Validity & Invalidity Valid arguments guarantee true conclusions but only when all of their premises are true Invalid arguments do not guarantee true conclusions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Truth Functional Logic
Advertisements

Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Making Inferences Drawing conclusions from two premises: When it rains, the grass gets wet. The grass is wet. Can we assume that it rained? Can we jump.
1 Valid and Invalid arguments. 2 Definition of Argument Sequence of statements: Statement 1; Statement 2; Therefore, Statement 3. Statements 1 and 2 are.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 5. ” All are lunatics, but he who can analyze his delusion is called a philosopher.” Ambrose Bierce “ Those who lack the courage.
 Assertions: unsupported declaration of a belief  Prejudice: a view without evidence for or against  Premises: explicit evidence that lead to a conclusion.
Deductive Arguments and Inference Rules Terminology: Valid Argument: – truth of the premises guarantees the truth of the conclusion – It would be contradictory.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
For Friday, read chapter 2, sections 1-2 (pp ). As nongraded homework, do the problems on p. 19. Graded homework #1 is due at the beginning of class.
Clarke, R. J (2001) L951-08: 1 Critical Issues in Information Systems BUSS 951 Seminar 8 Arguments.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
CSSE442 Computer Security – March 12, 2007 Tools for Evaluating Cyberethics Issues Ad Hominem Argument Slippery Slope Argument Fallacy of Appeal to Authority.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
Validity All UH students are communists. All communists like broccoli. All UH students like broccoli.
Deduction, Induction, & Truth Kareem Khalifa Department of Philosophy Middlebury College.
GLE Explore the concept of premises, including false premises. Intro to Logic.
Truth-Table Definition of Validity An argument is truth-table valid if it is impossible for the premises to all be True and the conclusion False. I.e.,
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
FALSE PREMISE.
Reasoning and Critical Thinking Validity and Soundness 1.
Question of the Day!  We shared a lot of examples of illogical arguments!  But how do you make a LOGICAL argument? What does your argument need? What.
Debate Basics: The Logical Argument. Argument An argument is a set of claims presented in a logical form. An argument attempts to persuade an audience.
Philosophical Method  Logic: A Calculus For Good Reason  Clarification, Not Obfuscation  Distinctions and Disambiguation  Examples and Counterexamples.
Study Questions for Quiz 1 1. The Concept of Validity (20 points) a. You will be asked to give the two different definitions of validity given in the lecture.
Sentence (syntactically Independent grammatical unit) QuestionCommandStatement “This is a class in logic.” “I enjoy logic.” “Today is Friday.”
Propositions and Arguments. What is a proposition? A proposition is a predicative sentence that only contains a subject and a predicate S is P.
Deductive Reasoning. Deductive reasoning The process of logical reasoning from general principles to specific instances based on the assumed truth of.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
More About Syllogisms The quantifiers, causes, and validity of Syllogisms.
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
2. The Logic of Compound Statements Summary
ARGUMENTS.
a valid argument with true premises.
WEEK 3 VALIDITY OF ARGUMENTS Valid argument: A deductive argument is valid if its conclusion is necessarily and logically drawn from the premises. The.
Logical Arguments an argument can be defined as a:
FALSE PREMISE.
Chapter 1: Good and Bad Reasoning
Lecture Notes 8 CS1502.
What makes a Good Argument?
Deductive Arguments.
Inductive / Deductive reasoning
Gettier and the analysis of knowledge
Win Every Argument Every Time
Chapter 3: Reality Assumptions
Activity 2.13: Highlighting logos
Overview Philosophy & logic.
Evaluating truth tables
3 Logic The Study of What’s True or False or Somewhere in Between.
Validity and Soundness
Testing for Validity and Invalidity
Inductive and Deductive Logic
TRUTH TABLE TO DETERMINE
Distinguish valid from invalid arguments and sound from unsound
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
Chapter 7: What is Argument?
Critical Thinking Review Notes
6.4 Truth Tables for Arguments
Philosophical Methods
Deductive & Inductive Reasoning
PROOF SURROGATE Jessica.
Phil2303 intro to logic.
SUMMARY Logic and Reasoning.
Propositional Logic 1) Introduction Copyright 2008, Scott Gray.
ID1050– Quantitative & Qualitative Reasoning
Evaluating Deductive Arguments
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Validity and Soundness, Again
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Identifying & Ordering
Presentation transcript:

Validity & Invalidity Valid arguments guarantee true conclusions but only when all of their premises are true Invalid arguments do not guarantee true conclusions even when all their premises are true

Valid All parrots are birds All birds have feathers So all parrots have feathers Invalid All crocodiles are reptiles All turtles are reptiles So all crocodiles are turtles

Be Careful! Not all invalid arguments have a false conclusion. The key point is: does the conclusion logically follow from the premises? Birds have wings A parrot has wings Therefore, a parrot is a bird

Validity & Soundness A sound argument = a valid structure + true premises To describe an argument as sound is a much more fundamental claim than to say it is valid

Why this is important! All inferior races should be eliminated Jews are an inferior race Thus, all Jews should be eliminated This valid but unsound argument was used to justify the elimination of six million Jews.