Revised Compliance Testing Program for Body Armor IACP Conference – San Diego, California November 8, 2008 Revised Compliance Testing Program for Body.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Establishing a New Accreditation Program in the U.S.
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Body Armor Standards and Testing Technical Workshop November 21-22, 2005 Dr. John Morgan Assistant Director for Science & Technology National Institute.
1.Quality-“a characteristic or attribute of something.” As an attribute of an item, quality refers to measurable characteristics— things we are able to.
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
4/23/2015 P.E.S.A.W.(public employees safe at work) 1 Safety Webinar: Hazard Communication and “Your Right to Know” Sponsored by the Georgia Department.
Ensuring Effective Monitoring, Certification and Verification of Emissions by Jed Jones Lloyd’s Register.
The New TNI Laboratory Accreditation Standards Requirements for an Accreditation Body.
Civil Administrative Enforcement of Environmental Laws.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego, CA January 20, AS9104/2 Oversight Process.
Accreditation 1. Purpose of the Module - To create knowledge and understanding on accreditation system - To build capacity of National Governments/ focal.
Revised Compliance Testing Process for Body Armor 9 th Annual Technologies for Critical Incident Preparedness Conference San Francisco, California November.
Conformity Assessment Practical Implications InterAgency Committee on Standards Policy June 2007 Gordon Gillerman Conformity Assessment Advisor Homeland.
Supervised by: Dr- Fatmah Baddar. 2 Health Care Service Accreditation Accreditation Accreditation is the process of assessing health institutions against.
Slide 1 FAA’s Special Technical Audit of Boeing and the Audit Resolution Plan.
Purpose of the Standards
ANSI ISO ICCA Program. ISO Standards ISO sets an internationally recognized benchmark to assure that the certification organization meets the set.
Per Anders Eriksson
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1.Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment: Roles and Responsibilities.
CPA is a UKAS company The Assessment Process 2014 Seminars.
April 2, 2013 Longitudinal Data system Governance: Status Report Alan Phillips Deputy Director, Fiscal Affairs, Budgeting and IT Illinois Board of Higher.
NVLAP Overview and Accreditation Process March 2006.
Codes, Standards & Conformity Assessment GP Russ Chaney CEO, The IAPMO Group
Independent School Process Agency of Education State Board of Education Presentation March 25, 2014.
Cybersecurity: Engineering a Secure Information Technology Organization, 1st Edition Chapter 7 Software Supporting Processes and Software Reuse.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment Body Armor Technical Workshop October 2005 Gordon Gillerman.
WHY CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT?. What is conformity assessment?  Conformity assessment is the name given to processes that are used to demonstrate that a.
Certification Approaches EAC Meeting Miami, FL August 2008 Gordon Gillerman Conformity Assessment Advisor Homeland Security National Institute of Standards.
Railway Transport Equipment (RTE) Certification Railway Transport Equipment Certification Procedure Application for railway transport equipment certification.
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
1 ICPHSO February, Toy Safety Certification Program SM.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Completing Independent Assessments Robert Flaharty & John Horan January 17, 2013 OP Assessor Workshop.
Quality Assurance of Malaysian Higher Education COPIA – Code of Practice for Institutional Audit COPPA – Code of Practice for Programme Accreditation.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
© 2011 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. All rights reserved. This document may not be reproduced or distributed without authorization. ASSET Safety Management.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
Standards and Testing Program Debra Stoe Physical Scientist Body Armor and Standards and Testing Program October 21, 2009 National Institute of Justice.
1 Thank you for visiting our site and welcome to the “Introduction to ISO 22000” Presentation that you requested. For more information.
EMS Today: Emerging Issues Energy & Environmental Division National Conference San Antonio, Texas September 20, 2005.
Conformity Assessment Overview Nuclear Energy Standards Coordinating Collaborative November 2009 Gordon Gillerman Chief Standards Services Division National.
SANAS ACCREDITATION DEES DHANRAJ BEE Lead Assessor.
SPS policy – Information Presentation Presentation to ROS June 16, 2004.
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
THE FUTURE OF THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW PROCESS July 2005 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Tier I: Module 5 CERCLA 128(a): Tribal Response Program Element 4: Verification & Certification.
Dispensary and Administration Site Information Presentation.
Yadvindera (Bobby) Bains MD Director of Radiation Oncology, Laredo Medical Center Adjunct Associate Professor, Dept of Radiation Oncology, University of.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup HIE Trust Framework: HIE Trust Framework: Essential Components for Trust April 21, 2010 David Lansky, Chair Farzad.
© Copyright 2005 TEM Consulting, LP - All Rights Reserved Presentation To EAC Aug. 23, 2005 Hearing, Denver, CORev 1 – 08/16/05 - HSB Considerations In.
Onsite Quarterly Meeting SIPP PIPs June 13, 2012 Presenter: Christy Hormann, LMSW, CPHQ Project Leader-PIP Team.
Access to Information: Bolivia Main Headline Goes Here Special Meeting of the Juridical and Political Affairs OAS December 13, 2010 Laura Neuman Access.
C e r t i f i c a t i o n f o r j u s t i c e a n d s u s t a i n a b i l i t y Developing Timber Legality Verification in Indonesia Taufiq Alimi.
THE ROLE OF PROFICIENCY TESTING - A PERSPECTIVE FROM AN ACCREDITATION BODY Randall Querry American Association for Laboratory Accreditation (A2LA) November.
Technology Services – National Institute of Standards and Technology Conformity Assessment ANSI-HSSP Workshop Emergency Communications December 2, 2004.
Internal Audit Quality Assessment Guide
European Life Sciences Infrastructure for Biological Information ELIXIR Collaboration Agreement Template ELIXIR/2014/10 Vera Herkommer.
2002 ANSI Annual Conference The Value of Accreditation Robert H. King Jr. President and CEO, RAB.
Welcome to the Testing Information Management System (TIMS)
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
School Site Councils & Site Governance Teams
Clinical Engineering Lecture (3).
Standards and Certification Training
Setting Actuarial Standards
Environmental Measurement Symposium
Resolving Issues ADR, Due Process and CDE Complaints
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
The Value of Accreditation
Presentation transcript:

Revised Compliance Testing Program for Body Armor IACP Conference – San Diego, California November 8, 2008 Revised Compliance Testing Program for Body Armor IACP Conference – San Diego, California November 8, 2008 NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CORRECTIONS TECHNOLOGY CENTER SYSTEM Lance Miller Director National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center–National Rockville, Maryland Lance Miller Director National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center–National Rockville, Maryland

National Institute of Justice Sponsors the CTP Provides Funding Legal Expertise/Counsel National Institute of Justice Sponsors the CTP Provides Funding Legal Expertise/Counsel National Institute of Justice Voluntary Compliance Testing Program (CTP)

National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center Administers the CTP Provides Subject Matter Expertise Law Enforcement Agency Outreach National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center Administers the CTP Provides Subject Matter Expertise Law Enforcement Agency Outreach National Institute of Justice Voluntary Compliance Testing Program

National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Provides Scientific and Engineering Support Conducts Research Authors standards and user guides National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Provides Scientific and Engineering Support Conducts Research Authors standards and user guides National Institute of Justice Voluntary Compliance Testing Program

NIJ Standards and Testing Program The Purpose of the National Institute of Justices Voluntary Compliance Testing Program is to ensure to the degree possible that body armor used for law enforcement and corrections application is safe, is reliable, and meets performance requirements throughout the declared performance period.

A new approach to compliance testing for body armor. In response to the Attorney Generals directive to assess…the processes by which body armor is tested and approved. Based on input from the law enforcement community, it is no longer satisfactory to only test armor designs once in like new condition: Must address ongoing performance of subsequent production units (post- compliance), and Take steps to begin to understand the effects of environmental factors over time on armor performance. The NIJ/NIST/NLECTC team reviewed current methods used to evaluate product conformance and safety to determine approach. A new approach to compliance testing for body armor. In response to the Attorney Generals directive to assess…the processes by which body armor is tested and approved. Based on input from the law enforcement community, it is no longer satisfactory to only test armor designs once in like new condition: Must address ongoing performance of subsequent production units (post- compliance), and Take steps to begin to understand the effects of environmental factors over time on armor performance. The NIJ/NIST/NLECTC team reviewed current methods used to evaluate product conformance and safety to determine approach. Compliance Testing Program Overview

Revisions to the NIJ Standard for Ballistic-Resistant Body Armor: NIJ Standard Revisions to the NIJ Standard for Ballistic-Resistant Body Armor: NIJ Standard NIJ Standards and Testing Program

What Changes? Redefined Threat Level Classes: Elimination of Threat Level I: No longer sufficient for LE duty use Velocities at Level IIA, II, and IIIA increased to reflect current threats.357 SIG replaces 9mm test round for Type IIIA Specified projectiles: Manufacturer and model of test rounds clearly identified in standard to reduce potential for variability in testing. Increased Amount of Testing: More armor samples tested per model: 12 complete vests (4 previous) Increased number of P-BFS shots: Previously 48 – Now 144 Testing of Multiple Armor Sizes: Five standard templates, from Small to Extra Large, are identified in standard. Manufacturers must submit the smallest and largest sizes for testing that they intend to produce for model. What Changes? Redefined Threat Level Classes: Elimination of Threat Level I: No longer sufficient for LE duty use Velocities at Level IIA, II, and IIIA increased to reflect current threats.357 SIG replaces 9mm test round for Type IIIA Specified projectiles: Manufacturer and model of test rounds clearly identified in standard to reduce potential for variability in testing. Increased Amount of Testing: More armor samples tested per model: 12 complete vests (4 previous) Increased number of P-BFS shots: Previously 48 – Now 144 Testing of Multiple Armor Sizes: Five standard templates, from Small to Extra Large, are identified in standard. Manufacturers must submit the smallest and largest sizes for testing that they intend to produce for model. NIJ Standard

What Changes? New Wet Conditioning Protocol: Previously shower spray: now submersion Verifies water resistance of ballistic panel covers and seams Increased Edge Performance: Minimum shot-to-edge distance reduced from 3 to 2 inches Manufacturers have option of specifying closer shot-to-edge distances New Shot Pattern (Type IIA, II, and IIIA): Remains six shots per panel, but 3 shot group introduced Grouped shots can be randomly placed on panel (in fair hit zone) Better evaluates armors ability to withstand multiple hits in a localized area What Changes? New Wet Conditioning Protocol: Previously shower spray: now submersion Verifies water resistance of ballistic panel covers and seams Increased Edge Performance: Minimum shot-to-edge distance reduced from 3 to 2 inches Manufacturers have option of specifying closer shot-to-edge distances New Shot Pattern (Type IIA, II, and IIIA): Remains six shots per panel, but 3 shot group introduced Grouped shots can be randomly placed on panel (in fair hit zone) Better evaluates armors ability to withstand multiple hits in a localized area NIJ Standard

Previous shot pattern New Shot Pattern ( , 2005 IRs) ( ) Previous shot pattern New Shot Pattern ( , 2005 IRs) ( ) NIJ Standard

What Changes? New Environmental Conditioning Protocol: Selected samples will be exposed to varying levels of temperature and humidity prior to ballistic testing Mechanical wear and tear (bending & flexing) will be simulated through the use of a tumbling chamber Intended to help identify armor designs that have inherent weaknesses to environmental conditions encountered in routine field use This protocol cannot be used to predict length of service life under field use conditions; instead, it provides some indication of the armors ability to maintain ballistic performance after exposure to heat, humidity, and simulated mechanical wear What Changes? New Environmental Conditioning Protocol: Selected samples will be exposed to varying levels of temperature and humidity prior to ballistic testing Mechanical wear and tear (bending & flexing) will be simulated through the use of a tumbling chamber Intended to help identify armor designs that have inherent weaknesses to environmental conditions encountered in routine field use This protocol cannot be used to predict length of service life under field use conditions; instead, it provides some indication of the armors ability to maintain ballistic performance after exposure to heat, humidity, and simulated mechanical wear NIJ Standard

What Changes? Expanded Ballistic Limit (V50) Testing: Introduced in NIJ Standard (2000) as an adjunct (no pass / fail criteria) to determine if ballistic limit testing was an appropriate tool to benchmark and evaluate ongoing armor performance; testing performed on 1 vest, 9mm only : Now part of the pass / fail criteria – no perforation of the armor at or below NIJ P-BFS fair hit velocities. V50 data now collected on new and environmentally conditioned samples, and with both calibers for the threat level Enhanced statistical analysis of data, to better characterize armor penetration performance What Changes? Expanded Ballistic Limit (V50) Testing: Introduced in NIJ Standard (2000) as an adjunct (no pass / fail criteria) to determine if ballistic limit testing was an appropriate tool to benchmark and evaluate ongoing armor performance; testing performed on 1 vest, 9mm only : Now part of the pass / fail criteria – no perforation of the armor at or below NIJ P-BFS fair hit velocities. V50 data now collected on new and environmentally conditioned samples, and with both calibers for the threat level Enhanced statistical analysis of data, to better characterize armor penetration performance NIJ Standard

Revisions to NIJs Compliance Testing Program: A New Beginning Revisions to NIJs Compliance Testing Program: A New Beginning NIJ Standards and Testing Program

Four Major Elements of the CTP 1.Type Testing 2.Compliance Decision 3.Attestation of Conformity 4.Conformity Assessment Follow-Up NIJ Standards and Testing Program

New program is a Conformity Assessment process Ensures products comply with the requirements of the standard during type testing and increases the confidence that subsequent production models continue to meet select requirements of the standard. Initial Type Testing to determine compliance with the standard Expanded test sample size Testing of conditioned samples. Periodic Follow-Up Testing of production models. Abbreviated ballistic testing (perforation only, 2 samples) Comparison of construction to originally tested samples Comparison of manufacturer documentation (build sheets) to original documentation on file New program is a Conformity Assessment process Ensures products comply with the requirements of the standard during type testing and increases the confidence that subsequent production models continue to meet select requirements of the standard. Initial Type Testing to determine compliance with the standard Expanded test sample size Testing of conditioned samples. Periodic Follow-Up Testing of production models. Abbreviated ballistic testing (perforation only, 2 samples) Comparison of construction to originally tested samples Comparison of manufacturer documentation (build sheets) to original documentation on file Compliance Testing Program Overview

What stays the same? Participation in the program is voluntary. NLECTC provides oversight and coordination of the Conformity Assessment process. Samples are tested by NIJ-approved, independent, third party laboratories. For initial Type Testing, applicants select NIJ-approved laboratory, negotiate and pay test costs directly to laboratory. Models found to comply with the standard will be listed on NIJs Body Armor Compliant Products List ( What stays the same? Participation in the program is voluntary. NLECTC provides oversight and coordination of the Conformity Assessment process. Samples are tested by NIJ-approved, independent, third party laboratories. For initial Type Testing, applicants select NIJ-approved laboratory, negotiate and pay test costs directly to laboratory. Models found to comply with the standard will be listed on NIJs Body Armor Compliant Products List ( Compliance Testing Program Administration

What Changes? New laboratory accreditation process. New manufacturer application process (on line /Internet forms) Standardized build sheet for documenting construction. Labeling and Model Designation for test samples: Test Article labeling for samples. Test Article test identification # assigned by CTP. Applicant provides listed model designation and NIJ Standard- compliant labels post-test. Test samples sent directly to test laboratory, not NLECTC. A Stop Point for models that fail PBS prior to conditioning. What Changes? New laboratory accreditation process. New manufacturer application process (on line /Internet forms) Standardized build sheet for documenting construction. Labeling and Model Designation for test samples: Test Article labeling for samples. Test Article test identification # assigned by CTP. Applicant provides listed model designation and NIJ Standard- compliant labels post-test. Test samples sent directly to test laboratory, not NLECTC. A Stop Point for models that fail PBS prior to conditioning. Compliance Testing Program Administration

What Changes Continued: Compliance Status: Applicants must agree to participate in Follow-up testing program for subsequent production units. Compliance Status of models is no longer infinite. Compliance is for a specific period of time (5 years), but is subject to periodic renewal. New process to address appeals and complaints: Special Review Committee (SRC): An impartial committee is convened whenever there is a dispute or appeal related to a compliance decision. The SRC reviews the matter and makes recommendations for resolution to NIJ. SRC members will include technical experts from Law Enforcement, Technical/Testing/Research, and Standards Development Organizations. What Changes Continued: Compliance Status: Applicants must agree to participate in Follow-up testing program for subsequent production units. Compliance Status of models is no longer infinite. Compliance is for a specific period of time (5 years), but is subject to periodic renewal. New process to address appeals and complaints: Special Review Committee (SRC): An impartial committee is convened whenever there is a dispute or appeal related to a compliance decision. The SRC reviews the matter and makes recommendations for resolution to NIJ. SRC members will include technical experts from Law Enforcement, Technical/Testing/Research, and Standards Development Organizations. Compliance Testing Program Administration

Follow-Up Testing Program: Working with the ANSI/ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB) Assembled Committee of Experts Review of Body Armor Sector-specific requirements (BA 9001) Design scope Contract with assessors for ISO 9000 / BA 9001 NLECTC oversees periodic sample collection and testing Follow-Up testing will require fewer samples Subjected to Perforation testing, in conjunction with physical comparison of construction and documentation. Developed a detailed process to ensure appropriate and consistent compliance status decisions based on test results. Follow-Up Testing Program: Working with the ANSI/ASQ National Accreditation Board (ANAB) Assembled Committee of Experts Review of Body Armor Sector-specific requirements (BA 9001) Design scope Contract with assessors for ISO 9000 / BA 9001 NLECTC oversees periodic sample collection and testing Follow-Up testing will require fewer samples Subjected to Perforation testing, in conjunction with physical comparison of construction and documentation. Developed a detailed process to ensure appropriate and consistent compliance status decisions based on test results. Compliance Testing Program Administration

A phone call… a mouse click away THE NATIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND CORRECTIONS TECHNOLOGY CENTER SYSTEM