Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Advertisements

Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Thomas J. English, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical Journal 
Multiparticle Adhesive Dynamics
Effect of Microvillus Deformability on Leukocyte Adhesion Explored Using Adhesive Dynamics Simulations  Kelly E. Caputo, Daniel A. Hammer  Biophysical.
The State Diagram for Cell Adhesion Mediated by Two Receptors
Koichiro Uriu, Luis G. Morelli  Biophysical Journal 
Precision and Variability in Bacterial Temperature Sensing
Bipedal Locomotion in Crawling Cells
Substrate Viscosity Enhances Correlation in Epithelial Sheet Movement
Differential Dynamics of Platelet Contact and Spreading
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
Aleš Benda, Yuanqing Ma, Katharina Gaus  Biophysical Journal 
Platelet Adhesive Dynamics
Apparent Subdiffusion Inherent to Single Particle Tracking
Quantifying Cell Adhesion through Impingement of a Controlled Microjet
Volume 111, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 103, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Luthur Siu-Lun Cheung, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Volume 109, Issue 12, Pages (December 2015)
Geometric Asymmetry Induces Upper Limit of Mitotic Spindle Size
Volume 90, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Kelly E. Caputo, Dooyoung Lee, Michael R. King, Daniel A. Hammer 
Modulating Vesicle Adhesion by Electric Fields
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
V.M. Burlakov, R. Taylor, J. Koerner, N. Emptage  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 6, Pages (September 2012)
Bart Smeets, Maxim Cuvelier, Jiri Pešek, Herman Ramon 
S. Majid Hosseini, James J. Feng  Biophysical Journal 
Eavesdropping on the Social Lives of Ca2+ Sparks
Viscoelasticity as a Biomarker for High-Throughput Flow Cytometry
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Strongly Accelerated Margination of Active Particles in Blood Flow
Drift and Behavior of E. coli Cells
Coherent Motions in Confluent Cell Monolayer Sheets
Validating Solution Ensembles from Molecular Dynamics Simulation by Wide-Angle X- ray Scattering Data  Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Statistics of Active Transport in Xenopus Melanophores Cells
Volume 110, Issue 7, Pages (April 2016)
Luthur Siu-Lun Cheung, Konstantinos Konstantopoulos 
Amir H.G. Isfahani, Jonathan B. Freund  Biophysical Journal 
Hung-Yu Chang, Xuejin Li, George Em Karniadakis  Biophysical Journal 
Lipeng Lai, Xiaofeng Xu, Chwee Teck Lim, Jianshu Cao 
Volume 83, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Integrin Molecular Tension within Motile Focal Adhesions
The Selectivity of K+ Ion Channels: Testing the Hypotheses
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Nobuhiko Watari, Ronald G. Larson  Biophysical Journal 
Christina Ketchum, Heather Miller, Wenxia Song, Arpita Upadhyaya 
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
John E. Pickard, Klaus Ley  Biophysical Journal 
Modeling Endoplasmic Reticulum Network Maintenance in a Plant Cell
The Mechanism of Phagocytosis: Two Stages of Engulfment
Volume 115, Issue 12, Pages (December 2018)
Volume 111, Issue 3, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz 
Structure and Response to Flow of the Glycocalyx Layer
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Quantitative Modeling and Optimization of Magnetic Tweezers
Jérémie Barral, Frank Jülicher, Pascal Martin  Biophysical Journal 
Dmitry A. Fedosov, Bruce Caswell, George Em Karniadakis 
Huan Lei, George Em Karniadakis  Biophysical Journal 
Presentation transcript:

Rolling Adhesion of Schizont Stage Malaria-Infected Red Blood Cells in Shear Flow  Anil K. Dasanna, Christine Lansche, Michael Lanzer, Ulrich S. Schwarz  Biophysical Journal  Volume 112, Issue 9, Pages 1908-1919 (May 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of the computational model showing a spherical (schizont) iRBC of radius R rolling in shear flow with shear rate γ˙. The spatially resolved receptors on the cell surface are localized to parasite-induced knobs and can form molecular bonds with the spatially resolved ligands on the substrates, which have a uniform density. The shear force Fs and the shear torque Ts lead to translational velocity v and rotational velocity Ω, depending on the details of the spatial receptor and ligand distributions and of the bond dynamics. The parasite P is labeled by fluorophores that are excited in the focal plane (FP). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 1908-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Trophozoites and schizonts show very different behavior in shear flow. (A) In the trophozoite stage, the iRBC is still biconcave and the single parasite is situated at the rim. (B) In the schizont stage, the iRBC is almost spherical and the parasite mass almost fills the complete host cell (reconstructed from confocal microscopic images, as described elsewhere (11)). (C) Shown here are three frames of a trophozoite moving over an endothelial monolayer in shear flow from right to left (shear rate 142 Hz, cell marked with arrows; the other cells are firmly attached). The full sequence is provided as Movie S1. (D) Shown here are three frames of a schizont rolling over the monolayer with the shear flow from right to left (shear rate 42 Hz). The full sequence is provided as Movie S2. Scale bars = 20 μm. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 1908-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Fluorescence amplitude reveals nature of movement in hydrodynamic flow. (A) Translational velocity and fluorescence amplitude oscillations are strongly correlated for a trophozoite, indicating flipping motion. (B) For a schizont, these correlations are strongly diminished, indicating rolling adhesion of an almost spherical cell. The shear rate is 42 Hz in both cases. Fluorescence movies are provided as Movies S3 and S4. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 1908-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Adhesive dynamics simulations of spherical iRBCs—trajectories. Visualization of receptor clustering and translational and rotational velocities of typical trajectories for clustering coefficients ρ = 0 (A and D), ρ = 0.4 (B and E) and ρ = 1.0 (C and F) is given. The total number of receptors in all three cases is NR = 500. Shear rate = 100 Hz, cell radius R = 4 μm, spring constant k = 1 pN/nm, encounter distance r0 = 50 nm, force scale Fd = 200 pN, and ligand density 25/μm2. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 1908-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Adhesive dynamics simulations of spherical iRBCs—state diagrams. (A) Shown here is on-off state diagram representing different dynamic states for given dimensionless on- and off-rates for NR = 1000. Clustering coefficient ρ = 0. (B) Shown here is an on-off state diagram for NR = 500 with different values of clustering coefficients: ρ = 0 (shaded), ρ = 0.4 (solid lines), and ρ = 1.0 (dotted lines). (C) Shown here is on-off state diagram without clustering (ρ = 0) for different numbers of one-receptor knobs: NR = 200 (dotted lines), NR = 500 (solid lines), and NR = 1000 (shaded). (D) Shown here is on-off state diagram for NR = 200 and different values of the multiplicity factor: m = 1 (dotted lines), m = 3 (solid lines), and m = 5 (shaded). Model parameters are as in Fig. 4. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 1908-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Adhesive dynamics simulations of spherical iRBCs—effect of external parameters. (A) A log-linear plot of translational and angular velocities against knob densities is shown for three ligand densities, 50, 100, and 200 nm for π = 2.5 and ϵ = 0.5. (B) Average translational and angular velocities against shear rate are shown for different knob densities for fixed on-rate κon = 10 Hz and fixed off-rate κoff = 5 Hz. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 1908-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Comparison between experimental and simulation results. Experimental data points are provided with standard deviations. Simulation data are shown in two bands: in ligand distance, we cover the range from 100 to 400 nm (light shaded band), and in on-rate, the range is from 0.1 to 10 Hz (dark shaded band). Off-rate = 0.77 Hz, force scale = 10 pN, and spring constant = 0.5 pN/nm. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 1908-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Adhesive dynamics simulations of bond dynamics and adhesive footprint. The gray and colored symbols mark the x- and y-positions of the knobs at which bonds are formed and broken, respectively. The values are shown in the center of mass system of the cell (the circle around the origin with radius 0.35 R is shown as a guide to the eye). Shear rates are (A) 42 Hz and (B) 142 Hz. As depicted schematically in the insets, breaking bonds are more stretched at higher shear rates. Full dynamics are shown in Movie S5. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 1908-1919DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.001) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions