The Aperture and Precision of the Auger Observatory

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AGASA Results Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, München, Germany Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration at 3 rd Int. Workshop on UHECR, Univ. Leeds.
Advertisements

JNM Dec Annecy, France The High Resolution Fly’s Eye John Matthews University of Utah Department of Physics and High Energy Astrophysics Institute.
Stereo Spectrum of UHECR Showers at the HiRes Detector  The Measurement Technique  Event Reconstruction  Monte Carlo Simulation  Aperture Determination.
Application for Pierre Auger Observatory.
Results from the Telescope Array experiment H. Tokuno Tokyo Tech The Telescope Array Collaboration 1.
Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Design Study the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers construction.
The Pierre Auger Observatory Nicolás G. Busca Fermilab-University of Chicago FNAL User’s Meeting, May 2006.
TeVPA, July , SLAC 1 Cosmic rays at the knee and above with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav for The IceCube Collaboration South Pole 4 Feb 2009.
AGASA update M. Teshima ICRR, U of CfCP mini workshop Oct
The TA Energy Scale Douglas Bergman Rutgers University Aspen UHECR Workshop April 2007.
First Analysis of the Auger APF Light Source Eli Visbal (Carnegie Mellon University) Advisor: Stefan Westerhoff.
The Highest Energy Cosmic Rays Two Large Air Shower Detectors
TAUP 2005: Zaragoza Observations of Ultra-high Energy Cosmic Rays Alan Watson University of Leeds Spokesperson for Pierre Auger Observatory
Systematics in the Pierre Auger Observatory Bruce Dawson University of Adelaide for the Pierre Auger Observatory Collaboration.
1 ricap07: Roma, June 2007 Recent results from the Pierre Auger Observatory (and comparisons with AGASA and HiRes) Alan Watson University of Leeds
Neutrino search in Auger Ricardo A. Vázquez University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain for the Pierre Auger collaboration Beijing, April 2006.
A neural network approach to high energy cosmic rays mass identification at the Pierre Auger Observatory S. Riggi, R. Caruso, A. Insolia, M. Scuderi Department.
First energy estimates of giant air showers with help of the hybrid scheme of simulations L.G. Dedenko M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow,
Konstantin Belov. GZK-40, Moscow. Konstantin Belov High Resolution Fly’s Eye (HiRes) Collaboration GZK-40. INR, Moscow. May 17, measurements by fluorescence.
Design and status of the Pierre Auger Observatory J. C. Arteaga Velázquez 1, Rebeca López 2, R. Pelayo 1 and Arnulfo Zepeda 1 1 Departamento de Física,
Cosmic Rays above the Knee Region 3 rd School on Cosmic Rays and Astrophysics Paul Sommers Penn State University Lecture 1 Science issues and open questions.
Measurement of the UHECR energy spectrum from hybrid data of the Pierre Auger Observatory Presenter: Lorenzo Perrone Università del Salento and INFN Lecce.
Auger at eV Bruce Dawson University of Adelaide, Australia.
Performance of CRTNT for Sub-EeV Cosmoc Ray Measurement Zhen Cao IHEP, Beijing & Univ. of Utah, SLC Aspen, CO, 04/2005.
The Status of the Pierre Auger Observatory Bruce Dawson University of Adelaide, Australia for the Pierre Auger Observatory Collaboration.
Humberto Salazar (FCFM-BUAP) for the Pierre Auger Collaboration, CTEQ- Fermilab School Lima, Peru, August 2012 Ultrahigh Cosmic Rays: The highest energy.
Claudio Di Giulio University of Roma Tor Vergata, INFN of Roma Tor Vergata IDAPP 2D Meeting, Ferrara, May The origin and nature of cosmic rays above.
Energy Spectrum C. O. Escobar Pierre Auger Director’s Review December /15/2011Fermilab Director's Review1.
ICHEP `06, Moscow The Auger project – status and results G. Matthiae University and Sezione INFN of Roma “Tor Vergata” Study of the highest energy cosmic.
Pierre Auger Observatory for UHE Cosmic Rays Gianni Navarra (INFN-University of Torino) for the Pierre Auger Collaboration XXXXth Rencontres de Moriond.
AGASA Results Masahiro Teshima for AGASA collaboration
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays at Pierre Auger Observatory
Stefano Argirò 1 for the Auger Collaboration 1 University of Torino, Italy, and INFN Physics case The Auger Observatory Performance Preliminary Analysis.
Pierre AUGER Observatory Jan Ridky Institute of Physics AS CR For Pierre Auger collaboration.
1 João Espadanal, Patricia Gonçalves, Mário Pimenta Santiago de Compostela 3 rd IDPASC school Auger LIP Group 3D simulation Of Extensive Air.
The Auger Observatory for High-Energy Cosmic Rays G.Matthiae University of Roma II and INFN For the Pierre Auger Collaboration The physics case Pierre.
Towards a high-resolution fluorescence telescope B. Tomé (LIP) IDPASC School on Digital Counting Photosensors for Extreme Low Light Levels, Lisboa,
Solving the Mystery of the Highest Energy Cosmic Rays : 1938 to 2007 cosmic rays: James W. Cronin Inaugural Conference: Institute for Gravitation and the.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
Status of the Pierre Auger Observatory Aaron S. Chou Fermilab Fermilab Users’ Meeting June 3, 2003.
Measurement of the UHECR energy spectrum from hybrid data of the Pierre Auger Observatory Presenter: Lorenzo Perrone Università del Salento and INFN Lecce.
The KASCADE-Grande Experiment: an Overview Andrea Chiavassa Universita’ di Torino for the KASCADE-Grande Collaboration.
1 CEA mercredi 26 novembre 2007 Latest news from the Pierre Auger Observatory Nicolas G. Busca - APC - Paris 7.
Preliminary Profile Reconstruction of EA Hybrid Showers Bruce Dawson & Luis Prado Jr thanks to Brian Fick & Paul Sommers and Stefano Argiro & Andrea de.
1 UHE Cosmic Ray Flux: The Auger Results C. Di Giulio for the Pierre Auger Collaboration a)Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata b)INFN Roma Tor Vergata.
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
L. CazónHadron-Hadron & Cosmic-Rays interactions at multi-TeV energies. Trento,2-Dez Results from the Pierre Auger Observatory L. Cazon, for the.
Bianca Keilhauer for the Pierre Auger Collaboration
High Energy Cosmic Rays The Primary Particle Types Paul Sommers for Alan Watson Epiphany Conference, Cracow January 10, 2004.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
A Measurement of the Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum with the HiRes FADC Detector (HiRes-2) Andreas Zech (for the HiRes Collaboration) Rutgers University.
Michael Prouza Center for Particle Physics Institute of Physics Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Prague Studies of the ultra-high energy cosmic.
1 A. Zech, Instrumentation in High Energy Astrophysics Chapter 6.3: Ultra-high energy cosmic rays & indirect detection.
Search for Anisotropy with the Pierre Auger Observatory Matthias Leuthold for the Pierre Auger Collaboration EPS Manchester 2007.
A Method of Shower Reconstruction from the Fluorescence Detector M.Giller, G.Wieczorek and the Lodz Auger group GZK-40 Moscow Workshop, May 2006.
TA-EUSO: First simulation study and status
L.L.Ma for LHAASO collaboration Beijing China
Expectation of Cosmic Ray Energy Spectrum with LHAASO
Andrea Chiavassa Universita` degli Studi di Torino
Existing and Planned UHE Cosmic Ray Experiments
Cosmic Rays at Extreme Energies The Pierre Auger Observatory
Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum Measured by HiRes Experiment
Pierre Auger Observatory Present and Future
30th International Cosmic Ray Conference
Preliminary Profile Reconstruction of EA Hybrid Showers
Litao Zhao Liaoning University&IHEP
Latest Results from the KASCADE-Grande experiment
Telescope Array Experiment Status and Prospects
After S Swordy (Chicago) Trans-GZK event detected at Haverah Park.
Studies and results at Pierre Auger Observatory
Presentation transcript:

The Aperture and Precision of the Auger Observatory M. Ave, R. Cester, B.R. Dawson, J. Lloyd-Evans, P. Sommers and A.A. Watson for the Pierre Auger Observatory Collaboration

Plan The Pierre Auger Observatory is a hybrid detector Surface Detectors Surface Detector Aperture and Resolution Fluorescence Detectors Hybrid Reconstruction of Shower Axis Hybrid Aperture and Resolution

Introduction Mendoza Province, Argentina 3000 km2, 875 g cm-2 1600 water Cherenkov detectors 1.5 km grid 4 fluorescence eyes -total of 30 telescopes each with 30o x 30o FOV 65 km

Introduction The Pierre Auger Project is a Hybrid detector Surface Detectors (SD) and Fluorescence Detectors (FD) shower development Nch(X) recorded by FD snapshot of shower front captured by SD at depth where particle densities at large core distances are near their maximum values

Why a Hybrid Observatory? Hybrid resolution of arrival directions, energies and masses is superior to that achieved by the SD or a single FD eye independently Rich set of measurements on each hybrid EAS SD and FD measure cosmic ray parameters using different methods with different systematic errors Cross-checks and control of systematics. while the FD only operates with a duty cycle of 10%, the Hybrid observations will allow confident analysis of SD data taken without FD coverage.

e.g. Measurements of Energy SD alone: E from estimates of water Cherenkov density 1000m from the shower core requires conversion factor from EAS simulations FD alone: E from estimates of energy deposition in the atmosphere (light a dE/dX). requires knowledge of atmospheric transmission. two methods can be compared with Hybrid Checks simulations and measurement systematics

Surface Detectors for SD-only operation, typically will require 5 stations at the 4 vem trigger level (< 20 Hz per station) standard techniques for direction and core finding. Several LDFs under study, including a modified Haverah Park function. 10 m2, 1.2 m depth, 3 PMTs, 40 MHz FADC Integrated signal expressed in units of vertical equivalent muons (1 vem ~ 100 pe)

Surface Detectors 1019eV proton SD water Cherenkov detectors measure muon, electron and gamma components of EAS, the latter especially important at large core distances

Surface Detector Resolution SD Angular resolution: E > 1019eV q (deg) Proton/Iron Photon E>1019eV E>1020eV 20o 1.1o 0.6o 4.0o 40o 0.5o 2.5o 60o 0.4o 0.3o 1.0o 80o 0.2o space angle containing 68% of events

Surface Detector Resolution Energy determined from fitted density at 1000m, r(1000). Conversion factor from simulations; averaged for p and Fe primaries. E > 1019 eV rms E resolution ~12% (assuming p/Fe mixture) Proton Iron photon

SD Aperture and Event Rate Eo (eV) Trig Aperture km2sr Rate per year > Eo 1018 3x1018 2200 15000 1019 7200 5150 2x1019 7350 1590 5x1019 490 1020 100 2x1020 30 Zenith < 60o, based on AGASA spectrum (Takeda et al 1998) (Zenith > 60o adds about 50% to event rate)

Auger Southern Site Hybrid reconstruction works when a shower is recorded by the surface array and at least one eye This multiple-eye design reduces our reliance on precise knowledge of atmospheric attenuation of light Mean impact parameter at 1019eV is 13km = Fluorescence site

Fluorescence Detector Schmidt aperture stop 3.8m x 3.8m prototype mirror and camera 440 pixel camera 30ox30o

Fluorescence Detectors 2 equipped bays looking over the engineering array

Hybrid Reconstruction of Axis good determination of shower axis is vital for origin studies, but also vital as first step towards good energy and mass composition assignment use eye pixel timing and amplitude data together with timing information from the SD. GPS clocks in SD tanks and at FDs. Hybrid methods using one eye give angular resolution comparable to “stereo” reconstruction

Hybrid Reconstruction (Cont.) eye determines plane containing EAS axis and eye plane normal vector known to an accuracy of ~ 0.2o to extract Rp and y, eye needs to measure angular velocity w and its time derivative dw/dt but difficult to get dw/dt, leads to degeneracy in (Rp,y) degeneracy broken with measurement of shower front arrival time at one or more points on the ground eg at SD water tank positions

Hybrid Reconstruction (Cont.) Simulations at 1019eV Reconstruct impact parameter Rp. Dramatic improvement with Hybrid reconstruction Single FD only median Rp error = 350m strong dependence on angular “Track Length” Hybrid median Rp error = 20 m

Simulated Hybrid Aperture Hybrid Trigger Efficiency “Stereo” Efficiency Note the significant aperture at 1018eV, and the stereo aperture at the higher energies Trigger requirement: at least one eye triggering on a track length of at least 6 degrees; two surface detectors. q < 60o Hybrid Aperture = Hybrid Trigger efficiency x 7375 km2sr

Hybrid Reconstruction Quality E(eV) Ddir (o) DCore (m) DE/E (%) DXmax g/cm2 1018 0.7 60 13 38 1019 0.5 50 7 25 1020 6 24 statistical errors only zenith angles < 60O 68% error bounds given detector is optimized for 1019eV, but good Hybrid reconstruction quality at lower energy

Conclusions the Hybrid nature of the Pierre Auger Observatory is a unique feature of the detector it offers a large set of “gold-plated” events during the 10% of time when both fluorescence and surface detectors are operating just as importantly, it provides cross-checks and justification to the collaboration and the community for the techniques used in analyzing the bulk of the data, that viewed by the surface array only