbered consecutively in sequence. (B) Stereo Cα trace of D2. Every tenth Cα is shown as a small sphere and numbered. The bound AMPPNP is shown with thickened black bonds. (C) Ribbon diagram of D2, with AMPPNP shown in a ball-and-stick representation. To aid in following the path of the backbone, the ribbon is white at the N terminus and becomes progressively darker moving toward the C terminus. The P loop and DExx box are green and red, respectively. (D) Ribbon diagram of the first two domains of E. coli DNA polymerase III δ′ (Guenther et al. 1997), shown in the same orientation and color scheme as (C), except for a zinc-binding insert unique to δ′ (α3), which is shown in white. (B)–(D), as well as Figure 2B and Figure 3, were prepared with MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis 1991). Cell 1998 94, 525-536DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81593-7)

Figure 2 Nucleotide Binding by D2 (A) Stereo view of the refined 2Fo−Fc electron density map within 2.4 Å of AMPPNP, contoured at 1.5 σ. The refined model is shown with AMPPNP and Mg2PLUSPUSSIGN in black, and protein and water molecules in white. The figure was prepared with BOBSCRIPT (Esnouf 1997). (B) Stereo view of nucleotide-binding site. AMPPNP is shown with black bonds. White, light gray, dark gray, and black spheres denote carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphorus atoms, respectively. Mg2PLUSPUSSIGN is shown as a larger black sphere. Water molecules are shown as single oxygen atoms. Hydrogen bonds are shown as thin dashed lines; Mg2PLUSPUSSIGN coordination bonds are shown as thick dashed lines. For clarity, the backbone at position 510 and the water molecule that interacts with the α-phosphate oxygens (see [C]) are not shown. (C) Schematic diagram of the interactions between AMPPNP and D2. Water molecules are indicated by “W.” Hydrogen and Mg2PLUSPUSSIGN coordination bonds are indicated with dashed lines. Main-chain amide and carbonyl oxygen groups that interact with the ligand are shown emanating from the box surrounding the residue name, and side chain functionalities are shown schematically. Nonpolar van der Waals contacts are indicated by arcs. In (B) and (C), the asterisk at Lys-639 designates that this residue comes from an adjacent protomer in the D2 hexamer. This lysine appears to be only partially occupied, and its interaction with Oγ of AMPPNP is likely replaced by a water molecule in a fraction of the molecules in the crystal (see text). Cell 1998 94, 525-536DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81593-7)

Figure 3 Structure of the D2 Hexamer (A) Ribbon diagram of hexamer viewed down the 6-fold axis. The N-terminal side is closer to the viewer. Adjacent protomers are shown in cyan and yellow, and the bound AMPPNP is shown in red. (B) Stereo diagram of the interface between adjacent protomers. The different protomers are shown in cyan and yellow. The backbones of the relevant regions are shown as a ribbon representation and labeled; loops in the cyan copy are labeled according to their flanking elements of secondary structure. The amino-terminal loop is labeled “N.” The backbone of the P loop and DExx box of the cyan protomer are shown in green and red, respectively. Residues that form hydrogen bonds and/or van der Waals contacts across the interface are shown colored by protomer, and the AMPPNP is shown with red bonds. Water molecules in the interfaces have been omitted for clarity. White, blue, red, yellow, and magenta spheres represent carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur, and phosphorus atoms, respectively. Cell 1998 94, 525-536DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81593-7)

Figure 4 Surface Representation of the D2 Hexamer In (A)–(C), blue and red represent regions of positive and negative potential, respectively, at the 10 kT/e level. The approximate dimensions are indicated. (A) View of the N-terminal side of the hexamer; the D1 domain would be predicted to face this surface. (B) View of the C-terminal side, rotated 180° about the horizontal with respect to the view in (A). (C) Side view, rotated 90° about the horizontal from that in (B). (D) Side view showing two hexamers related by a unit cell translation along the crystallographic c (6-fold) axis, correponding to the organization of D1 and D2 in full-length NSF. Cell 1998 94, 525-536DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81593-7)

Figure 5 Structure-Based Sequence Alignment of D2 and Other AAA Domains Representatives from several classes of AAA proteins are shown. Regions of AAA proteins corresponding to NSF D2 are shown in the upper block, and NSF D1 and its homologs are shown in the bottom block. On the line above the D2 block, elements of secondary structure are indicated. *, key buried hydrophobic positions; PLUSPUSSIGN, other residues that contribute to the hydrophobic core; n, residues that participate in nucleotide binding; h, residues in the hexamer interface that directly interact with residues of another protomer (based on hydrogen bond distance cutoff of 3.4 Å and van der Waals distance cutoff of 4.0 Å). The sequences and their EMBL accession numbers are NSF, Chinese hamster ovary NSF (X15652); Sec18p, the NSF ortholog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Z35949); Cdc48p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an NSF homolog involved in ER and Golgi membrane fusion and biogenesis (Z74174); p97 from Xenopus laevis, the ortholog of Cdc48p (X54240); Pex1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, involved in peroxisome biogenesis (Z28197); and Sug1p from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a proteosome component (Z72570). Cell 1998 94, 525-536DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81593-7)