Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Bhalchandra Jadhav, Klemens Wild, Martin R. Pool, Irmgard Sinning 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structural Insights into RNA-Dependent Ring Closure and ATPase Activation by the Rho Termination Factor  Emmanuel Skordalakes, James M. Berger  Cell 
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 11, Issue 11, Pages (November 2003)
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Choel Kim, Cecilia Y. Cheng, S. Adrian Saldanha, Susan S. Taylor  Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 53, Issue 2, Pages (January 2014)
Structure of the UBA Domain of Dsk2p in Complex with Ubiquitin
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages (September 2005)
Hong Ye, Young Chul Park, Mara Kreishman, Elliott Kieff, Hao Wu 
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (October 2012)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Shaun K. Olsen, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure of the Catalytic Domain of Human DOT1L, a Non-SET Domain Nucleosomal Histone Methyltransferase  Jinrong Min, Qin Feng, Zhizhong Li, Yi Zhang,
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 19, Issue 9, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 41, Issue 3, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Structural Basis for the Highly Selective Inhibition of MMP-13
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Structural Basis of 3′ End RNA Recognition and Exoribonucleolytic Cleavage by an Exosome RNase PH Core  Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Molecular Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Peter König, Rafael Giraldo, Lynda Chapman, Daniela Rhodes  Cell 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Analysis of E
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Species-Dependent Ensembles of Conserved Conformational States Define the Hsp90 Chaperone ATPase Cycle  Daniel R. Southworth, David A. Agard  Molecular.
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 41-56 (October 2007) Structures of GRP94-Nucleotide Complexes Reveal Mechanistic Differences between the hsp90 Chaperones  D. Eric Dollins, Joshua J. Warren, Robert M. Immormino, Daniel T. Gewirth  Molecular Cell  Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 41-56 (October 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overview of GRP94-NMC and Comparison with GRP94-NM and GRP94-MC The two protomers are shown in blue and cyan. (A) Ribbon drawing of side and top views. The AMPPNP is shown as a stick model. In the top view, the positions of helix N1, which mediate N domain dimer interactions, are indicated. In side views, the N domains are on top. (B) Stereo surface view of the GRP94-NMC dimer. The N domains do not contact each other. (C) Comparison of GRP94-NMC, GRP94-NM, and GRP94-MC structures. Domain boundaries are indicated by dashed lines. The same relative orientation is shown for each structure. Only a single protomer from the GRP94-NMC and GRP94-MC dimers is shown. (D) Overlay of the three structures. Colors are as in (C). Molecular Cell 2007 28, 41-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of GRP94-NMC with Yeast Hsp82 and HtpG (A) Ribbon diagrams of each structure. Hsp82 coordinates are from PDB code 2CG9, and HtpG coordinates are from PDB code 2IOQ. GRP94-NMC is AMPPNP bound. Hsp82 is AMPPNP bound, and cochaperone Sba1 has been removed for clarity. HtpG is unliganded. N domains are colored red and pink. (B) Comparison of N and M domain orientations in GRP94-NMC and Hsp82. GRP94 (blue) and Hsp82 (green) were superimposed using the middle and C-terminal domains for alignment. Alpha helices are shown as cylinders, and the AMPPNP is shown as sticks. The helix 4/5 lid of Hsp82 is colored pink. (C) The N-middle interaction dictates the positioning of the catalytic residues. Views are of the N-middle interaction in Hsp82 (green) and GRP94 (blue) with the N domains aligned. The catalytic E33 and R380 in Hsp82, and the equivalent E103 and R448, are indicated. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 41-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 GRP94 N Domain Conformations (A and B) Structures of the isolated N domain determined in the absence (A) or presence (B) of bound adenosine nucleotide. The core of the domain is colored gray, and the lid components, helices N1, N4, and N5, along with strand 1, are colored magenta or yellow. (C) N domain as found in the AMPPNP-bound GRP94-NMC structure. The orientation of the molecule is the same as in (A) and (B). The likely trajectory of the disordered portion of the helix N4/N5 lid is shown in dashed lines. (D) Details of the backbones of the three N domains in the vicinity of the nucleotide-binding pocket. Only the alpha carbons are shown. Colors are as in (A)–(C). The ball denotes the position of the Gly197 alpha carbon and shows the backbone transition observed in the N domain when adenosine nucleotides bind. (E) Close-up overlay as in (D) showing the movement of helix N1 upon nucleotide binding. (F) Superposition of yeast Hsp82-NMC (PDB code 2CG9) with GRP94-NMC. Hsp82 is in green, and GRP94 is in blue. The N domains from each structure were the basis for the alignment. The helix N4/N5 lid from Hsp82 is shown in pink. The molecular surface of the GRP94 M domain is shown. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 41-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The C-Terminal Domain of GRP94 Has Additional Dimer Interactions (A and B) The C-terminal domain. Helices comprising the strap residues are shown in gold. (C) A potential client-binding surface composed of Met-Met pairs and hydrophobic residues. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 41-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 ADP- and AMPPNP-Bound GRP94 Have Identical Conformations (A) Overlay of the two nucleotide-bound complexes. The AMPPNP complex is in blue, and the ADP complex is in cyan. Only one protomer of the GRP94 dimer is shown. (B) Stereo view of the bound AMPPNP. SA omit electron density contoured at 1.3 σ is shown with a 2 Å carve radius. The density for the nucleotide is shown in green, for the residues of the N domain in pink, and for the M domain in blue. The position of Arg448 is indicated, and the distance to the γ-phosphate of the AMPPNP is shown with a dashed line. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 41-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 GRP94 ATPase Assays Activity was monitored by the detection of free phosphate and represents the average of at least three independent measurements. Error bars depict the standard error of the mean. (A) GRP94 (white) and Hsp82 (shaded) constructs and chimeras used in these assays. S1 refers to strand N1, and H1 refers to helix N1. The GRP94-charged region segment is indicated by horizontal lines and that of Hsp82 by vertical lines. (B–D) Specific activity of GRP94 and selected GRP94 mutants. Constructs used in each assay are indicated next to each reaction curve. (E) Comparison of yeast Hsp82, GRP94-NMC, and Hsp82/GRP94 chimera ATPase rates. (F) Summary of relative ATPase rates for GRP94 and Hsp82. Activity is given as a percentage of the Hsp82 rate. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 41-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model of GRP94 ATP Hydrolysis Mechanism The apo N domains of the twisted V dimer (cartoon diagram in blue and cyan, helices represented as cylinders) undergo local conformational changes in the N mobile domain elements strand N1 and helix N1 (orange) and the helix N4/N5 lid (green) upon binding nucleotide (shown as sticks). Each protomer of ATP-bound twisted V dimer undergoes an ∼90° rotation around the N/M interface aligning the nucleotide with the catalytic residues of the M domain and transiently dimerizing the N domains. The ATP-bound “catalytically competent” closed dimer form is stabilized by crossprotomer interactions between strand N1 and helix N1 (orange) from the opposing chain, those elements previously rearranged upon nucleotide binding, as well a bridging effect between the terminal phosphate of the nucleotide and the catalytic residue of the M domain. The helix N4/N5 lid is closed over the nucleotide, trapping it in preparation for hydrolysis. After hydrolysis, there is a concomitant disassembly of the transient N dimer, rotation around the N/M interface, and restructuring of the mobile domain elements of the N domain. Molecular Cell 2007 28, 41-56DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.024) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions