Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Advertisements

Volume 67, Issue 1, Pages e3 (July 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 65, Issue 3, Pages e6 (February 2017)
Loss of Snf5 Induces Formation of an Aberrant SWI/SNF Complex
Volume 41, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Andrey V. Zavialov, Vasili V. Hauryliuk, Måns Ehrenberg  Molecular Cell 
Oxidative Charge Transport through DNA in Nucleosome Core Particles
The Real-Time Path of Translation Factor IF3 onto and off the Ribosome
Volume 61, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (November 2009)
Structural Mechanisms of Nucleosome Recognition by Linker Histones
The Initial Response of a Eukaryotic Replisome to DNA Damage
Volume 152, Issue 3, Pages (January 2013)
John D. Leonard, Geeta J. Narlikar  Molecular Cell 
Gracjan Michlewski, Sonia Guil, Colin A. Semple, Javier F. Cáceres 
Single-Stranded DNA Cleavage by Divergent CRISPR-Cas9 Enzymes
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 149, Issue 7, Pages (June 2012)
Dipali G. Sashital, Blake Wiedenheft, Jennifer A. Doudna 
Structures of Minimal Catalytic Fragments of Topoisomerase V Reveals Conformational Changes Relevant for DNA Binding  Rakhi Rajan, Bhupesh Taneja, Alfonso.
Distinct Strategies to Make Nucleosomal DNA Accessible
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2007)
Mechanism of Bidirectional Leading-Strand Synthesis Establishment at Eukaryotic DNA Replication Origins  Valentina Aria, Joseph T.P. Yeeles  Molecular.
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Single-Molecule Analysis Reveals Differential Effect of ssDNA-Binding Proteins on DNA Translocation by XPD Helicase  Masayoshi Honda, Jeehae Park, Robert.
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Nature of the Nucleosomal Barrier to RNA Polymerase II
Glenn Hauk, Jeffrey N. McKnight, Ilana M. Nodelman, Gregory D. Bowman 
Scott Gradia, Samir Acharya, Richard Fishel  Cell 
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (December 1997)
Mikhail Grigoriev, Peggy Hsieh  Molecular Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Anne Dallas, Harry F Noller  Molecular Cell 
Chromatin Constrains the Initiation and Elongation of DNA Replication
DEAD-Box Proteins Unwind Duplexes by Local Strand Separation
Sichen Shao, Ramanujan S. Hegde  Molecular Cell 
Xuetong Shen, Ryan Ranallo, Eugene Choi, Carl Wu  Molecular Cell 
DNA-Induced Switch from Independent to Sequential dTTP Hydrolysis in the Bacteriophage T7 DNA Helicase  Donald J. Crampton, Sourav Mukherjee, Charles.
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 30, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Nbs1 Converts the Human Mre11/Rad50 Nuclease Complex into an Endo/Exonuclease Machine Specific for Protein-DNA Adducts  Rajashree A. Deshpande, Ji-Hoon.
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Chul-Hwan Lee, Jun Wu, Bing Li  Molecular Cell 
Functional Recognition of the 5′ Splice Site by U4/U6
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Srabani Mukherjee, Luis G. Brieba, Rui Sousa  Cell 
Molecular Structures of Transcribing RNA Polymerase I
Structural and Mechanistic Analysis of the Slx1-Slx4 Endonuclease
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
An Early Developmental Transcription Factor Complex that Is More Stable on Nucleosome Core Particles Than on Free DNA  Lisa Ann Cirillo, Kenneth S Zaret 
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Ali Hamiche, Raphael Sandaltzopoulos, David A Gdula, Carl Wu  Cell 
Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
The Conformational Dynamics of the Mitochondrial Hsp70 Chaperone
Structural Organization of the RNA Polymerase-Promoter Open Complex
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Assembly of a Double Hexameric Helicase
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 58-69 (July 2009) Conformational Changes Associated with Template Commitment in ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling by ISW2  Vamsi K. Gangaraju, Punit Prasad, Ali Srour, Mohamedi N. Kagalwala, Blaine Bartholomew  Molecular Cell  Volume 35, Issue 1, Pages 58-69 (July 2009) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.013 Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Template Commitment of ISW2 to Nucleosomes Requires ATP (A) Template commitment of ISW2 was examined with equimolar amounts of ISW2 and 70N0 nucleosomes (42 nM), ATP (800 μM), and excess competitor DNA added at the indicated times and incubated at 20°C. Samples were removed at the respective times (circled numbers) and analyzed by gel shift assay, as shown on the right. In group IV, ISW2 and nucleosomes were incubated together for 10 min before starting the initial start time point. Lane numbers correspond to the time points sampled, and lane 1 is nucleosomes without ATP or ISW2. As nucleosomes change their translational position on DNA, their electrophoretic mobility shifts from its original position (N1) to progressively more central positions (N2 and N3). (B) Template commitment assays with radioactive (r70N0) and nonradioactive (c70N0) nucleosomes were added at different reaction times to show that template-committed complexes were resistant to competition by other nucleosomes. Nucleosome remodeling was initiated by incubating with 28 nM of either radiolabeled 70N0 (r70N0) or nonradiolabeled 70N0 (c70N0) and 28 nM of ISW2 at 20°C in the presence of 90 μM ATP. ISW2 at this molar concentration is completely bound with nucleosomes. Numbers above each time point indicate sample number and corresponding lane number. After each time point, the reaction was stopped and separated by 5% native gel electrophoresis. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 58-69DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.013) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 ISW1a Forms a Stable, Committed Complex with Nucleosomes upon Addition of ATP (A) Template commitment assays were done with ISW1a (42 nM) as described in Figure 1A. The location of the N1, N2, and N3 translational positions are indicated. (B) Reactions containing equimolar amounts of ISW1a and 70N0 (both 42 nM) were incubated at 20°C for the indicated times and analyzed by 5% native gel electrophoresis the same as in Figure 1B for ISW2. Gel shift assays show the different extents of nucleosome mobilization, with lane 1 being nucleosome alone and no ISW1a. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 58-69DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.013) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 The N-Terminal Tail of Histone H4 Is Required by ISW2 and ISW1a for Template Commitment (A and B) The experimental conditions are the same as in Figures 1A and 2A, except that nucleosomes had recombinant histone H4 lacking the N-terminal tail instead of full-length H4, longer incubation times were used, and reactions contained either ISW2 (A) or ISW1a (B). Molecular Cell 2009 35, 58-69DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.013) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conformational Changes in ISW2 while Binding and Hydrolyzing ATP (A and B) The interactions of ISW2 with nucleosomes (0N70) in the presence of 2 mM γ-S-ATP (A) or ADP (B) were mapped by hydroxyl radical DNA footprinting. End-positioned nucleosomes were incubated with saturating amounts of ISW2 at 30°C for 30 min and cleaved with hydroxyl radical. Overlays from the denaturing gels were plotted using Microsoft Excel. The profiles for free nucleosome (black) and ISW2-nucleosome complex without (red) and with the appropriate nucleotide added (blue) are shown. Numbering of the peaks refers to the number of base pairs from the dyad axis. Shaded boxes are the sites that ISW2 protects, and superhelical locations are shown on the x axis. (C) Site-directed mapping of nucleosome positions were carried out using nucleosomes that contain a unique cysteine at residue 53 of H2B. Heterogeneous nucleosomes (52 nM) were prebound with 95 nM ISW2 at 30°C for 10 min. Remodeling was carried out at 18°C for 5, 30, and 60 s in the presence of 90 μM of ATP and stopped with γ-S-ATP (400 μM) and SS-DNA (200 μg/μl). Mapping of the remodeled nucleosomes was carried out as described (Zofall et al., 2006). (D–F) ISW2-nucleosome complexes were DNA footprinted with ATP (90 μM), added and stopped after 5 (D), 15 (E), and 90 s (F) followed by hydroxyl radical cleavage for 30 s. The profiles of ISW2-bound nucleosomes (black) are compared to those in which ATP is added (orange). Molecular Cell 2009 35, 58-69DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.013) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Large Conformational Changes in ISW2 Interactions with Nucleosomes Occur Even When Translocation along DNA Is Blocked by Gaps (A–C) DNA footprinting of ISW2-nucleosome complexes was done with either a 2 nt gap in DNA (−24/−25, A and B) or a 1 nt gap (−35, C) from the dyad axis. The 2 nt gap was designed to block DNA translocation by ISW2 and to prevent movement of the nucleosome along DNA by ISW2. The 1 nt gap is so that nucleosomes are moved 10 bp by ISW2 and then prematurely stopped. DNA footprinting was performed and displayed as in Figure 4, with the initial regions of ISW2-bound shown as gray boxes and additional interactions that are observed in the presence of ATP as orange boxes. The extent of changes in the DNA footprint is further differentiated by light (partial) or darker (more complete) orange and gray boxes to indicate varying levels of protection. (D) The location of the initial contacts of ISW2 (blue) and those caused by the addition of ATP (orange) with nucleosomes containing a 2 nt gap 24 and 25 bp from the dyad axis are schematically shown. (E) The nucleosomal DNA sites that are strongly (red) and weakly (pink) protected by ISW2 with nucleosomes that contain a 2 nt gap and have ATP added are highlighted in the crystal structure of the nucleosome. The histone proteins have the following color scheme: H2A (yellow), H2B (orange), H4 (green), and H3 (blue). Molecular Cell 2009 35, 58-69DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.013) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Dpb4 Is Associated with Nucleosomal DNA ∼15 bp in Front of the ATPase Domain during Template Commitment Site-specific DNA photoaffinity crosslinking was carried out under similar conditions to those in Figures 5 and 6 except for photoreactive DNA. Nucleosomes were assembled with a series of photoreactive probes spanning 17 to 67 bp from the dyad axis. DNA probes contain either a 2 (A) or 1 nt (B) gap 24/25 and 35 bp from the dyad axis, respectively, in order to determine the conformational changes of ISW2 complex during remodeling. As a control, crosslinking was done at positions in the absence of gap and/or ATP for each probe position. Nucleosomes were incubated with ISW2, irradiated, and treated with DNaseI and S1 nuclease as described, and the ISW2 subunits were separated by 4%–20% polyacrylamide SDS-PAGE. The crosslinked subunits of ISW2 complex are marked as Itc1, Isw2, and Dpb4. The bottom portion of the gel shows histone crosslinking, and occasionally, trace amounts of undigested probe are evident (∗). Molecular Cell 2009 35, 58-69DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.013) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Model for Initiation, Elongation, and Termination Phases in ISW2 Remodeling of Nucleosomes The nucleosome is represented as having its histone core in the center with only one DNA gyre (black line) evident and some extranucleosomal DNA. The initial superhelical locations on the DNA and histone core are separately labeled 1 through 7 to track DNA movement relative to the histone octamer surface in this model. ISW2 interactions with DNA are shown in gray with the putative tracking, anchor, and channel domains labeled. The initiation (A), elongation (B–F), and termination (G) stages of ISW2 remodeling are displayed with two alternative models for elongation of the remodeling complex. In (B) and (C), the primary mode of nucleosome movement is tracking of DNA through the ATPase domain of ISW2. The other model for nucleosome movement uses large shifts in conformation, represented as two black lines, to help illustrate the protein structure that ties the two domains together. The distance between the domains changes as ATP is hydrolyzed due to conformational shifts. Molecular Cell 2009 35, 58-69DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2009.05.013) Copyright © 2009 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions