José M. Dias, Zhanna Alekseenko, Joanna M. Applequist, Johan Ericson 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Advertisements

Transcription Factor Hand-offs “Enhance” Motor Neuron Differentiation
Foxa2: The Rise and Fall of Dopamine Neurons
Retinoid Receptor Signaling in Postmitotic Motor Neurons Regulates Rostrocaudal Positional Identity and Axonal Projection Pattern  Shanthini Sockanathan,
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 69, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages (March 2001)
Neuronal patterning: Making stripes in the spinal cord
Volume 6, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 61, Issue 5, Pages (March 2009)
Iain Patten, Marysia Placzek  Current Biology 
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
Michael K. Gross, Mirella Dottori, Martyn Goulding  Neuron 
Volume 152, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
A Hedgehog-Insensitive Form of Patched Provides Evidence for Direct Long-Range Morphogen Activity of Sonic Hedgehog in the Neural Tube  James Briscoe,
A Role for the Roof Plate and Its Resident TGFβ-Related Proteins in Neuronal Patterning in the Dorsal Spinal Cord  Karel F Liem, Gabi Tremml, Thomas M.
G. Christopher Tan, Esteban O. Mazzoni, Hynek Wichterle  Cell Reports 
Volume 71, Issue 6, Pages (September 2011)
All Mouse Ventral Spinal Cord Patterning by Hedgehog Is Gli Dependent and Involves an Activator Function of Gli3  C.Brian Bai, Daniel Stephen, Alexandra.
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Retinoid Signaling and Neurogenin2 Function Are Coupled for the Specification of Spinal Motor Neurons through a Chromatin Modifier CBP  Seunghee Lee,
Coordinate Regulation of Motor Neuron Subtype Identity and Pan-Neuronal Properties by the bHLH Repressor Olig2  Bennett G. Novitch, Albert I. Chen, Thomas.
Retinoid Signaling and Neurogenin2 Function Are Coupled for the Specification of Spinal Motor Neurons through a Chromatin Modifier CBP  Seunghee Lee,
Canonical Wnt Signaling Dynamically Controls Multiple Stem Cell Fate Decisions during Vertebrate Body Formation  Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental.
Shanthini Sockanathan, Thomas M Jessell  Cell 
Pierre Mattar, Michel Cayouette  Neuron 
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (December 2006)
SOX2 Functions to Maintain Neural Progenitor Identity
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Derivation and FACS-Mediated Purification of PAX3+/PAX7+ Skeletal Muscle Precursors from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells  Bianca Borchin, Joseph Chen, Tiziano.
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2009)
Hiromi Shimojo, Toshiyuki Ohtsuka, Ryoichiro Kageyama  Neuron 
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
A Homeodomain Protein Code Specifies Progenitor Cell Identity and Neuronal Fate in the Ventral Neural Tube  James Briscoe, Alessandra Pierani, Thomas.
Volume 104, Issue 6, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
GRM7 Regulates Embryonic Neurogenesis via CREB and YAP
Specification of Motor Neuron Identity by the MNR2 Homeodomain Protein
Multipotent Flk-1+ Cardiovascular Progenitor Cells Give Rise to the Cardiomyocyte, Endothelial, and Vascular Smooth Muscle Lineages  Steven J. Kattman,
MiR-219 Regulates Neural Precursor Differentiation by Direct Inhibition of Apical Par Polarity Proteins  Laura I. Hudish, Alex J. Blasky, Bruce Appel 
Xuepei Lei, Jianwei Jiao  Stem Cell Reports 
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Coordinate Regulation of Motor Neuron Subtype Identity and Pan-Neuronal Properties by the bHLH Repressor Olig2  Bennett G. Novitch, Albert I. Chen, Thomas.
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages (April 2012)
Pranav Sharma, Hollis T. Cline  Neuron 
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages (September 2003)
Neural Subtype Specification from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (October 1997)
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2007)
Temporally Regulated Asymmetric Neurogenesis Causes Left-Right Difference in the Zebrafish Habenular Structures  Hidenori Aizawa, Midori Goto, Tomomi.
Jonas Muhr, Thomas M Jessell, Thomas Edlund  Neuron 
Kaumudi Joshi, Seunghee Lee, Bora Lee, Jae W. Lee, Soo-Kyung Lee 
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (December 2013)
Directed Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells into Motor Neurons
The bHLH Transcription Factor Olig2 Promotes Oligodendrocyte Differentiation in Collaboration with Nkx2.2  Qiao Zhou, Gloria Choi, David J. Anderson 
Deregulation of Dorsoventral Patterning by FGF Confers Trilineage Differentiation Capacity on CNS Stem Cells In Vitro  Limor Gabay, Sally Lowell, Lee.
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 1999)
Assigning the Positional Identity of Spinal Motor Neurons
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (January 1996)
The bHLH Transcription Factor Olig2 Promotes Oligodendrocyte Differentiation in Collaboration with Nkx2.2  Qiao Zhou, Gloria Choi, David J. Anderson 
Yasuhiro Yamada, Hitomi Aoki, Takahiro Kunisada, Akira Hara 
Presentation transcript:

Tgfβ Signaling Regulates Temporal Neurogenesis and Potency of Neural Stem Cells in the CNS  José M. Dias, Zhanna Alekseenko, Joanna M. Applequist, Johan Ericson  Neuron  Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 927-939 (December 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.033 Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Tgfβ Signaling Suppresses Early-Born Neurons and Induces Premature Generation of Late-Born Cell Types in the Developing Neural Tube (A) Expression of Shh, Nkx2.2, and Tgfβ2 in chick hindbrain (rhombomeres [r] 6–7) at Hamburger-Hamilton (HH) stages 18 and 24. (B) Effects of unilateral electroporation of CRMNkx2.2-Tgfbr1CA with CRMNkx2.2-EGFP in the chick hindbrain at HH stage 12. (+) indicates electroporated side of the neural tube. Expression of Nkx2.2 and Phox2b, Tbx20, and Gata2 at 24 hpe, and of Lmx1b and 5-HT, Gata3, Pet1, Sert, Lmx1b and GFP, Lmx1b, and Isl1/2 at 48 hpe. Lmx1b is expressed by 5HTNs and also floor plate (FP) cells, delimited by dashed lines. (C) Expression of Tgfβ2, Phox2a, Isl1/2, and Brn3a in chick midbrain at HH stage 20 and HH26. vz, ventricular zone; OMN, oculomotor neuron. (D) Effects of unilateral electroporation of CAGG-Tgfbr1CA in the chick midbrain at HH 12. Expression of Phox2a and Isl1/2 at 24 hpe and of Brn3a at 48 hpe. (E) Effects of unilateral electroporation of CAGG-Tgfbr1CA with CAGG-GFP in HH 12 chick embryos at thoracic spinal cord levels, 72 or 96 hpe, on the expression of the somatic MN marker Hb9, and the OLP markers Olig2 and Sox10. Electroporated cells express GFP protein. (F) Schematic summary. MN, motor neuron; 5HTN, serotonergic neuron; OLP, oligodendrocyte precursor cell; OMN, oculomotor neuron; RNN, red nucleus neurons; SMN, somatic motor neuron. See also Figure S1. Neuron 2014 84, 927-939DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.033) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Opposing Relationship between Phox2b and Tgfβ2, but Not of Phox2b and Foxa2, in the Nkx2.2+ Temporal Differentiation Lineage (A) Quantification of the number of (i) Nkx2.2+/Phox2b+ and Nkx2.2+/Foxa2+ coexpressing cells and (ii) Phox2b+/Foxa2+ coexpressing cells at r2/3 level of hindbrain at different stages. Values presented as mean ± SD. (B) Expression of Foxa2, Phox2b, and Tgfβ2 in chick Nkx2.2 progenitors at HH 18 and HH 25 at r2 level. Dashed line delimits boundary with floor plate (FP). (C) Coexpression analysis of Nkx2.2, Phox2b, and Foxa2 in E9.5 mouse embryos. (D) Expression of Phox2b, Foxa2, and Tgfβ2 24 hpe after unilateral electroporation of CRMNkx2.2-Tgfbr1CA at HH 12. (E) Expression of Foxa2, β-gal, and Tgfβ2 in Phox2b+/− and Phox2b−/− embryos at E9.5. β-gal is expressed under the control of Phox2b locus. Brackets delimit Nkx2.2 progenitor domain. Neuron 2014 84, 927-939DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.033) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Induction of Tgfβ2 and Execution of the MN-to-5HTN Switch Is Programmed within the Nkx2.2 Temporal Lineage Downstream of Shh (A and B) Electroporation of CAGG-Shh in HH 12 chick hindbrain. Expression of Tbx20 or Pet1 at r5–7 at 50 hpe and 70 hpe (A). Expression of Shh at 6 hpe and Nkx2.2, Foxa2, Phox2b, and Tgfβ2 at 6, 15, 20, 30, 40, and 50 hpe in intermediate neural tube (yellow boxed region) (B). (+), electroporated side; (−), control side; E.P., electroporation. (C–H) Expression of Tbx20 and Pet1 at 50 hpe in control embryos (C) and after electroporation of CAGG constructs expressing Tgfbr1CA (D), Phox2b (E), Shh (F), Shh+Tgfbr1CA (G), and Shh+Tgfbr1CA+Phox2b (H). Micrographs correspond to dashed box region in (A). N, nondefined neurons. (I) Gene regulatory network underlying the execution of the MN-to-5HTN temporal fate switch. Phox2b predominates over 5HTN-determining transcription factors (Foxa2, Ascl1, Nkx2.2). Termination of MN production and implementation of 5HTN differentiation is mediated by late induction of Tgfβ2, which is intrinsically programmed in the temporal lineage downstream of Shh. See also Figure S2. Neuron 2014 84, 927-939DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.033) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Period of MN Generation Is Extended, and Induction of 5HTNs and OLPs Delayed, in Tgfbr1 Mutant Mice (A and B) Transverse sections at r2/3 level of ventral hindbrain in control (Nkx6.2-Cre+/−) and Tgfbr1mut (Nkx6.2-Cre+/−,Tgfbr1fl/fl) embryos. Expression analysis of Tgfβ2 at E11; Nkx2.2, Lmx1b, Gata3, Pet1 at E11.5 (A); Lmx1b, 5-HT, and Sert at E12.5 (A); Nkx2.2 and Phox2b at E10.5–E11.5 and Isl1 at E11.5 (B). FP, floor plate; MN, motor neuron. (C–F) Quantification per hemisection at r2/3 level in Tgfbr1mut and control embryos of the numbers of Nkx2.2+ cells expressing Phox2b at E10.5 and E11.5 (C); Isl1+ cells labeled with BrdU in embryos pulsed with BrdU at E9.5, E10.25, or E11 and analyzed at E12.5 (D); Isl1+-MNs at E10, E11.5, and E12.5 (E); and Isl1+-MN at E11.5 (F). Dashed boxed region in (B) was used for quantifications in (F). Values presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 embryos per genotype). (G and H) Temporal profile of Lmx1b+ (G) and Olig1+ (H) cells located close to ventricular zone in control and Tgfr1 mutant embryos at r2/3 level of hindbrain at different developmental stages. (I and J) Quantification per hemisection in Tgfbr1mut and control embryos at r2/3 level of the numbers of the following: Lmx1b+ cells located laterally to the Nkx2.2 progenitor domain (I), Olig2+ cells located within or immediately adjacent to the Nkx2.2 progenitor domain (J). Olig2+ cells that had migrated from the Nkx2.2 domain were not included in the counting (J). Values presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 embryos per genotype). (K) Unilateral electroporation of CRMNkx2.2-Tgfbr1CA in caudal hindbrain induces premature 5-HT+ cells at 48 hpe and premature Olig2+, Sox10+ cells at 72 hpe. (+), electroporated side. (L) Scheme of temporal execution of the MN-to-5HTN switch and 5HTN-to-OLP switch in wild-type (wt) embryos, Tgfbr1 mutant mice, and in response to early activation of Tgfβ signaling. See also Figure S3. Neuron 2014 84, 927-939DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.033) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Establishment of the Nkx2.2 Temporal Lineage in an ESC Differentiation Protocol (A) Schematic illustration of mouse-ESC differentiation protocol. (B–D) Analysis of Nkx2.2, Sox3, Phox2b, Isl1, and Gata3 at 3–4 DDC (B); Nkx2.2, Phox2b, Isl1, Gata3, and Olig2 at 5.5–7.5 DDC (C); and Nkx2.2, Olig2, and Sox10 at 8.5–10 DDC (D). (E–M) Expression of Phox2b, Gata3, and neuronal marker Tuj1 at 4, 6, and 8 DDC (E–G); 5-HT and Lmx1b at 4, 7, and 13 DDC (H–J); Phox2b and Prph (K), Tph2 and 5-HT (L), and Olig2 and MBP (M) at 16 DDC. See also Figure S4. Neuron 2014 84, 927-939DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.033) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Tgfβ2 Restricts Differentiation Potential of ESC-Derived Neural Progenitor Cells and Promotes Enriched Generation of 5HTNs (A) Analysis of differentiation potential and “specification state” of Nkx2.2+ progenitors isolated by p-MACS at 4, 6, and 8 DDC when cultured in the absence or presence of DAPT, respectively. The generation of Phox2b+/Tuj1+ MNs and Gata3+/Tuj1+ 5HTNs was examined 72 hr after replating and Olig2+ OLPs 6 days after replating. Analysis of Phox2b, 5-HT, and Olig2 expression in cells isolated at 8 DDC was examined 6 days after replating. FT, flowthrough. (B) Effects of transient application of Tgfβ2 (2 ng/ml) between 2.5 and 3.5 DDC on progenitor identity and neuronal fate selection. Expression of Nkx2.2 and Phox2b at 4 DDC, Isl1 and 5-HT at 8 DDC, Phox2b and Gata3 expression in Tuj1+ neurons at 8 DDC in control and Tgfβ2-treated cultures. (C) Percentage of EdU+/HuC/D+ neurons that expressed the MN marker Isl1 36 hr after EdU pulse-labeling of mitotic cells at 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5.5, 6.5, and 8.5 DDC in control cultures or in cultures treated with Tgfβ2 between 2.5 and 3.5 DDC. Values presented as mean ± SD. (D) Expression of Sox3 and Tuj1 at 8 DDC in control conditions and in cultures treated with DAPT at 6 DDC. (E) Proportion of all TuJ1+ neurons expressing MN marker Phox2b or 5HTN marker Gata3 in control cultures or Tgfβ2-treated cultures (2.5–3.5 DDC) at 72 hr (h) after isolation of progenitors by p-MACS at 4 DDC or 6 DDC. After replating, cells were either allowed to differentiate normally or forced to differentiate in response to DAPT treatment. (F) Summary scheme: (i) the Nkx2.2+ progenitor pool undergoes sequential states of progenitor specification; (ii) temporal switch decisions are associated with progressive restriction in progenitor potency; (iii) temporal windows indicating the time over which Nkx2.2+ have competence to generate MNs, 5HTNs, and OLPs (as indicated by Tgfβ gain- and loss-of-function experiments). See also Figure S5. Neuron 2014 84, 927-939DOI: (10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.033) Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions