Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
YidC and Oxa1 Form Dimeric Insertion Pores on the Translating Ribosome
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Andrei Korostelev, Sergei Trakhanov, Martin Laurberg, Harry F. Noller 
Interaction of Era with the 30S Ribosomal Subunit
James M. Ogle, Frank V. Murphy, Michael J. Tarry, V. Ramakrishnan  Cell 
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 118, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Laura Lancaster, Harry F. Noller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (December 2005)
Molecular Model of the Human 26S Proteasome
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (November 2007)
Locking and Unlocking of Ribosomal Motions
Hani S. Zaher, Rachel Green  Molecular Cell 
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
A Model for How Ribosomal Release Factors Induce Peptidyl-tRNA Cleavage in Termination of Protein Synthesis  Stefan Trobro, Johan Åqvist  Molecular Cell 
Ribosomal Protein L3: Gatekeeper to the A Site
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Trapping the Ribosome to Control Gene Expression
Fabien Darfeuille, Cecilia Unoson, Jörg Vogel, E. Gerhart H. Wagner 
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages (December 2015)
The Path of Messenger RNA through the Ribosome
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 12, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Crystal Structures of a Ligand-free MthK Gating Ring: Insights into the Ligand Gating Mechanism of K+ Channels  Sheng Ye, Yang Li, Liping Chen, Youxing.
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 57, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Functional Architecture of RNA Polymerase I
Regulation of the Protein-Conducting Channel by a Bound Ribosome
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Organization of an Activator-Bound RNA Polymerase Holoenzyme
Volume 102, Issue 5, Pages (September 2000)
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Jinzhong Lin, Matthieu G. Gagnon, David Bulkley, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Structural Basis of EZH2 Recognition by EED
Crystal Structure of the DegS Stress Sensor
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Anne Dallas, Harry F Noller  Molecular Cell 
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 123, Issue 7, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 121, Issue 5, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages e3 (March 2018)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Solution Structure of the E. coli 70S Ribosome at 11.5 Å Resolution
Egor Svidritskiy, Andrei A. Korostelev  Structure 
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Molecular Mechanism of Drug-Dependent Ribosome Stalling
Presentation transcript:

Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages 1019-1031 (September 2007) Structured mRNAs Regulate Translation Initiation by Binding to the Platform of the Ribosome  Stefano Marzi, Alexander G. Myasnikov, Alexander Serganov, Chantal Ehresmann, Pascale Romby, Marat Yusupov, Bruno P. Klaholz  Cell  Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages 1019-1031 (September 2007) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.008 Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Cryo-EM Structures of Five Different 70S Complexes Illustrating the Entrapment Mechanism and Its Relief Views from the L1 side (left), from the 30S side (middle) and from the top (right). Localization and domain assignment (domain 1 and pseudoknot) by comparison of (A) empty 70S ribosome, (B) “stalled preinitiation” rpsOSD-S15-70S complex, and (C) “Δ1-preinitiation” Δ1rpsOSD-S15-70S (mRNA mutant lacking the 5′ hairpin loop domain 1). Entrapment relief by comparison of (B) “stalled preinitiation” complex and (D) “fMet-preinitiation” rpsOSD-S15-70S-fMet-tRNAfMet complex, with (E) “fMet-initiation” rpsOSD-70S-fMet-tRNAfMet complex. The 30S and 50S subunits are shown in blue and orange, respectively. The S15-mRNA part is shown in red, the E-site tRNA in yellow, and the P-site initiator fMet-tRNAfMet in green. The L1-stalk, the toe, the head, the platform and ribosomal protein S2 are indicated. Cell 2007 130, 1019-1031DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structure and Function Comparison of 30S and 70S Ribosome Complexes with the Repressor-Bound mRNA (A) Formation of the blocked ribosome-rpsOSD mRNA-S15 complex as visualized by toe-printing assays. Appearance of reverse transcriptase stop at position +10 is the signature for the stalled ribosome complex promoted by increasing amount of S15. The signal at position +17 is obtained when an active translation initiation complex is formed. Toe-printing experiments were conducted with rpsOSD transcript, E. coli 30S or 70S ribosomes, and when indicated tRNAfMet and S15. The initiator tRNA was added after S15. S15 concentration was gradually increased: 0 nM (lanes A, C, H, and L), 200 nM (lanes B, D, I and M), 1 μM (lanes E, J) and 2 μM (lanes F, K and N). Lane A: Incubation control of mRNA in the absence of the ribosome and S15. Lane B: Incubation control of mRNA in the absence of the ribosome but with S15. Lanes G and U: sequencing ladders. The AUG position is marked. (B) Structures of the 70S and 30S ribosomes with the repressor-bound mRNA. The only significant difference between 30S and 70S complexes is the conformation of the nonregulatory domain 1 of the rpsO mRNA (oriented toward the E-site in the 70S ribosome, or toward the solvent side in the 30S subunit). Cell 2007 130, 1019-1031DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Detail View of rpsO-S15 Complex and Its Interactions with the Ribosome The model of the rpsO-S15 complex (Mathy et al., 2004) fitted to the extracted cryo-EM density (light pink surface) is shown in the ribbon representation. Top, view from the solvent side; bottom, view from the top; domain 1 in blue, pseudoknot in red, protein S15 in green, and SD sequence in magenta. The position of the AUG start codon is indicated in cyan; the possible path of the connecting RNA-loops is in gray. The ribosomal proteins surrounding the rpsO-S15 complex are indicated and the anti-SD (aSD) sequence is in orange. The secondary structure of the rpsO mRNA is shown in the middle, residues crucial for interaction with S15 are shown in red (see also Figure S1). The two inserts describe the stalled preinitiation complex with the fitted mRNA/S15 model in the same orientation as the corresponding panels. Cell 2007 130, 1019-1031DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Platform-Binding Center for Folded 5′-UTR mRNAs The platform-binding center for structured mRNAs is shown on the small ribosomal subunit (Schuwirth et al., 2005) (viewing angle as in Figure 3 top panel). Ribosomal proteins and RNA helices are labeled and color-coded as in Figure 3. Conserved surface residues of S2, S7, and S11, adjacent to the position of the folded mRNAs, are highlighted by cyan van der Waals spheres. In the case of the rspO-S15 complex, a conformational change positions S2 away from helix h26 (compared to the crystal structure) providing additional conserved residues (highlighted in red) for mRNA binding. Cell 2007 130, 1019-1031DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Schematic Representation of the Entrapment Mechanism and Its Relief Comparison of the folded rpsO mRNA position (A) with the normal mRNA path (B) obtained after S15 release and fMet-tRNAfMet binding. The 50S (orange) and the 30S (light blue) subunits are represented as a projection shape seen from the top of the ribosome. In the active 70S initiation complex (B), the initiation codon is located in the P-site and interacts with the fMet-tRNAfMet (Yusupova et al., 2001). In the inactive 70S complex (A), repressor protein S15 stabilizes the rpsO mRNA in a folded conformation and prevents the start codon from entering the mRNA channel. The SD sequence of the mRNA (in magenta) interacts with the anti-SD sequence at the 3′ end of the 16S rRNA (in orange) forming a short helix, which is shifted outwards in the 70S-rpsO-S15 complex. SD/anti-SD interactions are present in the docked and unfolded states. Cell 2007 130, 1019-1031DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.008) Copyright © 2007 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions