US LHC Accelerator Research Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Wire scanners MDW chicane energy collimator 3 MPS collimators in this region end of linac Damage Simulation in MPS Collimators L. Keller Apr. 9, 2006.
Advertisements

Coll Eng E Doyle 1/18 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Prototype Engineering Status 6/21/06 Jaw-hub-shaft concept - continued Permanent.
The FAIR Antiproton Target B. Franzke, V. Gostishchev, K. Knie, U. Kopf, P. Sievers, M. Steck Production Target Magnetic Horn (Collector Lens) CR and RESR.
Collimator Damage Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Cockcroft Institute “All Hands Meeting”, January 2006.
A 10-m long steel wire (cross – section 1cm 2. Young's modulus 2 x N/m 2 ) is subjected to a load of N. How much will the wire stretch under.
CLIC collimator survival IWLC 2010 J.L. Fernández-Hernando – ASTeC/Cockcroft Institute (Daresbury Lab.) 21/10/2010 J.L. Fernández-HernandoASTeC/CI21/10/2010.
Zero Degree Extraction using an Electrostatic Separator Take another look at using an electrostatic separator and a weak dipole to allow a zero degree.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
1 3D Simulations for the Elliptic Jet W. Bo (Aug 12, 2009) Parameters: Length = 8cm Elliptic jet: Major radius = 0.8cm, Minor radius = 0.3cm Striganov’s.
BLM thresholds for MQW magnets V. Raginel, B. Auchmann, D. Wollmann BLM Threshold Working Group meeting, 24/02/2015.
SLAC rotating collimator for HiRadMat beam tests 14 March 2014 S. Redaelli, A. Bertarelli, CERN T. Markiewicz, SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
Beam LARP Rotatable Collimator Mechanical Engineering Discussion 03 October 2008 Phase II CERN ME Video Mtg. Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC.
Design of the Photon Collimators for the ILC Positron Helical Undulator Adriana Bungau The University of Manchester Positron Source Meeting, July 2008.
LHC Phase II Collimator teleconference - 4 March 2008LHC Rotatable Phase II Collimators 1 beam LARP Phase II collimator Progress and Plans 4 March 2008.
Collimation Meeting Tests on a Fully Assembled TCT Collimator in the HiRadMat Facility M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, on behalf of the Collimation Team.
LHC Phase II Collimator Compact jaw simulations New FLUKA => ANSYS mapping scheme New 136mm x 950mm jaw –60cm primary collimator –Helical cooling channel.
Status of Phase II Energy Loss Studies 1. FLUKA with “simple” CERN-provided input file modeling ~40m around primary collimators used for all SLAC studies.
The SLAC Phase II Collimator Program 15 June 2005 CERN Team Visit Tom Markiewicz SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
Concept of a Collimation System with Enhanced Operational Stability and Performance.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Plans for collimator survival and SLAC tests J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Heat Transfer Simulation for the Welding of the T-Section.
Collimator and beamline heating External Review of the LHC Collimation Project CERN Wed 30/6/2004.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
Task List for Phase II Rotatable Collimator Project at SLAC 30 January 2007 CERN/LARP Video Meeting Tom Markiewicz/SLAC BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC US LHC.
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
Russian Research Center” Kurchatov Institute” Shock wave propagation near 450 GeV and 7 TeV proton beams in LHC collimator materials Alexander Ryazanov.
LARP LHC PHASE II SECONDARY COLLIMATOR CD1 REVIEW. - E. Doyle 15 Dec /25 LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Review SLAC 12/15/05 Prototype Engineering.
BOOSTER COLLIMATION AND SHIELDING Proton Source Workshop Fermilab December 7-8, 2010 Nikolai Mokhov Fermilab Accelerator Physics Center.
Phase II Collimators for LHC Upgrade at SLAC - Material Issues E. Doyle 03 Sept /25 Workshop on Materials for Collimators CERN 2007/09/03 Phase.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
DRAFT Simulation of Errant Beams in the BDS How many bunches will damage beamline components or quench SC coils? Analysis Steps 1.Use TRANSPORT with BDS.
Recent Energy Deposition Simulations TCSM-A6L7 L. Keller LARP Video Mtg. 02 Oct
accident deformation – doyle 1/12 Phase II Collimator - Accident Deformation Simulation December 11, 2006.
Radiation studies for the MI collimation system and ILC vertical cryostat test area December 13, 2006 Igor Rakhno Accelerator Physics Department.
Halo Collimation of Protons and Heavy Ions in SIS-100.
Experimental tests of wakefields and material damage for ILC spoilers
Radiation damage simulations for CLIC and ILC spoilers and ATF tests
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
P. Sievers/CERN. A. Ushakov/Univ. Hamburg. S. Riemann/DESY-Zeuthen.
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1
Problem: A kicker failure can deposit 9 x 1011 protons on any metallic
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC1 Review SLAC 12/15/05 RC1 Construction and Test Plan LARP LHC PHASE II COLL REVIEW – RC1.
Thermo-mechanical simulations jaws + tank
Advanced Beam Dump for FCC-ee
Federico Carra – EN-MME
BEAM LOSS MONITORING SYSTEM
BDA30303 Solid Mechanics II.
Status of energy deposition studies in IR3
Recommendations of 12/16/05 review committee & SLAC response
LARP Collimation – Engineering & Analysis
23 April 2012 Tom Markiewicz/SLAC
XFEL Collimation and Beam Switchyard Vacuum Issues
¼ meshed models for Omega3P calculations
accident deformation – doyle (rev1) 1/8
LHC Collimation Requirements
Interaction Region Design Options e+e- Factories Workshop
External Review of LHC Collimation Project Oliver Aberle 1th July 2004
LARP Rotatable Collimators for LHC Phase II Collimation
LARP Phase II Secondary Collimator RC-1
Discussion of High Energy Proton Losses in Arc 7
Direct Hits on Titanium Alloy Spoilers
Micro Status Report of SLAC Phase II Plan Tom Markiewicz SLAC
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
Monte Carlo simulations for the ODIN shielding at ESS
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
accident deformation – doyle 1/8
Presentation transcript:

US LHC Accelerator Research Program BNL - FNAL- LBNL - SLAC Accident Simulations in Phase II Secondary Collimators 1 April, 2009 1. 7 TeV => 1.0 MJ 2. 0.45 TeV => 2.2 MJ L. Keller

SLAC Damage Test - 1971 Beam entering a few mm from the edge of a 30 cm long copper block The length and depth of this melted region is comparable to the ANSYS simulation for the LHC accident. 30 cm 500 kW beam 0.65 MJ in 1.3 sec Beam diameter ~ 2000 µ It took about 1.3 sec to melt thru the 30 cm block, but for this relatively large beam, the front two radiation lengths remain intact.

Tevatron Accident – 2003 Beam Lost on Stainless Steel Collimator Energy deposition ~0.5 MJ groove is 25 cm long, 1.5 mm deep

secondary collimator - causing it to melt within a substantial volume. LHC : A kicker failure can deposit 9 x 1011 protons (8 bunches) on any metallic secondary collimator - causing it to melt within a substantial volume. Missteered beam 9x1011 protons, 1 MJ on secondary Jaw Copper Jaw 120 cm melting 25-30 cm 3D ANSYS model, E. Doyle above Cu melting

Cross Section at Shower Maximum Showing Copper Melting and Possible Fracture Regions in a Mis-steering Accident 7 TeV, 8 bunches Copper Jaw 2.5 cm Fracture zone, radius = 7 mm Melting zone (grey), radius = 3.3 mm

FLUKA/ANSYS Simulation of 7 TeV Accident, 1.0 MJ Zoom in at Shower Maximum, Z = 20 cm Melted/vaporized zone 4 mm Zoom 6 mm 2.5 cm Temp (ºC)

7 TeV, 8 bunches, 1 MJ Accident Case – jaw adjacent to the one being directly hit, ≈ 4 mm gap. This jaw may be damaged too. Copper Copper Fracture at 200deg C 840 deg C

7 TeV, 8 bunches Another accident Case – Beam hits the horizontal primary collimator The first jaw in the downbeam secondary collimator (40m away) probably OK. Copper Copper 250 ˚C

ANSYS Simulation of Permanent Deformation in 7 TeV Accident 1.0 MJ J. Amann E. Doyle Virtually no deformation at phi = ±90º Beam side 47 µm X (m) Back side upbeam end downbeam end Z (m)

450 GeV Errant Beam Scraping the TT40 Vacuum Chamber - 2004 (Goddard, et.al., AB-Note-2005-014 BT) 2.2 MJ Side of Beam Impact Vacuum Chamber Wall Opposite from Beam Impact

FLUKA/ANSYS Simulation of Injection Accident, 2.2 MJ Cut at Shower Maximum, Z = 15 cm Melted/vaporized zone Zoom 6 mm 9 mm 2.5 cm J. Amann E. Doyle Temp (ºC)

ANSYS Simulation of Permanent Deformation in 450 GeV Accident 2.2 MJ J. Amann E. Doyle Virtually no deformation at phi = ±90º X (m) 110 µm Beam side Back side upbeam end downbeam end Z (m)

Instantaneous Water Pressure Bump Cooling Tubes 2.5 cm Transverse to Beam Impact Copper yield ≈ 300 bar 1.0 MJ Pressure (bar) 2.2 MJ Pressure (bar)

Summary and Conclusions 1. For 1 MJ @ 7 TeV impacting the edge of a copper cylinder, a) The vaporized/molten zone is ~4 mm deep x ~6 mm high. b) The permanent deformation is ~50 µ toward the beam axis. The cooling water pressure bump is 6 bar. 2. For 2.2 MJ @ 450 GeV impacting the edge of a copper cylinder, a) The vaporized/molten zone is ~6 mm deep x ~9 mm high. b) The permanent deformation is ~110 µ toward the beam axis. The cooling water pressure bump is 25 bar. 3. Accident experience at other accelerators has shown that nearby vertical surfaces are splattered with metal droplets a fair distance above and below the beam axis, so that when moving to a fresh surface a rotatable jaw is preferable to raising or lowering the vertical surface.