Joint submission for Box 5 calibration May 2015 Joint submission for Box 5 calibration Date: 2015-05-14 Authors: Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

May 2015 Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Month Year doc.: IEEE 802.11-yy/xxxxr0 May 2015 Abstract This joint submission provides updated simulation results for Box-5 calibration of each members However, the results are not matched yet To speed up the Box-5 calibration, we agreed some detail implementations Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics John Doe, Some Company

Box-5 Calibration [1] Box 0, 1, and 2 calibration are almost done May 2015 Box-5 Calibration [1] Box 0, 1, and 2 calibration are almost done Box 3 calibration is now in progress Box 5 calibration was initially discussed in September meeting Box 5: Integrated system simulator calibration The objective is to align a combination of all PHY and MAC features Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Box-5 PHY Details [2] May 2015 PHY parameters BW All BSSs at 5GHz [80 MHz, no dynamic bandwidth] Channel model TGac D NLOS per link Shadow fading iid log-normal shadowing (5 dB standard deviation) per link Data Preamble Type [5GHz, 11ac], always decoded correctly after successful reception, duration is considered. STA TX Power 15 dBm per antenna  AP TX Power 20 dBm  per antenna AP number of TX/RX antennas 1/1 STA number of TX /RX antennas AP antenna gain 0 dBi STA antenna gain -2 dBi Noise Figure 7dB CCA threshold -56 dBm (measured across the entire bandwidth after large-scale fading) Rx sensitivity -76 dBm (a packet with lower rx power is dropped) Link Adaption Fixed MCS =5 (234.0 Mbps) Channel estimation ideal PHY abstraction RBIR, BCC [1, 5] Channel correlation Independent or time-correlated channel per packet Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Box-5 MAC Details [2] May 2015 MAC parameters Access protocol [EDCA, AC_BE with default parameters] [CWmin = 15, CWmax = 1023, AIFSn=3 ] Queue length A single queue for each traffic link is set inside AP/STA sized of 2000 packets Traffic type UDP CBR with rate 10^8bps (may not enough to model full buffer) MPDU size 1540 Bytes (1472 Data + 28 IP header + 40 MAC header) Aggregation [A-MPDU / max aggregation size / BA window size, No A-MSDU, with immediate BA], Max aggregation: 64 MPDUs with 4-byte MPDU delimiter Max number of retries 10 Beacon Disabled RTS/CTS OFF Traffic direction UL Only Output metric -CDF or Histogram of per non-AP STA throughput (received bits/overall simulation time) -PER of all AP/STA (1 - # of success subframes / # of transmitted subframes) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

11ac Scenario 6 – OBSS Enterprise [2][3] May 2015 11ac Scenario 6 – OBSS Enterprise [2][3] Fixed Location and Association STA1 (5,-9.5) STA2 (3.5,7.5) STA4 (-4.5,0.5) STA5 (-1.5,6) STA7 (-9,-5) STA8 (-8.5,8.5) STA10 (-3,0.5) STA11 (-0.5,8) STA13 (-4,-4) STA14 (7.5,-1) STA16 (8,-6) STA17 (0,-7.5) STA19 (-2.5,-4.5) STA20 (0.5,-2) STA22 (0,-4.5) STA23 (-1.5,7) STA25 (3.5,-5) STA26 (9,9.5) STA28 (-8,-5.5) STA29 (1.5,3.5) AP A (0,0) AP B (40,20) AP C (-40,-20) STA3 (7.5+xb, ‑9.5+yb) STA9 (7+xb, -7.5+yb) STA15 (3+xb, -0.5+yb) STA21 (-6.5+xb, -3+yb) STA27 (‑6+xb, 2.5+yb) STA6 (-5.5+xc,4.5+yc) STA12 (7+xc,7+yc) STA18 (10+xc,0.5+yc) STA24 (3+xc,2.5+yc) STA30 (9.5+xc,3.5+yc) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

History on Box-5 Calibration May 2015 History on Box-5 Calibration We have discussed Box-5 calibration from September meeting Many issues have been agreed and addressed in DCN 1523r5 Simulator members agreed that we have to focus on 1 BSS UL case in March meeting (BSS B) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Focusing case No shadowing Fixed MCS = 5 instead of 7 currently used May 2015 Focusing case No shadowing Fixed MCS = 5 instead of 7 currently used Firstly calibrate 3 combinations of 2-STA case (3+9, 3+27, 3+15) Then we turn to 3-STA case (3+9+27, 3+9+15) Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

One BSS Test Result Each STA Throughput [Mbps] May 2015 LG [5] ZTE [6] MediaTek [7] WILUS NEWRACOM [8] Huawei NTT 2 STAs STA 3, STA 9 98.25 98.13 98.27 98.00 98.16 100.92 98.02 98.30 95.84 97.28 98.59 98.37 98.16 98.15 STA 27 91.02 94.19 96.73 93.46 97.77 97.28 97.31 95.10 95.53 99.76 96.94 97.01 97.58 STA 15 98.36 98.95 98.10 98.38 98.48 101.22 97.21 98.26 95.77 97.23 99.74 97.36 97.44 99.23 3 STAs STA 9, 65.66 65.49 55.61 66.87 60.30 71.59 83.67 88.47 21.23 63.51 67.00 61.77 67.07 65.46 52.25 64.66 63.61 59.54 61.82 62.18 61.52 60.16 62.89 66.01 67.33 65.75 72.23 62.68 60.10 72.15 65.56 61.92 62.98 59.89 58.95 65.52 70.07 56.66 62.54 60.75 61.63 63.79 Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

One BSS Test Result Sum Throughput [Mbps] May 2015 LG [5] ZTE [6] MediaTek [7] WILUS NEWRACOM [8] Huawei NTT 2 STAs STA 3, STA 9 196.38 196.27 199.08 196.32 193.12 196.96 196.31 STA 27 185.21 194.86 191.23 194.59 190.63 196.7 STA 15 197.31 196.48 199.7 195.47 193 197.1 196.67 3 STAs STA 9, 186.76 198.76 193.37 192.28 184.78 187.81 185.52 189.06 205.31 194.93 190.46 184.36 189.27 186.17 Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Agreement during off-line discussion May 2015 Agreement during off-line discussion Each members make sure own simulator about following issues and specify among this group Power Spectral density (scale to 80 MHz) Preamble decoding procedure (EMD 571r8)[9] Capture window size, preemption window size, etc.. Each single link performance (STA-AP 1-to-1) A-MPDU aggregation algorithm Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Agreement during off-line discussion May 2015 Agreement during off-line discussion Running time: at least 10 seconds per 1 drop No capture effect: Receiver is locked during PPDU length UDP traffic starts during 1.000 ~ 1.010 seconds Additional performance metrics may be used PER 1 - # of success subframes / # of transmitted subframes Average number of aggregated subframe # of transmitted subframes / # of transmitted PPDU Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

May 2015 Conclusion This joint submission provided simulation results for Box-5 calibration of each members We focused 1 BSS UL case However, the results are not matched yet To speed up the Box-5 calibration, we agreed some detail implementations Text for Simulation Scenario Document (980r10) will be presented Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics

Reference [1] 11-14/0571r5 Evaluation Methodology May 2015 Reference [1] 11-14/0571r5 Evaluation Methodology [2] 11-14/1177r2 Box5 Calibration Discussion [3] 11-09/0451r16 TGac Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology [4] 11-14/1523r5 Offline Discussion Minutes of SLS Calibration [5] 11-14/1392r7 Simulation Results for Box5 calibration [6] 11-15/0638r0 Simulation Results for Box5 [7] 11-15/0613r0 Box 5 Calibration Result [8] 11-15/0610r1 Simulation Results for Box 5 Calibration [9] 11-14/0571r8 Evaluation Methodology Suhwook Kim, LG Electronics