Discussion on product interoperability: from CARD4L to MRI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Incoming Themes for 2017 Frank Kelly, USGS
Advertisements

Analysis Ready Data LSI-VC – Adam Lewis Co-chair
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Framework
Analysis Ready Data (ARD) SEO Status Report
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Initiative
LSI-Related Activities
Data Interoperability Summary
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Analysis Ready Data ..
USGS Status Frank Kelly, USGS EROS CEOS Plenary 2017 Agenda Item #4.14
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability: Framework
LSI-VC Jenn Lacey, USGS, LSI-VC Co-Lead CEOS SIT-33
FDA context Steven Hosford On behalf of FDA Co-chairs
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability: Overview & Framework
Extension of ARD concept to Atmosphere and Oceans?
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
Analysis ready data: definition document
Agency Report Geoscience Australia
USGS Agency Update: CARD4L Production Roadmap
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Initiative
SAR-related ARD activities
WGCV-32 Action Item Review
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability
CEOS Status/Overview Steven Hosford LSI-VC-5 Agenda Item #1.4
FDA Objectives and Implementation Planning
Session 2: Analysis Ready Data
Action Item Status / CEOS Work Plan Status
CEOS Chair Priorities for 2017
CARD4L Product Alignment Assessment
CEOS DB API and Waveband Improvements
Joint Remote Sensing Research Program 2016 Research Updates
CEOS Analysis Ready Data for Land (CARD4L) Framework Recap
ESA inputs on SAR ARD Susanne Mecklenburg, Nuno Miranda Steven Hosford
Review of Chair Priorities
LSI-VC Work Plan Updates
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
ARD Uncertainties WGCV Plenary # 43 Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil
Uncertainties for Analysis Ready Data
A CEOS STRATEGY FOR ANALYSIS READY DATA (ARD)
Satellite Interoperability Workshop LSI/SDCG/GEOGLAM Joint Meeting
Future Near-term Plans
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
LSI-VC User Requirements
Day 2 Summary K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 42 May 16-19, 2017.
Steve Labahn (USGS), LSI-VC Co-Lead
Agency Reports – USGS Jenn Lacey LSI-VC-5 Agenda Item #2 February 2018
CEOS Context LSI/SDCG/GEOGLAM Joint Meeting
LSI-VC CEOS Work Plan Tasks
WG Calibration and Validation
Analysis Ready Data Strategy for CEOS
A Broader CEOS ARD Strategy
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Product self-assessment to CARD4L Normalised Radar Backscatter
Session 2: CEOS Analysis Ready Data for Land (10:50 – 11:00)
Global Data Flows LSI-VC-7 S Ward, Feb 2019.
CEOS Work Plan LSI-VC Deliverables
SR Self Assessment for CARD4L - Geoscience Australia
WGISS 47 FDA Elements Demonstration Workshop
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
CEOS ARD strategy – and SDCG role
DEM related topics K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 45 CSIRO, Perth
SEO Report to WGISS-48 Brian Killough
CEOS Analysis Ready Data Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Discussion on product interoperability: from CARD4L to MRI Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Discussion on product interoperability: from CARD4L to MRI ESA Data Quality team LSI-VC-5 Agenda Item #?? February 2018

Product Interoperability CEOS Analysis Ready Data for Land CARD4L CARD4L are satellite data that have been processed to a minimum set of requirements and organized into a form that allows immediate analysis with a minimum of additional user effort, and, interoperability both through time and with other datasets CARD4L aims to reduce barriers to interoperability between products Where do these barriers to interoperability stem from?

Barriers to Product Interoperability Acquisition geometry. Confidence that given data is acquired at a given point in space (geolocation accuracy) and represents a given area centred on that point (spatial resolution). Use of common reference datasets (grids, DEMs, …) reduces interoperability barriers

Barriers to Product Interoperability Sensor compatibility. A spectrum of levels of interoperability exists across data acquired by different sensors according to the differences in the construction of the sensor. This ranges from: Same sensor: data acquired by the same sensor (at two points in time) or sensor series (flying on the same series of missions – Sentinel 2a and 2b) Same sensor family: data acquired by sensors of the same family (e.g. Vegetation 1, Vegetation 2, Proba-V) Same Parameter: data acquired by sensors developed separately but acquiring data of a similar category. In this case, the objective is to obtain interoperable higher level products derived from the data, for example Surface Reflectance. Use of the same calibration approaches and corrections required to reduce interoperability barriers

Levels of interoperability Single Sensor ARDs Being compliant to a CARD4L PFS does not guarantee product interoperability No constraints on using set reference datasets (Grid, DEM, etc.) or specified processing algorithms Single Sensor Interoperable ARDs Applying constraints on reference datasets (Grid, DEM, etc.) and specified processing algorithms Increased level of product interoperability Medium Resolution Interoperability products Merged/combined products generated by combining lower level products