ERIE Summer Workshop Series: Watershed restoration

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

S trategic S ubwatershed I dentification P rocess Illinois Department of Natural Resources Conservation 2000 Ecosystems Program.

Advertisements

OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. ECOLOGICAL TRAINING INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION SURVEY SURVEY LITERATURE REVIEW LITERATURE REVIEW FIELD SURVEY METHODS.

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Restoration and Regulation Discussion Joseph P. DaVia US Army Corps of Engineers-Baltimore Chief, Maryland.

Measure 76 Parks and Natural Resources Fund 15% Lottery Revenue Parks Subaccount Natural Resources Subaccount Grant Fund 65% Operating Fund 35%

Capacity Building for RCDs The Santa Cruz Countywide Partners in Restoration (PIR) Permit Coordination Program Prepared for the California Association.

Analysis of Dike 14 CDF to Public Greenspace. Who owns Dike 14? State of Ohio holds Dike 14 as a public trust land Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority.

Water Resources Monitoring Strategy for Wisconsin: Building on Experience Mike Staggs, WDNR Bureau of Fisheries Management and Habitat Protection Acknowledgements:

Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions Third Generation Watershed Management Plan.

Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,

Project WILD. What the Public Should Know  Fish and wildlife resources are a public trust  Conservation and management of terrestrial and water resources.

Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.

What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.

Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.

EEP Data Flow Kevin H. Miller CVS-EEP Vegetation Monitoring Workshop Wake Technical Community College Northern Campus June 9, 2009.

Incorporating Climate Change Adaptation in EPA Region 10 Programs: An example based on a newly initiated pilot in the Office of Water and Watershed’s Total.

©2002 Institute of Water Research, all rights reserved Institute of Water Research, Michigan State University Great Lakes Protection Fund Project Restoring.

Restoring Great Lakes Basin Waters Through the Use of Conservation Credits and an Integrated Water Balance Analysis System Institute of Water Research,

Allen Berthold Texas Water Resources Institute. Review: Clean Water Act Goal of CWA is to restore and maintain water quality suitable for the “protection.

Ground Water and Ecosystems Restoration Division Assessing the Effectiveness of Restoration Technologies Elise Striz and Joe Williams.

Florida Department of Environmental Protection Watershed Assessment 2015 Strategic Monitoring in the Florida Keys DEAR- Water Quality Assessment Program.

West Virginia University Natural Stream Restoration Program An Interdisciplinary Program Focusing on Research, Education, and Professional Services in.

1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.

Our mission ead and execute environmental programs and provide expertise that enables Army training, operations, acquisition and sustainable military communities.

Engineering for Ecosystem Restoration: University at Buffalo Summer Workshop Series 2011 River Processes, Fluvial Geomorphology and Channel Processes.

Lake Superior Binational Program and Lakewide Management Plan Lynelle Hanson Lake Superior Binational Forum Meeting Ashland, Wisconsin March 23, 2012.

Ecology and environment, inc. International Specialists in the Environment The McKinstry Creek & Riparian Area NYSDOT Rt. 219 Mitigation Project Analysis.

Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator

Presented by Insert your name, title, and district Lower Hudson Coalition of Conservation Districts Volunteer Streamwalk Program Developed by the Westchester.

Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan

Watershed-based Plan To Restore the Hackensack Meadowlands: The Meadowlands Comprehensive Restoration Implementation Plan Terry Doss and Karen Appell The.

A Review of Some Grant-Funded Watershed Projects in Central Illinois: Part II Illinois Lake Management Association Grant Opportunities and Funding Options.

Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps

Loudoun County Water Resources Monitoring Presented to Loudoun Valley High School May 9, 2012 David Ward and Scott Sandberg Loudoun County Department of.

STATUS OF GREEN LAKE. Status of Green Lake Lake Management Plan Approved Lake Management Plan Approved Three Grants Awarded Three Grants Awarded.

Marin Coastal Permit Coordination Program. Why do we need a program? Called for in Watershed Plans: As many as 9 permits to consider for restoration.

Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.

Integrating Other Laws into BLM Planning. Objectives Integrate legal requirements into the planning process. Discuss laws with review and consultation.

Number of Copies Agency Submissions & Comments. Coordination ESRs are reviewed by OES and coordinated with resource agencies as part of the NEPA review.

Wildlife Agencies Government Organizations that Work for Wildlife.

Western Lake Erie Basin Partnership Presented by: Name, Title Your Organization DATE YOU PRESENTED The Meeting you presented at.

COMPREHENSIVE FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT : Promoting Wise Uses of Floodplains CA Department of Water Resources/ CIFMCG Workshop July 2006.

BDCP, Interfacing with Conservation Plans Habitat Conservation Planning from Tahoe to the Bay 7 th Annual Workshop November 18, 2009 Carl Wilcox California.

Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.

1 Implementing the Concepts Environment Pre-Conference Workshop TRB MPOs Present and Future Conference August 27, 2006 Michael Culp FHWA Office of Project.

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.

Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.

Clean Water Act Mrs. Perryman Mrs. Trimble. Clean Water Act “Restore and maintain the chemical, physical and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters”

Kentucky Growth Readiness for Water Quality Does your water quality matter?

State of the Streams Loudoun County: 2005 Loudoun Strategic Watershed Management Planning Conference February 23, 2006 Presented by: Darrell Schwalm Loudoun.

EPA-Great Lakes The US Environmental Protection Agency, USEPA, applies the WBD to many facets of their programs. Using Subwatershed (5th-level, 10-digit.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Working with the USGS 6/19/2009.

Water quality challenges in the Bay Delta Estuary.

Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.

The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.

IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE Rice County Local Water Management Plan BOARD PRESENTATION JUNE 16, 2015.

Origin  On October 18, 1997 – 25 th Anniversary of Clean Water Act – Federal agencies were asked to rededicate their efforts to cleaning up the Nations.

1 New York AOC Workshop Niagara Falls, NY April 27, 2016.

Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment

Partners in Conservation

GREAT BAY and NEW HAMPSHIRE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS

Our Mission Protect water quality and quantity for present and future

Sean D. Rafferty Research Director and Associate Director

The Ohio Clean Marinas Program Expansion

Creating and Managing Watershed Stewardship Programs Session 5

The watershed management process

The Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Program in Illinois

Watershed Literacy & Engagement

Project design and implementation

Getting organized.

Nonpoint Source Program

Presentation transcript:

ERIE Summer Workshop Series: Watershed restoration Course overview

Instructors Kelly M. Frothingham Alan J. Rabideau Geography and Planning Department, Buffalo State College, Buffalo, NY 14222, frothikm@buffalostate.edu Relationships between fluvial dynamics and aquatic habitat in stream systems impacted by human activity, stream channel restoration and naturalization, and interdisciplinary ecosystem-based watershed management Alan J. Rabideau Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering Department, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, rabideau@buffalo.edu Mathematical modeling of flow and reactive contaminant transport in groundwater, subsurface remediation, and decision and risk analysis for environmental systems

Guest lecturers Mike Goehle Victor DiGiacomo Mike Greer Aquatic Invasive Species Coordinator – Northeast Region, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Lower Great Lakes Fish & Wildlife Conservation Office Victor DiGiacomo Eighteenmile Creek Remedial Action Plan Coordinator, Niagara County Soil & Water Conservation District Mike Greer Planning Management Team Leader, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District Kathleen Buckler Biologist, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Buffalo District Margaret Wooster Habitat Planner, Buffalo Niagara Riverkeeper Colleen Bronner Ph.D. student, UB Environmental Engineering

Goals of the lectures Provide an introduction to watershed management planning and the current state of stream restoration Environmental values, especially pertaining to restoration goal setting Cover the watershed management process, including Setting project objectives Community involvement Project design & implementation Monitoring and evaluation Applied approaches and case studies presented by regional experts

Schedule Time Topic Presenter(s) Monday, 6/20 8:00-9:00 ----------------------------------------------------- 9:00-10:00 10:00-11:00 11:00-12:00 12:00-12:15 Introductions 12:15-1:00 Course overview Kelly Frothingham 1:00-2:00 Watershed management overview 2:00-2:15 Break 2:15-3:30 Current state of stream restoration 3:30-4:30 Intro to environmental ethics Alan Rabideau 4:30-5:00 Wrap-up

Schedule Time Topic Presenter(s) Tuesday, 6/21 8:15-8:30 Announcements & discussion 8:30-10:00 Natural and human-induced disturbances Kelly Frothingham 10:00-10:15 Break 10:15-11:45 USFWS presentation: invasive species Mike Goehle 11:45-1:00 Lunch 1:00-2:00 Watershed management process 2:00-2:45 Getting organized 2:45-3:00 3:00-4:30 NCSWCD presentation: project case study Victor DiGiacomo 4:30-5:00 Wrap-up

Schedule Time Topic Presenter(s) Wednesday, 6/22 8:15-8:30 Announcements & discussion 8:30-10:00 Project communication Kelly Frothingham 10:00-10:15 Break 10:15-11:45 Problem and opportunity identification 11:45-1:00 Lunch 1:00-2:00 Setting project objectives 2:00-3:00 Stream restoration goal setting Alan Rabideau 3:00-3:15 3:15-4:30 4:30-5:00 Wrap-up

Schedule Time Topic Presenter(s) Thursday, 6/23 8:15-8:30 Announcements & discussion 8:30-10:00 Project design & design implementation Kelly Frothingham 10:00-10:15 Break 10:15-11:45 USACE presentation: cost benefit & risk assessment Mike Greer 11:45-1:00 Lunch 1:00-2:30 USACE presentation: permitting Kathleen Buckler 2:30-2:45 2:45-4:15 Riverkeeper presentation: project case study Margaret Wooster 4:15-5:00 Wrap-up

Schedule Time Topic Presenter(s) Friday, 6/24 8:15-8:30 Announcements & discussion 8:30-9:00 Monitoring, evaluation, adaptive management Kelly Frothingham 9:00-10:00 Project monitoring & evaluation methods Colleen Bronner 10:00-10:15 Break 10:15-11:30 Project monitoring & evaluation: national trends & local case studies 11:30-12:00 Wrap up and review 12:00-1:00 ----------------------------------------------------- 1:00-2:00 2:00-3:00 3:00-4:00 4:00-5:00

Resources Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG). 1998. Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices. By the Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group. GPO Item No. 0120-A; SuDocs No. A 57.6/2:EN 3/PT.653. ISBN-0-934213-59-3. Available on-line: http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Technical/stream_restoration/) 15 Federal agencies, including those in the USDA, US Dept. of Commerce, DOD, HUD, Dept. of the Interior, USEPA, TVA, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency Overview of stream corridors, including physical, chemical and biological characteristics Disturbances and developing a watershed management plan Applying restoration principles—analysis of corridor condition; restoration design; restoration installation, monitoring, and adaptive management USEPA. 2008. Handbook for Developing Watershed Plans to Restore our Waters. By the US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Nonpoint Source Control Branch. EPA 841-B-08-002. Available on-line: http://water.epa.gov/polwaste/nps/handbook_index.cfm Focused on threatened and impaired waterbodies , the Clean Water Act, and TMDLs References at the end of the presentations TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load