Oct4 Is a Key Regulator of Vertebrate Trunk Length Diversity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (September 2006)
Advertisements

Leslie Dunipace, Abbie Saunders, Hilary L. Ashe, Angelike Stathopoulos 
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 22, Issue 7, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 20, Pages S1-S2 (October 1999)
Jolanta E. Pitera, Virpi V. Smith, Peter Thorogood, Peter J. Milla 
Gabrielle Kardon, Brian D Harfe, Clifford J Tabin  Developmental Cell 
Martin Gering, Roger Patient  Developmental Cell 
Smoothened Mutants Reveal Redundant Roles for Shh and Ihh Signaling Including Regulation of L/R Asymmetry by the Mouse Node  Xiaoyan M. Zhang, Miguel.
Volume 28, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (September 1998)
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
Volume 154, Issue 6, Pages (September 2013)
All Mouse Ventral Spinal Cord Patterning by Hedgehog Is Gli Dependent and Involves an Activator Function of Gli3  C.Brian Bai, Daniel Stephen, Alexandra.
RBM24 Is a Major Regulator of Muscle-Specific Alternative Splicing
Robert G. Kelly, Nigel A. Brown, Margaret E. Buckingham 
Kim F. Rewitz, Naoki Yamanaka, Michael B. O'Connor  Developmental Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Supplemental Figure 3 A B C T-DNA 1 2 RGLG1 2329bp 3 T-DNA 1 2 RGLG2
Mechanisms of Odor Receptor Gene Choice in Drosophila
Kimberle Shen, Harwin Sidik, William S. Talbot  Cell Reports 
Jolanta E. Pitera, Virpi V. Smith, Peter Thorogood, Peter J. Milla 
Vertebrate Segmentation: From Cyclic Gene Networks to Scoliosis
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (November 2012)
Kathleen S. Christine, Frank L. Conlon  Developmental Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 18, Pages (September 2001)
CPG2 Neuron Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (January 2013)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Benjamin L. Martin, David Kimelman  Developmental Cell 
Tbx5 and Tbx4 Are Not Sufficient to Determine Limb-Specific Morphologies but Have Common Roles in Initiating Limb Outgrowth  Carolina Minguillon, Jo Del.
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (June 2009)
The Graded Response to Sonic Hedgehog Depends on Cilia Architecture
Volume 106, Issue 2, Pages (July 2001)
Volume 11, Issue 15, Pages (August 2001)
Satoko Nishimoto, Susan M. Wilde, Sophie Wood, Malcolm P.O. Logan 
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
E2a Is Necessary for Smad2/3-Dependent Transcription and the Direct Repression of lefty during Gastrulation  Andrea E. Wills, Julie C. Baker  Developmental.
RPK1 and TOAD2 Are Two Receptor-like Kinases Redundantly Required for Arabidopsis Embryonic Pattern Formation  Michael D. Nodine, Ramin Yadegari, Frans.
Yali Huang, Rodrigo Osorno, Anestis Tsakiridis, Valerie Wilson 
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
Stefano De Renzis, J. Yu, R. Zinzen, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Yu-Chiun Wang, Zia Khan, Eric F. Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
The Chick Transcriptional Repressor Nkx3
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
The REF-1 Family of bHLH Transcription Factors Pattern C
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Temporally Regulated Asymmetric Neurogenesis Causes Left-Right Difference in the Zebrafish Habenular Structures  Hidenori Aizawa, Midori Goto, Tomomi.
Pharyngeal arch patterning in the absence of neural crest
FGF Signaling Regulates Mesoderm Cell Fate Specification and Morphogenetic Movement at the Primitive Streak  Brian Ciruna, Janet Rossant  Developmental.
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Enhancer Control of Transcriptional Bursting
Reprogramming Hox Expression in the Vertebrate Hindbrain: Influence of Paraxial Mesoderm and Rhombomere Transposition  Nobue Itasaki, James Sharpe, Alastair.
Zhen Zhang, Jamie M. Verheyden, John A. Hassell, Xin Sun 
Presentation transcript:

Oct4 Is a Key Regulator of Vertebrate Trunk Length Diversity Rita Aires, Arnon D. Jurberg, Francisca Leal, Ana Nóvoa, Martin J. Cohn, Moisés Mallo  Developmental Cell  Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 262-274 (August 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Characterization of the Ventral Ectopic Mass in Gdf11 Mutant Embryos The tail region of E10.5 wild-type (WT; A, C, E–J, Q–S) or Gdf11−/− (B, D, K–P, T–V) embryos was analyzed by whole-mount in situ hybridization against T(Brachyury) (A, B, E, K), Sox2 (C, D, F, L), Fgf8 (G, M), Wnt3a (H, N), Nkx1.2 (I, O), Foxa2 (J, P), or Oct4 (S, V), or by immunofluorescence with antibodies against Sox2 (Q, R, T, U), T(Brachyury) (Q, T), or Oct4 (R, U). (E)–(P) show transverse sections through the areas indicated in (A)–(D) or in Figures S1C–S1J, with the dorsal part oriented to the top. In (E), (F), (K), and (L) the outline of the embryo is indicated. (Q), (R), (T), and (U) show sagittal sections through the tail region. The arrow in (B) indicates the ectopic mass. The red arrowheads in (K)–(P) indicate the gut epithelium and the arrows the ectopic mass-associated epithelium. The arrow in (V) indicates expression in the ectopic mass and the arrowhead shows expression in the posterior neural tube. Developmental Cell 2016 38, 262-274DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Consequences of Sustained Oct4 Expression in Mouse Embryos (A–D) Skeletal analysis of a wild-type (A), a Gdf11−/− (B), and two Cdx2-Oct4 transgenic (C, D) embryos at E18.5. The number of thoracic (T) and lumbar (L) vertebrae is shown. (E–I) Analysis of a wild-type (E), Gdf11−/− (F), and two Cdx2-Oct4 transgenic (G–I) embryos at E10.5 stained simultaneously for Uncx4.1 and Ptx1 (E–G) or with Uncx4.1 and Tbx4 (H, I). The number of interlimb somites is indicated. (I) shows a close-up of the caudal end of the embryo in (H). The embryo in (G) is expected to produce a skeleton similar to the one shown in (C) and the embryo in (H) and (I) is expected to produce a skeleton similar to that in (D). The arrow in (I) indicates the posterior embryonic end showing the absence of a tailbud and the red arrowhead the position of the hindlimb/ventral mesoderm. Developmental Cell 2016 38, 262-274DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Molecular Characterization of Cdx2-Oct4 Transgenics E10.5 wild-type (A–E and K–M) and Cdx2-Oct4 transgenic (F–J and N–P) embryos were analyzed by in situ hybridization with probes for Fgf8 (A, F), T(Brachyury) (B, G), Hand2 (D, I), Hoxd11 (E, J), Hoxa10 (K, N), Hoxc10 (L, O), and Hoxd10 (M, P). (A), (B), (C), (F), (G), and (H) show dorsal close-ups of the posterior end of the embryos. (A′), (B′), (C′), (F′), (G′), and (H′) show transverse sections through the areas indicated in the corresponding whole-mount stained embryo. The black arrow in (D) and (I) indicates the posterior end of the embryos, whereas the posterior end of the lateral mesoderm is indicated with a red arrowhead. In all images involving Hox genes the inset shows a dorsal view of the posterior embryonic end to show that the paraxial mesoderm of the transgenics is mostly negative for posterior Hox gene expression. The arrows in (L) and (O) indicate the paraxial mesoderm and the red arrowhead the hindlimb. Developmental Cell 2016 38, 262-274DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Oct4 Expression and Genomic Environment in Snake Embryos (A and B) Oct4 expression in a corn snake embryo shortly after it underwent trunk-to-tail transition. (B) shows a close-up of the lower trunk/tail region. (C) Structure of the genomic area surrounding the Oct4 locus in mouse. (D) Structure of the genomic area surrounding Oct4 locus in python. In (C) and (D) the coding regions and their transcriptional orientation are indicated with red arrows. (E) Close-up of the region containing Npdc1- and Oct4-coding exons in the python. Exons are represented as boxes. (F–I) RT-PCR analysis of transcripts synthesized from the python Npdc1 and Oct4 transcription units using primer sets Py-Npdc-RT-F1 and Py-Npdc-RT-R1 (F), Py-Npdc-RT-F2 and Py-Oct4-RT-R1 (G), Py-Oct4-RT-F1 and Py-Oct4-RT-R2 (H), and Py-Oct4-RT-F2 and Py-Oct4-RT-R3 (I). The position of the primers is indicated in (E). Developmental Cell 2016 38, 262-274DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparison of Last Npdc1 Exons and First Oct4 Exons between Python and Mouse (A) Schematic structure of the mouse Npdc1 gene. (B) Eighth python Npdc1 exon. The sequence includes the end of the open reading frame (bold) and the 3′ UTR. The king cobra has a similar sequence but is not shown in this figure. The splice acceptor site (in yellow), the termination codon (in green), and translation products are indicated, together with the coordinates of the exon in contig GenBank: NW_006534040. (C) RT-PCR analysis showing the existence of the eighth Npdc1 exon in python using oligonucleotides from the regions indicated in the orange box in (B). (D) Comparison of the protein fragments encoded by the last exons of the mouse and python Npdc1 genes. (E) Comparison of the mouse and python Oct4 proteins. Regions encoded by the different exons are color coded. Note the striking difference in exon 1-encoded peptides, which contrasts with the high similarity in the rest of the molecules. Developmental Cell 2016 38, 262-274DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Sequence Comparison in the Vicinity of the Oct4 Locus in Snakes and Lizards The genomic sequences from the area including Oct4 from gecko, Anolis, Pogona, glasslizard, boa, king cobra, and brown spotted pit viper were plotted against the corresponding area of python using a VISTA software. Homologies within coding exons are represented in blue and conservation in non-coding regions in red. Developmental Cell 2016 38, 262-274DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Regulatory Capacity within the Snake Oct4 Locus (A–F) β-Galactosidase reporter assay to explore the capacity of the conserved 250-bp region (A–C) or the larger 1.2-kb fragment (D–F) from the genomic region upstream of the snake Oct4 gene. The arrows indicate the neural tube, the blue arrowhead the neural crest, and the red arrowhead the presomitic mesoderm. (C) and (F) show sections though the areas indicated in (A) and (D), respectively. The black arrow indicates the neural tube and the red arrow the somitic mesoderm. The outline of the tissue is contoured in red. (G and H) Whole-mount in situ hybridization with a probe against the corn snake Oct4 mRNA, on wild-type (G) or transgenic embryos for a BAC containing the Oct4 locus (H). Developmental Cell 2016 38, 262-274DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.06.021) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions