Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Advertisements

The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Herpes Simplex Virus Glycoprotein D Bound to the Human Receptor HveA
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 3, Issue 9, Pages (September 1995)
Structures of Mismatch Replication Errors Observed in a DNA Polymerase
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Structure of the Replicating Complex of a Pol α Family DNA Polymerase
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
Einav Gross, David B Kastner, Chris A Kaiser, Deborah Fass  Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Ryan C. Wilson, Janice D. Pata  Molecular Cell 
Volume 108, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Yanhui Xu, Yu Chen, Ping Zhang, Philip D. Jeffrey, Yigong Shi 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Crystal Structure of a DinB Lesion Bypass DNA Polymerase Catalytic Fragment Reveals a Classic Polymerase Catalytic Domain  Bo-Lu Zhou, Janice D. Pata,
Structural Basis for a New Templated Activity by Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase: Implications for V(D)J Recombination  Jérôme Loc'h, Sandrine Rosario,
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
DNA Lesion Bypass Polymerases Open Up
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Ryan C. Wilson, Meghan A. Jackson, Janice D. Pata  Structure 
Error-Prone DNA Polymerases
Crystal Structure of a SIR2 Homolog–NAD Complex
Specificity Determinants in Phosphoinositide Dephosphorylation
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Structural Insight into Translesion Synthesis by DNA Pol II
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Yi Mo, Benjamin Vaessen, Karen Johnston, Ronen Marmorstein 
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
A Putative Mechanism for Downregulation of the Catalytic Activity of the EGF Receptor via Direct Contact between Its Kinase and C-Terminal Domains  Meytal.
RNA Synthesis in a Cage—Structural Studies of Reovirus Polymerase λ3
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Structural Insight into Translesion Synthesis by DNA Pol II
Crystal Structure of the Human Myeloid Cell Activating Receptor TREM-1
DNA Synthesis across an Abasic Lesion by Human DNA Polymerase ι
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Structural Insights into the Origins of DNA Polymerase Fidelity
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
RNA Synthesis in a Cage—Structural Studies of Reovirus Polymerase λ3
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Debanu Das, Millie M Georgiadis  Structure 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2006)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 561-572 (February 2004) A Structural Solution for the DNA Polymerase λ-Dependent Repair of DNA Gaps with Minimal Homology  Miguel Garcia-Diaz, Katarzyna Bebenek, Joseph M Krahn, Luis Blanco, Thomas A Kunkel, Lars C Pedersen  Molecular Cell  Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages 561-572 (February 2004) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00061-9

Figure 1 Structure-Based Amino Acid Alignment of the Four Human Family X DNA Polymerases Amino acid identities with human Pol λ are shown in white over a black background. Conserved residues are indicated in bold black letters. Residue numbers indicate position with respect to the N-terminal Met. The secondary structure elements of human Pol λ are indicated on top of the alignment. The color of the background corresponds to the structural subdomains: 8 kDa domain (purple), fingers (blue), palm (red), and thumb (green). Molecular Cell 2004 13, 561-572DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00061-9)

Figure 2 Biochemical Properties of the Catalytic Core of Pol λ (A) Photographs of an SDS-PAGE gel with purified Pol λ (lane 1). Protein molecular-weight markers are shown in lane 2. (B) Substrates used for polymerase assays: template/primer (1), five nucleotide gap without a 5′ phosphate (2), and five nucleotide gap with a 5′ phosphate (3). P, T, and DP indicate the upstream primer for polymerase extension, the template, and the downstream primer strands, respectively. (C) Polymerization by Pol λ in a five nucleotide gap. Reactions were carried out using 50 nM Pol λ and 200 nM DNA for 10 min at 37°C using a template/primer (lane 1), a five nucleotide gap (lane 2), or a five nucleotide gap with a 5′ phosphate (lane 3), and processed as described in Experimental Procedures. (D) Error rates in the M13 assay. The assay was carried out as described in Experimental Procedures. The error rates for −1 frameshift (black) and base substitution (gray) errors are expressed for full-length Pol λ, the 39 kDa fragment of Pol λ, and Pol β. Data for full-length Pol λ and Pol β are from Bebenek et al. (2003). (E) dRP lyase assay. The reactions were carried out as described in Experimental Pro-cedures. The dRP-containing substrate was incubated with 50 nM 39 kDa (lane 1) or full-length (lane 2) Pol λ for 10 min at 37°C. Molecular Cell 2004 13, 561-572DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00061-9)

Figure 3 Pol λ Bound to a Two Nucelotide Gap (A) Ribbon representation of human Pol λ bound to a two nucleotide gap. The different subdomains are colored purple (8 kDa), blue (fingers), red (palm), and green (thumb). The C terminus and N terminus of the protein are labeled in black (C and N, respectively). The template strand (T) is shown in gray, while the primer (P) and downstream primer (D) strands are shown in yellow. The secondary structure elements of human Pol λ (Figure 2) are labeled in yellow. (B) Pol λ active site. Electron density plot showing a number of interactions in the active site of the enzyme. The template strand is gray, the primer strand is yellow, and Pol λ residues are red. Hydrogen bonding is shown for the terminal base pair. (C) Protein-DNA contacts in Pol λ. Stick diagram of the Pol λ-DNA interactions. Red arrows represent hydrogen bonding, and blue arrows represent other protein-DNA contacts. For hydrogen bonds, the atom establishing the bond is indicated. Water molecules involved in hydrogen bonding are indicated with an encircled W. Three sugar rings are labeled 0, −1, and +1, indicating the first available template nucleotide and its 3′ and 5′ template neighbors, respectively. (D) The 8 kDa of Pol λ. Relevant residues are shown in red. Van der Waals surfaces are transparent. Molecule A of the PDB file was used to generate the figures using Molscript (Kraulis, 1991), Grasp (Nicholls et al., 1991), and Raster3D (Merritt and Bacon, 1997). Molecular Cell 2004 13, 561-572DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00061-9)

Figure 4 Superimposition of Pol λ with the Open and Closed Conformations of Pol β Superimposition of the α carbon trace of human Pol λ (red) with the structures of human Pol β in an open (1BPX; yellow) and closed (1BPY; blue) conformation. The roman numerals refer to different regions of the Pol λ structure as indicated in the text. The rms deviation was 1.4 Å for 112 C-α atoms for 1BPX and 1.4 Å for 113 C-α atoms for 1BPY. Molecular Cell 2004 13, 561-572DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00061-9)

Figure 5 Closed Conformation of Pol λ (A) Superimposition of the thumb and palm subdomains of Pol λ (red) and Pol β in an open (yellow; 1BPX) and closed (blue; 1BPY) conformation. The thumb motion during the conformational change in Pol β is indicated with a yellow arrow. The three catalytic carboxylates are shown in stick representation for all three proteins. Also shown are the two metal ions from 1BPY. (B) Overlay of the active site of Pol λ (red) and Pol β in an open (yellow) and closed (blue) conformation. The incoming ddCTP in the Pol β 1BPY structure is shown in green. The distance between the 3′ C of the terminal primer nucleotide and the α-phosphate of the incoming ddCTP is 7.27 Å (as compared to 4.47 Å in Pol β 1BPY). (C) Palm-thumb interactions in Pol λ. The ribbon is colored according to the structural subdomains. Relevant Pol λ residues are shown in stick representation (gold). (D) Thumb-8 kDa interactions in Pol λ (red) and Pol β (1BPY, blue). Relevant residues are shown in red (Pol λ) and blue (Pol β) in a stick representation. The van der Waals surface of the residues is transparent. Molecular Cell 2004 13, 561-572DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00061-9)

Figure 6 Electrostatic Surface Potential of Pol λ and Pol β In this view, the molecules are rotated 180° relative to those in Figure 7B. The incoming dNTP (in yellow) is bound in a positively charged channel. The image in the left panel was created by ovelaying the Pol λ structure with that of Pol β 1BPY. Only the incoming dNTP from the Pol β structure is shown. Molecular Cell 2004 13, 561-572DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00061-9)

Figure 7 Biological Implications of the Pol λ Structure (A) Stereo view of an overlay of the active site of Pol λ with that of Pol β in a closed conformation (1BPY). The DNA corresponds to the Pol λ structure, while the incoming ddCTP (green) and metal ions (gray balls) correspond to Pol β 1BPY. Relevant residues are shown in red (Pol λ) and blue (Pol β). The template strand is gray and the primer terminus is yellow. (B) Electrostatic surface potential of Pol λ and Pol β. The DNA for each of the structures is shown in gray (template) and yellow (primer and downstream primer). The potential ranges from −8 kT/e (red) to 8 kT/e (blue). Molecular Cell 2004 13, 561-572DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00061-9)