Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 28, Issue 4, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Analysis of the Staphylococcus aureus DgkB Structure Reveals a Common Catalytic Mechanism for the Soluble Diacylglycerol Kinases  Darcie J. Miller, Agoston.
Volume 41, Issue 6, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 7, Pages (July 2001)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Structural Basis of DNA Recognition by p53 Tetramers
Ping Wang, Katelyn A. Doxtader, Yunsun Nam  Molecular Cell 
Structure of an LDLR-RAP Complex Reveals a General Mode for Ligand Recognition by Lipoprotein Receptors  Carl Fisher, Natalia Beglova, Stephen C. Blacklow 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure of the Human MutSα DNA Lesion Recognition Complex
Identification of Phe187 as a Crucial Dimerization Determinant Facilitates Crystallization of a Monomeric Retroviral Integrase Core Domain  Meytal Galilee,
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 63, Issue 6, Pages (September 2016)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 40, Issue 4, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2009)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (October 2006)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 9-19 (October 2005)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Error-Prone DNA Polymerases
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ski7 Is a GTP-Binding Protein Adopting the Characteristic Conformation of Active Translational GTPases  Eva Kowalinski, Anthony.
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Jeffrey J. Wilson, Rhett A. Kovall  Cell 
Gymnastics of Molecular Chaperones
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Visualizing the ATPase Cycle in a Protein Disaggregating Machine: Structural Basis for Substrate Binding by ClpB  Sukyeong Lee, Jae-Mun Choi, Francis.
Gregory J. Miller, James H. Hurley  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e5 (June 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Yong Xiong, Fang Li, Jimin Wang, Alan M. Weiner, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
Petra Hänzelmann, Hermann Schindelin  Structure 
Structural Switch of the γ Subunit in an Archaeal aIF2αγ Heterodimer
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut Monica C. Pillon, Jessica J. Lorenowicz, Michael Uckelmann, Andrew D. Klocko, Ryan R. Mitchell, Yu Seon Chung, Paul Modrich, Graham C. Walker, Lyle A. Simmons, Peter Friedhoff, Alba Guarné  Molecular Cell  Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 145-151 (July 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.027 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Molecular Cell 2010 39, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.027) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structure of BsMutL-CTD (A) Ribbon diagram of the BsMutL-CTD monomer. Secondary structure motifs are labeled and colored blue (helices) and yellow (strands) with the connecting loops in light green. The endonuclease and the endonuclease-associated motifs are shown in purple, while the additional conserved motifs are shown in orange. (B) Ribbon diagram of the BsMutL-CTD dimer with one protomer shown as in (A) and the other one as gray ribbons. (C) Sequence alignment of the C-terminal regions of BsMutL, hPMS2, and EcMutL. Secondary structure elements of BsMutL-CTD are shown as arrows (strands) and cylinders (helices). The five conserved motifs are highlighted in purple and underlined. Conserved hydrophobic residues are highlighted in yellow. The conserved 487QEMIVP motif is highlighted in orange. See also Figure S1. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.027) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Endonuclease Activity of BsMutL (A) Nicking activity of BsMutL (left) and BsMutL-CTD (center) in the presence of Mg2+, Zn2+, Mn2+, or Cd2+ as indicated. Comparison of the nicking activity of BsMutL and BsMutL-D462N in the presence of Mn2+ (right). Migration of supercoiled (SC), nicked (N), and linear (L) DNA is indicated. (B) Endonuclease activity of BsMutL in the presence of 0.5 mM (+) and 5 mM (++) nucleotide. (C) DNA binding by BsMutL (WT), BsMutL-CTD (CTD), and BsMutL variants as indicated. Data are presented as the mean of three independent measurements, and the error bars correspond to the standard errors of the mean (SEM = σ/√n, where σ is the average and n the sample size). (D) Stimulation of the endonuclease activity of BsMutL (1 mM Mn2+) by a second divalent metal ion (1 mM). Molecular Cell 2010 39, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.027) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Regulatory Zn2+-Binding Site in BsMutL-CTD (A) Organization of the endonuclease site of BsMutL-CTD bound to Zn2+ (crystal form III). Hydrogen bonds are shown as black dashed lines with the water molecules and Zn2+ ions shown as red and lilac spheres, respectively. Conserved motifs are color coded green (462DQHAX2EX4E), purple (604CPHGRP), and orange (572SCK). (B) Zinc-affinity profiles of BsMutL-CTD and point mutants of BsMutL-CTD as indicated. Data are presented as the mean of three independent measurements ± SEM. (C) Bar diagram showing the relative mutation frequency of the indicated mutL variants altered in the Zn2+-binding, the endonuclease site, and the putative β-binding motif. Data are presented as the mean of four independent cultures ±SEM. (D) Superimposition of the β-binding motif in BsMutL-CTD (green) onto those of Pol II (yellow, PDB 3D1E), Pol IV (cyan, PDB 1UNN), and FEN-1 (purple, PDB 1RXM) shown as a main-chain trace with the β clamp structure (PDB 3D1E) presented as a semitransparent electrostatic potential surface. See also Figures S2 and S3 and Movie S1. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.027) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Model of Activation of the Endonuclease Activity of MutL (A) Orthogonal views of the electrostatic surface potential of the BsMutL-CTD protomer. The second protomer is shown as a ribbon diagram with the endonuclease motifs in purple. (B) Upon mismatch binding, MutS (blue) undergoes a nucleotide-dependent conformational change that triggers recruitment of MutL (green) to the mismatch site, likely aided by the β clamp (purple). ATP binding by MutL then promotes the association of its two ATPase subunits and brings the ATPase in close proximity to the dimerization domain of the protein. Coordinated interaction of MutS and β clamp bound to DNA (ribbon diagram) with ATP-bound MutL could thus license the latent endonuclease activity of MutL. ATP and ADP are shown as yellow and orange stars, respectively. Molecular Cell 2010 39, 145-151DOI: (10.1016/j.molcel.2010.06.027) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions