Proposal for Resolving Comments on Intra-Mesh Congestion Control

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beacon Measurement on Pilot Frames
Advertisements

Coexistence Motions for LB84 Comment Resolution
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
Motions Date: Authors: January 2006
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Submission for CID 12 and 231 Date: Authors: 6/22/2006
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Congestion control timer
ADS Study Group Mid-week Report
Protection Assurance Method
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Number of Encoder as a function of MCS
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Proposal for QAP Available Admission capacity
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
Signalling Multicast Group in PSMP frame
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2007 Month Year
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
Off-channel selection
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
3GPP2 Liaison Report Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
May 2005 CAPWAP AHC Closing Report
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions
Signalling Multicast Group in PSMP frame
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: January 2005 January 2005
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
WNG SC Closing Report Date: Authors: November 2005
Beamforming and Link Adaptation Motions for LB 84 Comment Resolutions
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
Presentation transcript:

Proposal for Resolving Comments on Intra-Mesh Congestion Control February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Proposal for Resolving Comments on Intra-Mesh Congestion Control Date: 2007-02-28 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.11. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.11. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures <http:// ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair <stuart.kerry@philips.com> as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.11 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at <patcom@ieee.org>. Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Abstract Review of congestion control scheme and proposal for its simplification to address lb93 comments. Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

Congestion Control as in the draft February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Congestion Control as in the draft Local congestion monitoring Out of scope Congestion control signaling The trigger for signaling is an internal matter and out of scope The signaling is defined by the standard The behavior of the nodes as a reaction to the congestion control signal is defined by the standard; how they achieve that behavior is out of scope. Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

Congestion signaling Congestion Control Request February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Congestion signaling Congestion Control Request Congestion Control Response Neighborhood Congestion Announcement Most of the comments question Target transmission rate element and Neighborhood congestion control announcement Complexity of the solution Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

Congestion Control Request February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Congestion Control Request Category action Target transmission rate element 1 byte 1 byte 20 bytes Congestion control request frame format ID length Target Data Rate (AC-BK) Target Data Rate (AC-BE) Target Data Rate (AC-VI) Target Data Rate (AC-VO) Expiration Timer 1 byte 1 byte 4 bytes 4 bytes 4 bytes 4 bytes 2 bytes Target transmission rate element Many comments have questioned target data rate How it is defined How compliance to it is measured Makes implementations too complicated Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

Congestion Control Request February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 Congestion Control Request February 2007 Red indicates the modifications Category action Expiration Timer element 1 byte 1 byte 11 bytes Congestion control request frame format ID length Expiration Timer (AC-BK) Expiration Timer (AC-BE) Expiration Timer (AC-VI) Expiration Timer (AC-VO) Congestion Control Mode 1 byte 1 byte 2 bytes 2 bytes 2 bytes 2 bytes 1 byte Expiration timer element One expiration timer per AC Nodes defer from transmitting in that AC for duration of expiration timer Expiration timer = 0 means no congestion in that AC Congestion Control Mode allows extension to more advanced and efficient solutions Simple and yet extensible Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

Congestion Control Response February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Congestion Control Response Category action Offered traffic load element 1 byte 1 byte 18 bytes Congestion control Response frame format ID length Offered Traffic Load (AC-BK) Offered Traffic Load (AC-BE) Offered Traffic Load (AC-VI) Offered Traffic Load (AC-VO) 1 byte 1 byte 4 bytes 4 bytes 4 bytes 4 bytes Target transmission rate element Offered traffic load needed for computation of target transmission rate Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

Congestion Control Response February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Congestion Control Response Red indicates the modifications Category action Congestion control response element 1 byte 1 byte 1 byte Congestion control Response frame format ID length Congestion Control Mode 1 byte 1 byte 1 byte Congestion control response element Congestion Control mode used to extend the response matching the congestion control request message Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

Neighborhood Congestion Announcement February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Neighborhood Congestion Announcement Category action Neighborhood congestion element 1 byte 1 byte 5 bytes Neighborhood congestion announcement frame format ID length Congestion Level Expiration Timer 1 byte 1 byte 1 byte 2 bytes Neighborhood congestion element Many many comments as congestion level and reaction of the receivers to this message are undefined. Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

Neighborhood congestion announcement February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Neighborhood congestion announcement Red indicates the modifications Transmission of Congestion Control Request message in broadcast achieves the same goal. Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner

February 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0250r0 February 2007 Summary Modify congestion control signaling to simplify the mechanism and allow for extensibility for more advanced approaches Replace target transmission rate by expiration timer Use congestion control request message in broadcast for neighborhood congestion control messages Use Congestion Control Mode to allow for other congestion control schemes. Bahareh Sadeghi Steven Conner