AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Some slides in this presentation were excerpted from US Eds February 2009 PowerPoint presentation titled: Help! Im a New Title I Director. What Do I Need.
Advertisements

Title I: Supplemental Educational Services Regional Technical Assistance Sessions May,2009.
External Auditors – Common Findings in Federal Programs Allen, Green & Williamson, LLP.
1 “Changing Performance” Nashville, Tennessee February 2, National Title I Conference Consolidating Funds S choolwide P rograms Sandy Brown &
West Virginia’s Experience. West Virginia Issues  SEA Maintenance of Financial Support (MFS) – USED Waiver  LEA Maintenance of Effort (MOE) – OSEP Verification.
Maintenance of Effort IV-B Funding LEA Level Special Education Services Kansas Department of Education Special Education Services.
IDEA Proportionate Share and Equitable Services: Serving Parentally Placed Private School Students with Disabilities OSE/ISD Directors Leadership Meeting.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
Title I Services in Non-Public Schools Equitable Services Requirements and Funding Basics.
Equitable Services, Part 1 Meaningful Consultation Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I University.
1 South Dakota Department of Education – Grants Management Rob Huffman – Administrator Mark Gageby – Special Education Fiscal Kim Fischer – Fiscal Monitoring.
Schoolwide Program Presentation New England Comprehensive Assistance Center Steve Hamilton.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
School-wide Consolidation 2015 ESEA Directors Institute August 26, 2015.
1 MERA May 17, 2011 Mike Radke, Director, Office of Field Services, Michigan Department of Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
Virginia Department of Education Division Leadership Liaison Meeting January 7, 2013.
Title I Coordinator Training Equitable Services December 7,
In P rivate Schools C hildren with Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Title I Coordinator Training Equitable Services January 10,
Region Three Pilot “Virtual” Consolidation. Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E]
Consolidation of Funds in Schoolwide Programs FY15 Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
Federal Grant Training. I. Title I-A Fiscal Requirements  To ensure Title I-A funds are in addition to regular services normally provided, three fiscal.
TITLE I, PART A ESEA ROLLOUT SPRING 2013 Version Title I, Part A Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Schoolwide Programs – New Guidance Karen Seay, Director Federal Policy and ESEA Research Division New Directors’ Training September 17-18, 2015
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
Schoolwide Funding Consolidation Panel Panelists: Nancy Konitzer, Arizona Department of Education, Rebecca Vogler, Cincinnati Public Schools and Jose Figueroa,
What Business Managers Need to Know About Presented by: Cindy Rhoads, Regional Coordinator Division of Federal Programs PA Department of Education
Schoolwide Consolidation Consolidation Legislation and Guidance Title I Schoolwide Fiscal Guidance issued February, 2008 [Section E] Designing Schoolwide.
Oklahoma State Department of Education Janet Barresi State Superintendent of Public Instruction Consolidated Schoolwide Funds.
Major Changes to Title I Regulations Public School Choice & Supplemental Educational Services Presented by: Karen Davies, Title I School Improvement Coordinator.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Federal Programs and the ESEA Flexibility Waiver Titles I, II, VI and X.
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
1 OSEP Verification Visits Fiscal Component FFY Office of Special Education Programs.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Kay Townsend, Fiscal Consultant Title I, IIA, VI, & X Oklahoma State Department of Education (405)
Title I, Part A Schoolwide Programs Webinar #9 James Connolly Terry Reyes Office for Grants and Federal Fiscal Compliance May 27,
IDEA Grants Application: Maintenance of Effort. 2 What is Maintenance of Effort? IDEA regulation (34 CFR § ) which directs districts, for each grant.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
School-wide Consolidation: LEA Panel
A Principal’s Guide to Title I, Part A and LAP Requirements
ESSA Updates: Non-public / Private Schools Equitable Services
Title I Services For Children Enrolled In Private Schools Molly Little Associate Director, Instructional Services and Federal Programs North Clackamas.
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
Every Student Succeeds Act
Introduction to LEA MOE Tool
Excess Costs IDEA-B Requirement
LEA Maintenance of Effort and Excess Cost Calculation
Title I, Part A Supplement not Supplant (SNS) Under ESSA
Fiscal Impact of Non-Public School Updates under the ESSA
Oregon Department of Education
Virtual Network Meeting: Consolidated Application
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Maintenance of Effort Virginia Department of Education
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective
Supplement Not Supplant Under Essa
Office of Federal and State Accountability
Equitable Services Sections 1117 and 8501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
Universal Review: Fiscal Requirements
ESEA Programs | December 2018
Implementing Equitable Services Requirements
Managing Perkins Funds
Managing Federal grants
Title I, Part A Virginia Department of Education
SPECIAL EDUCATION FINANCE UPDATES
Presentation transcript:

AUDITS----SINGLE AUDIT CONCEPT, COMPLIANCE

CROSS-CUTTING PROVISIONS compliance requirements apply to more than one ESEA program programs authorized in ESEA are designed to work in concert with each other, rather than separately

MAINTENANCE OF EFFORT compliance requirement if an LEA fails to maintain fiscal effort, the SEA must reduce the amount of allocated funds

AUDIT OBJECTIVE To determine whether the LEA’s calculation: consistent with the requirements supported by the records of the LEA

SUGGESTED AUDIT PROCEDURES LEA where LEA does calculation ensure LEA included only allowable categories trace amounts used in calculations to records of audited records

SUPPLEMENT NOT SUPPLANT compliance requirement increase the level of funds available from non-Federal funds

AUDIT OBJECTIVE SEA and LEA: To determine LEAs used funds only to supplement, and not supplant, non-Federal funds

AUDIT PROCEDURES determine procedures used by SEA and LEA to ensure funds used to supplement, and not supplant identify funded activities determine whether services would have been provided with non-Federal funds

COMPARABILITY compliance requirement funds provide services to Title I schools services provided are comparable to services provided in non-Title I schools each LEA must develop procedures for complying maintenance of records

AUDIT OBJECTIVE LEA: to determine LEA has developed procedures for compliance to determine LEA has maintained records

SUGGESTED AUDIT PROCEDURES SEA: review SEA records document SEA review of LEA compliance

SUGGESTED AUDIT PROCEDURES LEA: determine if LEA has procedures and measures for complying with comparability requirement review comparability documents trace comparability data to supporting records

CONSOLIDATION ADMINISTRATIVE FUNDS an LEA may consolidate with SEA approval not required to keep separate records

AUDIT OBJECTIVE SEA: To determine: amount taken for State administration amount within statutory and regulatory limits procedures for LEA request to consolidate

AUDIT OBJECTIVE LEA: To determine: LEA received prior approval amount within statutory and regulatory limits

SUGGESTED AUDIT PROCEDURES SEA has procedures for responding to LEA requests determine LEA obtained prior approval amounts transferred did not exceed allowable amounts scan general ledger or other records for misclassification

AUDIT OBJECTIVE SEA and LEA: To determine obligations occurred during the period of availability

SUGGESTED AUDIT PROCEDURES test transactions recorded AFTER end of audit period determine if underlying obligations recorded properly test transactions recorded DURING audit period verify the system was not changed to avoid lapsing funds

SUGGESTED AUDIT PROCEDURES (continued) review accounting records for adjustments trace these adjustments to their source determine that Federal funds were spent within the period of availability

SCHOOLWIDE PROGRAMS 50% of the children enrolled in the school or residing in the school attendance area must be from low-income families

AUDIT OBJECTIVE The LEA to determine: schools operating schoolwides are eligible the schoolwide programs are based on a comprehensive plan with all required elements Federal funds supplement the total amount of funds available

SUGGESTED AUDIT PROCEDURES review records verify school met poverty eligibility requirement review the procedures and documentation for distribution of resources determine whether the non-Federal funds was reduced

SUGGESTED AUDIT PROCEDURES (continued) review and determine if the schoolwide plan: contains a comprehensive needs assessment was developed in consultation of parents identifies schoolwide reform strategies for improving student achievement