Anurag Komaravelli, Nikita Dagar, Vatsal Vora QuickSend Making sharing of web content super fast and easy Anurag Komaravelli, Nikita Dagar, Vatsal Vora

Existing Systems

QuickSend

User Study Conditions Number of participants: 33 Population: College students who are Facebook Users The participants were friends and family of the group members. They were asked to fill out the SUS questionnaire for Facebook prior to using QuickSend. Participants used QuickSend at their convenience in their homes for a week. Then, they were asked fill out the SUS questionnaire for QuickSend.

Results and Analysis Degree of freedom = 32 Level of significance = 0.05 The p-value of 0.16966 says that there is a 16.966% chance that this sample was obtained by chance. Therefore, we cannot make any conclusions about the hypothesis and we fail to reject the Null hypothesis. Mean SUS score Standard Deviation t-value (Paired Sample) p-value Facebook 75.5 14.5 0.97 0.16966 QuickSend 78.6 10.9

Conclusion Hypotheses: Quicksend is more preferred than Facebook Null Hypotheses: Facebook is the same or more preferred than QuickSend We have failed to reject the null hypothesis which means that we cannot say if Facebook is the same or more preferred than QuickSend.