Comparing previous simulation work with current study.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Cytotoxicity of MSP samples to normal and cancer cell lines.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Velocity of hygrobots. Velocity of hygrobots. (A) The difference between l and lp corresponds to a distance that a hygrobot advances a period. (B) Velocity.

Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Multidrone flight trajectories and corresponding order parameters.

Distribution of the number of collisions and the average closest-neighbor distance as a function of communication range and delay. Distribution of the.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

Allometric scaling of select biohybrid and organic devices.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Fig. 2 CFD results. CFD results. Results of CFD simulations in horizontal (left column) and vertical (right column) cross-sections. All models oriented.

Order parameters as a function of time for different vflock values during real experiments with 30 drones. Order parameters as a function of time for different.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Prosthesis system diagram.

Effect of slenderness on optimal shapes.

SoFi system overview. SoFi system overview. (Top, left to right) Soft robotic fish and diver interface module. (Bottom, left to right) Subcomponents of.

Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities under different grid lengths (lg) and burr lengths (lb). Microrobots with different cell-carrying capacities.

Schematic of experimental setup and screen captures from swimming.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Fig. 2 TRXSS data. TRXSS data. TRXSS data covering delay times from 10 ns to 10 ms for wild-type DmCry (A), for the DmCry(H378A) mutant (B), and for XlPho.

Results for random clusters.

Histograms showing the distribution of people with respect to their performances for the single task and multitask conditions. Histograms showing the distribution.

Characteristics of the topology-optimized actuator and long-term tests

The two modalities for the multitask condition.

Probability distribution of the communication outages as a function of distance. Probability distribution of the communication outages as a function of.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.

Object manipulations performed by our biohybrid robots.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

The prototype and working mechanism.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Fig. 1 Automatic optimization of rMFM parameters yields stronger agreement between empirical and simulated RSFC. Automatic optimization of rMFM parameters.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Examples of AEGIS autonomous target selection.

Overview of the experimental setup and visual stimulus.

Fig. 1 Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing sectors, 2009–2014. Average contribution (million metric tons) of seafood-producing.

Details of seal design. Details of seal design. (A) RAD sampler (left), with close-up view (right) indicating the soft edges that form the light seal.

Response of the actuator to different stimulations.

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Jetting phase analysis.

Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.

Kinematic and mechanical advantage trade-off study.

Characterization and optimization of the device.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Fig. 4 Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal phyla across France. Mapping of abundance of the most dominant bacterial and archaeal.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Fig. 1 TFP distribution and deviations.

Fig. 3 Results of the proposed algorithm applied to a detail from the Adam panel. Results of the proposed algorithm applied to a detail from the Adam panel.

Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic skins. Onboard sensors enable state feedback and closed-loop control of robotic.

Fig. 2 Daily TNC pickups and drop-offs for an average Wednesday in fall 2016 (1). Daily TNC pickups and drop-offs for an average Wednesday in fall 2016.

Fig. 4 Evolution of rate constants over varying interaction strengths.

Recorded spatial distribution of swift parrots.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Presentation transcript:

Comparing previous simulation work with current study. Comparing previous simulation work with current study. Sample timelines of two order parameters (right, velocity correlation at top and normalized velocity magnitude at bottom) from our previous work (40) (algorithm A) and our novel flocking model (algorithm B). Trajectories corresponding to the gray sections of the timelines are shown for both models on the left, with color mapped to time. Corresponding motion can be seen in movies S1 and S2. Algorithm B performs much better and has a lower transient time. We used the following interaction parameter set for algorithm A: Cfrict = 30 m2, m, m, and prep = 1 s−1 [for details on parameters, see (40)]. For algorithm B, we used the optimized parameter set for vflock = 4 m/s. Using an average from 10 simulations with the same parameter setup, the order parameters averaged over time were and m/s for algorithm A and and m/s for algorithm B. Gábor Vásárhelyi et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaat3536 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works