U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Damage Prevention Programs Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Elements of an Effective Safety and Health Program
Advertisements

August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
Report to TACIR on Underground Utility Damage Prevention in Tennessee
Tennessee Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations September 2010.
Ventura County Mobile Home Park Rent Review Board Hearing February 26, 2014 Proposed Amendments to Mobile Home Park Rent Control Ordinance Project No.
Harassment, Intimidation and Bullying NJ State Board of Education February
A tool to protect Minnesota's waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Sept. 10, 2012.
1 Food Safety and Inspection Service Import Permit Policies Guidance for Products Containing Small Amounts of Meat, Poultry or Processed Egg Ingredients.
Overview of the Privacy Act
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention PHMSA Update Annmarie Robertson PHMSA/Office.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Damage Prevention Programs Christie Murray Senior.
2010 PODS User Conference Houston, Texas October 28, 2010 PHMSA Update John A. Jacobi, P.E. CATS Manager, SW Region.
Negotiated Rulemaking – What You Need to Know and How You Can Participate David Bergeron U.S. Department of Education 1.
Gregory S. Winton, Esq. The Aviation Law Firm
ADEQ Regulatory Process
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Spill Response Plans – Why Are They Developed? Alan K. Mayberry.
Montana Safe Digging Law 2014 Joint Engineers Conference Thu - Nov :00am-11:30am.
How OSHA Conducts Inspections
1 OSHA FEDERAL OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT (OSHA) OF 1970 George Mason University College of Nursing and Health Science Regulatory Requirements.
Ohio’s One-Stop Utility Resource Gas Pipeline Safety Pipelines - State and Local Issues Pete Chace GPS Program Manager (614)
MSHA Criteria for Citations Flagrant Violations As Required by the Mine Safety & Health Administration.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Update Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety.
© 2004 West Legal Studies in Business A Division of Thomson Learning 1 Chapter 43 Administrative Law Chapter 43 Administrative Law.
Powers and Functions of Administrative Agencies
Powers and Functions of Administrative Agencies. Question - Net-Neutrality FTC Announced Final Regulations – Late February 2015 Imagine you are a member.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Notice of Proposed Rulemaking: Pipeline Damage Prevention Programs.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
Administrative Agencies Chapter 4. Copyright © 2007 Thomson Delmar Learning Objectives Identify executive-branch agencies. Explain that administrative.
8/28/2015 The Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)  Also known as the Buckley Amendment.  Statute: 20 U.S.C. 1232g; Regulations: 34 CFR.
ILLINOIS COMMERCE COMMISSION Darin Burk Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.
1 Frazer C. Hilder Attorney, Office of Chief Counsel Hazardous Materials Preemption Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration U.S. Department.
U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Regulatory and Compliance Landscape Western Region Gas Conference.
Doug Stephens Program Manager USW TMC Grant Programs (Mobile) (Office)
Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Significant Provisions Of S MINERS ACT Pertaining to Enforcement of all M/NM Mines. New ombudsman within the Office.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Part 190 NPRM: Administrative Procedures - 1 -
Administrative Law The Enactment of Rules and Regulations.
Damage Prevention – Are States as engaged as they need to be ? Pipeline Safety Trust Meeting November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Glynn Blanton, PHMSA State.
OSHA – What to Expect When You’re Inspected (Following Federal Guidelines)
Submitting Public Comments to the EPA Public Outreach Presentation New Orleans, LA June 26-27, 2014 Holly Wilson U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
By Michelle Hoang Period 2 APES April 30, 2012 The Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference, November 19, 2015 TURNING TO THE STATES: WOULD MORE STATE AUTHORITY AND OVERSIGHT IMPROVE SAFETY? A Look at the.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.
Rulemaking Process and Cost Benefit Analysis
U.S. DOT Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Integrity Management Systems November 18, 2015 Chris McLaren - 1 -
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
M S H A PART 100 RULING. 30 CFR PART 100 ASSESSMENT OF CIVIL PENALTIES; FINAL RULE.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Regulatory Initiatives.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Oil Spill Response Plans A History Lesson PHMSA Review and Approval.
©2001 West Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 6: Administrative Law.
Sharing Information (FERPA) FY07 REMS Initial Grantee Meeting December 5, 2007, San Diego, CA U.S. Department of Education, Office of Safe and Drug-Free.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Damage Prevention Update and Damage Prevention Rulemaking Sam.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS May 11, 2016 REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM.
Gas Pipeline Safety Federal Regulatory Update Pete Chace Public Utilities Commission of Ohio Gas Pipeline Safety Program Manager.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
Kentucky Pipeline Safety Seminar
Federal Regulatory Update
Chapter 6 Administrative Law
The Rulemaking Process
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Pipeline Safety
Presented to the Project Certification Committee on November 16, 2011.
National Conference of Regulatory Attorneys
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA)
Miners Rights Rights & Responsibilities Under the Mine Safety & Health Act of 1977 Introduce topic. Hand out Miner’s Rights Booklets. Mine Safety & Health.
Cupa violation Review BAESG Meeting May 20, 2019 Matthew Burge
Presentation transcript:

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Damage Prevention Programs Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) Docket No. PHMSA U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration - 1 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Overview of Presentation Administrative information and how to make comments on the proposed rule History and purpose of the proposed rule Overview of contents of the proposed rule - 2 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Administrative Information Title: Pipeline Damage Prevention Programs Docket No. PHMSA , Comments are invited –Federal eRulemaking Portal: –Fax: –Mail: Docket Operations Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, DC –Hand delivery See NPRM document for additional instructions on providing comments

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration History Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement and Safety (PIPES) Act of 2006 –Heavy focus on preventing excavation damage to pipelines (a leading cause of serious pipeline incidents) –New limited enforcement authority for PHMSA pertaining to excavators who damage pipelines in states with inadequate damage prevention enforcement programs Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) published on this subject October 29, 2009 – Docket ID PHMSA

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) The ANPRM sought comment on the following: 1.Criteria for determining adequacy of state damage prevention enforcement programs; 2.Administrative procedures available to a state to contest a notice of inadequacy; 3.The Federal requirements for excavators PHMSA would enforce in states with inadequate enforcement programs; 4.The adjudication process for excavators who are cited by PHMSA, and; 5.The adequacy of PHMSAs existing damage prevention requirements for pipeline operators. PHMSA received extensive comments, all of which are addressed in the NPRM - 5 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Intent of the NPRM Every state has an excavation damage prevention law, but no two laws are identical (see comm/DamagePrevention.htm) Some states do not adequately enforce their damage prevention laws Effective enforcement reduces excavation damage rates The proposed rule is intended to accomplish the following: Reduce excavation damage to pipelines Encourage states to adopt effective, balanced damage prevention law enforcement programs Provide backstop Federal enforcement authority in states that lack adequate enforcement programs - 6 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Intent of the NPRM NPRM seeks to revise Pipeline Safety Regulations to: 1.Establish criteria and procedures for determining adequacy of state pipeline excavation damage prevention law enforcement programs 2.Establish the administrative process for making adequacy determinations 3.Establish the Federal requirements PHMSA will enforce in states with inadequate enforcement programs 4.Establish the adjudication process for administrative enforcement proceedings against excavators where Federal authority is exercised - 7 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Criteria for Adequate Enforcement (see NPRM for complete language) 1.Does the state have enforcement authority with civil penalties? 2.Has the state designated an agency or other body as the responsible enforcement authority? 3.Is the state using its enforcement authority and making information publicly available that demonstrates the effectiveness of enforcement? 4.Does the state have a reliable mechanism for learning about excavation damage? 5.Does the state use damage investigation practices that are adequate to determine the at-fault party? - 8 -

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 6.Does the states damage prevention law require: a)Excavators must call the one-call before excavating; b)Excavators may not excavate in disregard of the marked location of pipelines; c)An excavator who causes damage to a pipeline: i.Must report the damage to the owner/operator of the pipeline, and; ii.Must call 911 or another emergency telephone number if the damage results in a release. 7.Does the state limit exemptions for excavators from its excavation damage prevention law? Criteria for Adequate Enforcement (see NPRM for complete language)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Annual review using proposed criteria summarized on previous slides Review will encompass information from any state agency or office with a role in the enforcement program PHMSA may take immediate enforcement action excavators in a state upon a finding of inadequacy States have five years from a finding of inadequacy to implement an adequate program –After five years, state is subject to a reduction in base grant funding established under 49 U.S.C Procedures for Evaluating States (see NPRM for complete language)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Before commencing excavation activity, excavators must: 1.Call an available one-call system to notify pipeline operators of the timing and location of intended excavation; 2.If pipelines exist in the area, wait for the operator(s) to arrive at the excavation site and mark the location of the pipeline(s); 3.Excavate with proper regard for the marked location of the pipeline(s) and take all practicable steps to prevent excavation damage to the pipeline, and; 4.Make additional use of the one-call as necessary Federal Requirements for Excavators (see NPRM for complete language)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration If a pipeline is damaged in any way by excavation activity, excavator must report the damage to the pipeline operator, whether or not a leak occurs If a damage causes release of flammable, toxic, or corrosive gas or liquid that may endanger life or cause serious bodily harm or damage to property or the environment, excavator must call 911 Homeowners using only hand tools, as opposed to mechanized excavating equipment, on their own property are exempt from these requirements Federal Requirements for Excavators (see NPRM for complete language)

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Requirements for Pipeline Operators (see NPRM for complete language) PHMSA may enforce existing damage prevention requirements applicable to pipeline operators if a pipeline operator fails to respond to a locate request or fails to accurately locate and mark its pipeline. –49 CFR –49 CFR –49 U.S.C. §

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSAs Enforcement Process (see NPRM for complete language) To conduct enforcement proceedings for alleged violations of excavation damage prevention requirements, PHMSA proposes to use the existing adjudication process for alleged pipeline safety violations: –Notice of probable violation; –30-day period to respond, including the opportunity to request an administrative hearing; –Issuance of final order; –Opportunity to petition for reconsideration

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Civil and Criminal Penalties (see NPRM for complete language) PHMSA may assess civil penalties for violations of the excavation damage prevention requirements proposed in the NPRM –Only in states with inadequate enforcement programs The maximum administrative civil penalties that may be imposed are specified in 49 U.S.C. § Criminal penalties may be imposed as specified in 49 U.S.C. §

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration More Information Sam Hall Program Manager (804) Larry White Attorney Advisor (202)