Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Networks of Dynamic Allostery Regulate Enzyme Function
Advertisements

Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 11, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 95, Issue 8, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
Solution Structure of the U11-48K CHHC Zinc-Finger Domain that Specifically Binds the 5′ Splice Site of U12-Type Introns  Henning Tidow, Antonina Andreeva,
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (September 2013)
AnchorDock: Blind and Flexible Anchor-Driven Peptide Docking
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e7 (December 2017)
Volume 23, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Yizhou Liu, Richard A. Kahn, James H. Prestegard  Structure 
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Leonardus M.I. Koharudin, Angela M. Gronenborn  Structure 
Yuan Yang, Chang Shu, Pingwei Li, Tatyana I. Igumenova 
Volume 21, Issue 10, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
A Conformational Switch in the CRIB-PDZ Module of Par-6
Supertertiary Structure of the MAGUK Core from PSD-95
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Binding Dynamics of Isolated Nucleoporin Repeat Regions to Importin-β
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Structural Basis of Prion Inhibition by Phenothiazine Compounds
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 17, Issue 10, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (February 2005)
Structural Diversity in Integrin/Talin Interactions
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Insights into Oncogenic Mutations of Plexin-B1 Based on the Solution Structure of the Rho GTPase Binding Domain  Yufeng Tong, Prasanta K. Hota, Mehdi.
Alemayehu A. Gorfe, Barry J. Grant, J. Andrew McCammon  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (July 2005)
A Self-Sequestered Calmodulin-like Ca2+ Sensor of Mitochondrial SCaMC Carrier and Its Implication to Ca2+-Dependent ATP-Mg/Pi Transport  Qin Yang, Sven.
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Paul Robustelli, Kai Kohlhoff, Andrea Cavalli, Michele Vendruscolo 
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages (September 2016)
Kalyan S. Chakrabarti, Jess Li, Ranabir Das, R. Andrew Byrd  Structure 
Volume 17, Issue 7, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Two Pathways Mediate Interdomain Allosteric Regulation in Pin1
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages e5 (July 2019)
Structure and Interactions of PAS Kinase N-Terminal PAS Domain
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages e3 (September 2017)
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages (December 2011)
Figure 1. Comparison of X-ray structures of the pol β apoenzyme (3UXN-A (5)), binary complex (3ISB (30)) with ... Figure 1. Comparison of X-ray structures.
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (September 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 509-517 (April 2016) Long-Range Communication between Different Functional Sites in the Picornaviral 3C Protein  Yan M. Chan, Ibrahim M. Moustafa, Jamie J. Arnold, Craig E. Cameron, David D. Boehr  Structure  Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 509-517 (April 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2016.02.019 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Poliovirus 3C Protease Has Multiple Functions (A) The structure of the 3C protease (PDB: 1L1N) showing the locations of the proposed RNA binding site (in green spheres) and the catalytic triad (in black spheres). (B) 3C interacts with viral RNA control sequences including the internal origin of replication (oriI) site. The stem left (SL) RNA that is used in these studies corresponds to the nucleotide sequence shown in blue. (C) 3C catalyzes the hydrolysis of peptide bonds in the viral polyprotein, including between 2C and 3A, and 2A and 2B. These cleavage sites are represented by the CA and AB peptides, respectively. The two C-terminal Arg residues (underlined) are added to the peptide to increase solubility, but they are not predicted to interact with 3C. See also Figure S1. Structure 2016 24, 509-517DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.02.019) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 RNA and Peptide Binding Perturb the Chemical Environment around the Other Ligand's Binding Site (A and B) 1H-15N HSQC spectra were compared with 3Cinactive without and 3Cinactive bound with (A) SL RNA or (B) CA peptide. NMR chemical shift perturbations were calculated using the equation Δδcombined = (ΔδH2 + (ΔδN/5)2)1/2 where ΔδH and ΔδN are the chemical shift differences between 3C with and without the appropriate ligand for the backbone amide proton and nitrogen, respectively. (C) Residues showing substantial chemical shift perturbations in the presence of RNA and/or peptide are plotted as spheres on the 3C X-ray crystal structure (PDB: 1L1N), where those with chemical shift perturbations one and two SDs above the average are shown respectively in light blue (orange) and darker blue (red) for SL RNA (peptide) binding. Residues that show substantial chemical shift pertubations for both SL RNA and peptide binding are shown in purple. NMR spectra were collected at 298 K with ∼215 μM 3Cinactive in the presence/absence of 215 μM SL RNA or 215 μM CA peptide using a buffer consisting of 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and 50 mM NaCl. See also Figure S2. Structure 2016 24, 509-517DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.02.019) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The Conformational Ensemble of 3C Is Different when Bound with Both Peptide and RNA Compared with when It Is Bound with Only One Ligand (A) Spectral overlays of specific resonances from 1H-15N HSQC spectra collected for ligand-free 3Cinactive (black), and 3Cinactive bound with SL RNA (blue) or CA peptide (red) or both (purple). (B) The NMR spectra of the ternary complex bound with peptide and SL RNA also depends on the order of ligand binding. The resonances are colored purple and cyan for when SL RNA and CA peptide are added first, respectively. (C) Locations of residues associated with two or more resonances in the ternary complexes bound with peptide and RNA are shown as magenta colored spheres. NMR spectra were collected at 298 K with ∼215 μM 3Cinactive in the presence/absence of 215 μM SL RNA or 215 μM CA peptide using a buffer consisting of 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5) and 50 mM NaCl. See also Figure S3. Structure 2016 24, 509-517DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.02.019) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Binding of RNA Selects for a Different Subset of 3C Conformations (A–C) Example NMR R2 relaxation dispersion curves collected at 1H Larmor frequencies of 600 (black) and 850 (red) MHz (A). Error bars indicate estimated uncertainties in R2. Residues displaying Rex values greater than 5 s−1 at 850 MHz for (B) ligand-free 3Cinactive and (C) 3Cinactive bound with SL RNA are plotted as colored spheres. (D) Comparison of the dynamic chemical shift changes (Δω) derived from the R2 relaxation dispersion curves between ligand-free 3Cinactive and SL RNA-bound 3Cinactive. It should be noted that some residues that show Δω > 4.5 ppm are not plotted. Residues with substantially different Δω in the presence/absence of SL RNA are also plotted as blue spheres in (C). The R2 relaxation dispersion experiments were conducted at 295 K using a buffer consisting of 25 mM potassium phosphate (pH 8.0) and 150 mM NaCl. See also Table S1. Structure 2016 24, 509-517DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.02.019) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Nanosecond Dynamics Nearby the Protease Active Site and RNA-Binding Site (A) Shown is the average 3Cactive structure (gray), calculated from the last 50 ns of the MD simulation, superimposed on the 3C crystal structure (light blue, PDB: 1L1N). Apart from the N-terminal residues (aa 1–13), the two structures superimpose well with an RMSD of 1.52 Å. (B) The calculated per-RMSD across the last 50 ns of the trajectory is plotted as a function of residue. Residues corresponding to the peaks are indicated by red arrows and labeled. The N-terminal residues appeared to show the largest amplitude dynamics during the simulation. (C) The per-RMSD in (B) is mapped onto the average 3C structure. Residues corresponding to the highest 25% of per-RMSD data (>1.6) are colored red, residues corresponding to the lowest 25% of per-RMSD data (<0.8) are colored green, and residues with per-RMSD values in the range 0.8–1.6 are colored gray. (left) Residues that showed largest perturbations in chemical shifts due to peptide binding are displayed as spheres and labeled; these residues, with the exception of His168, revealed a small-to-moderate dynamics during simulation. In this view, the peptide-binding site is at the front. (Right) A different view in which the RNA-binding site is at the front. Residues that showed largest perturbations in chemical shifts upon RNA binding are displayed as spheres and labeled; these residues revealed moderate-to-large dynamics during the simulation. See also Figure S4. Structure 2016 24, 509-517DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.02.019) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Conformational Channeling in the 3C Protein Schematics of the conformational energy landscapes on 3C in the absence and presence of peptide and RNA ligands. Importantly, the ligand-binding order determines the lowest energy conformation in the ternary complex, as also suggested by the chemical shift perturbations in Figure 3. This channeling of the free energy landscape may also affect how 3C interacts with other viral and host factors. Structure 2016 24, 509-517DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2016.02.019) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions