REAL Reflection Prompts and Rubric.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

Project-Based vs. Text-Based
The Teacher Work Sample
An Overview of Service Learning: Building Bridges, Making Connections
Metadisciplinary Outcomes for Science Literacy (Can Assess Now by Standardized Concept Inventory) STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO… 1. Define the domain of science.
Enduring Skills to support Student Growth Goal-setting 1 UL Louisville Writing Project KY ASCD Learn, Teach, Lead LWP Mini-Conference, 2014 Carol Franks,
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
Presented by Exploring edTPA with READ Exploring edTPA with READ Ellen Dobson and Diana Lys May 2, 2014.
MFM1P1 Culminating Performance Task
A PRACTICAL GUIDE to accelerating student achievement across cultures
CHAPTER 3 ~~~~~ INFORMAL ASSESSMENT: SELECTING, SCORING, REPORTING.
As a result of activities in grades 9-12, all students should develop: abilities necessary to do scientific inquiry. understandings about science inquiry.
Christopher Martinelli Theory into Practice.  The academic challenges for ELL students are very real and are magnified by the need for students to learn.
AP® U.S. History Exam Design
Teaching Event –commentaries –written responses to a set of task-specific prompts. –provide contextual information needed to understand the artifacts and.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Presenters: Kevin Bontenbal, Cuesta College Roberta Eisel, Citrus College Tracy Schneider, Solano College Facilitator: Glenn Yoshida, Los Angeles Southwest.
A Process to Identify the Enduring Skills, Processes, & Concepts for Social Studies 1.
Deep Learning ThroughLiteracy-Rich Instructional Strategies Sara Overby Coordinating Teacher for Secondary Literacy
Shifting to a Standards- Based Mindset Through Quality Assessments and Backwards Design LMS Department Everett High School October 10, 2014.
Adapted from: PARCC Model Content Frameworks English Language Arts/Literacy October 2011.
“Knowledge” Do Now: As a teacher, what does this statement make think about or feel: “He Who Can Does He Who cannot Teaches” George Bernard Shaw.
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
EPortfolio Practice and Transfer of Learning Within a First-Year Writing Program Center for Writing and Rhetoric Guy Krueger and Karen Forgette RESEARCH.
PACT Areas that are Scored 1. Context for Learning 2. Planning 3. Instruction 4. Assessment 5. Reflection 6. Academic Language strand that runs across.
Eportfolio: Tool for Student Career Development and Institutional Assessment Sally L. Fortenberry, Ph.D., and Karol Blaylock, Ph.D. Eportfolio: Tool for.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
ED 562 Seminar Dr. Rubel. Tonight’s Agenda Class Share Discussion Questions Q & A The Final Project.
January 29, 2010ART Beach Retreat ART Beach Retreat 2010 Assessment Rubric for Critical Thinking First Scoring Session Summary ART Beach Retreat.
Assessing General Education Workshop for College of the Redwoods Fred Trapp August 18, 2008.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
What is the TPA? Teacher candidates must show through a work sample that they have the knowledge, skills, and abilities required of a beginning teacher.
Historical Thinking Skills
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
REVISIONS TO GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES Auburn University Senate Information Item, August 2014.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
Pennsylvania Standard B Algebra and Functions Discover and generalize patterns, including linear, exponential and simple quadratic relationships.
Pennsylvania Standard J. Geometry Standard
Historical Thinking Skills A.P. World History Mr. Schabo Crestwood High School All info care of College Board:
HISTORICAL THINKING A lesson on WHY and HOW we study history.
Historical Thinking Skills. Skill Type I: Chronological Reasoning Skill 1: Historical Causation Historical thinking involves the ability to identify,
RUBRIC TO ASSESS ACADEMIC SERVICE-LEARNING REFLECTION PAPERS Adapted from Rubric Developed by Dr. Barrett Brenton, St. John’s University (NYC) and Campus.
1 Orientation 101 General Education Program Student Learning Outcomes.
Updated Leeds Curriculum What is the Leeds Curriculum? The distinctive Leeds curriculum has research at the heart of student education across.
Inquiry Learning and Social Studies College and Career Readiness Conferences Summer
 The DBQ requires the construction of a reasoned essay that melds analysis of the documents to specific knowledge of the time period being covered. 
Using Research Logs to Build Information Literacy Skills Violet H. Harada University of Hawaii IRA Annual Conference May 6, 2003.
Personal Project: THE RUBRIC Learning Intention We are learning to identify the important components of the Personal Project, and understand.
Developing a Work Based Portfolio
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
School on Fire: Student Growth and Inquiry for Hot Results Wayne Stevens, Effectiveness Coach Kentucky Department of
New ELA Guidelines Shifts in ELA Common Core  Rise in Nonfiction Texts.  Content Area Literacy Close and careful reading of text  Increase Complexity.
Social Studies Key Issue: To what extent should we embrace nationalism?
Donna Lipscomb EDU 695 MAED Capstone Common Core Presentation INSTRUCTOR KYGER MAY 21, 2015.
FDU University Core Program Core Concepts for Citizenship and Success.
Advanced Placement Programming
Designing and Assessing Civic Engagement Activities for 300 Level Learning Communities Maggie Commins November 28th, 2016.
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
The IBCC Reflective Project
AP computer science PRINCIPLES
New Student Experience
What to do With Data? (Or, closing the alleged loop)
REAL Reflection Prompts and Rubric.
APUSH DBQ New 2018 Rubric.
AP World History Exam The Long Essay.
Historical Thinking Skills
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Incorporating Experiential Learning Into Your Classroom
Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession EHHS Conceptual Framework
Presentation transcript:

REAL Reflection Prompts and Rubric

REAL Requirements Final reflection (experience analysis) Think critically about not just the concepts, but the skills and values as well. Additional artifact relevant to the experience Poster presentation Photostory Journal publication Etc.

Analysis/Reflection - Prompt Analyze the essential knowledge and skills acquired in various college courses within your discipline which were utilized in this experience. (in the discipline) Analyzes the essential knowledge and skills acquired in courses outside your discipline in core curriculum which were utilized in this experience. (beyond the discipline) Analyze the essential knowledge and skills acquired in experiences outside the classroom which were utilized in this experience. (beyond academics) Analyze the interconnectedness of knowledge and skills developed within your discipline, in your general education courses, and in extracurricular experiences. (making connections) Assess the impact of the applied learning experience on the development of your global awareness in the context of academic, political, social, cultural, and/or economic environments. (global awareness) Assess the experience and ascertain the larger implications as they apply to the discipline and beyond. (broader impact)

Within the Discipline - Rubric Level 1.0 Unsatisfactory Score: 1.0 The student merely describes the experience. No evidence of connecting the experience to the courses/content areas in the discipline. Level 2.0 Weak Score: 2.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from courses/content areas in the discipline but no analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 3.0 Developing Score: 3.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from courses/content areas in the discipline but a weak analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 4.0 Proficient Score: 4.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from one or two courses/content areas in the discipline and an in depth analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 5.0 Exemplary Score: 5.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from three or more courses/content areas in the discipline as well as an in depth analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding of the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application.

Beyond the Discipline - Rubric Level 1.0 Unsatisfactory Score: 1.0 The student merely describes the experience. No evidence of connecting the experience to the courses/content areas outside the discipline. Level 2.0 Weak Score: 2.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from courses/content areas outside the discipline but no analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application.. Level 3.0 Developing Score: 3.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from courses/content areas outside the discipline but a weak analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 4.0 Proficient Score: 4.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from one or two courses/content areas outside the discipline and an in depth analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 5.0 Exemplary Score: 5.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from three or more courses/content areas outside the discipline as well as an in depth analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application.

Beyond Academics - Rubric Level 1.0 Unsatisfactory Score: 1.0 The student merely describes the experience. No evidence of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 2.0 Weak Score: 2.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from experiences outside the classroom but no analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 3.0 Developing Score: 3.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from experiences outside the classroom but a weak analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 4.0 Proficient Score: 4.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from only one experience outside the classroom and an in depth analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application. Level 5.0 Exemplary Score: 5.0 The student presents a list of knowledge and skills from two or more experiences outside the classroom as well as an in depth analysis of how the experience contributed to the student understanding the connectedness between his/her academic experience and meaningful real-world application.

Making Connections - Rubric Level 1.0 Unsatisfactory Score: 1.0 The student merely describes the experience without mention of the disciplinary knowledge and skills acquired in their general education or of the interconnectedness of the experience to any disciplinary knowledge. Level 2.0 Weak Score: 2.0 The student presents only a list of knowledge and skills but no analysis of the interconnectedness of these knowledge and skills. Level 3.0 Developing Score: 3.0 The student presents a good analysis of how the experience contributed to student understanding of the interconnectedness of knowledge and skills in only one of the three areas. Level 4.0 Proficient Score: 4.0 The student presents a good analysis of how the experience contributed to student understanding of the interconnectedness of knowledge and skills in two of the three areas. Level 5.0 Exemplary Score: 5.0 The student presents a good analysis of how the experience contributed to student understanding of the interconnectedness of knowledge and skills in all three areas.

Global Awareness - Rubric Level 1.0 Unsatisfactory Score: 1.0 The student describes the experience but makes no connection to personal biases, stereotypes, preconceptions, and/or assumptions. Seems unaware of their own personal biases, stereotypes, or preconceptions. Level 2.0 Weak Score: 2.0 The student lists but does not analyze their own possible biases, stereotypes, preconceptions, and/or assumptions. Arguments are missing. Insights are expressed but not supported or related to the experience. Level 3.0 Developing Score: 3.0 The student lists but does not analyze their own possible biases, stereotypes, preconceptions, and/or assumptions. Reasoning is stated in simplistic terms. Insights are expressed but not supported. Level 4.0 Proficient Score: 4.0 The student analyzes their own possible biases, stereotypes, preconceptions, and/or assumptions. Reasoning is stated but shows lack of depth of insight and/or relevance. Level 5.0 Exemplary Score: 5.0 The student analyzes their own possible biases, stereotypes, preconceptions, and/or assumptions. Reasoning is clear and shows depth of insight and relevance.

Broader Impact - Rubric Level 1.0 Unsatisfactory Score: 1.0 The student describes the experience but seems unaware of the global issues in the experience. Level 2.0 Weak Score: 2.0 The student lists but does not analyze the global issues in the experience. Reasoning is missing. Insights and/or connections are expressed but not supported or related to the experience. Level 3.0 Developing Score: 3.0 The student lists but does not analyze the global issues in the experience. Reasoning is stated in simplistic terms. Insights and/or connections are expressed but not supported. Level 4.0 Proficient Score: 4.0 The student analyzes the global issues in the experience. Reasoning is stated but shows lack of depth of insight, connection to their education, and/or relevance. Level 5.0 Exemplary Score: 5.0 The student analyzes the global issues in the experience. Reasoning is clear and shows depth of insight, connection to their education, and relevance.