DNA Damage-Mediated Induction of a Chemoresistant Niche

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
William H. D. Hallett, Weiqing Jing, William R. Drobyski, Bryon D
Advertisements

Tumor-Derived Jagged1 Promotes Osteolytic Bone Metastasis of Breast Cancer by Engaging Notch Signaling in Bone Cells  Nilay Sethi, Xudong Dai, Christopher.
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
William H. D. Hallett, Weiqing Jing, William R. Drobyski, Bryon D
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
The Requirement for Cyclin D Function in Tumor Maintenance
Lung Natural Helper Cells Are a Critical Source of Th2 Cell-Type Cytokines in Protease Allergen-Induced Airway Inflammation  Timotheus Y.F. Halim, Ramona H.
Blocking LFA-1 Activation with Lovastatin Prevents Graft-versus-Host Disease in Mouse Bone Marrow Transplantation  Yang Wang, Dan Li, Dan Jones, Roland.
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
IL-17 Gene Ablation Does Not Impact Treg-Mediated Suppression of Graft-Versus-Host Disease after Bone Marrow Transplantation  Lucrezia Colonna, Mareike.
DNA Damage-Mediated Induction of a Chemoresistant Niche
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (March 2017)
Inhibition of Cathepsin S Reduces Allogeneic T Cell Priming but Not Graft-versus-Host Disease Against Minor Histocompatibility Antigens  Hisaki Fujii,
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 28, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 146, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Inhibition of KLF4 by Statins Reverses Adriamycin-Induced Metastasis and Cancer Stemness in Osteosarcoma Cells  Yangling Li, Miao Xian, Bo Yang, Meidan.
T Cell and B Cell Immunity can be Reconstituted with Mismatched Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Without Alkylator Therapy in Artemis-Deficient.
Acquisition of a Functional T Cell Receptor during T Lymphocyte Development Is Enforced by HEB and E2A Transcription Factors  Mary Elizabeth Jones, Yuan.
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Tumor Self-Seeding by Circulating Cancer Cells
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages (September 2016)
Antisense Targeting of cFLIP Sensitizes Activated T Cells to Undergo Apoptosis and Desensitizes Responses to Contact Dermatitis  Dan V. Mourich, Jessica.
Modeling the Therapeutic Efficacy of p53 Restoration in Tumors
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages e4 (April 2018)
In vivo validation of effects of combination therapies on subpopulation composition. In vivo validation of effects of combination therapies on subpopulation.
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Blimp-1 Transcription Factor Is Required for the Differentiation of Effector CD8+ T Cells and Memory Responses  Axel Kallies, Annie Xin, Gabrielle T.
An Osteopontin/CD44 Axis in RhoGDI2-Mediated Metastasis Suppression
CD25 expression distinguishes functionally distinct alloreactive CD4+ CD134+ (OX40+) T-cell subsets in acute graft-versus-host disease  Philip R Streeter,
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (May 2018)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Opposing Effects of TGF-β and IL-15 Cytokines Control the Number of Short-Lived Effector CD8+ T Cells  Shomyseh Sanjabi, Munir M. Mosaheb, Richard A.
Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance  Valeria R. Fantin, Julie St-Pierre,
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (April 2016)
Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages (April 2017)
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase VHL Regulates Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α to Maintain Regulatory T Cell Stability and Suppressive Capacity  Jee H. Lee, Chris Elly,
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
TWEAK Attenuates the Transition from Innate to Adaptive Immunity
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Notch 1 Signaling Regulates Peripheral T Cell Activation
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Endogenous Control of Immunity against Infection: Tenascin-C Regulates TLR4- Mediated Inflammation via MicroRNA-155  Anna M. Piccinini, Kim S. Midwood 
Volume 2, Issue 6, Pages (December 2012)
Presentation transcript:

DNA Damage-Mediated Induction of a Chemoresistant Niche Luke A. Gilbert, Michael T. Hemann  Cell  Volume 143, Issue 3, Pages 355-366 (October 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 The Thymus Represents a Chemoprotective Niche that Harbors Surviving Lymphoma Cells Following Doxorubicin Treatment (A) Lymphoma-bearing mice were imaged for whole body fluorescence prior to treatment and 4 days following a single dose of 10 mg/kg doxorubicin. Representative mice are shown. (B) Ratios of live GFP-tagged Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− B lymphoma cells in the thymus versus peripheral lymph nodes were quantified by flow cytometry, before (n = 4 mice) and 48 hr after (n = 5 mice) doxorubicin treatment. Average ratios are indicated with a line. (C) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections of lymph node and thymus from a tumor-bearing bearing mouse 48 hr after doxorubicin treatment. The dotted line in the thymus demarcates a small region of infiltrating lymphocytes neighboring a larger region of surviving lymphoma cells. Representative fields are shown at 40× magnification. (D) A western blot showing γ-H2AX levels in FACS sorted GFP-positive lymphoma cells from the thymus and peripheral lymph nodes following doxorubicin treatment. β-Tubulin serves as a loading control. The untreated sample is a lysate from cultured lymphoma cells. (E) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing the overall survival of tumor-bearing C57BL/6 (n = 8) or C57BL/6 Rag1−/− (n = 5) mice following doxorubicin treatment. The p value was calculated using a log rank test. See also Figure S1. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Thymic Conditioned Media Contains Soluble Chemoprotective Factors (A) A graph showing lymphoma cell survival in the presence of doxorubicin alone or in the presence of conditioned media. The data are represented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 3). (B) A graph showing the growth of lymphoma cells cultured in the absence or presence of conditioned media. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (C) Cytokine array analysis of conditioned media from untreated and doxorubicin treated lymph nodes and thymus. The data is represented graphically as normalized signal intensity. Conditioned media was pooled from 3 or 4 mice for each array. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 IL-6 and Timp-1 Are Chemoprotective In Vitro and In Vivo (A) A graph showing the fold change in lymphoma cell number 72 hr after treatment with doxorubicin as a single agent or doxorubicin plus recombinant IL-6. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 4 independent experiments). (B) A graph showing the relative survival of cultured lymphoma cells at 24 hr intervals following treatment with doxorubicin alone, doxorubicin plus recombinant IL-6 or Timp-1, or doxorubicin plus both IL-6 and Timp-1. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). (C) A schematic diagram of the lymphoma transplant experiment, showing injection of IL-6+/+ lymphoma cells into both IL-6+/+ and IL-6−/− recipients. (D) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing post-treatment survival of IL-6+/+ (n = 17) or IL-6−/− (n = 5) mice bearing IL-6+/+ lymphomas. All mice were treated with a single dose of 10mg/kg doxorubicin. The p value was calculated using a log rank test. (E) H&E stained sections of lymphomas 72 hr following doxorubicin treatment. The black dotted line shown in the thymus from the IL-6+/+ recipient mouse demarcates a zone of surviving lymphoma cells that is absent in the other sections. Representative fields are shown at 20× magnification. See also Figure S2. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Doxorubicin Induces the Release of IL-6, and Inhibition of This Cytokine Signaling Sensitizes Tumor Cells to Chemotherapy (A) Quantification of IL-6 levels in conditioned media from the thymus or lymph nodes of untreated mice (n ≥ 10) or mice treated for 18 hr with 10mg/kg doxorubicin (n ≥ 7). Values were normalized by tissue weight. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (B) Quantification of IL-6 levels in conditioned media derived from tumor-bearing thymuses or lymph nodes of doxorubicin treated (n = 3) or untreated (n = 3) mice. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (C) A bar graph showing the fold change in number of live cells at 48 hr following treatment with doxorubicin alone or in combination with conditioned media plus or minus a Jak2 inhibitor. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (D) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing tumor free survival of lymphoma-bearing mice treated with doxorubicin (n = 9) or doxorubicin plus two doses of 50mg/kg AG-490 m-CF3 (n = 4). The p value was calculated using a log rank test. (E) H&E sections of lymphomas 72 hr after treatment with doxorubicin or doxorubicin plus AG-490 m-CF3. Black dotted lines distinguish surviving lymphoma cells, which are largely absent in the presence of AG-490 m-CF3, from infiltrating immune cells. Representative fields are shown at 20× magnification. See also Figure S3. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Endothelial Cells Secrete IL-6 and Timp-1 in Response to DNA Damage in a p38 MAP Kinase-Dependent Manner (A and B) (A) IL-6 and (B) Timp-1 levels were quantified by ELISA in conditioned media derived from sorted thymic cell populations The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n ≥ 3 independent experiments). Values were normalized to the number of cells sorted. (C) A graph showing lymphoma cell survival in response to 20nM doxorubicin, with or without endothelial cell co-culture. Fold change in cell number was assessed at 48 and 72 hr posttreatment. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 6 independent experiments). (D) A western blot for Bcl-XL levels in lymphoma cells in the presence or absence of TCM for 24 hr. The blot is representative of three independent experiments. (E) A graph showing the results of a GFP competition assay in cells partially transduced with a Bcl-XL shRNA or a control vector. Fold change in GFP percentage was assessed 48 hr following treatment with 20nM doxorubicin. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (F) A bar graph showing the amount of IL-6 in conditioned media from endothelial cells sorted from the thymus of untreated mice (n = 5), mice treated with doxorubicin (n = 8) or mice treated with doxorubicin plus 10 μm SB203580 (n = 4). Values were normalized to cell number. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (G) A graph showing the amount of IL-6 present in conditioned media from untreated and treated human vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs). The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (H) A graph showing the amount of IL-6 present in conditioned media from HUVECs 48 hr after treatment with doxorubicin alone or doxorubicin plus either 10 μm SB203580 or 10 μm KU55933. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). See also Figure S4. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Genotoxic Damage Promotes Cellular Senescence in Thymic Stromal Cells and Subsequent IL-6-Mediated Thymic Rebound (A) β-galactosidase staining of normal and tumor-bearing thymuses and lymph nodes in the presence or absence of doxorubicin-induced DNA damage. Representative fields are shown at 20× magnification. (B) A graph showing relative thymic and splenic weight following genotoxic damage in the presence and absence of IL-6. Organ weights are shown as the ratio of individual irradiated thymus or spleen weights relative to the average unirradiated thymic or spleen weight for each genotype. Each dot represents an individual mouse, with a line demarcating the mean for each cohort. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. See also Figure S5. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 DNA Damage Acutely Induces IL-6 in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Promoting Both Cellular Survival and Senescence (A) IL-6 levels were quantified in conditioned media derived from Focus cells treated with 200 nM doxorubicin for 24 hr. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (B) A graph showing the amount of IL-6 present in Focus cells 48 hr following treatment with either SB203580 or KU55933, in the presence or absence of doxorubicin. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3). (C) A graph showing the results of an acute cell survival assay in which Focus cells were treated with doxorubicin and increasing doses of Ag490, as indicated, for 4 days. The data are represented as mean ± SEM (n = 3 independent experiments). (D) A colony formation assay showing Focus cells that were treated with doxorubicin, Ag490 or both for 24 hr before replating. Results are representative of three independent experiments. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Athymic Mice Show Improved Tumor-free Survival Following Treatment with Doxorubicin, Related to Figure 1 (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) sections of lymph node, spleen, bone marrow and thymus from mice bearing Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumors. Mice were untreated or treated with a single dose of 10 mg/kg doxorubicin for 72 hr. Surviving lymphoma cells are absent in the lymph node, spleen and bone marrow but present in the thymus. Scale bars indicate 35 microns on all panels. (B) A histogram showing γH2AX levels across a population of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− lymphoma cells treated in vitro and in vivo in the thymus. (C) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing the tumor free survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 (n = 8) or C57BL/6 Rag1−/− (n = 5) mice following treatment with 10mg/kg doxorubicin. The p value was calculated using a log rank test. (D) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing the tumor free survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 (n = 8) or C57BL/6 thymectomized (n = 11) mice following treatment with 10 mg/kg doxorubicin. The p value was calculated using a log rank test. (E) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing the overall survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 (n = 5) or C57BL/6 Rag1−/− (n = 4) mice. The p value was calculated using a log rank test. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Soluble Factors in the Thymic Tumor Microenvironment Modulate Doxorubicin-Induced Lymphoma Cell Death but Do Not Affect Growth, Related to Figure 3 (A) A bar graph depicting lymphoma cell survival following treatment with doxorubicin alone or doxorubicin and recombinant cytokines as indicated. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (B) A graph showing lymphoma cell number at 72 hr. Lymphoma cells are untreated or treated with IL-6 or Timp1 as indicated. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (C) A graph of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− lymphoma cell migration in response to no stimulation, IL-6 or SDF-1. SDF-1 serves as a positive control. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) A histogram showing surface IL6r expression on Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− lymphoma cells. (E) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing the tumor free survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 (n = 17) or C57BL/6 IL-6−/− (n = 5) mice following treatment with 10 mg/kg doxorubicin. (F) A Kaplan-Meier curve depicting overall survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 (n = 5) or C57BL/6 IL-6−/− (n = 5) mice. (G) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing the tumor free survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 (n = 5) or C57BL/6 IL-6−/− (n = 4) mice following treatment with a fractionated dose of 20mg/kg doxorubicin. The p values for all Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated using a log rank test. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Inhibition of Cytokine Signaling Sensitizes Lymphoma Cells to Doxorubicin but Does Not Affect Growth, Related to Figure 4 (A) IL-6 levels were quantified by ELISA for conditioned media from spleen of untreated mice (n = 3) or mice treated for 18 hr with 10mg/kg doxorubicin (n = 3). Values were normalized by tissue weight. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (B) A Kaplan-Meier curve depicting tumor free survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice treated with either a single dose of 10mg/kg doxorubicin (n = 6) or a single dose of both 10mg/kg doxorubicin and 50mg/kg AG-490 m-CF3 (n = 11). (C) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing overall survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice treated with either a single dose of 10mg/kg doxorubicin (n = 6) or a single dose of both 10mg/kg doxorubicin and 50mg/kg AG-490 m-CF3 (n = 11). (D) A Kaplan-Meier curve showing overall survival of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− tumor-bearing C57BL/6 mice treated with vehicle control (n = 5) or 50mg/kg AG-490 m-CF3 (n = 6). The p values for all Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated using a log rank test. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 Endothelial Cells Release IL-6 via p38 Activation in Response to DNA Damage, Related to Figure 5 (A) IL-6 levels were quantified by ELISA for conditioned media from macrophages sorted from the thymus of untreated mice or mice treated with 10mg/kg for 18 hr. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (B) IL-6 levels were quantified by ELISA for conditioned media from untreated mice (n = 8), mice treated with 10mg/kg doxorubicin for 18 hr (n = 15) or mice treated with 100mg/kg vatalanib for 4 days and then 100mg/kg vatalanib and 10mg/kg doxorubicin for 18 hr (n = 12). Values displayed are pg/mL per thymus. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (C) A representative fluorescent image of pospho-p38 levels in endothelial cells from untreated mice or mice treated with 10mg/kg doxorubicin for 18 hr. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S5 Genotoxic Damage Promotes Cellular Senescence in Thymic Stromal Cells, Related to Figure 6 (A) β-galactosidase staining of peripheral lymphoma and thymic lymphoma 6 days following doxorubicin-induced DNA damage. Representative fields are shown at 20× magnification. (B) β-galactosidase staining of Eμ-myc p19Arf−/− thymic lymphomas at 6 or 12 days following doxorubicin-induced DNA damage. Representative fields are shown at 20× magnification. (C) β-galactosidase staining and quantification of β-galactosidase staining in thymic endothelial cells sorted from untreated mice or mice treated with 10 mg/kg doxorubicin for 4 days. The data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Immunohistochemistry showing infiltration of CD11C and CD206 positive dendritic cells and macrophages into the tumor following treatment with doxorubicin. Representative fields are shown at 20× magnification. Cell 2010 143, 355-366DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions