Simulating the Advanced LIGO Interferometer Using the Real Control Code Juan F. Castillo.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
19. October 2004 A. Freise Automatic Alignment using the Anderson Technique A. Freise European Gravitational Observatory Roma
Advertisements

LIGO - G R 1 HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI David Ottaway November 2005 LIGO-G Z.
Transportation of Ultra-Stable Light via Optical Fiber Emily Conant Bard College, California Institute of Technology Mentors: Evan Hall, Rana Adhikari,
LIGO-G070xxx-00-M December 19, 2007 Single Stage ISI Electronics Overview Ben Abbott Mohana Mageswaran December 19, 2007.
1 Virgo commissioning status M.Barsuglia LAL Orsay.
LIGO-G W Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning Frederick J. Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
E2E school at LLO1  Han2k »Model of the LHO 2k IFO »Designed for lock acquisition study  SimLIGO1 »Model of all LIGO 1 IFOs »Designed for –noise hunting.
NSF : Nov. 10, LIGO End to End simulation overview  Time domain simulation written in C++  Like MATLAB with Interferometer toolbox  Major physics.
Angular Noise in a Suspended Interferometer with DC Readout Royal Reinecke Co-Mentors: Alan Weinstein and Rana Adhikari.
Matthew Evans, Ph237 April Application of Simulation to LIGO Interferometers  Who am I? »Matthew Evans, Ph.D. from Caltech on Lock Acquisition 
LIGO-G D 1 Requirements Environment and constraints Performance requirements Functional requirements.
Investigation of the influence of suspended optic’s motion on LIGO detector sensitivity Sanichiro Yoshida Southeastern Louisiana University.
Ilya Berdnikov, Cornell University. Characterization of the LIGO 40m Lab Mode Cleaner Digital Suspensions Summer Project by Ilya Berdnikov Mentors:
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
Active Seismic Isolation Systems for Enhanced and Advanced LIGO Jeffrey S. Kissel 1 for the LSC 1 Louisiana State University The mechanical system for.
Thermal noise issues Chinyere Ifeoma Nwabugwu Louisiana State University August 05, 2005 Eric Black, Akira Villar, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, Kate Dooley, Royal.
Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule
Takanori Sekiguchi Anual Meeting of Physics Society of Japan Sep. 22nd, 2013) Prototype Test of Vibration Isolation System Current Status & Schedule 1.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
LIGO-G D Enhanced LIGO Kate Dooley University of Florida On behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SESAPS Nov. 1, 2008.
Optical Gyroscopes for Ground Tilt Sensing in Advanced LIGO The need for low frequency tilt sensing The optics in Advanced LIGO’s suspensions must be very.
Takanori Sekiguchi External Review Control and tuning of suspension 1 T. Sekiguchi KAGRA 4th External Review.
The purpose of the change of basis matrices is to combine local instruments to sense (or drive ) the platforms rigid body motions along the axis of the.
LIGO- G D The LIGO Instruments Stan Whitcomb NSB Meeting LIGO Livingston Observatory 4 February 2004.
LSC-March  LIGO End to End simulation  Lock acquisition design »How to increase the threshold velocity under realistic condition »Hanford 2k simulation.
LIGO-G09xxxxx-v1 Form F v1 LIGO Laboratory1 Designing a frequency offset locking loop for the 40m prototype Arm Length Stabilization System Sai.
Advanced LIGO Simulation, 6/1/06 Elba G E 1 ✦ LIGO I experience ✦ FP cavity : LIGO I vs AdvLIGO ✦ Simulation tools ✦ Time domain model Advanced.
LIGO-G Z The Status of VIRGO E. Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration GWADW 2004, Aspen From the CITF to VIRGO Commissioning of the Fabry-Perot.
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
Modeling the Input Optics with e2e T. Findley, S. Yoshida, D. Dubois, N. Jamal, and R. Dodda Southeastern Louisiana University LIGO-G D.
MODELING THE CALIBRATED RESPONSE OF THE ADVANCED LIGO DETECTORS Luke Burks 2013 LIGO Caltech SURF Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jameson Rollins Final Presentation.
Laser Frequency Stabilization – 2004, May 04 1 Laser Frequency Stabilization François BONDU CNRS – ARTEMIS, Nice VIRGO How it works (Design) Make it work.
Adaptive Control Loops for Advanced LIGO
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
SURF 2015 lecture: Jun 24, 2015 Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
LSC Meeting at LHO LIGO-G E 1August. 21, 2002 SimLIGO : A New LIGO Simulation Package 1. e2e : overview 2. SimLIGO 3. software, documentations.
1 Locking in Virgo Matteo Barsuglia ILIAS, Cascina, July 7 th 2004.
Optical Spring Experiments With The Glasgow 10m Prototype Interferometer Matt Edgar.
LIGO-G R 1 HAM Passive Seismic Attenuation System (SAS) System Performance, Fabrication, Assembly, Installation Riccardo DeSalvo, Valerio Boschi,
Elba Gravitational Wave Adv. Detector Workshop1May 22, 2002 Simulation of LIGO Interferometers 1. End to End simulation 2. Lock acquisition 3. Noise.
LIGO-G Z LIGO’s Thermal Noise Interferometer Progress and Status Eric D. Black, Kenneth G. Libbrecht, and Shanti Rao (Caltech) Seiji Kawamura.
LIGO-G v1 Searching for Gravitational Waves from the Coalescence of High Mass Black Hole Binaries 2014 LIGO SURF Summer Seminar August 21 st, 2014.
ALIGO 0.45 Gpc 2014 iLIGO 35 Mpc 2007 Future Range to Neutron Star Coalescence Better Seismic Isolation Increased Laser Power and Signal Recycling Reduced.
Active Vibration Isolation using a Suspension Point Interferometer Youichi Aso Dept. Physics, University of Tokyo ASPEN Winter Conference on Gravitational.
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane Luke Burks LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration.
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Squeezing in Gravitational Wave Detectors
GW Policy: The Future: G3 Detectors
IPC (GROUP-5) SR. NO NAME EN. NO 1 SAVAN PADARIYA
Progress toward squeeze injection in Enhanced LIGO
LCGT Seismic Attenuation System LCGT-SAS
Nergis Mavalvala MIT IAU214, August 2002
ACS UC Berkeley Space Sciences Laboratory
Features in the Quad State Space Model
Nergis Mavalvala (age 47)
Homodyne readout of an interferometer with Signal Recycling
Commissioning the LIGO detectors
Quantum effects in Gravitational-wave Interferometers
e2e Simulation Techniques in Quantum Microscopy and GW Interferometry
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Status of LIGO Installation and Commissioning
Lock Acquisition Real and Simulated
LIGO Detector Commissioning
Improving LIGO’s stability and sensitivity: commissioning examples
HAM SAS Test Plan at LASTI
HAM-SAS Mechanics Status of modeling V.Boschi, V. Sannibale.
Chapter 1. Introduction to Control System
Measurement of radiation pressure induced dynamics
Presentation transcript:

Simulating the Advanced LIGO Interferometer Using the Real Control Code Juan F. Castillo

Acknowledgments Mentor Joseph Betzweiser California Institute of Technology and National Science Foundation Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship Program National Society of Hispanic Physicist Victor M. Blanco Undergraduate Summer Research Fellowship As everyone knows Sites are undergoing a major renovation in Livingston and Hanford Installing next generation of wave detectors Will yield far superior results than initial and enhanced LIGO New hardware systems are being installed Some components are being tested for functionality and stability Control codes constantly modified as hardware is being adjusted Question has been raised - how to test the control system Currently no easy methods We wanted to build a model to use and improve on

What can be done? Implementing a real-time simulation of the hardware that communicates to the control code will generate a practical troubleshooting technique. Goal - implement a real-time simulation of the physical model Write a diagnostic tool On a nightly basis, check that changes to control code work

Things to Keep in Mind How do we develop a simulation? What is noise and how do we simulate it? What have we learned during this process? Key points Structure of the simulation layout Which noise being represented Results and possible expansion Solve a problem Previous SURF’s created suspension and simple optical cavity simulations Create simulation for the Horizontal Access Module’s internal seismic isolation (HAM ISI) system HAM defines what the analog system of the interferometer senses Takes control signals from actuator and transmits to sensors Simple explanation of ISI - Table with multiple position and motion sensor Create structure of layout using Simulink Used as a drawing tool whose output is parsed by a script to generate C code Actual C code used to run the simulation Simulink is used as a drawing tool only

Highlighted yellow box – simulation component Pink box – library part identical to control code of HAM ISI Control code input is simulation output Control code output is simulation input Background on noise and filters Noise – anything that makes it harder to measure the gravitational wave signal in interferometer Seismic noise (focus) – seismic fluctuations such as earthquakes, ocean tides, human traffic Shot noise - fluctuation in the vacuum field beating against the radio frequency sidebars Electronic noise – sensor and actuator noise Filters components to simulate noise Applied transfer functions from two different undamped data sets Data between ground and sensors - undamped and left alone Data between actuators and sensors - undamped with excitation  Create noise filters writing Matlab scripts Existing functions used in LIGO lab Takes vector (transfer function data set, amplitude and phase) and fits it to a state-space model with a common zero and pole set Prepare and write zpk models to our components

Chart represents one of our filters simulation – actuator x and cps x sensor Blue line is actual data gathered during one night Red dashed line is simulated representation Additional components – inverting filters and inverted matrices Create inverting filters – correct calibration from digital signal measured in counts to actual units Incorporated inverted matrices Convert signal into sim from actuator basis to Cartesian basis Convert outgoing signals – Cartesan basis back to the sensor basis

The model inside HAM ISI control code library part Yellow highlighted green boxes are matrices that must be inverted Yellow highlighted blue rectangles are filters that must be inverted Control code input is simulation output Control code output is simulation input

The model inside our simulation part Yellow highlighted boxes are inverted filters and matrices Red highlighted boxes are filters for ground to sensor and actuator to sensor noise Simulation input is control code output Simulation output is control code input

Results to this Point Results Simulate a push in one direction “See” controls dampen simulated ground noise in the same way the controls damp the real ground noise Simulation is running and gathering results Debugging stage to verify accuracy and reliability Issues with the calibration of our data Future Expansion Incorporate noise sources we neglected – shot and electronic Simulation for suspension system Use alternate method to verify From first principles Size and mass of tables Simulate using the established laws of physics vs. data model fitting

OVERVIEW Learned about noise and filters Discussed framework of simulation Explained how to interpret and expand Explained noise and filters Filters for seismic noise How to assemble and incorporate filters Explained simulation build Structure of layout - Simulink Matlab scripts for filters Explained results and possible expansion We have laid the groundwork for future models to be incorporated in an overall effective simulator to test the control code and hardware. The ability to troubleshoot the overall system by using a simulation model is critical in effectively dealing with unforeseeable problems. Questions?