What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

Water Pollution. Definitions Impaired Waters Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act requires states to develop lists of impaired waters, those that do.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of Our Community’s New Storm Water Management Program.
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
Clean Water Act SAFE 210. History/Amendments Recent major amendments were enacted in 1972, 1977, and – Established the National Pollutant Discharge.
Water Quality Standards and MS4 Storm Water Permitting.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
The Lake Allegan/Kalamazoo River Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Plan Implementation by Jeff Spoelstra, Coordinator, Kalamazoo River Watershed Council.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.
Nebraska Department of Environmental Quality TMDLs 101 An Explanation of the Federal Clean Water Act’s TMDL Requirements and How they Impact Carter Lake.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
Upper Providence Township Stormwater Management MS4 Program.
Environmental Harm Urban stormwater frequently contains litter, oil, chemicals, toxic metals, bacteria, and excess nutrients, like nitrogen and phosphorous.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview of the Hempfield Township’s New Storm Water Management Program.
When It Rains, It Drains An Overview: The Lower Providence Township Storm Water Management Program.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas EPA Region 6 Dallas, Texas.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Setting the Course for Improved Water Quality A TMDL Training Program for Local Government Leaders and Other Water Resource.
Approaches to Addressing Bacteria Impairments Kevin Wagner Texas Water Resources Institute.
Design for Water Quality CE 365K Hydraulic Engineering Design Spring 2015 David R. Maidment.
Texas Clean Rivers Program Nueces River Authority Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Citizens.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Rules Overview: Why Do We Do What We Do Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County Alisa Max, P.E. Harris County.
1 ATTAINS: A Gateway to State-Reported Water Quality Information Webcast Sponsored by EPA’s Watershed Academy June 18, 2008, 11:30am-1:30pm EST Shera Bender,
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Creation of MS4 Regulations Green / Tradewater River Basin Team Henderson, Kentucky Prepared by Henderson Water Utility April 22, 2008.
Water Quality Reduction Trading Program Draft Rule Language Policy Forum January 29,
1 Sandra Spence EPA Region 8 TMDL Program EPA Region 8 TMDL Program Integrating Watershed Plans and TMDLs to Help Answer Watershed Planning Questions November.
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Eric Agnew Environmental Regulations February 15, 2006.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
MWCOG Water Resource Workshop “Preparing for Regulatory Change” February 20, 2004 Track 2: Panel #4 - Storm Water MS4 Regulation Paula Estornell, USEPA,
West Metro Water Alliance A Path to Clean Water – Understanding TMDLs and Watershed Planning September 21, 2011 Diane Spector Wenck Associates, Inc.
Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards
Fecal Bacteria Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in 4 Austin Watersheds Presented to the City of Austin Environmental Board November 7, 2012.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
REVISIONS TO THE FEDERAL WATER QUALITY STANDARDS RULE JILL CSEKITZ, TECHNICAL SPECIALIST TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans016-1 Unit 17 Point Source Control Federal Water Pollution Control Act (Clean Water Act of 1972)
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
1975 EPA Study  Extensive construction in 1950s -1970s  Poor canal flushing results in “stagnation, putrification, and excessive nutrient enrichment.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP’s) John Reimer City of Madison Engineering Department.
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS Four Mile Run Bacteria TMDL March 25, 2002
Stormwater Management and MS4 Compliance
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Regulatory Requirements Background
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Tim Cawthon TCEQ Nonpoint Source Program
The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees? Larry Koenig, P.E. Total Maximum Daily Load Program Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Texas TMDL Program Texas is required under the federal Clean Water Act to list impaired waters and to take action to restore them. A surface water body is considered impaired if it does not meet the criteria for support of one or more of its beneficial uses, as defined in the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards. Impaired waters are identified every two years on the Texas Water Quality Inventory and 303(d) List. Two part process is used for restoration: 1) establish a total maximum daily load, and 2) develop an implementation plan.

How Are Waters Assessed? Waters are assessed against uses defined in the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/nav/eq/eq_swqs.html Numeric and narrative criteria are evaluated Four general categories of use are defined: Aquatic life use Contact recreation Public Water Supply Fish Consumption/Oyster Waters

How Are the Results Reported? The results of the assessment are reported in the Water Quality Inventory and 303(d) List Report includes: Assessment of surface waters to determine if they meet standards [CWA §305(b) report] Identification of those waters that do not meet standards [CWA §303(d) List] http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/compliance/monitoring/water/quality/data/wqm/305_303.html New assessments occur every 2 years (even-numbered years). EPA approval may lag behind list compilation, so latest list is not always the current list for regulatory purposes.

Restoring Impaired Waters Appropriate scientific methods are used to evaluate the water body. A separate load allocation must be prepared for each pollutant affecting each water body. One project may develop many TMDLs for a single water body. Projects may also address similar impairments in multiple water bodies. Not all projects result in TMDLs; some analyze use attainability, some determine extent of impairment to determine if a TMDL is needed.

Key Elements of the Program TMDL – Total Maximum Daily Load Determines the maximum amount (load) of a pollutant that a water body can receive and still maintain uses, and allocates this load to sources in the watershed. Implementation Plan A detailed description of the regulatory and voluntary management measures necessary to achieve the pollutant reductions identified in a TMDL. Allocating the effort to reduce loading is often of most concern to stakeholders. That is addressed implicitly during the TMDL phase and explicitly during the Implementation Plan phase.

What Is a TMDL? A TMDL is a scientific analysis (often based on a computer simulation model) that: determines the maximum amount (or load) of a particular pollutant that a water body can receive and attain and maintain its standards “allocates” this allowable load to point and nonpoint sources of pollution in the watershed TMDL = WLA + LA + MOS A TMDL is also a document submitted to the EPA. It identifies the pollutant of concern and its sources, and allocates the allowable load. http://www.tceq.state.tx.us/implementation/water/tmdl/index.html What do “maximum” and “daily” mean? One court decision recently said “daily means daily”, but application to stormwater seems to require a longer perspective because of flow variability. In many situations, maximum allowable depends on temporal flow conditions, and is related to time scale. There may be changes to regulations to address court decision. Who or what receives “allocations” ? May be areas (subwatersheds); land uses; specific regulated sectors; etc. Where is loading described or allocated? May be on land at source (produced load); or when first reaches water body (gross load); or at defined stream monitoring point (net load). Each is case specific, depends on how analyses and modeling were done. Important but difficult details – pay attention!

TMDL Development Process Public Comment TCEQ Approval EPA Approval 303(d) List Category 5a Initiate TMDL Projects for Impaired Waters TMDL Allocation Report Develop Implementation Plan Stakeholders Implement The Plan Best to participate as stakeholder during development, rather than waiting to comment on proposals. More time available to think and comment, more chance to influence course of action. Stakeholder involvement

Two Kinds of Restoration Plans TMDL Implementation Plans (IPs) Watershed Restoration Plans (WRPs) Both have the same goal — improving water quality in rivers, lakes, or bays. IPs are remedial actions for impaired waters; WRPs may be either remedial or preventive. IPs are based on total maximum daily loads; WRPs use other measurable goals for water quality. (Sometimes WRPs are called Watershed Protection Plans or WPPs.) Both: - define actions needed to reduce pollution and restore water quality; - include regulatory and voluntary actions; - are developed in cooperation with regional and local stakeholders; - are based on sound scientific methods and tools. When to use which is still to be determined.

Implementing TMDLs Implementation plans (IPs) are collaborative and involve a wide variety of stakeholders. Citizens, watershed interest groups State, local, and federal agencies Regulated organizations Control actions for point source discharges; management measures for nonpoint source discharges Often, plans are phased in based on progress in achieving water quality improvement. Water quality improvement may take years. Follow-up monitoring is crucial. If you may need to reduce loading, you really should participate in IP development.

Is Stormwater Point Source (WLA) or Nonpoint Source (LA)? It may be either or both, depending on point of view: For technical analyses and modeling, usually considered a nonpoint source. Legally, a point source if someone has a permit for it, a nonpoint source if there is no permit. For TMDLs, often included with nonpoint sources in load allocation, but implementation may include ‘control actions’ via permits that require ‘management measures’. Both permitted and unpermitted stormwater must be included in a TMDL.

Control Actions Point source TMDL allocations affect permits: New, amended, or renewed permitted loads must be consistent with the TMDL allocation. TCEQ may initiate amendments to impose new limits, or may impose them with routine renewals or amendments. Permitted loading from existing facilities may be substantially reduced. New facilities may be required to meet more stringent effluent limits than expected.

Control Actions, Continued Point source TMDL allocations affect permits: In some cases or areas, stormwater permits may receive new or more stringent limits consistent with TMDL allocations. Permittees may no longer be eligible for general permits. Additional monitoring and reporting requirements may be needed. Permittees may have the opportunity to negotiate effluent trading agreements in order to meet net load limit for watershed. Blue lines most pertinent to MS4 permittees now or soon. Trading could be possible in future.

Management Measures Nonpoint source TMDL allocations may result in implementation of best management practices (BMPs): Management of runoff Detention basins, filter strips, infiltration basins, porous pavement, retention ponds, swales Management of operations to decrease or eliminate pollutants in runoff Spill prevention and control, source controls, education Managing nonpoint sources is an iterative process.

Types of TMDL Pollutants or Stressors Bacteria Nutrients Oxygen Demand Total Dissolved Solids, Chloride, Sulfate Organic or Metal Toxics and someday, maybe  Sediment  Aquatic Habitat Quality ? Flow Regime ? Sediment attached pollutants may be most effectively addressed by MS4 permittees.

Some things MS4s may do differently or in addition because of TMDLs Monitoring Search for pollutant sources Manage loading Public education Support or encourage Low Impact Development Blue items are major tasks. Other items fit within as subtasks or purposes.

Additional Monitoring New parameters More sites More frequently or different schedule Purposes: Characterize loading (initially) – quantity, timing, spatial distribution Locate specific sources Track reductions and BMP effectiveness (later)

Managing Stormwater Loading Select effective BMPs appropriate for pollutants and site factors Are pollutants dissolved or particulate? Can detention basins, conveyance facilities, etc. be retrofitted, rebuilt, or designed differently in the future? Can dry-weather flows be disinfected? Street or parking lot sweeping? Public education? Low Impact Development? Work with sanitary sewer entities to correct storm runoff surcharges/emissions? Effectiveness of stormwater BMPs is not well defined. Relatively few studies, highly variable results. Site-specific factors very much influence BMP functionality.

For More Information On TMDLs TCEQ TMDL Program Website: www.tceq.state.tx.us/implementation/water/tmdl/ Larry Koenig lkoenig@tceq.state.tx.us (512) 239-4533